Azerbaijan’s Policy Regarding Misappropriation of Armenian Cultural Heritage in the Light of International Principles (Authenticity, Integrity, Cultural Significance, Outstanding Universal Value) of Heritage Protection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46991/hc.2022.18.2.175Keywords:
protection of cultural heritage, international principles of heritage, authenticity, integrity, cultural significance, exclusivity (outstanding universal value), misappropriation of Armenian heritage, alteration of the function of heritage, vandalism of AzerbaijanAbstract
The aggressive policy of Azerbaijan towards the cultural heritage of Artsakh is not limited to destruction, demolition and physical violence against the Armenian heritage. A much more dangerous policy exists and is widely used, which, while outwardly preserving the main structure of the heritage, alienates from it the most important thing - the Armenian identity. Alienation of identity occurs through change, appropriation, Azerbaijanization, Turkification and other ways. This policy is a gross violation of the basic international principles for the protection of cultural heritage: the principles of “authenticity”, “cultural significance”, “integrity” and “exclusivity”. This way of working is also a significant obstacle to the comprehensive preservation of heritage elements, vitality, principles of naturalness and cultural habitat. By distorting historical facts, Azerbaijan neutralizes the true tradition of heritage, violates the possibility of transferring value to generations with its main function, its integrity, details, elements and attributes. The attribution of Armenian values to Caucasian Albanians, Turks or their Azerbaijaization takes away these values from their real owners, the Armenian community of Artsakh, according to whose life experience, knowledge and skills they were created and must be preserved as such. According to the international principles of heritage, its idea, the feelings it evokes, the potential of the heritage, the information it carries, can often be more than the structure itself, but Azerbaijan consistently manipulates them. The appropriated Armenian heritage is the embodiment of the creative genius of the Artsakh Armenian community and its preservation is entrusted to the Artsakh Armenian community itself, but it is purposefully constantly alienated from its native people and the whole world.
References
Ambartsumian Ye. (2021), “Why Armenian Cultural Heritage Threatens Azerbaijan’s Claims to Nagorno-Karabakh, Hyperallergic, https://hyperallergic.com/614619/why-armenian-cultural-heritage-threatens-azerbaijans-claims-to-nagorno-karabakh/ . (In Armenian)
Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Armenia v. Azerbaijan), International court of justice , The Hague, Netherlands, No. 2021/34, 7 December 2021, https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/180/180-20211207-PRE-01-00-EN.pdf ։
Arts‘akhi mshakut‘ayin zh’aṛangut‘yan mshtaditarkum kayk‘, Ahazanger bazh’in, https://monumentwatch.org/hy/%d5%a1%d5%b0%d5%a1%d5%a6%d5%a1%d5%b6%d5%a3%d5%a5%d6%80/ ։ (In Armenian)
Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance, (1999)․
Australia ICOMOS, Guidelines to the Burra charter: cultural significance, (1988), https://www.marquis-kyle.com.au/bcsignificance.htm :
Background Document on the Notion of Integrity,UNESCO, International World Heritage ExpertMeeting on Integrity for Cultural Heritage, 12‐15 March 2012, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates, 2012, https://whc.unesco.org/document/121725 :
Burra Charter, ICOMOS Australia, Definitions, (1981), https://australia.icomos.org/wp-content/uploads/Burra-Charter_1981.pdf ։
Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, UNESCO, (1972), https://whc.unesco.org/en/conventiontext/ ,
Council of Europe, Parliamentary Assembly, Resolution 2391 (2021), Humanitarian consequences of the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan / Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, https://pace.coe.int/en/files/29483/html :
HH GAA haytararut‘yuně Adrbejani koghmits‘ Arts‘akhum iragortsvogh haykakan mshakut‘ayin ts‘eghaspanut‘yan tsragri veraberyal, https://www.sci.am/m/newsview.php?id=477&langid=1
HH varch‘apeti, AH nakhagahi ew ṚD nakhagahi haytararut‘yuně, 10.11.2020, https://www.primeminister.am/hy/press-release/item/2020/11/10/Announcement/ ։
International World Heritage Expert Meeting on Integrity for Cultural Heritage 12 to 15 March 2012, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates, Background document on the notion of integrity prepared by The World Heritage Centre, ICOMOS, ICCROM and IUCN version of 7 march 2012, https://whc.unesco.org/uploads/events/documents/event-833-7.pdf ։
Khatchadourian L., Smith Ad., The US can help prevent the destruction of cultural heritage in Nagorno-Karabakh. Here’s how, Dec 15, 2020։
Managing Cultural World Heritage, UNESCO /ICCROM/ICOMOS/IUCN 2018, https://whc.unesco.org/document/171923 ։
Nara Document on Authenticity, ICOMOS, (1994), https://www.icomos.org/charters/nara-e.pdf :
Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention UNESCO, Intergovernmental Committee for the protection of The World Cultural and Natural Heritage, WHC. 11/01 November 2011, https://whc.unesco.org/archive/opguide11-en.pdf :
Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention, UNESCO, Paris, Intergovernmental committee for the protection of the world cultural and natural heritage, WHC. 05/2 2 February 2005, https://whc.unesco.org/archive/opguide05-en.pdf ։
Petrosyan H․ (2010), Mshakut‘ayin ēt‘nots‘idn Arts‘akhum (MZH’ bṛnayurats‘man mekhanizmě), Adrbejani petakan ahabekch‘ut‘yuně ew ēt‘nikakan ztumneri k‘aghak‘akanut‘yuně Leṛnayin GHarabaghi dem, SHushi, ēj 137-148. (In Armenian)
Rapport de la Réunion d'experts sur l'Evaluation des Principes généraux et des critères pour les propositions s'inscription de biens naturels du patrimoine mondial Parc national de la Vanoise, France, 22-24 mars 1996․
Stovel Herb (2007), Effective use of authenticity and integrity as world heritage qualiifying conditions, http://www.ceci-br.org/novo/revista/docs2007/CT-2007-71.pdf ։
The Burra Charter, The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance) (1999) http://www.icomosubih.ba/pdf/medjunarodni_dokumenti/1999%20Povelja%20iz%20Burre%20o%20mjestima%20od%20kulturnog%20znacenja.pdf ։
The Human rights Ombutsman of the republic of Artsakh, The Armenian cultural heritage in Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabakh): cases of vandalism and at risk of destruction by Azerbaijan , Ad Hoc Public Report Stepanakert 26 January, 2021։
Understanding and assessing cultural significance, Australia ICOMOS Burra Charter (2013), https://australia.icomos.org/wp-content/uploads/Practice-Note_Understanding-and-assessing-cultural-significance.pdf :
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Armine Tigranyan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.