A STUDY OF CHATGPT AS AN ASSISTANT FOR PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ REFLECTIVE WRITING

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46991/educ-21st-century.v8.i1.141

Keywords:

reflective writing, ChatGPT, AI writing assitant, teacher's reflection, pre-service teachers

Abstract

This study addresses a critical challenge in teacher education: the tendency of pre-service teachers’ reflective writing to remain largely descriptive, lacking the necessary intellectual depth, conceptual framing, and critical analysis. To investigate potential technological scaffolds, the purpose of this research was to examine the efficacy of ChatGPT as a conversational writing assistant designed to support and enhance the development of structured reflective thinking during initial professional preparation. Conducted among primary pre-service teachers at Iakob Gogebashvili Telavi State University, Georgia, in December 2024, the study employed a mixed-methods research approach. Data collection involved the systematic gathering and cross-validation of independent reflective essays, ChatGPT-assisted reflective essays, and comprehensive conversation logs captured directly from the AI interface. The empirical findings demonstrate that ChatGPT can significantly and positively impact the structural organization of reflective writing, expanding content parameters, and enhancing programmatic vocabulary use. However, the data concurrently reveals that AI integration can influence student writing in unintended ways, notably by diminishing the writer’s authentic voice through standardized phrasing. Consequently, the research underscores the urgent need to explore specific genres of prompt engineering and structured AI scaffolding that can effectively foster deeper metacognitive reflection without compromising original authorship. These insights offer valuable guidance for educational leaders aiming to integrate artificial intelligence responsibly into contemporary teacher training curricula.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aleksanyan, A. (2020). Motivational, engaged and reflective teaching competences in quality teacher education. In J. Madalińska-Michalak (Ed.), Studies on quality teachers and quality initial teacher education (pp. 284–295). FRSE Publications. https://doi.org/10.47050/66515314.284–295

Arefian, M. H., Çomoğlu, I., & Dikilitaş, K. (2024). Understanding EFL teachers’ experiences of ChatGPT-driven collaborative reflective practice through a community of practice lens. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 20(2), 318–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2412769

Atlas, S. (2023). ChatGPT for higher education and professional development: A guide to conversational AI. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/cba_facpubs/548

Bain, J. D., Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., & Mills, C. (1999). Using journal writing to enhance student teachers’ reflectivity during field experience placements. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 5(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354060990050104

Buchholtz, N., & Huget, J. (2024). ChatGPT as a reflection tool to promote the lesson planning competencies of pre-service teachers. In Proceedings of the 17th ERME Topic Conference MEDA 4 – University of Bari Aldo Moro, Italy, 3-6 September 2024 (pp. 129–136). University of Bari Aldo Moro.

Chen, Y., Yu, B., Zhang, X., & Yu, Y. (2016). Topic modeling for evaluating students' reflective writing: A case study of pre-service teachers' journals. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (pp. 1–5). https://doi.org/10.1145/2883851.2883951

Chong, C., Sheikh, U. U., Samah, N. A., & Sha'Ameri, A. Z. (2020). Analysis on reflective writing using natural language processing and sentiment analysis. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 884(1), Article 012069. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/884/1/012069

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539

Cohen-Sayag, E., & Fischl, D. (2012). Reflective writing in pre-service teachers' teaching: What does it promote? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(10), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2012v37n10.1

Davis, E. A. (2006). Characterizing productive reflection among pre-service elementary teachers: Seeing what matters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(3), 281–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.11.003

Dempere, J., Modugu, K., Hesham, A., & Ramasamy, L. K. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on higher education. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1206936. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1206936

Doucet, C. R., & Wilson, S. (1997). A three-step method of self-reflection using reflective journal writing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25(5), 964–968. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997025964.x

Dumlao, R. P., & Pinatacan, J. R. (2019). From practice to writing: Using reflective journal instruction in enhancing pre-service teachers' professional development. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12430a

Essel, H., Vlachopoulos, D., Tachie-Menson, A., Johnson, E., & Baah, P. (2022). The impact of a virtual teaching assistant (chatbot) on students’ learning in Ghanaian higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19, Article 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00362-6

Evans, G. C., & Maloney, C. (1998). An analysis framework for reflective writing. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 23(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.1998v23n1.4

Fuchs, K. (2023). Exploring the opportunities and challenges of NLP models in higher education: Is ChatGPT a blessing or a curse? Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1166682. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1166682

Galli, F., & New, C. (2022). Gibbs’ cycle review: Emotions as a part of the cycle. E-Motion, 19, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.33776/remo.vi19.7224

Ghaye, T. (2010). Teaching and learning through reflective practice: A practical guide for positive action (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203833322

Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Further Education Unit.

Kim, M. K. (2018). Pre-service teachers' reflective journal writing on practicum. Modern English Education, 19(2), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.18095/meeso.2018.19.2.04

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

Loos, E., Gröpler, J., & Goudeau, M.-L. S. (2023). Using ChatGPT in education: Human reflection on ChatGPT’s self-reflection. Societies, 13(8), Article 196. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13080196

Mezirow, J. (1990). How critical reflection triggers transformative learning. In J. Mezirow (Ed.), Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning (pp. 1–20). Jossey-Bass.

Minott, M. A. (2008). Valli's typology of reflection and the analysis of pre-service teachers' reflective journals. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 33(5), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2008v33n5.4

Poldner, E., van der Schaaf, M., Simons, P. R. J., van Tartwijk, J., & Wijngaards, G. (2014). Assessing student teachers' reflective writing through quantitative content analysis. European Journal of Teacher Education, 37(3), 348–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2014.892479

Rasul, T., Nair, S., Kalendra, D., Robin, M., de Oliveira Santini, F., Ladeira, W. J., Sun, M., Day, I., Rather, R. A., & Heathcote, L. (2023). The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29

Schön, D. A. (1991). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Ashgate Publishing.

Spalding, E., & Wilson, A. (2002). Demystifying reflection: A study of pedagogical strategies that encourage reflective journal writing. Teachers College Record, 104(7), 1393–1421. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00208

Wang, Y., Petrina, S., & Feng, F. (2017). VILLAGE—Virtual immersive language learning and gaming environment: Immersion and presence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 431–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12388

Wei, X., Wang, L., Koszalka, T. A., Lee, L., & Liu, R. (2025). Enhancing pre-service teachers’ reflective thinking skills through generative AI-assisted digital storytelling creation: A three-dimensional framework analysis. Computers & Education, 226, Article 105356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105356

Wulandari, M., & Purnamaningwulan, R. A. (2024). Exploring Indonesian EFL pre-service teachers’ experiences in AI-assisted teaching practicum: Benefits and drawbacks. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 27(2), 415–432. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v27i2.8690

Yaacob, A. bin, Suryani, I., Asraf, R. M., Bahador, Z. bin, & Supian, N. S. (2023). Exploring the use of Gibbs’ reflective model in enhancing in-service ESL teachers’ reflective writing. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4497558

Zhang, C., Schießl, J., Plößl, L., Hofmann, F., & Gläser-Zikuda, M. (2023). Evaluating reflective writing in pre-service teachers: The potential of a mixed-methods approach. Education Sciences, 13(12), Article 1213. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13121213

Zhu, H. (2024). The influence and application of ChatGPT in the teaching reflection of international Chinese teachers. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 28, 145–152. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v28i.13456

Zuckerman, T., & Rajuan, M. (2008). From journal writing to action research: Steps toward systematic reflective writing. Zeitschrift Schreiben, 2(1), 1–9.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-17

How to Cite

A STUDY OF CHATGPT AS AN ASSISTANT FOR PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ REFLECTIVE WRITING. (2026). Education in the 21st Century, 8(1), 141-156. https://doi.org/10.46991/educ-21st-century.v8.i1.141

Similar Articles

31-40 of 387

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.