Banber Erevani hamalsarani. P'ilisop'ayut'yun, hogebanut'yun.
| E - ISSN | : | 2738-2621 |
| P - ISSN | : | 1829-4553 |
Vol. 16 No. 2(47) (2025)
Full Issue
PHILOSOPHY
-
PHILOSOPHY
The christian humanism of Gregor Narekatsi
AbstractThe article discusses an issue related to the evaluation of the worldview and philosophical views of Grigor Narekatsi (951-1003), the greatest poet and philosopher of the Middle Ages, and to clarify it, the concepts of the Middle Ages, Renaissance, Armenian Renaissance, Christian God-centered humanism and Renaissance human-centered humanism are analyzed. Some researchers, referring to Narekatsi's book “The Book of Tragedy”, his innovative thoughts and approaches, the doctrine of the "inner" man and the salvation of man, consider him a representative of the Armenian Renaissance, a forerunner, that is, not a thinker of the Middle Ages, but of the Renaissance era. If in the Soviet period, when the Marxist methodology was in control, the circulation of such narrative was understandable (the theory of the Oriental and Armenian Renaissance was meant to justify the proposition of the Marxist philosophy of history that universal patterns operate with iron necessity in history, for example, all peoples must go through the same stages of development), then it is unclear why researchers today defend this highly ideological and ineffective methodological narrative. According to the author, such narrative is due to the fact that these researchers: a/ essentially ignore the differences between Medieval and Renaissance cultures, as a result of which the phenomena characteristic of medieval culture are presented as renaissance, b/ ignore the peculiarities of Christian God-centered humanism and Renaissance human-centered humanism, c/ Considering Narekatsu as a representative of the Armenian Renaissance, they allegedly give him an assessment corresponding to his genius (in this case it is assumed that the Renaissance era is progressive compared to the Middle Ages). Meanwhile, Narekatsi- the greatest representative of Christian humanism, truly a "Archimandrite of the Universal Church" is a medieval thinker with his vision of human salvation, with his way of thinking, ways of discussing and solving worldview-philosophical issues.
ReferencesԳասպարյան Դ., Հայկական Վերածնունդ (ժամանակը և առանձնահատկությունները) http://shirak.asj-oa.am/598/1/41.pdf (մուտք՝ 18.07.2023)։ (Gasparyan D., Haykakan Veratsnund (zhamanaky yev arrandznahatkut’yunnery) http://shirak.asj-oa.am/598/1/41.pdf (mutk։ 18.07.2023)).
Գրիգոր Նարեկացի, Մատյան ողբերգության։ Տաղեր / թարգմանությունը Վ․ Գևորգյանի, Եր., 1979։ (Grigor Narekats’i, Matyan voghbergut’yan. Tagher / targmautyuny V. Gevorgyani, Yer., 1979).
Զաքարյան Ս. Ա., Հայկական Վերածննդի հարցը (մեթոդաբանական տեսանկյուն), Եր., 2006։ (Zak’aryan S. A., Haykakan Veratsnndi harts’y (met’vodabanakan tesankyun), Yer., 2006).
Թամրազյան Հ., Գրիգոր Նարեկացին և Նարեկյան դպրոցը, հ. Գ, Եր., 2017։ (T’amrazyan H., Grigor Narekats’in yev Narekyan dprots’y, h. G, Yer., 2017).
Խրլոպյան Գ. Տ., Հայ սոցիալական իմաստասիրության պատմություն։ Հելլենիստական և վաղ ֆեոդալական շրջան, Եր., 1978։ (Khrlopyan G. T., Hay sots’ialakan imastasirut’yan patmut’yun. Hellenistakan yev vagh feodalakan shrjan, Yer., 1978).
«Հայկական Վերածնունդ», http://www.panarmenian.net/arm/details/222911/ (մուտք՝ 18.07.2023): («Haykakan Veratsnund», http://www.panarmenian.net/arm/details/222911/ (mutk։ 18.07.2023).
Նալբանդյան Վ. Ս., Գրիգոր Նարեկացի, Եր., 1990։ (Nalbandyan V. S. Grigor Narekats’i, Yer., 1990).
Պողոսյան Ս., Իմ Նարեկացին, Եր., 2007։ (Poghosyan S., Im Narekats’in, Yer., 2007).
Бурдах К․ Реформация․ Ренессанс․ Гуманизм․ М․, 2004․ (Burdah K․ Reformaciâ․ Renessans․ Gumanizm․ M․, 2004)․
Горфункель А.Х. Философия эпохи Возрождения. Учебное пособие. М., 1980․ (Gorfunkelʹ A.H. Filosofiâ épohi Vozroždeniâ. Učebnoe posobie. M., 1980)․
-
PHILOSOPHY
A new attempt to solve a mistery of David the Invincible
AbstractIt is known, as a result of modern scientific reconstruction, the Armenian written tradition about David the Invincible has been questioned, and he has been moved from the fifth century to the second half of the sixth century. The article examines the issue of the reconstruction of the time of David the Invincible and, based on the references in medieval texts, an attempt is made to substantiate the fact that the Armenian medieval written tradition about David has not yet been refuted. It is shown that if there are no so-called “evidentiary” grounds for seeing David in the fifth century, then they are also absent in the new reconstructions that remove David from the fifth century. In particular, some arguments put forward in Misak Khostikyan’s work “David the Philosopher” are examined and their refutations are given, or, at the very least, their lack of sufficient grounds is shown. The article suggests that the priest David mentioned by Yeghishe could very likely be the same David the philosopher, who has been called “Invincible” in Armenian written tradition for some time. It is also shown that in some texts that have come down to us from the fifth century, there are mentions of people named David, and it should not be excluded that they or some of them may refer to David the Invincible.
The method of analogy is used to gain a clearer understanding of the spiritual and intellectual culture of late antiquity or the early Middle Ages. Parallels are drawn with other thinkers of the time, Prohaeresius and Boethius, to show the close connection of early Christian culture with the ancient Greco-Roman philosophical tradition. This makes it possible to refute the approach of researchers who in a scientific manner suggest to exclude that David could have been a Christian, and at the same time could teach the Hellenistic material to first-year philosophy students.
ReferencesԱկինեան Հ. Ն., Թուղթ Փոտայ Պատրիարքի առ Զաքարիա Կաթողիկոս Հայոց Մեծաց // Հանդէս Ամսօրեայ, 1968, Ապրիլ-Հունիս, թիվ 4, էջ 139։ (Akinean H. N., T’ught’ P’votay Patriark’i arr Zak’aria Kat’voghikos Hayots’ Metsats’ // Handes Amsoreay, 1968, April-Hunis, t’iv 4, ej 139. )
Ակինեան Ն., Դաւիթ Հարքացի Անյաղթ Փիլիսոփայ։ Կեանքն եւ գործերը, Վիեննա, Մխիթարեան տպարան, 1959։ (Akinean N., Dawit’ Hark’ats’i Anyaght’ P’ilisop’ay. Keank’n yev gortsery, Viyenna, Mkhit’arean tparan, 1959. )
Եղիշէի Վարդապետի Վասն Վարդանայ եւ Հայոց պատերազմին եւ քննադատութիւնք Միքայել Փաշայի Փորթուգալ, Վենետիկ ի տպ. Ս. Ղազարու, 1903։(Yeghishei Vardapeti Vasn Vardanay yev Hayots’ paterazmin yev k’nnadatut’iwnk’ Mik’ayel P’ashayi P’vort’ugal, Venetik i tp. S. Ghazaru, 1903)
Մատենագիրք հայոց, Գ հատոր, Անթիլիաս-Լիբանան, 2004։(Matenagirk’ hayots’, G hator, Ant’ilias-Libanan, 2004)
Կորիւն վարդապետի, Մամբրէի վերծանողի, եւ Դաւթի Անյաղթի Մատենագրութիւնք, ի Վենետիկ, ի տպարանի Սրբոյն Ղազարու, յամին 1833:(Koriwn vardapeti, Mambrei vertsanoghi, yev Dawt’i Anyaght’i Matenagrut’iwnk’, i Venetik, i tparani Srboyn Ghazaru, yamin 1833: )
Խաչիկյան. Լ., Եղիշեի «Արարածոց մեկնությունը», Եր․, Զվարթնոց, 1992։(Khach’ikyan. L., Yeghishev «Araratsots’ meknut’yuny», Yer․, Zvart’nots’, 1992.)
Խոստիկյան Մ., Դավիթ փիլիսոփան, Ներքին գրոց մատենաշար, Աշոտ Հովհաննիսյանի անվան հումանիտար հետազոտությունների ինստիտուտ, Եր., 2020: (Khostikyan M., Davit’ p’ilisop’an, Nerk’in grots’ matenashar, Ashot Hovhannisyani anvan humanitar hetazotut’yunneri institut, Yer., 2020)
Ղազարայ Փարպեցւոյ Պատմութիւն Հայոց եւ թուղթ առ Վահան Մամիկոնեան, աշխատութեամբ Գ. Տեր-Մկրտչեան և Ստ. Մալխասեան, Տփղիս, Արագատիպ Մնացական Մարտիրոսեանցի, 1904։(Ghazaray P’arpets’woy Patmut’iwn Hayots’ yev t’ught’ arr Vahan Mamikonean, ashkhatut’eamb G. Ter-Mkrtch’ean yev St. Malkhasean, Tp’ghis, Aragatip Mnats’akan Martiroseants’i, 1904. )
Մուրադեան Գ., Դաւիթ Անյաղթին վերագրուած եւ նրա անուանն առնչուող գրուածքներ, Մատենագիրք հայոց, Ի հատոր։(Muradean G., Dawit’ Anyaght’in veragruats yev nra anuann arrnch’uogh gruatsk’ner, Matenagirk’ hayots’, I hator. )
Յարութիւնեան Ն., Խորհրդային Հայաստանի բռնադատուած փիլիսոփայ Միսակ Խոստիկեանի կորսուած համարուող գիտական և գրական ժառանգութեան մասին // Հայկազեան հայագիտական հանդէս, Պեյրութ, 2009, էջ 401-423։(Yarut’iwnean N., Khorhrdayin Hayastani brrnadatuats p’ilisop’ay Misak Khostikeani korsuats hamaruogh gitakan yev grakan zharrangut’ean masin // Haykazean hayagitakan handes, Peyrut’, 2009, ej 401-423.)
Յովհան Աւձնեցի, Նորին ընդդէմ երեւութականաց, Մատենագիրք հայոց, Է. հատոր։(Yovhan Awdznets’i, Norin ynddem yerevut’akanats’, Matenagirk’ hayots’, E. hator.)
Պետրոսյան Ս. Ս., Դավիթ Անհաղթի հոգու խնամքի իմաստասիրությունը և արդիականությունը, Մայր Աթոռ Սուրբ Էջմիածին, 2017։( Petrosyan S. S., Davit’ Anhaght’i hogu khnamk’i imastasirut’yuny yev ardiakanut’yuny, Mayr At’vorr Surb Ejmiatsin, 2017. )
Ստեփանոս Սիւնեցի, Պիտանի լուծմունք սահմանացն եւ Պորփիւրին Տէր Ստեփանոսի Սիւնեաց Եպիսկոպոսի // Մատենագիրք հայոց, Զ հատոր, Անթիլիաս, 2007։(Step’anos Siwnets’i, Pitani lutsmunk’ sahmanats’n yev Porp’iwrin Ter Step’anosi Siwneats’ Yepiskoposi // Matenagirk’ hayots’, Z hator, Ant’ilias, 2007.)
Սրբոց վարդապետացն հայոց Մովսէսի եւ Դաւթի հարցմունք ընդ երկաբնակ չարափառսն, Մատենագիրք հայոց, Ի հատոր, ԺԲ դար, Երևան, 2014, էջ 660-740։(Srbots’ vardapetats’n hayots’ Movsesi yev Dawt’i harts’munk’ ynd yerkabnak ch’arap’arrsn, Matenagirk’ hayots’, I hator, ZHB dar, Yerevan, 2014, ej 660-740. )
Հ. Տեն, Գեղարվեստի փիլիսոփայությունը, Պետհրատ, Երևան, Մոսկվա, 1936։(H. Ten, Gegharvesti p’ilisop’ayut’yuny, Pethrat, Yerevan, Moskva, 1936.)
Arevšatyan S. S., Le “Livre des Êtres” et la Question de l’Appartenance de Deux Lettres Dogmatiques Anciennes // “Revue des Etudes Armeniennes”, Paris, 1984, XVIII, էջ 23-32:
Bury J. B. History of the Later Roman Empire, Macmillan and Co., Ltd., 1923․
Dvornik F., Patriarch Photius, Scolar and Statesman // Dvornik F., Photian and Byzantine Ecclesiastical Studies, Variorum Reprints, London, 1974, VII.
Eunapius, Lives of the Philosophers and Sophists in Philostratus and Eunapius, The Lives of the Sophists with an English translation by W. C. Wright, Loeb Classical library, London, 1922.
Greenwood, T. Failure of a Mission? Photius and the Armenian Church. // Le Museon, 2006, 119, 1-2, pp. 123-168. Hussey J. M., Louth A., The Orthodox Church in the Byzantine Empire, Oxford Univ. Press, 2010․
Marenbon J., Boethius, Oxford Univ. Press, 2003․
Photius, The Library of Photius, vol. I, trans. By J. H. Freeze, Macmillan, London, NY, 1920․
The Acts of Concil of Chalcedon, Translated with an introduction and notes by Richard Price and Michael Gaddis, Vol. 1, Liverpul Univ. Press, 2005․
Warren N.De, Staiti A. (Eds.), New Approaches to Neo-Kantianism, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2015.
Watts E. J., City and School in Late Antique Athens and Alexandria, University of California Press, Berkeley, LA, London, 2006․
Westerink L. G., Introduction // Pseudo-Elias (Pseudo-David), Lectures on Porphyry’s Isagoge. Introduction, Text and Indices by L. G. Westerink, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1967․
Адонцъ, Н., Арменiя въ эпоху Юстиниана, СПб, 1908(Adonts", N., Armeniya v" epokhu Yustiniana, SPb, 1908․)
Всеобщая история Вардана Великого, М., 1861.(Vseobshchaya istoriya Vardana Velikogo, M., 1861.)
-
PHILOSOPHY
The problem of artificial intelligence in the context of existential ontology
AbstractIn today’s virtual and increasingly digitalized world, the questions surrounding the relationship between the development of artificial intelligence and the existential ontology of the human being have acquired new theoretical and practical significance. These issues require focused philosophical and socio-cultural reflection.Taking this reality into account and addressing the challenges facing contemporary society, the article places special emphasis on the fundamental questions concerning the nature, development, and functions of artificial intelligence, as well as the problems and potential risks it poses. Attention is also given to the prospects for effective human–AI interaction and the potential of human–machine systems to contribute to solving real societal issues.The core issue lies in the fact that the increasing penetration of artificial intelligence into nearly all spheres of life—its growing role in the digital economy, business, and other domains—as well as the emergence of virtual reality and the post-human era, demand a rethinking of the place and role of cutting-edge technologies in human life.Furthermore, the interest in artificial intelligence is driven not only by the modern human’s attraction to technological innovations that aim to improve socio-economic life, but also by the fact that AI exhibits playful dimensions and is tied to questions concerning the organization of leisure and entertainment in consumer society.
References1. Միրզոյան Վ. Ա․, Հանրաբանական դիտարկումներ: Թարգմանությունների ժողովածու, Եր., Մեկնարկ, 2024 թ., 400 էջ:
2. Агамбен Дж. Homo sacer. Суверенная власть и голая жизнь. М., «Европа», 2011, 256 с.
3. Брайдотти Р. Постчеловек. М., Института Гайдара, 2021. 408 с.
4. Ваттимо Дж. Прозрачное общество. М., Логос, 2002, 128 с.
5. Гумбрехт Х. У. Производство присутствия: чего не может передать значение․М․, Новое литературное обозрение, 2006, 184 с.
6. Делѐз Ж. Капитализм и шизофрения․ Екатеринбург, Рипол классик, т.1, 2025, 512 с.
7. Кассирер Э. Избранное. Опыт о человеке․ М., Гардарика, 1998, 794 с.
8. Кутырёв В. А. Естественное и искусственное:борьба миров. Директ-Медиа, М., 2014, 270 с.
9. Мамардашвили М. К. Сознание – это парадоксальность, к которой невозможно привыкнуть: Как я понимаю философию: Москва: Прогресс, 1990. 199 с.
10. Мигуренко Р. А. Человеческие компетенции и искусственный интеллект, Изв․Томского политех․ университета. Экономика: Философия, социология и культурология. 2010. Т. 317. № 6, 85-89 с.
11. Мигуренко Р. А. Постнеклассические стратегии решения проблемы сознания и здравый смысл. Томск․политех․ унив․ Эконом․, Философия, социология и культурология., 2012. № 6, 157-161 с.
12. Сергеев С. Ф. Образование в техногенном мире: гуманизм и трансгуманизм. Школьные технологии. , № 1, 2018. 22-28 с.
13. Стоян А. А. Роль "машин желания" в обществе массового человека. Вестник ЛГУ, № 1, 2018, 56-68 с.
14. Терещенко Н.А. Социальная философия после «смерти социального»: Казань: Казан. ун-т., 2011, 368 с.
15. Энтин М. Л., Энтина Е. Г., Тнэлм Н. И.. В поисках партнерских отношений – XI.Росия и Европейский Союз в 2019-первой половине 2020 года. М., Зебра -Е, 2020, 592 с.
16. Eden A. H., Jams M. H. Singularity Hypotheses: A Scientific and Philosophical Assessment, Springer Heidelberg New York Dordecht London, 2013.1-12
17. Jonas H. Homo pictor and differentia of man. Social Research.Vol. 29., № 2 (S․1962), 201–220p.
18. Leroi-Gourhan, A. Gesture and Speech․ Cambridge, MA: October, 1993, 451 p.
1. Mirzoyan V. A., Republican Reflections: A Collection of Translations, Yerevan, Meknark, 2024, 400 p.
2. Agamben, G. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Moscow, “Evropa”, 2011, 256 p.
3. Braidotti, R. The Posthuman. Moscow, Gaidar Institute, 2021, 408 p․
4. Vattimo, G. The Transparent Society. Moscow, Logos, 2002, 128 p․
5. Gumbrecht, H. U. The Production of Presence: What Meaning Cannot Convey. Moscow, New Literary Observer, 2006, 184 p.
6. Deleuze G. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Yekaterinburg, Ripol Klassik, Vol. 1, 2025,512 p.
7. Cassirer E. Selected Works: An Essay on Man. Moscow, Gardarika, 1998, 794 p.
8. Kutyrev V. A. The Natural and the Artificial: A Struggle of Worlds. Moscow, Direct-Media, 2014, 270 p.
9. Mamardashvili M. K. Consciousness Is a Paradox One Cannot Get Used To: How I Understand Philosophy. Moscow: Progress, 1990, 199 p.
10. Migurenko R. A. Human Competencies and Artificial Intelligence, Proceedings of Tomsk Polytechnic University. Economics: Philosophy, Sociology, and Cultural Studies. 2010, Vol. 317, No. 6, pp. 85–89.
11. Migurenko R. A. Post-Nonclassical Strategies for Solving the Problem of Consciousness and Common Sense. Tomsk Polytechnic University. Economics, Philosophy, Sociology, and Cultural Studies, 2012, No. 6, pp. 157–161.
12. Sergeev, S. F. Education in a Technogenic World: Humanism and Transhumanism. School Technologies, No. 1, 2018, pp. 22–28.
13. Stoyan A. A. The Role of "Machines of Desire" in the Society of the Mass Man. Vestnik LGU, No. 1, 2018, pp. 56–68.
14. Tereshchenko N. A. Social Philosophy after the "Death of the Social". Kazan: Kazan University, 2011, 368 p.
15. Entin M. L., Entina E. G., Tnelm N. I. In Search of Partnership Relations – XI. Russia and the European Union in 2019–First Half of 2020. Moscow, Zebra-E, 2020, 592 p.
16. Eden A. H., Jams M. H. Singularity Hypotheses: A Scientific and Philosophical Assessment, Springer Heidelberg New York Dordecht London, 2013.1-12p.
17. Jonas H. Homo pictor and differentia of man. Social Research.Vol. 29., № 2 (S․1962), 201–220p.
18. Leroi-Gourhan A. Gesture and Speech․ Cambridge, MA: October, 1993, 451 p.
PSYCHOLOGY
-
PSYCHOLOGY
The dynamics of personality adaptation mechanisms under conditions of prolonged armed conflict.
AbstractThis paper examines the theoretical and methodological foundations for studying the dynamics of personality adaptation mechanisms under conditions of prolonged armed conflict. The relevance of the topic stems from the need to comprehend the processes of psychological adaptation under sustained exposure to extreme stressors that go beyond the classical understanding of traumatic situations. The study draws on the systemic and subject-activity approaches, as well as contemporary conceptual frameworks that expand the understanding of adaptation, including the theories of resilience, continuous traumatic stress (CTS), and basic assumptions. In this work, adaptation mechanisms are viewed as an interconnected system influenced by internal (mental state, basic assumptions) and external (characteristics of stress exposure, social support, and context) factors.
The empirical section presents data from a pilot study involving three groups differing in their experience of living in a conflict zone. Based on these data, the paper provides a step-by-step rationale for the selection of diagnostic instruments. The following validated methods were used: Psychological Defense Measurement Scale (E.R. Pilyugina, R.F. Suleymanov), Method for the Determination of Individual Coping Strategies (MDICS) by E. Heim, «Dominant States» by L.V. Kulikov, World Assumptions Scale (WAS) by R. Janoff-Bulman, an original biographical questionnaire.
The results revealed intergroup differences in defense profiles, coping strategies, psychoemotional states, and cognitive attitudes. Correlational analysis identified stable links between adaptation components, including associations between emotional regulation, a positive self-image, and subjective control, as well as the maladaptive role of avoidance and rationalization under conditions of prolonged stress. These findings are interpreted as reflections of the specific nature of adaptation to continuous stress exposure. The study emphasizes the need for an integrative approach that considers both individual and contextual variables. The findings support the hypothesis of the dynamic nature of adaptation mechanisms and provide a foundation for future research directions.
ReferencesАнцыферова Л.И. К психологии личности как развивающейся системы // Психология формирования и развития личности. – М.: Наука, 1981. – С. 3–19.(Antsyferova L.I. K psikhologii lichnosti kak razvivayushcheysya sistemy // Psikhologiya formirovaniya i razvitiya lichnosti. – M.: Nauka, 1981. – S. 3–19.)
Дикая Л.Г. Адаптация: методологические основания и основные направления исследований / Л.Г. Дикая // Психология адаптации и социальная среда: современные подходы, проблемы, перспективы. – 2007. – С. 17–42.(Dikaya L.G. Adaptatsiya: metodologicheskiye osnovaniya i osnovnyye napravleniya issledovaniy / L.G. Dikaya // Psikhologiya adaptatsii i sotsial'naya sreda: sovremennyye podkhody, problemy, perspektivy. – 2007. – S. 17–42)
Кашенкова М.М. Копинг-поведение и защитные механизмы в системе адаптации личности / Сборник трудов филиала РГСУ в г. Обнинске. – Вып. 2. – Обнинск, 2007. – С. 62–64.(Kashenkova M.M. Koping-povedeniye i zashchitnyye mekhanizmy v sisteme adaptatsii lichnosti / Sbornik trudov filiala RGSU v g. Obninske. – Vyp. 2. – Obninsk, 2007. – S. 62–64. )
Куликов Л.В. Проблема описания психических состояний // Психические состояния / Сост. и общ. ред. Л.В. Куликова. – СПб., 2001. – С. 11–42.(Kulikov L.V. Problema opisaniya psikhicheskikh sostoyaniy // Psikhicheskiye sostoyaniya / Sost. i obshch. red. L.V. Kulikova. – SPb., 2001. – S. 11–42. )
Куфтяк Е.В. Психологическое здоровье и защитные механизмы (психологические защиты и совладание) в детском возрасте // Психологические исследования. 2016. Т. 9, № 49. С. 4.(Kuftyak Ye.V. Psikhologicheskoye zdorov'ye i zashchitnyye mekhanizmy (psikhologicheskiye zashchity i sovladaniye) v detskom vozraste // Psikhologicheskiye issledovaniya. 2016. T. 9, № 49. S. 4.)
Левитов Н.Д. О психических состояниях человека / Н.Д. Левитов. – Москва: Просвещение, 1964. – 344 с.(Levitov N.D. O psikhicheskikh sostoyaniyakh cheloveka / N.D. Levitov. – Moskva: Prosveshcheniye, 1964. – 344 s. )
Ломов Б.Ф. Методологические и теоретические проблемы психологии. – М.: Наука, 1984. – 444 с.(Lomov B.F. Metodologicheskiye i teoreticheskiye problemy psikhologii. – M.: Nauka, 1984. – 444 s. )
Мясищев В.Н. Личность и неврозы. – Л., 1960.(Myasishchev V.N. Lichnost' i nevrozy. – L., 1960. )
Пилюгина Е.Р., Сулейманов Р.Ф. Методика измерения психологической защиты // Экспериментальная психология. 2020. Том 13. № 2. С. 194–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2020130213 (Pilyugina Ye.R., Suleymanov R.F. Metodika izmereniya psikhologicheskoy zashchity // Eksperimental'naya psikhologiya. 2020. Tom 13. № 2. S. 194–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2020130213 )
Распопин Е.В. Методы изучения и оценки психических состояний // Известия Уральского федерального университета. Серия 1: Проблемы образования, науки и культуры. – 2016. – Т. 22, № 4(154). – С. 129–137.(10. Raspopin Ye.V. Metody izucheniya i otsenki psikhicheskikh sostoyaniy // Izvestiya Ural'skogo federal'nogo universiteta. Seriya 1: Problemy obrazovaniya, nauki i kul'tury. – 2016. – T. 22, № 4(154). – S. 129–137. )
Яницкий М.С., Портнова А.Г., Богомолов А.М. Психологическая адаптация: функциональные, структурные и динамические аспекты // Психология адаптации и социальная среда: современные подходы, проблемы, перспективы: коллективная монография. – М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2007. – С. 96–108.(Yanitskiy M.S., Portnova A.G., Bogomolov A.M. Psikhologicheskaya adaptatsiya: funktsional'nyye, strukturnyye i dinamicheskiye aspekty // Psikhologiya adaptatsii i sotsial'naya sreda: sovremennyye podkhody, problemy, perspektivy: kollektivnaya monografiya. – M.: Institut psikhologii RAN, 2007. – S. 96–108)
Bonanno G.A., Romero S.A., Klein S.I. (2015). The Temporal Elements of Psychological Resilience: An Integrative Framework for the Study of Individuals, Families, and Communities. Psychological Inquiry, 26(2), 139–169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2015.992677
Goral A., Feder-Bubis P., Lahad M., Galea S., O’Rourke N., Aharonson-Daniel L. (2021). Development and validation of the Continuous Traumatic Stress Response scale (CTSR) among adults exposed to ongoing security threats. PLoS ONE, 16(5): e0251724. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251724
Janoff-Bulman R. (1992). Shattered assumptions: Towards a new psychology of trauma. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kimhi S., Eshel Y., Bonanno G.A. (2020). Resilience protective and risk factors as prospective predictors of depression and anxiety symptoms following intensive terror attacks in Israel. Personality and Individual Differences, 159, 109864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109864
Masten A.S. (2007). Resilience in developing systems: Progress and promise as the fourth wave rises. Development and Psychopathology, 19(3), 921–930. doi:10.1017/S0954579407000442
Pavlova I., Krauss S., McGrath B., Cehajic-Clancy S., Bodnar I., Petrytsa P., Synytsya T., Zhara H. (2024). Individual and contextual predictors of young Ukrainian adults' subjective well-being during the Russian–Ukrainian war. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 16(3), 886–905. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12484
Schwarzer R. (2024). Stress, resilience, and coping resources in the context of war, terror, and migration. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 57, 101393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2024.101393
-
PSYCHOLOGY
A comparative analysis of family roles and values
AbstractThis study aims to identify the values in family relationships within the context of traditional and egalitarian family structures. It examines the differences between urban and rural families, focusing on role distribution, child-rearing practices, and the maintenance of family relationships․ Special attention is given to terminal and instrumental values, which shape family interactions, contribute to harmony, and influence parenting strategies. Empirical research highlights key differences in the value orientations of traditional and modern families, reflecting their adaptation to the changing social conditions. The findings reveal that traditional families emphasize preserving personal life, ensuring family well-being, and strengthening emotional bonds across generations. At the same time, egalitarian families focus on the equal distribution of responsibilities, professional self-realization, and social engagement. In contrast, rural families place greater importance on traditions, familial warmth, and values that promote family stability and strengthen intergenerational bonds. The family remains a fundamental element of the social structure, shaping individual identity, preserving cultural heritage, and contributing to societal stability. The article underscores the importance of studying family values and roles in the context of modern globalization and social transformation
ReferencesԳալստյան Մ. Վ., Օհանջանյան Ռ. Ս., Զաքարյան Թ. Զ., Հակոբյան Գ. Լ., Արդի հայ ընտանիքը փոխակերպվող հասարակությունում/ ՀՀ ԳԱԱ հնագիտության և ազգագրության ինստիտուտ,- Եր.։ «Գիտություն» հրատ., 2017, 328 էջ (. Galstyan M. V., Ohanjanyan RR. S., Zak’aryan T’. Z., Hakobyan G. L., Ardi hay yntanik’y p’vokhakerpvogh hasarakut’yunum/ HH GAA hnagitut’yan yev azgagrut’yan institut,- Yer.. «Gitut’yun» hrat., 2017, 328 ej )
Հարությունյան Ն., Ընտանիքի կիրառական հոգեբանություն։ Ուսումնամեթոդական ձեռնարկ/ Կազմող՝ Ն. Ա. Հարությունյան; Երևան,։ Հեղինակային հրատ., 2021, - 244 էջ (Harut’yunyan N., Yntanik’i kirarrakan hogebanut’yun. Usumnamet’vodakan dzerrnark/ Kazmogh, N. A. Harut’yunyan; Yerevan,. Heghinakayin hrat., 2021, - 244 ej )
Հարությունյան Ն. Ա. Ընտանիքի կայունության հոգեբանական հիմքերը։ Մենագրություն/ Ն. Ա. Հարությունյան. -Երևան։ Հեղ. հրատ., 2018. - 280 էջ (Harut’yunyan N. A. Yntanik’i kayunut’yan hogebanakan himk’ery. Menagrut’yun/ N. A. Harut’yunyan. -Yerevan. Hegh. hrat., 2018. - 280 ej )
Հովակիմյան Գ. Պ., Ազգային ավանույթների և սովորույթների հոգեբանություն (ուսումնական ձեռնարկ).- Եր.- «Քայլ Պրես», 2005.- 220 էջ (Hovakimyan G. P., Azgayin avanuyt’neri yev sovoruyt’neri hogebanut’yun (usumnakan dzerrnark).- Yer.- «K’ayl Pres», 2005.- 220 ej )
Рейгодский Д.Я. (редактор-составитель). Практическая психодиагностика. Методики и тесты. Учебное пособие. -Самара։ Издательский Дом «БАХРАХ-М», 2001 – 637-641с. (Rejgodskij D.Â. (redaktor-sostavitelʹ). Praktičeskaâ psihodiagnostika. Metodiki i testy. Učebnoe posobie. -Samara. Izdatelʹskij Dom «BAHRAH-M», 2001 – 637-641s. )
Сомкин А. А., Данилова О. А., Трансформация понятий «семья» и «брак» в современном российском обществе (https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/transformatsiya-ponyatiy-semya-i-brak-v-sovremennom-rossiyskom-obschestve/viewer) (. Somkin A. A., Danilova O. A., Transformaciâ ponâtij «semʹâ» i «brak» v sovremennom rossijskom obŝestve (https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/transformatsiya-ponyatiy-semya-i-brak-v-sovremennom-rossiyskom-obschestve/viewer)
Кабакова М. П., Психология семьи и брака Учебное пособие, Алматы «Қазақ университеті» 2014, 9-10 с. (Kabakova M. P., Psihologiâ semʹi i braka Učebnoe posobie, Almaty «Kˌazakˌ universitetí» 2014, 9-10 s. )
Шнейдер Л.Б., Семейная психология: Учебное пособие для ву¬зов. - 4-е - М.: Академический Проект; Трикста, 2008. - 768 с(Šnejder L.B., Semejnaâ psihologiâ: Učebnoe posobie dlâ vu¬zov. - 4-e - M.: Akademičeskij Proekt; Triksta, 2008. - 768 s )
Маркосян М. Отношение О молодых студентов к браку и его трудностям в годы обучения. https://geopolitika.am/dir/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2024_6_151_156.pdf(․ Markosân M. Otnošenie O molodyh studentov k braku i ego trudnostâm v gody obučeniâ. https://geopolitika.am/dir/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2024_6_151_156.pdf)
-
PSYCHOLOGY
The impact of maternal-infant attachment style on infant sleep regulation
AbstractThis article explores the fundamental manifestations of maternal-infant emotional attachment in the postpartum period and their correlation with the characteristics of infant sleep.
Drawing upon established attachment theories, the study highlights the depth and quality of the mother-infant bond, emphasizing its role in shaping the child’s ability to regulate sleep.
The analysis underscores that behavioral sleep disturbances are not contingent upon birth order, age, gender, or the family’s socio-economic status. Rather, they are inherent to the child’s natural developmental trajectory. The author posits that sleep disturbances should not be viewed solely as physiological phenomena but as reflections of the child’s emotional and psychological well-being.
Furthermore, sleep constitutes an essential component of the vital instinct that safeguards the infant from the overwhelming stimuli of the external world, which may otherwise inundate the immature and unprepared psyche of the newborn.
Achieving optimal and high-quality sleep necessitates the integration of psychological physiological, and environmental factors, with maternal emotional responsiveness playing a pivotal role in this equilibrium.
In high of this, the article presents a pilot study investigating the relationship between maternal-infant attachment style and the methods employed for sleep regulation, providing empirical insights into this intricate dynamic.
ReferencesБехтерев В. «Пиктограмма» как метод изучения личности в норме и при некоторых нервно-психических заболеваниях, Ленинград 1984, 26 էջ (Bekhterev V. «Piktogramma» kak metod izucheniya lichnosti v norme i pri nekotorykh nervno-psikhicheskikh zabolevaniyakh, Leningrad 1984, 26 ēǰ).
Винникот Д. Маленькие дети и их матери, Москва 2013, 78 էջ (Vinnikot D. Malen'kiye deti i ikh materi, Moskva 2013, 78 ēǰ).
Винникот Д. От педиатрии к психоанализу, Москва 2019, 520 էջ (Vinnikot D. Ot pediatrii k psikhoanalizu, Moskva 2019, 520 ēǰ).
Клайн М. Зависть и благвдарность, Москва 2001, 100 էջ (Klayn M. Zavist' i blagvdarnost', Moskva 2001, 100 ēǰ).
Марилауни К. Жизнь растений 1-ый том, СПб. 1903, 765 էջ (Marilauni K. Zhizn' rasteniy 1-yy tom, SPb. 1903, 765 ēǰ).
Пентли Э. Как уложить ребенка спать без слез, Минск, 2014, 240 էջ (Pentli E. Kak ulozhit' rebenka spat' bez slez, Minsk, 2014, 240 ēǰ).
Фюнгерова М. Наш ребенок, Прага 1958, 417 էջ (Fyungerova M. Nash rebenok, Praga 1958, 417 ēǰ).
Юнг К․ О природе психе, Москва, Ваклер 2002, 412 էջ (Yung K․ O prirode psikhe, Moskva, Vakler 2002, 412 ēǰ).
Ainsworth M․ Patterns of Attachment, 1978 New Jersey, 409 p.
Bowlby J․ Attachment and Loss, Volume 1, 1971 England, 480 p.
Freud S. Zur Einführung des Narzißmus, 1924, Wien, 35 p.
Hartmann H․ Ego psychology and the problem of adaptation, NY 1958, 121 p.
Weissbluth M․ Healthy sleep habits, happy child, 1987 NY, 432 p.
Winnicott D․ The child, the family, and the outside world, 1964 USA, 240 p.
-
PSYCHOLOGY
The role of organizational communication in the trust-building process in the organization (on the example of the RA labor market)
AbstractIn today's fast-changing labor market, creating an atmosphere of trust within an organization is crucial for its stability and success. Trust serves as a foundation in the relationship between employees and the organization, gaining even more importance during times of crisis. Examining the role of organizational communication and other influential factors in building trust will enable HR professionals and leadership teams to direct resources to ensure a high level of trust within the organization. This is especially important in the rapidly changing environment, where ensuring high organizational performance and employee engagement are among organizations' key challenges.
This research aims to study the role of organizational communication in the process of building trust in the organization, as well as to identify the key factors that influence trust formation. It is assumed that in organizations where employees rate the quality of communication high, trust in the organization is also at a higher level. The survey method was used to conduct the research.
According to the research results, there is a positive correlation between trust in the organization and the level of communication within the organization (r=0.72). In the process of employees' trust in the organization, the most important factors are leadership honesty, a healthy and positive work environment, transparency, and leadership support.
ReferencesZak P. J.(2017), The Neuroscience of Trust, Harvard Business Review, pp. 84-90 /https://hbr.org/2017/01/the-neuroscience-of-trust?registration=success /
Pirson M. A., Malhotra D.(2011), Foundations of Organizational Trust. What Matters to Different Stakeholders? , Organizational Science
Mayer R C., Davis J. H., Schoorman F. D.(1995), “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust”, The Academy of Management Review, vol 20, No. 3, pp. 709-734 / https://www.jstor.org/stable/258792 / (DOI: 10.2307/258792.)
McEvily B., Tortoriello M.(2011), “Measuring trust in organizational research: Review and recommendations”, Journal of Trust Research, 1: 1, 23-63
Delahaye P. K.(2003), Guideline for Measuring Trust in Organizations, Institute for Public Relations
Kulpers S., Wolbers J.(2021), Organizational and Institutional Crisis management, https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1611 / (DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1611.)
Мелконян Н., Асриян Э.(2021), Управление коммуникациями в условиях кризиса, ЕреванскийГосударственный Университет, УДК 316.6..( Melkonyan N., Asriyan E.(2021), Upravleniye kommunikatsiyami v usloviyakh krizisa, YerevanskiyGosudarstvennyy Universitet, UDK 316.6.
