THE ROLE OF INTERNET ADDICTION IN THE TRANSFORMATION OF FAMILY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46991/educ-21st-century.v8.i1.157

Keywords:

Problematic Internet Use (PIU), family systems theory, technoference, interpersonal communication, digital parenting, media literacy, psychological alienation

Abstract

In the era of global digitalization, problematic internet use (PIU) has transcended the boundaries of individual psychopathology, evolving into a systemic challenge to the institution of the family. The purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the mechanisms underlying the transformation of intra-family communication under the influence of uncontrolled digital engagement and parental "technoference". A qualitative-driven mixed-methods design was employed in this research. The empirical base comprised data obtained from 87 respondents representing 25 families residing in various socio-economic zones of the Republic of Armenia. Data collection was conducted through semi-structured questionnaires, followed by the application of inductive thematic narrative analysis and descriptive statistics. The results demonstrate the bidirectional, cyclical nature of digital alienation. It was revealed that 73% of the participants (64 out of 87 respondents) report a critical reduction in face-to-face interactions within the home environment. Latent parental technoference was found to be closely associated with feelings of emotional deprivation in adolescents and their compensatory retreat into virtual reality (with screen time exceeding 8 hours). Furthermore, an analysis of family control strategies highlighted a profound institutional crisis: the predominance of either normative permissiveness (67% of families) or ineffective punitive surveillance (33%), which engenders cognitive dissonance and "digital hypocrisy". The scientific novelty of the study lies in the conceptualization of the "transnational digital connection" paradox within transition economies: the internet fulfills a vital function in preserving macro-social ties with the diaspora (viewed positively by 82% of respondents), while simultaneously acting as a catalyst for micro-social, intra-family disconnection ("alone together"). The practical significance of this work consists in substantiating the need to transition from prohibitive parenting practices towards the cultivation of mindful digital parenting and co-viewing as essential conditions for restoring the ecology of family communication in the 21st century.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Lusine Ghazaryan, Yerevan State University

    PhD Candidate, Department of General Psychology
    Faculty of Philosophy and Psychology
    Yerevan State University

References

Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Polity Press.

Baumrind, D. (1991). The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 11(1), 56–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431691111004

Bian, M., & Leung, L. (2014). Linking loneliness, shyness, smartphone addiction symptoms, and patterns of smartphone use to social capital. Social Science Computer Review, 33(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314532442

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Caplan, S. E. (2002). Problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being: Development of a theory-based cognitive-behavioral measurement. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(5), 553–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00004-3

Castells, M. (2004). Galaktika Internet: Razmyshleniya ob Internete, biznese i obshchestve [The Internet galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, business, and society]. U-Faktoriya.

Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2016). How "phubbing" becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.018

Clark, L. S. (2013). The parent app: Understanding families in the digital age. Oxford University Press.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Ghazaryan, L. (2024). Causes of internet addiction in the context of individual involvement in professional activity. Bulletin of Yerevan University E: Philosophy, Psychology, 15(3), 80–87. https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU:E/2024.15.3.080

Ghazaryan, L. (2025). Comparative analysis of professional characteristics of internet addiction formation. Bulletin of Yerevan University E: Philosophy, Psychology, 16(3), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU.E/2025.16.3.091

Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hertlein, K. M., & Blumer, M. L. (2013). The couple and family technology framework: Intimate relationships in a digital age. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203083505

Kildare, S., & Middlemiss, W. (2017). Impact of parents mobile device use on parent-child interaction: A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 579–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.003

Kim, J., Lee, A., & Lee, S. (2017). The tendency of sexual abuse and problematic internet use in adolescents. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(4), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2016.1225134

Kwon, M., Lee, J. Y., Won, W. Y., Park, J. W., Min, J. A., Hahn, C., & Kim, D. J. (2013). Development and validation of a smartphone addiction scale (SAS). PLOS One, 8(2), Article e56936. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056936

Livingstone, S., & Smith, P. K. (2014). Annual research review: Harms experienced by child users of online and mobile technologies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55(6), 635–654. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12197

McDaniel, B. T. (2019). Parent distraction with phones, reasons for use, and impacts on parenting and child outcomes: A review of the emerging research. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(2), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.139

McDaniel, B. T., & Coyne, S. M. (2016). "Technoference": The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women's personal and relational well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000065

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Park, N., & Lee, H. (2012). Social implications of smartphone use: Korean college students' smartphone use and psychological well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(9), 491–497. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0580

Poli, R. (2017). Internet addiction update: Diagnostic criteria, assessment and prevalence. Neuropsychiatry, 7(1), 4–8. https://doi.org/10.4172/Neuropsychiatry.1000171

Robert, I. V. (2018). Metodologiya pedagogicheskogo issledovaniya [Methodology of pedagogical research]. Nauka o cheloveke: Gumanitarnye issledovaniya, 3(33), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.17238/issn1998-5320.2018.33.85

Soldatova, G. U., & Rasskazova, E. I. (2014). Roditel'stvo v tsifrovom obshchestve: Preodolenie razryva pokoleniy [Parenthood in the digital society: Overcoming the generation gap]. Voprosy psikhologii, (5), 27–38.

Tudorel, O., & Vintila, M. (2020). The family environment and problematic internet use: A review of the literature. Journal of Family Therapy, 42(3), 320–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12298

Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books.

Turner, A. (2020). Smartphone addiction symptoms and frequencies among young adults. Addiction Research & Theory, 28(5), 405–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2019.1673641

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Xie, X., Chen, W., Zhu, X., & He, D. (2021). Parents' technoference and children's smartphone addiction: The moderating role of gender. Children and Youth Services Review, 127, Article 106093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106093

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-17

How to Cite

THE ROLE OF INTERNET ADDICTION IN THE TRANSFORMATION OF FAMILY COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS. (2026). Education in the 21st Century, 8(1), 157-168. https://doi.org/10.46991/educ-21st-century.v8.i1.157

Similar Articles

31-40 of 213

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.