Հտ․ 14 No. 2 (39) (2023)

Տե՛ս https.//www.facebook.com/watch/?ref=tab

For a comprehensive survey of rights competition issues, see Michael Sachs, Basis of the General Doctrine of Fundamental Rights in Germany. Subjective public rights in administrative law, Yerevan, Tigran Mets, 2012

This point of view is thoroughly researched by T.I. by Shakirov. International standards of independence and accountability of advocates, Shakirov T. R., Text of a scientific article on the speciality «Law», link to the article: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/mezhdunarodnye-standardty-nezavisimosti-i-podotchetnosti-advokatov

Nowak M., Commentary on the U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Kehl: N.P.Engel Verlag, 2005. P. - 383, 384. Голованов С.С., Гарантии независимости и неприкосновенности адвокатов, Вопросы современной юриспруденции, 5(66), 2017 г., link to the asrticle ՝ https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/garantii-nezavisimosti-i-neprikosnovennosti-advokatov, Вайпан В.А., Настольная книга адвоката: постатейный комментарий к Федеральному закону об адвокатской деятельности и адвокатуре. / В.А. Вайпан // - М.: Юстицинформ, 2017 г. - С. 98. Демидова Л.А., Адвокатура в России: учебник // Л.А. Демидова, В.И. Сергеев. - М.: Юстицинформ, 2016. - 569 с. Суровова К.Ю., Организационная деятельность адвоката: понятие и содержание / К.Ю. Суровова // «Адвокатская практика», 2016, № 5

This point of view is thoroughly researched by T.I. by Shakirov: «International Standards of Independence and Accountability of Lawyers», Shakirov T. R., Text of a scientific article on the specialty «Law» Report to the aricle: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/mezhdunarodnye-standarty-nezavisimosti-i-podotchetnosti-advokatov

I addressed this question in detail in the article entitled «Current Issues of Overcoming Legal Conflicts and Legislative Gaps». «Collection of materials of the conference of the faculty of the Faculty of Law of YSU», 1(3) 2019, Ch. editor: G.S. Ghazinyan. - S.: YSU Publishing House, Yerevan - 2020

See, e.g., Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary, 7th ed., Oxford University Press, 2006, p. 1085 and Cambridge Dictionary (https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/perspective).

What Is Strategic Perspective? By Zach Lazzari, 3 June 2019, https://smallbusiness.chron.com/strategic-perspective-14365.html.

For more details on the execution of judgments of the ECtHR, see “The Execution of the Court’s Judgments” in Law of the European Convention on Human Rights, D.J. Harris, M. O’Boyle, E.P. Bates & C.M. Buckley, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, 2014, pp. 180-199, “The Execution of Judgments” in The European Convention on Human Rights, Clare Ovey & Robin C.A. White, 4th ed., Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 496-502, and “Enforcement of Judgments” in Taking a Case to the European Court of Human Rights, Philip Leach, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 83-106.

Armenia joined the Council of Europe on 25 January 2001 (the country profile is available at https://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/armenia).

For brief information on the reforms undertaken within the execution of judgments of the ECtHR is presented at the website of Armenia’s Government Representation before the European Court of Human Rights, https://echr.am/en/legislative/legislativeammendments.html.

The Law on Representative on International Legal Matters, HO-141-N, adopted 10 July 2019.

Guide to good practice on the implementation of Recommendation CM/Rec(2008)2 of the Committee of Ministers on efficient domestic capacity for rapid execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights, (CDDH(2017)R87 Addendum I, as adopted by the Steering Committee for Human Rights (CDDH) at its 87th meeting, 6-9 June 2017 in Strasbourg, para. 17).

The effectiveness of the Armenian model of execution was also facilitated by the use of new working methods developed by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe in 2011 (Human Rights Files, No. 19, p. 35, https://echr.am/resources/echr//pdf/1468c3fde0d097cf21fcbac9c153e028.pdf).

Guide to good practice on the implementation of Recommendation (2008)2 of the Committee of Ministers on efficient domestic capacity for rapid execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (as adopted by the CDDH at its 87th meeting, 6–9 June 2017). See also: Report on measures taken by the member States to implement relevant parts of the Brussels Declaration (as adopted by the CDDH at its 91st meeting, 18–21 June 2019).

One of several changes in size, amount, quality, etc. that happen frequently, especially from one extreme to another. - https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/fluctuation

There are certain locations in parameter space, however, where changes are explosive. The system crosses over an invisible boundary and the landscape of attractors alters dramatically. Such changes are called bifurcations. - Russ Marion, The Edge of Organization, Chaos and Complexity Theories of Formal Social Systems, Sage Publications, 1999, p. 20.

Alvin Toffler, The Third Wave, Bantam Books, 1989.

Klaus Schwab, The Fourth Industrial Revolution, World Economic Forum, Geneva, 2016, https://law.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/3385454/Schwab-The_Fourth_Industrial_Revolution_Klaus_S.pdf

Ibid. p. 9.

Andra Le Roux-Kemp, “The Fourth Industrial Revolution and a New Policy Agenda for Undergraduate Legal Education and Training in England and Wales”, Journal of Law, Technology, and Trust, 2(1). 2021, pp. 1-35, p. 4.

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qt-uncertainty/

Chris Jay Hoofnagle, Simson L. Garfinkel, Law and Policy for Quantum Age, Cambridge University Press, 2022.

Klaus Schwab, ibid, p. 11.

E.P. Hennock, The origins of the welfare state in England and Germany, 1850–1914, Cambridge University Press, 2007, 73–85.

Loi concernant les mines, les minières et les carriers 1810; Décret contenant les dispositions de police relatives à l'exploitation des mines 1813.

Miquel Martin-Casals (ed.), The Development of Liability in relation to Technological Change, Cambridge University Press, 2010.

Sean Bottomley, The British patent system during the industrial revolution, 1700–1852, Cambridge University Press 2014.

Jonatan Bromander, Expropriation i Sverige – en rättshistorisk analys, examensarbete Juridiska institutionen Uppsala 2020.

Marc Steinberg, England’s great transformation: law, labor, and the Industrial Revolution, The University of Chicago Press, 2016.

Bruno Debaenst, “The Digital Revolution from a Legal Historical Perspective”, Law, AI and Digitalization, (ed) Katja de Vries and Mattias Dahlberg, Juridiska Fakulteten, I Uppsala, 2021, pp. 23-36, p. 24.

Klaus Schwab, ibid, p. 11.

Miloš Vec, Recht und Normierung in der Industriellen Revolution. Neue Strukturen der Normsetzung in Völkerrecht, staatlicher Gesetzgebung und gesellschaftlicher Selbstnormierung, Klostermann Vittorio 2006.

Bruno Debaenst, ibid, p. 26.

Bruno Debaenst, ibid, p. 26.

Klaus Schwab, ibid, p. 11.

Michael Haenlein & Andreas Kaplan, ‘A Brief History of Artificial Intelligence: on the Past, Present, and Future of Artificial Intelligence’ [2019] California Management Review 61(4) 5 (6).

Bruno Debaenst, ibid, p. 27.

Engr. A. K. M. Fazlul Hoque, The 4th Industrial Revolution: Impact and Challenges, Conference paper, Conference: National Conference on Electronics and Informatics jointly organized by Bangladesh Electronics Informatics Society and Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission held at Atomic Energy Centre, Dhaka, 4-5 December 2019: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337830441_4th_Industrial_Revolution-_Impact_and_Challenges

On February 23, 2022, the European Commission presented its proposal for a law on corporate sustainability obligations – the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDD). The Bundestag has passed the Act on Corporate Due Diligence Obligations in Supply Chains (July 16, 2021), which can be considered as an implementation of the EU requirements. Meanwhile, Germany has provided more detailed regulations rather than the EU act. The Law enters into force on January 1, 2023.

Francis Fukuyama, The End of History and the Last Man, Free Press, 1992, 2006.

Willem H. Gravett, Is the Dawn of the Robot Lawyer upon Us? The Fourth Indus- trial Revolution and the Future of Lawyers, 2020, 23 Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 1.

Charles Sainctelette, De la responsabilité et de la garantie (accidents de transport et de travail), Bruylant, 1884, 49.

Bruno Debaenst, ibid, p. 29-30.

Klaus Schwab, ibid, p. 12.

Engr. A. K. M. Fazlul Hoque, ibid.

Benjamin Alarie, Anthony Niblett & Albert H Yoon, ‘Law in the future’, 2016, 66 (4), University of Toronto Law 423 (424); Jerry Kaplan, Artificial Intelligence, What Everyone Needs to Know, Oxford University Press 2016.

Klaus Schwab, ibid, p. 12.

Virginia Bacay Watson, The Fourth Industrial Revolution and its Discontents: Governance, Big Tech, and the Digitization of Geopolitics, Hindsight, Insight, Foresight: Thinking about Security in the Indo-Pacific, September, 2020, pp. 37-48, p. 38.

Ravel Law. 2015a. Ravel: Data Driven Research www.ravellaw.com (accessed December 30, 2015).

Surdeanu, Mihai, Nallapati, Ramesh, Gregory, Walker, Joshua, and Manning, Christopher D., Risk analysis for intellectual property litigation, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. New York, NY: ACM, 2011, pages 116-20.

Ross Intelligence. 2015. Ross: Your Brand New Super Intelligent Attorney www.rossintelligence.com/ (accessed December 0, 2015).

Kevin D. Ashley, Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics, New Tools for Law Practice in the Digital Age, Cambridge University Press, 6th printing, 2019, p. 6.

Kevin D. Ashley, ibid, p. 8.

Michiel Fierens, Stephanie Rossello and Ellen Wauters, ‘Setting the Scene: On AI Ethics and Regulation’, in Jan De Bruyne and Cedric Vanleenhove (eds), Artificial Intelligence and the Law (Intersentia 2021), p. 49.

Jan De Bruyne and Cedric Vanleenhove (eds), Artificial Intelligence and the Law, Intersentia, 2021; Woodrow Barfield & Ugo Pagallo (ed.), Research Handbook on the Law of Artificial Intelligence, Edward Elgar Publishing 2018.

Jan De Bruyne, Elias Van Gool and Thomas Gils, ‘Tort Law Damage Caused by AI Systems’, in Jan De Bruyne and Cedric Vanleenhove (eds), Artificial Intelligence and the Law (Intersentia 2021), p. 359.

Klaus Schwab, ibid, p. 8.

Richard Susskind, Tomorrow’s lawyers. An Introduction to Your Future (second edition), Oxford University Press, 2017, p. xvii.

Bruno Debaenst, ibid, p. 32-33.

Ruth L. Okediji, Creative Markets and Copyright in the Fourth Industrial Era: Reconfiguring the Public Benefit for a Digital Trade Economy, International Center for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD), Issue Paper No. 43, 2018․

Andra Le Roux-Kemp, “The Fourth Industrial Revolution and a New Policy Agenda for Undergraduate Legal Education and Training in England and Wales”, Journal of Law, Technology, and Trust, 2(1). 2021, pp. 1-35; Taron Simonyan, “Practical Challenges of a Lawyer in XXI century: Artificial Intelligence”, Articles of the annual conference of the Faculty of Law YSU, 2018, Yerevan, pp. 35-45․

Petre Prisecaru, "Challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution," Knowledge Horizons - Economics 8, no. 1 (2016), pp. 57-62, p. 57.

The Law’s column was added by the Author.

Klaus Schwab, ibid, p. 86.

Klaus Schwab, ibid, p. 92.

Lawrence Solum B., Legal Personhood For Artificial Intelligences, 70 N.C. L. Rev. 1231, 1992, p 1231, https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr/vol70/iss4/4/ , Hatziavramidis K. S., Esq., Artificial Intelligence & The Law: Pros And Cons, 2018, p 383, https://lintar.untar.ac.id/repository/penelitian/buktipenelitian_10288001_3A220716.pdf

Cuthbert O., Saudi Arabia Becomes First Country To Grant Citizenship To A Robot, Arab News, 26 October 2017, https://www.arabnews.com/node/1183166/saudi-arabia

Cuthbertson A., Artificial Intelligence “Boy” Shibuya Mirai Becomes World's First AI Bot To Be Granted Residency, Newsweek, 6 November 2017, https://www.newsweek.com/tokyo-residency-artificial-intelligence-boy-shibuya-mirai-702382

European Parliament, Committee On Legal Affairs. Report With Recommendations To The Commission On Civil Law Rules On Robotics (2015/2103(INL)), pp. 17–18, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0005_EN.html

Gill v. Whitford, US Supreme Court, (138 S. Ct. 1916 (2017)), Rucho v. Common Cause, US Supreme Court, (139 S. Ct. 2484 (2019)), Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, US Supreme Court, (136 S. Ct. 1540 (2016)); Kraus v. Cegavske, No. 82018, 2020 Nev. Unpub. LEXIS 1043 (Nov. 3, 2020); Williams-Sonoma Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. (N.D. Cal. 3:18-cv-07548); Asif Kumandan et al. v. Google LLC (N.D. Cal. 5:19-cv-04286); Vance et al v. Amazon.com, Inc. (W.D. Wa. 2:20-cv-01084); Vance et al v. Facefirst, Inc. (C.D. Cal. 2:20-cv-06244); Vance et al v. Google LLC (N.D. Cal. 5:20-cv-04696); Vance et al v. Microsoft Corporation (W.D. Wa. 2:20-cv-01082); Janecyk v. IBM Corp. (Cook County Cir. Ct. Ill. 2020CH00833); Jordan Stein v. Clarifai, Inc. (Cook County Cir. Ct. Ill. 2020CH01810); K. et al v. Google, LLC (N.D. Cal. 5:20-cv-02257); Williams et al. v. PersonalizationMall.com LLC (N.D. Ill. 1:20-cv-00025).

Chris Jay Hoofnagle, Simson L. Garfinkel, ibid, p. 355.

Большой юридический словарь / [В. А. Белов и др.]; Под ред. А.Я. Сухарева, В.Е. Крутских. - 2. изд

Авакьян с.А. Конституция России: природа, эволюция, современность М.2000.528.

Кравец И.А Конституционная телеология и основы конституционного строя: научно-практическое издание: Издательские решения,2016.С.8-9 .

Крусс В.И.Конституционализация права: основы теории: монография.М.:Норма: инфа-М2017.240с.

Лексин И.В Конституционное право и конституционный судебный процесс в свете представлений о конституционализации отраслей российского права //3-й Московский юридический форум. X Международная научно-практическая конференция /Кутафинские чтения/: материалы конференции ч 1.М 2016 С .228-229

.Տես` Դանիելյան Գ.Բ. «Իրավական որոշակիության, իրավունքի անալոգիայի (համանմանության) եվ իրավական ակտի մեկնաբանության փոխհարաբերության արդի հիմնախնդիրները» , «Բամբեր Երևանի համալսարանի. Իրավագիտություն» Երևան 2016 N2(20)`էջ.3-17

Гаджиев Г.А. Конституционная идентичность и права человекав России// Ученние записки юридического факультетеа. СПб: Фонд «Университет».2017. Вып. 42-43

Малеина Н. М. ''Защита личных неимущественных прав советских граждан'', М., 1991, Знание, p. 9-10.

Теория государства и права, /Под ред. Н. И. Матузова, А. В. Малько/ - 2. изд., перераб. и доп. - М. : Юристъ, 2004, p. 209-211.

Алексеев С. С. ''Общая теория права'', М.: Проспект, 2009, p. 305.

Нечаева Л. М. ''Семейно-правовой статус несовершеннолетнпх'', //Проблемы реализации правовых норм впериод проведения судебно-правовой реформы, Тюмень, 1994, p. 140.

Ильина О. Ю. ''Проблемы интереса в семейном праве Российской Федерации'', М, Городец, 2007 p. 78.

Антокольская М. В. 'Семейное право'', Учебник, Изд. 2-е, перераб. и доп., Ibid, p. 228.

European Court of Human Rights, Case of Olsson v. Sweden (No. 2), 27.11.1992, app No (s). 13441/87. European Court of Human Rights, Case of P., C. and S. v. The United Kingdom, 16/07/2002, App. No(s). 56547/00. European Court of Human Rights, Case of W. v. The United Kingdom, 08/07/1987, Application No. 9749/82.

The UN Committee on the Rights of the Child supervises the implementation by the member states of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, ratified by RA in 1993, and of the two protocols attached to the Convention.

Otto Luchterhandt, Nora Sargsyan "Regulation of children's rights according to RA 2015 under the editorship of the Constitution", "Articles of Yerevan University. Jurisprudence", Yerevan, 2019 N 2 (29), page 31.

Katherine Hunt Federle & Danielle Gadomski ''THE CURIOUS CASE OF THE GUARDIAN AD LI¬TEM'', available at https://udayton.edu/law/_resources/documents/law_review/curious_case_of_the_guardian.pdf as of 25.04.2023.

Katherine Hunt Federle ''Children’s Rights and the Need for Protection'', Family Law, Quarterly 34(3), 2000, p. 426-427.

Katherine Hunt Federle & Danielle Gadomski ''THE CURIOUS CASE OF THE GUARDIAN AD LITEM'', Ibid.

The decision of the RA Court of Cassation dated December 02, 2016 in civil case No. SD3/0139/02/15.

The decision of the RA Court of Cassation of March 23, 2012 in civil case No. YAKD/0474/02/11.

UN Committee on the Rights of the Children, General Comment № 14 (2013).

The decision of the RA Court of Cassation of December 27, 2011 in civil case No. ARAD/0264/02/11.

Алексеев С. С. ''Общая теория права'', М., Ibid., p. 358.

Попондопуло, Владимир Ф., Дмитрий А.Петров. 2020. «Комплаенс как правовой инструмент минимизации рисков и профилактики правонарушений». Вестник СанктПетербургского государственного университета. Право 1: стр. 105. (available at 26.03.2023 https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2020.107):

Кабисов А.Р. Соотношение конкуренции и монополии в период перехода к рыночной экономике, М., 2001, Дисс., стр. 98:

Маршалл А. Принципы экономической науки. М.: Изат. группа Прогресс, 1993, Т. I, стр 60:

Ерёменко В. Законодательство о пресечении недобросовестной конкуренции капиталических стран. М., 1994, стр. 4:

Шершеневич Г.Ф. Курс торгового права,Ч.II. Спб, 1908., стр. 109:

Chevalier F. Unfair Competition// Industrial property in Asia and the Pasific, 1988, N 22, p. 41:

Հայաստանի Հանրապետության Սահմանադրության մեկնաբանություններ, Գ. Հարությունյանի և Ա. Վաղարշյանի խմբ., Եր.: «Իրավունք», 2010, էջ 411:

The ICC Antitrust Compliance Toolkit. p. 4 (available at 30.03.23 https://compliance.concurrences.com/en/compliance/2020/corporations-initiatives/the-icc-antitrust-compliance-toolkit)

Родионова Д.Н. Антимонопольный комплаенс как важная часть системы предупреждения антимонопольных нарушений // Вестник БГУ. ‒ 2017. ‒ Вып. 3. ‒ стр. 92:

Medvedeva N. V. Antimonopoly complains in the system of development of competition // Power and Administration in the East of Russia. 2019. No. 1 (86).pp. 4 (available at 30.03.2023 http://vlastdviu.ru/downLoad/rio/j2019-1/7%20%D0%9C%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B0%20%D0%9D.%20%D0%92..pdf ):

OECD Policy document DAF/COMP (2011)20 Promoting Compliance with Competition Law 2011. p. 14 ( available at 26.03.2023 http://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/Promotingcompliancewithcompetitionlaw2011.pdf):

International Chambers of Commerce. “The ICC Antitrust Compliance Toolkit”, 2013. p. 4 (available at 24.03.2023 chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://iccwbo.org/content/uploads/sites/3/2013/04/ICC-Antitrust-Compliance-Toolkit-ENGLISH.pdf):

United Kingdom Office of Fair Trading Guidance document 1341 How your business can achieve compliance with competition law 2011. pp.5-6 (available at 26.03.2023 http://oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/ca-and-cartels/competition-awareness-compliance/oft1341.pdf.):

Глубокая Ю. Антимонопольный комплаенс в США и Европе. По какому пути пойдет Россия? // Конкуренция и право. ‒ 2015. ‒ № 4. ‒ стр. 34:

Knyazeva, I.V., Dozmarov, K.V. (2020). Antitrust Сompliance Рrogramme – Рrevention of Risks of Violation of Competition Law by the Company. ECO. No. 4. p.127 (In Russ.). (available at 28.03.2023 https://competitionsupport.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Knyazeva-Dozmarov.pdf ):

Compliance-guideline. 2022 p. 19, (available at 27.03.23 http://competition.am/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Complience-guideline.pdf):

Румянцева Ю.Н. Антимонопольный комплаенс как часть комплаенс-программы соблюдения законодательства Российской Федерации // Пролог: журнал о праве / Prologue: Law Journal. – 2019. – № 2. стр. 56:

See https://pdf.arlis.am/1

See https://pdf.arlis.am/75780

See https://www.irtek.am/views/act.aspx?aid=150015

See https://rm.coe.int/new-criminal-code-guideline-arm/1680a72c57

Seehttps://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_10699/b9ab9819ab2d12f2938889cc08a5baa909989122/#:~:text=1.%20Вынесение%20судьей%20(судьями)%20заведомо,на%20срок%20до%20четырех%20лет

See https://defensewiki.ibj.org/images/d/d7/Criminal_Code_Germany.pdf

See https://yurist-online.org/laws/codes/crime/Criminal_Code_of_Ukraine.pdf

See https://www.vertic.org/media/National%20Legislation/Kazakhstan/KZ_Criminal_Code.pdf

See https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/page-19.html#h-117787

See https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I

See https://criminallaw.uslegal.com/crimes-against-justice/

See https://yurist-online.org/laws/foreign/criminalcode_fr/_doc-5-.pdf

See Arakelyan Sergey, Gabuzyan Ara, Khachikyan Harutyun, Ghazinyan Gagik, Maghakyan Norik, Margaryan Anna, Simonyan Tigran, Kocharyan Vigen, Criminal Law of the Republic of Armenia (special part) 2012, Yer., Yerevan Univ. Public..

See, for example, Kudryavtsev V.L. Legal and procedural problems of determining the subject of a crime stipulated by art. 305 of CC RF “Issuing of a manifestly unjust judgment, decision or other judicial act”

See, for example, Kudryavtsev V.L. Legal and procedural problems of determining the subject of a crime stipulated by art. 305 of CC RF “Issuing of a manifestly unjust judgment, decision or other judicial act”

See Arakelyan Sergey, Gabuzyan Ara, Khachikyan Harutyun, Ghazinyan Gagik, Maghakyan Norik, Margaryan Anna, Simonyan Tigran, Kocharyan Vigen, Criminal Law of the Republic of Armenia (special part) 2012, Yer., Yerevan Univ. Public..

See http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_120709/

See, for example, Kudryavtsev V.L. Legal and procedural problems of determining the subject of a crime stipulated by art. 305 of CC RF “Issuing of a manifestly unjust judgment, decision or other judicial act”

See https://undocs.org/A/75/172

See Arakelyan Sergey, Gabuzyan Ara, Khachikyan Harutyun, Ghazinyan Gagik, Maghakyan Norik, Margaryan Anna, Simonyan Tigran, Kocharyan Vigen, Criminal Law of the Republic of Armenia (special part) 2012, Yer., Yerevan Univ. Public..

See Kartashov Alexandr Yuryevich Criminal Responsibility for Issuing Manifestly Unfair Judgment, Decision or Other Judicial Act – criminal law and criminology, criminal-executional law, Dissertation, Stavropol – 2004, Course on Criminal Law, Special part. V. 5 / edited by G.N. Borzenkov, V.S. Komissarov. – M. 2002. – P. 196; Criminal Law, Special part. V. 2 /edited by L.D.Gaukhman, S.V.Maksimov – M 1999.

See in the same place.

See Kartashov Alexandr Yuryevich Criminal Responsibility for Issuing Manifestly Unfair Judgment, Decision or Other Judicial Act – criminal law and criminology, criminal-executional law, Dissertation, Stavropol – 2004

See Kartashov Alexandr Yuryevich Criminal Responsibility for Issuing Manifestly Unfair Judgment, Decision or Other Judicial Act – criminal law and criminology, criminal-executional law, Dissertation, Stavropol – 2004

See in the same place.

See Arakelyan Sergey, Gabuzyan Ara, Khachikyan Harutyun, Ghazinyan Gagik, Maghakyan Norik, Margaryan Anna, Simonyan Tigran, Kocharyan Vigen, Criminal Law of the Republic of Armenia (special part) 2012, Yer., Yerevan Univ. Public..

See http://www.nayiri.com/imagedDictionaryBrowser.jsp?dictionaryId=24&query=ակնհայտ

See http://www.nayiri.com/imagedDictionaryBrowser.jsp?dictionaryId=29&dt=HY_HY&query=ակնհայտ

See Arakelyan Sergey, Gabuzyan Ara, Khachikyan Harutyun, Ghazinyan Gagik, Maghakyan Norik, Margaryan Anna, Simonyan Tigran, Kocharyan Vigen, Criminal Law of the Republic of Armenia (special part) 2012, Yer., Yerevan Univ. Public..

See http://www.ysu.am/files/pashtoneakan.pdf

See Arakelyan Sergey, Gabuzyan Ara, Khachikyan Harutyun, Ghazinyan Gagik, Maghakyan Norik, Margaryan Anna, Simonyan Tigran, Kocharyan Vigen, Criminal Law of the Republic of Armenia (special part) 2012, Yer., Yerevan Univ. Public..

See Kartashov Alexander Yuryevich Criminal Responsibility for Issuing Manifestly Unfair Judgment, Decision or Other Judicial Act – criminal law and criminology, criminal-executional law, Dissertation, Stavropol – 2004

See European Convention on Human Rights, Article 6: Right to a fair trial, United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 14, Constitution of the Republic of Armenia, Chapter 2.

See V. Hovhannisyan, S. Meghryan, V. Esayan, P. Tadevosyan, A. Gharslyan, T. Markosyan, Y. Khundkaryan, Civil Procedure textbook (1), chapter - The means of protection of subjective rights, Yerevan, 2022.

See Commentaries to the Armenian Constitution, Yerevan, “Iravunq”, 2010, p. 210.

See United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 1958.

See RA Law on "Commercial Arbitration", 2007.01.31/8(532).

See Civil Procedure Code of RA, 2018.03.05/16(1374).

See R.C. Crampton, D.P. Currie, H.H. Kay, L. Kramer Conflict of Laws. Cases, Comments. Questions/ Fifth edition. ST paul, 1993, pp. 404-406, Lits, M.O. Recognition and enforcement of foreign court and arbitration decisions in the Russian Federation: correlation between international legal and domestic regulation. Dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Juridical Sciences, Ekaterinburg, 2002, pp. 55-56, etc.

See Yablochkov, T.M. Works on Private International Law (Classics of Russian Civil Law. Private International Law). Moscow, Statut, 2009, pp. 162-164.

According to Article 34, sections 3 and 4 of the "On Commercial Arbitration" law of the RA, an application for annulment of an arbitral award cannot be submitted after three months from the date of receiving the tribunal's decision. If an application is made under Article 33 of the law to correct errors in the award, such as arithmetic, typographical, or other similar errors, or to request an additional award, the application must be submitted within three months from the date of the tribunal's decision on that matter. If an application for annulment is submitted, the court may suspend the proceedings for a certain period of time, at the request of either party or at its own discretion, to allow the arbitral tribunal to resume the arbitration process or take other proper measures that may remedy the grounds for annulment of the award.

Karabelnikov B.R. International Commercial Arbitration, M, Infotropic Media, 212, 276-282

Lebedev SN International comm arb M., 1965, page 21.։

See the decision of the RA Court of Cassation No. 3-93 (VD) of 29.02.2008 on the civil case.

UNCITRAL Model Law article 1(3), Tibor Varadi, The international commercial arbitration in different legal sistems, 1998 p. 52

Rene David, Arbitration in International Trade, 1985, p. 84

Accepted 23 December, 2022 584-N

The Swedish Arbitration Act (The Swedish Code of Statutes (SFS) 1999:116, updated as per SFS 2018:1954) https://sccarbitrationinstitute.se/sites/default/files/2022-11/the-swedish-arbitration act_1march2019_eng-2.pdf

The Enforcement Code (1981:774) (including amendments up to SFS 2001:377)՝ https://www.regeringen.se/contentassets/1500e590992c4340a9600211fbc609b0/the-enforcement-code-1981774/

Arbitration Act 1996, https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/23/contents

German Arbitration Act The following provisions of the Arbitral Proceedings Reform Act have entered into force on 1 January 1998. Subsequent amendments, i.a. by the Civil Procedure Reform Act of 27 Jul.

and the Law of Contracts Reform Act of 26 Nov. 2001 have been incorporated. Article 1, No. 7 of the Arbitral Proceedings Reform Act: Tenth Book of the Code of Civil Procedure Arbitration Procedure Sections 1025 – 1066 https://sccarbitrationinstitute.se/sites/default/files/2022-11/german-arbitration-act.pdf, https://www.disarb.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Wissen/Deutsches_Schiedsverfahrensrecht_98_-_Englisch.pdf

The Federal Arbitration Act (USA) https://sccarbitrationinstitute.se/sites/default/files/2022-11/the-federal-arbitration-act-usa.pdf

Raffaele Giarda, International: Artificial Intelligence in the administration of justice, february 19, 2022, https://www.globalcompliancenews.com/2022/02/19/international-artificial-intelligence-in-the-administration-of-justice310122/

https://rm.coe.int/ethical-charter-en-for-publication-4-december-2018/16808f699c

Совет Европы, Использование ареста и конфискации без вынесения обвинительного приговора, 2021, page 10.

Теодор Гринберг, Линда Сэмюэль, Вингейт Грант, Ларисса Грей, Возврат похищенных активов: Руководство по конфискации активов вне уголовного производства; Пер. с англ. — М.: Альпина Паблишерз, 2010, page 35.

Жан-Пьер Брюн, Ларисса Грей, Кевин Стивенсон, Клайв Скотт, Руководство по возврату активов для специалистов-практиков; Пер. с англ. — М.: Альпина Паблишер, 2012, pages 28-29, 161-163.

Venice Commission, CDL-AD(2022)048, Amicus curiae Brief for the Constitutional Court of Armenia on certain questions relating to the Law on the Forfeiture of Assets of Illicit Origin, adopted by the Venice Commission at its 133rd Plenary Session (Venice, 16-17 December 2022), para. 25.

Parliamentary Assembly Resolution 2218, Fighting organised crime by facilitating the confiscation of illegal assets, 26 April 2018 (17th Sitting), para. 5 and 9.

Adopted 16.04.2020․ entered into force 23.05.2020։ See HHPT 2020.05.13/50(1605) Art.580։ Hereinafter referred to as “the Law”.

Venice Commission, CDL-AD(2022)048, Amicus curiae Brief for the Constitutional Court of Armenia on certain questions relating to the Law on the Forfeiture of Assets of Illicit Origin, adopted by the Venice Commission at its 133rd Plenary Session (Venice, 16-17 December 2022), para. 27.

https://www.e-draft.am/projects/1931/about.

Adopted 17.11.2017. Entered into force 09.04.2018. See HHPT 2017.12.13/74(1349) Art.1213.

Совет Европы, Использование ареста и конфискации без вынесения обвинительного приговора, 2021, page 25.

Venice Commission, CDL-AD(2022)014, Kosovo - Opinion on the Draft Law N°08/L-121 on The State Bureau for verification and confiscation of unjustified assets, adopted by the Venice Commission at its 131st Plenary Session (Venice, 17-18 June 2022), para. 19.

Constitutional Court Decision DCC–1432 of 30.10.2018.

Constitutional Court Decision DCC–1611 of 28.09.2021.

Constitutional Court Decision DCC–1249 of 22.12.2015.

Constitutional Court Decision DCC-844 of 07.12.2009.

Constitutional Court Decision DCC-1584 of 09.03.2021.

Constitutional Court Decision DCC–922 of 02.11.2010.

Constitutional Court Decision DCC–1191 of 24.02.2015.

Айвазян Вардан, Конфликтогенная природа верховенства права и генезис системных конфликтов конституционно-правового регулирования, Бизнес в законе, экономико-юридический журнал, N 2, г. Москва, 2016 г., стр. 120-127.

Кант И., Критика чистого разума, пер. с нем. Н. Лоского,-Мн.: Литература, 1998, 960 стр.

Конец истории и последний человек / Фрэнсис Фукуяма ; [пер. с англ. М. Б. Левина].: АСТ; Москва; 2015, 259 стр.

Источник: https://ru.citaty.net/tsitaty/633404-vladimir-vladimirovich-putin-kto-ne-zhaleet-o-raspade-sovetskogo-soiuza-u-togo-n/»

Источник https://vk.com/@wpristav-rss-209740668-1293694745

Фуллер Лон А., Мораль права, М., ИРИСЭН, 2007, 308 стр.

The Code of Administrative Procedure of Germany, Article 80, https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_vwgo/englisch_vwgo.pdf

The Code of Administrative Procedure of Georgia, Article 29, https://matsne.gov.ge/en/document/download/16492/48/en/pdf

The Code of Administrative Procedure of Czechia, § 73, https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/pp/compliance/C2016-143_Czech/Annex5_CodeAdministrativeJustice.pdf

The Code of Procedure of the Administrative Court of Estonia, § 249, https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/527012014001/consolide

The European experience in this field is more thoroughly analyzed in the justifications for the adoption of the Law HO-384-N “On Supplementations and Amendments to the Code of Administrative Procedure of the Republic of Armenia”.

This issue is currently also present in civil procedure. Article 129 of the Code of Civil Procedure also provides for the possibility of applying the discussed means of securing the claim, but the persons, against whom these measures are applied, do not have the opportunity to become a person participating in the case in any status and to make use of the procedural tools related to securing the claim.

See Нерсесянц В. С. Общая теория права и государства. Учебник для юридических вузов и факультетов. – М.: Издательская группа НОРМА—ИНФРА-М, 1999. – 485с., available at՝ http://kursach.com/biblio/0010019/507.htm (02.02.2020)

See Венгеров а. Б. Теория государства и права. Учебник 3-е изд. – М.: Юриспруденция, 2000. – 528 с.: available at՝ http://www.bibliotekar.ru/teoria-gosudarstva-i-prava-4/22.htm (24.04.2020)

In a similar way, the decision of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation "On some issues of the application of the Constitution of the Russian Federation in the administration of justice by the courts" states: “According to the Article 15 (1) of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the Constitution has the highest legal force, direct effect and is applied throughout the territory of the Russian Federation. (…) In cases where a provision of the Constitution contains a reference, the courts must apply the law governing that relationship when considering the case. In case of uncertainty regarding the compliance of the law to be applied in a specific case with the Constitution, the court applies to the Constitutional Court with an application regarding the question of the compliance of the law with the Constitution”. - see Пленум верховного суда Российской Федерации: Постановление от 31 октября 1995 г. N 8 ՛՛О некоторых вопросах применения судами Конституции Российской Федерации при осуществлении правосудия՛՛

See Constitutional Court CCD-1459 decision of May 7, 2019.

However, in our opinion, this decision again does not clearly reveal the essence of the possibility of applying the constitutional norm by the courts.

Ukraine has adopted a different approach in this matter, ensuring the right of a person to have his case examined within a reasonable time. In particular, if the court finds that the current law does not comply with the Constitution, it applies the constitutional norm as a directly applicable norm, and after making its decision, it refers to the Supreme Court to resolve the question of the constitutionality of the contested legal norm in the Constitutional Court-see Judge Tetiana Brezina The principle of direct effect of the norms of the constitution and the specifics of its application by the court, National law journal: Theory and practice- 2008, p. 28: available at՝ http://www.jurnaluljuridic.in.ua/archive/2018/1/part_2/8.pdf

Տե՛ս Administrative procedures: monograph / ed. L.L. Popov, S.M. Zubarev. – M.: Norma: INFRA-M, 2018

Deirdre Curtin, Herwig C. H. Hofmann, Joana Mendes, “Constitutionalising EU Executive Rule-Making Procedures: A Research Agenda”, European Law Journal, Vol. 19, Issue 1, 2013

Article 19. Administrative proceedings is the activity of administrative body directed at the adoption of an administrative act

Article 2, part 3: Peculiarities of certain types of administrative proceedings are laid down by laws and international treaties of the Republic of Armenia

Administrative proceedings and litigation. Educational manual / G. Danielyan. - Yer.: "YSU" ed., 2022

Fox, William F. Understanding Administrative Law/William F. Fox, Jr.—4th ed. p. cm.— (Legal text series)

Administrative proceedings and litigation. Educational manual / G. Danielyan. - Yer.: "YSU" ed., 2022

Administrative proceedings and litigation. Educational manual / G. Danielyan. - Yer.: "YSU" ed., 2022

Article 30, part 1: Grounds for initiating administrative proceedings are: (a) the application or complaint of a person; (b) initiative of the administrative body

Article 30, part 2: In cases provided for in point (a) of part 1 of this Article, administrative proceedings shall be considered initiated from the date when administrative body received the application or complaint, except for the cases when application or complaint was readdressed to the competent administrative body or was returned to the applicant (complainant) pursuant to Article 33 of this Law

Article 11: In excercising its powers the administrative body shall act in such a manner as to, without undermining the performance of its powers, ensure the most effective utilisation of means submitted to its disposal, in shortest possible term and for assuring the most faviourable results

Deweer v. Belgium, judgment of 27 February 1980, paragraph 56, Artico v. Italy, judgment of 13 May 1980, paragraph 32, Goddi v. Italy, judgment of 9 April 1984, paragraph 28, Colozza v. Italy, judgment of 12 February 1985, paragraph 26.

The decision of the RA Court of Cassation of August 24, 2012, case No. YSHD/0002/01/11

The decision of the RA Court of Cassation of April 18, 2013, case No. YAKD/0218/06/12.

Арабули Д.Т. Сравнительный анализ заочного судебного разбирательства в Российской Федерации и Республике Казахстан // Мировой судья. 2008. № 6. С. 17–18 ;

Мазюк Р.В. Международное сотрудничество по уголовным делам и заочное уголовное преследование // Вестник ОГУ. 2009. № 3. С. 78–81 ;

Тукиев А.С. Особенности заочного возбуждения уголовных дел // Актуальные проблемы права: материалы науч. конференции. Караганда: КарЮИ МВД РК им. Б. Бейсенова, 2002. С. 68–69 ;

Тукиев А.С., Ахпанов А.Н., Кусаинов Ш.К. Особенности привлечения в качестве обвиняемого по заочной форме уголовного судопроизводства в Республике Казахстан // Закон и время. 2004. № 10. С. 42–44 ;

Хасенов О.З. Институт заочного обвинения в уголовном судопроизводстве Республики Казахстан // URL: www.rusnauka.com/1_NIO_2014/Pravo/5_154476.doc.htm ; и др.

Купрейченко С.В. Заочное судопроизводство в Российской Федерации по уголовным делам о тяжких и особо тяжких преступлениях: Монография.- М.: Юрлитинформ, c. 133,135.

Decision No. 22-8535/2008 of the Sverdlovsk District Court of August 27, 2008.

Клевцов К.К Досудебное производство в отношении лиц, уклоняющихся от уголовной ответственности за пределами территории Российской Федерации./ под ред. канд. юрид. наук, доц. А.М. Багмета. — М.: Юрлитинформ, 2018. С. 197-198․

Информация о постановлении ЕСПЧ от 18 мая 2004 г. по делу «Шомодьи (Somogyi) против Италии (жалоба № 67972/01) // СПС «КонсультантПлюс».

Тукиев А.С. Проблемы процессуальной формы заочного уголовного судопроизводства: автореф. дис. … канд. юрид. наук. Караганда, 2005. С. 20.

Литвишко П.А. Осуществление уголовно­процессуальной юрисдикции в зарубежных представительствах государств: дис. … канд. юрид. наук. М., 2014. С. 79.

Клевцов К.К Досудебное производство в отношении лиц, уклоняющихся от уголовной ответственности за пределами территории Российской Федерации./ под ред. канд. юрид. наук, доц. А.М. Багмета. — М.: Юрлитинформ, 2018. С. 201-202․

See Строгович М.С. Уголовное преследование в советском уголовном процессе, М., 1951, page 58.

See Уголовный процесс, словарь справочник, /под ред. В.М. Савицкого, М., 1999, page 186.

See A practical guide to conceptual solutions, innovative approaches and key institutions of the new RA Criminal Procedure Code, Yerevan, 2022. page 287.

See The Decision No. EKD/0136/11/11 of the RA Court of Cassation, 22 December 2011 regarding Levik Poghosyan.

See Article 6, Part 1, Clause 44 of the RA Code of Criminal Procedure.

See The Decision No. EKD/0136/11/11 of the RA Court of Cassation, 22 December 2011 regarding Levik Poghosyan.

See Кальницкий В.В. Право свидетелья на зашиту // Законодательство и практика, 2000, № 2(5) - pages 11-13։

See Part 1 of Article 255 of the RA Criminal Procedure Code.

Recommendation was adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 19 and 21 January 2000 at its 694th Session.

Adopted in Rome on 4 Nov. 1950; entered into force on 3 Sept. 1953.

See, inter alia, the Court’s judgment in the Papamichalopoulos case against Greece of 31 October 1995, paragraph 34, Series A 330-B.

For more details on the decision of the ECtHR on a unilateral declaration or friendly settlement as a basis for reopening the case, see the decision of the Court of Cassation of October 19, 2021 on revising the ruling of the Chamber of Civil and Economic Affairs of the Court of Cassation of 07.04.2006.

Pursuant to the decision of the RA Constitutional Court CCD-1573 of 27.01.21, parаgraph 1 of Article 415 of Civil Procedure Code was recognized as contradicting Articles 61 and 75 of the RA Constitution and void to the extent that it precludes the review of judicial acts of the Court of Appeal which have entered into force, but are not subject to appeal upon new circumstances.

The decision of the Court of Cassation of November 7, 2019 on criminal case No. ECD/ 0190/06/08, the decision of the Court of Cassation of October 19, 2021, the decision of the Chamber of Civil and Economic Affairs of the Court of Cassation of 07.04.2006 on grounds for review under new circumstances, etc.

UN Refugee Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (1951), Article 1(A)(2), available at: https://www.unhcr.org/1951-refugee-convention.html.

Amnesty International, “Refugees, Asylum Seekers and Migrants” available at: https://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/refugees-asylum-seekers-and-migrants/#:~:text=An%20asylum%20seeker%20is%20a,decision%20on%20their%20asylum%20claim.

Annick Pijnenburg and Conny Rijken (2021), “Moving Beyond Refugees and Migrants”, available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/1369801X.2020.1854107?needAccess=true&role=button.

IOM, “Definition of "Migrant" available at: https://www.iom.int/about-migration.

UN International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families (1990), available at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-convention-protection-rights-all-migrant-workers.

Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings (2005), Article 4 (a), available at: https://rm.coe.int/168008371d.

RA Criminal Code (2021), Article 188 (4), available at: https://www.arlis.am/DocumentView.aspx?DocID=172528.

UN Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons Especially Women and Children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2000), Article 3 (a), available at: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/ProtocolonTrafficking.pdf.

UNODC, “Human trafficking and migrant smuggling”, available at: https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/secondary/human-trafficking-and-migrant-smuggling.html.

EUROPOL, “Trafficking in Human Beings”, available at: https://www.europol.europa.eu/crime-areas-and-statistics/crime-areas/trafficking-in-human-beings.

Klara Smits & Mirjam Van Reisen (2023), “Deceived and Exploited: Classifying the Practice as Human Trafficking”, available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367254709_Deceived_and_Exploited_Classifying_the_Practice_as_Human_Trafficking/link/63cea4b26fe15d6a57425555/download.

Mirjam Van Reisen, Klara Smits, Morgane Wirtz & Anouk Smeets (2023), “Living in a Black Hole: Explaining Human Trafficking for Ransom in Migration”, available at: https://research.tilburguniversity.edu/en/publications/living-in-a-black-hole-explaining-human-trafficking-for-ransom-in.

UNHCR Guidelines on International Protection No. 7: The Application of Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees to Victims of Trafficking and Persons at Risk of Being Trafficked, pp. 29-40, available at: https://www.unhcr.org/publications/legal/443b626b2/guidelines-international-protection-7-application-article-1a2-1951-convention.html.

Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings (2005), Article 10 (2), available at: https://rm.coe.int/168008371d.

Council of Europe Group of Experts on Action Against Trafficking in Human Beings Guidance Note On the entitlement of victims of trafficking, and persons at risk of being trafficked, to international protection, paragraph 15 (2020), available at: https://rm.coe.int/guidance-note-on-the-entitlement-of-victims-of-trafficking-and-persons/16809ebf44.

Ibid. paragraphs 34-48.

UNODC, “Human trafficking and migrant smuggling”, available at: https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/secondary/human-trafficking-and-migrant-smuggling.html.

OSCE Uniform Guidelines for the Identification and Referral of Victims of Human Trafficking within the Migrant and Refugee Reception Framework in the OSCE Region (2019), available at: https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/2/4/413123_0.pdf

Bibliography

Books

Stavroula Karapapa and Luke McDonagh, Intellectual Property Right, Oxford University

Press 2019,

Bently L, Brad Sherman, Dev Gangjee, Phillip Johnson, Intellectual Property Right,

Oxford University Press 2018,

Paul Torremans, Intellectual property right, 9 th edition, Oxford University Press 2018

Articles

Bruce Lehman, The Pharmaceutical Industry and the Patent System, International

Intellectual Property Institute, {2003}

Dean Baker, End Patent Monopolies on Drugs, The New York Times

William N. Monte (2016) Compulsory licensing of patents, Information &

Communications Technology Law

Frederick M. Abbott and Jerome H Reichman, The Doha Round’s Public Health Legacy:

Strategies for the Production and Diffusion of Patented Medicines under the Amended

TRIPS Provisions, Journal of International Economic Law

Margaret Chon, Intellectual Property and the Development Divide

Kenan Malik, Big Pharma Can Only See the Benefit of R&D for Wealthy Markets, The

Guardian

Oliver Morgan, Parallel Trade in Drugs Puts EU Patients at Risk, The Guardian

Sarah Boseley, Calls for actions on patients denied 100,000 GBP cystic fibrosis drug, The

Guardian

Christina Walker, My son’s life depends on this cystic fibrosis drug. And ministers stand

in the way, The Guardian

1998: Big Pharma versus Nelson Mandela, Médecins Sans Frontières

Ellen F.M. ‘t Hoen, Hans V. Hogerzeil, Jonathan D. Quick and Hiiti B. Sillo, A quiet

revolution in global public health: The World Health Organization’s Prequalification of

Medicines Programme, Journal of Public Health Policy

Jared S. Hopkins, Generic-Drug Approvals Soar, But Patients Still Go Without, The Wall

Street Journal

Bangkok’s Drug War Goes Global, The Wall Street Journal

Paul Garwood, Kenya Rejects Bid to Remove Government’s Compulsory Licensing

Flexibilities, Intellectual Property Watch

Other

Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property, {1994}

Declaration on the TRIPS agreement and the public health, WTO MINISTERIAL

{2001}

UN GA Declaration on the Right to Development 41/128 {1986}