INTERTEXTUALITY IN POLITICAL DISCOURSE

Հեղինակներ

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46991/FLSP.2026.26.023

Բանալի բառեր:

political discourse, intertextuality, stylistic devices, Critical Discourse Analysis, social media, conversationalized discursive practices

Ամփոփում

Intertextuality as a rhetorical device plays a crucial role in political discourse, it helps political leaders to persuade people in the importance and relevance of their ideas and principles by emphasizing common values through references to history, cultural traditions, and religious beliefs. By means of such intertextual devices as quotations, allusions, references, and indirect speech political actors draw on shared background knowledge and cultural memory to strengthen the influence of their messages and ensure their credibility and trustworthiness. Intertextuality is actively used in political discourse to perform such functions as legitimizing power, delegitimizing opponents, constructing collective identity, persuading, shaping political reality, ensuring historical continuity, and maintaining or contesting power relations. At the same time, such forms of intertextuality as conversationalized discursive practices are actively employed, including through social networks, to influence audiences and strengthen the connection between speakers and listeners. It helps build relationships with the audiences, create an impression of proximity and engagement, making political communication more effective.

Ներբեռնումներ

Ներբեռնման տվյալները դեռ հասանելի չեն:

Հղումներ

1. Bakhtin, M. (1984). Rabelais and his world. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

2. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination. University of Texas Press, Slavic Series.

3. Bloome, D. and Egan-Robertson, A. (2004). The Social Construction of Intertextuality in Classroom Reading and Writing Lessons. Uses of Intertextuality in Classroom and Educational Research (eds. Shuart-Faris, N. and Bloome, D.). Greenwich, Conn.: Information Age Publishing.

4. Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.

5. Edwards, L. (2018). What Made Reagan a Truly Great Communicator. https://www.heritage.org/conservatism/commentary/what-made-reagan-truly-great-communicator (accessed 14.04.2026).

6. Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis. The Critical Study of Language. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

7. Fairclough, N. (1994). Conversationalization of Public Discourse and the Authority of the Consumer. The Authority of the Consumer (eds. Keat, R., Whiteley, N. and Abercrombie, N.). L., NY: Routledge, pp. 235-249.

8. Fairclough, N. (1992). Intertextuality in Critical Discourse Analysis. Linguistics and Education, N 4, pp. 269-293.

9. Jorgensen, M. and Phillips, L. (2002). Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method.

L.: SAGE Publications Ltd.

10. Kristeva, J. (1986). Word, Dialogue and Novel. The Kristeva Reader. Columbia University Press.

11. Lakoff, G. (2016) Understanding Trump’s Use of Language. https://george-lakoff.com/2016/08/19/understanding-trumps-use-of-language/ (accessed 14.04.2026).

12. Piper, J. (2024). Trump flails for a schoolyard taunt that’ll work against Harris. https://www.politico.com/news/2024/08/17/donald-trump-kamala-harris-nicknames-00174461

(accessed 14.04.2026).

13. Reagan, R. (1983). Quotes. “In the real world, peace through strength must be our motto.” https://www.reaganfoundation.org/ronald-reagan/quotes/in-the-real-world-peace-through-strength-must-be-our (accessed 14.04.2026).

14. Reisigl, M., and Wodak, R. (2001). The Discourse-Historical Analysis of the Rhetoric of Racism and Anti-Semitism. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Anti-Semitism (eds. Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R.). London: Routledge, pp.31–90.

15. Sheigal, E.I. (2004). Semiotics of political discourse. Moscow: ITDGK “Gnosis”.

16. van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical Discourse Analysis. The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (eds.Tannen, D., Hamilton, H. E. and Schiffrin, D.). John Wiley & Sons, pp.466-485.

17. van Dijk T. A. (2009). Society and Discourse. How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk. Cambridge University Press.

18. Wodak, R. (2022). Shameless normalization as a result of media control: The case of Austria. Discourse & Society. Vol. 33(6), pp. 788–804.

Ներբեռնումներ

Հրատարակվել է

2026-07-01

Թողարկում

Բաժին

Articles

Ինչպես մեջբերել

Abrahamyan, S. (2026). INTERTEXTUALITY IN POLITICAL DISCOURSE. Օտար լեզուները մասնագիտական նպատակների համար, 26, 23-54. https://doi.org/10.46991/FLSP.2026.26.023