Content Validity Assessment of the "Personal Self-Transfor­mation Potential" Questionnaire Using the CVI Method

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU.E/2025.17.1.090

Keywords:

potential for personal self-transformation, career change, content validity, CVI, questionnaire adaptation, personal potential

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to present the results of the adaptation and content validation of the Armenian version of the "Potential for Personal Self-Transformation" questionnaire, with the aim of creating an instrument to study its impact on career change in Armenia. The questionnaire is designed to assess key components such as the need for change, conscious self-transformation ability, personal resources, and belief in the possibility of self-change. The linguistic adaptation of the questionnaire was carried out using the back-translation procedure, ensuring conceptual and semantic equivalence with the original. The study involved 9 experts from the field of psychology (university lecturers and researchers), based on whose ratings a mixed-methods analysis was conducted, combining quantitative (Content Validity Index - CVI) calculation and qualitative analysis of the experts' comments. As a result of the analysis, based on the I-CVI scores (acceptable threshold ≥ 0.78) and qualitative feedback, a final 23-item version of the questionnaire was formed from the initial 24 items. The overall content validity index of the scale (S-CVI/Ave) was 0.90, which is considered an excellent score. The findings suggest that the instrument can be effectively utilized both for research purposes and in career counseling and Human Resource Management (HRM) to assess personal resources. The adapted version possesses high content validity and serves as a reliable basis for future psychometric studies, including reliability testing and construct validation.

Author Biography

  • Mariam Manukyan, Yerevan State University

    PhD Applicant at the Chair of General Psychology, Yerevan State University

References

1. Гришина Н.В. (2018). «Самоизменения» личности: возможное и необходимое. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Психология и педагогика, 8(2), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu16.2018.202 / Grishina, N. V. (2018). «Samoizmeneniya» lichnosti: vozmozhnoe i neobkhodimoe ["Self-changes" of personality: possible and necessary]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Psikhologiya i pedagogika [Sankt-Petersburg University Gazette. Psychology and Pedagogy], 8(2), 126–138.

2. Гришина Н.В., Манукян В.Р., Муртазина И.Р., Аванесян М.О. (2021). Самоизменения личности: Проблемы, модели, исследования. Коллективная монография. СПб., Изд-во С.-Петерб. ун-та./ Grishina, N. V., Manukyan, V. R., Murtazina, I. R., & Avanesyan, M. O. (2021). Samoizmeneniya lichnosti: Problemy, modeli, issledovaniya [Self-changes of personality: Problems, models, research]. Kollektivnaya monografiya. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta.

3. Манукян, В.Р., Муртазина, И.Р., Гришина, Н.В. (2020). Опросник для диагностики потенциала самоизменений личности. Консультативная психология и психотерапия, 28(4), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2020280403/ Manukyan, V. R., Murtazina, I. R., & Grishina, N. V. (2020). Oprosnik dlya diagnostiki potentsiala samoizmeneniy lichnosti [Questionnaire for diagnosing the potential for self-changes of personality]. Konsul'tativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 28(4), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2020280403

4. Aluja, A., García, L. F., & García, O. (2002). A comparative study of Zuckerman's three structural models for personality through the NEO-PI-R, ZKPQ-III-R, EPQ-RS and Goldberg's 50-bipolar adjectives. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(5), 713-725.

5. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489-497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147

6. Taherdoost, H. (2022). What are Different Research Approaches? Comprehensive Review of Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Research, Their Applications, Types, and Limitations. Journal of Management Science & Engineering Research, 5(1), 53-63.

7. Yusoff, M. S. B. (2019). ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Education in Medicine Journal, 11(2), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6

8. Zukerman, M. (2007). Sensation seeking and risky behavior. American Psychological Association.

Published

2026-04-03

Issue

Section

PSYCHOLOGY

How to Cite

Manukyan, M. (2026). Content Validity Assessment of the "Personal Self-Transfor­mation Potential" Questionnaire Using the CVI Method. Bulletin of Yerevan University E: Philosophy, Psychology, 17(1(49), 90-100. https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU.E/2025.17.1.090

Most read articles by the same author(s)