THE INFLUENCE OF THE 1993 COPENHAGEN AND 1999 HELSINKI SUMMITS ON TURKEY-EU RELATIONS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46991/jos.2026.29.1.116

Keywords:

Turkey, European Union, summit, international relations, geopolitics, history

Abstract

The new geopolitical situation that arose as a result of the collapse of the bipolar world order led to significant changes in Turkey's foreign policy. On the one hand, the collapse of the USSR weakened Turkey's importance as the West's main partner on the southern borders of the USSR, on the other hand, the new geopolitical situation and the power vacuum in the region that arose as a result of the disappearance of the second pole created new opportunities for Turkey. It is no coincidence that in the late 1980s and early 1990s, unprecedented activity was recorded in Turkey to radically revise its domestic and foreign policies and attempt to implement them. Turning to Turkey-EU relations, it is worth noting that in parallel with the new directions of foreign policy, Turkey continued to maintain active relations with the Union in the 1990s, seeking to complete the long process of membership.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Aksu, K. 2012. Turkey-EU Relations: Power, Politics and the Future. London: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

2. Aybey, A. 2004. "Turkey and the European Union Relations: A Historical Assessment." Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi 4, no. 1: 19–38.

3. Baykal, S. 2002. "Turkey-EU Relations in the Aftermath of the Helsinki Summit." Ankara Review of European Studies 2, no. 3: 1–15.

4. Buhari, D. 2009. "Turkey-EU Relations: The Limitations of Europeanisation Studies." The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations 40: 91–121.

5. Hale, William. 2002. Turkish Foreign Policy, 1774–2000. London: Frank Cass.

6. Hatipoğlu, E. 2005. "The Turkish-EU Relationship in Historical Perspective." In Turkish-Israeli Relations in a Trans-Atlantic Context. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University.

7. Huntington, Samuel P. 1996. The Clash of Civilization and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster.

8. Keyman, E. Fuat, and Senem Aydın. 2004. "European Integration and the Transformation of Turkish Democracy." EU-Turkey Working Papers, no. 2. Brussels: Center for European Policy Studies (CEPS). https://www.ceps.eu/ceps-publications/european-integration-and-transformation-turkish-democracy/.

9. Kirişci, Kemal. 2004. The Domestic Politics of Negotiating Pre-Accession. Bologna: University of Bologna.

10. Kochenov, Dimitry. 2008. EU Enlargement and the Failure of Conditionality. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.

11. Laçiner, Sedat. 2003–2004. "Ozalism (Neo-Ottomanism): An Alternative in Turkish Foreign Policy?" Journal of Administrative Sciences 1, nos. 1–2: 161–202.

12. Öniş, Ziya. 2003. "Domestic Politics, International Norms and Challenges to the State: Turkey-EU Relations in the Post-Helsinki Era." Turkish Studies 4, no. 1: 9–34.

13. Sönmezoğlu, Faruk. 2001. Türk Dış Politikasının Analizi. İstanbul: Der Yayınları.

14. Theophylactou, Demetrios A. 2012. "Geopolitics, Turkey’s EU Accession Course and Cyprus." Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 12, no. 1: 165–178.

15. Vardan, Ömer. 2009. "Turkey-EU Relations and Democracy in Turkey: Problems and Prospects." Turkish Policy Quarterly 8, no. 1: 35–43.

16. Yeşilada, Birol A. 2007. "Benefits of Turkey's EU Membership for Both Parties." In Benefits of Turkey’s EU Membership. Montreal: European Union Studies Association-Canada.

17. Shlykov, V. I. 2010. Vlijanie faktora peregovorov s ES na realizaciju reform v Turcii (1999–2009 gg.). Moskva: Institut vostokovedenija RAN (IV RAN).

18. European Economic Community. 1963. Ankara Agreement: Agreement Establishing an Association Between the European Economic Community and Turkey. Signed September 12, 1963. https://www.ab.gov.tr/files/ardb/evt/1_avrupa_birligi/1_2_temel_belgeler/1_2_1_ortaklik_anlasmasi/ankara_agreement_en.pdf.

19. EC-Turkey Association Council. 1995. Customs Union Decision: Decision No. 1/95 of the EC-Turkey Association Council on Implementing the Final Phase of the Customs Union. https://www.ab.gov.tr/-files/ardb/evt/EEC-Turkey_association_agreements_and_¬protocols_¬and_-other_basic_texts.pdf.

20. European Commission. 1998. Regular Report on Turkey’s Progress Towards Accession. Brussels. https://www.ab.gov.tr/files/-AB_Iliskileri/Tur_En_Realitons/Progress/Turkey_Progress_Report_1998.pdf.

21. European Council. 1993. Copenhagen Summit Presidency Conclusions. Copenhagen. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/enlargement/-ec/¬pdf/¬cop_en.pdf.

22. European Council. 1997. Luxembourg Summit Presidency Conclusions. Luxembourg. https://www.ab.gov.tr/files/ardb/evt/-1_avrupa_birligi/¬1_4_zirveler_1985_sonrasi/1997_12_luksemburg_-zirvesi_¬baskanlik_sonuc_bildirgesi_en.pdf.

23. European Council. 1999. Helsinki Summit Presidency Conclusions. Helsinki. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/hel1_en.htm.

24. European Union. 1992. Treaty on European Union (Maastricht Treaty). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. https://europa.eu/european-union/sites/europaeu/files/docs/-body/¬treaty_on_european_union_en.pdf.

25. European Union Council. 2001. Council Decision of 12 March 2001 on the Principles, Priorities, Intermediate Objectives and Conditions Contained in the Accession Partnership with the Republic of Turkey (2001/235/EC). Official Journal of the European Communities. http://www.ab.gov.tr/files/AB_Iliskileri/Tur_En_Realitons/Apd/Turkey_APD_2001.pdf.

26. UNC European Union Center of Excellence (UNC EUCE). 2008. "Turkey’s Quest for EU Membership." EUCE Briefing Series. http://europe.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Brief4-0803-turkeys-quest.pdf.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

THE INFLUENCE OF THE 1993 COPENHAGEN AND 1999 HELSINKI SUMMITS ON TURKEY-EU RELATIONS. (2026). Journal of Oriental Studies, 29(1), 116-131. https://doi.org/10.46991/jos.2026.29.1.116

Most read articles by the same author(s)