The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the New Path of Law

Authors

  • Taron Simonyan Yerevan State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU:C/2023.14.2.021

Keywords:

industrial revolutions, accelerating changes, artificial intelligence, LegalTech, transformation in legal practice, transformation in teaching law, transformation in perception of law

Abstract

The contemporary accelerating changes in technology lead to drastic
transformations in economy, social and political structures, as well as legal practice and
the very essence of law. The present research is a try to bring to the light the evolution
of industrial revolutions and realize the transformations and developments of law and
legal practice throughout the First, Second, Third and Fourth Industrial Revolutions.
Taking into account the consequences of the previous industrial revolutions and
the ongoing nature of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, the research defines some
general developments / paths in the law, especially the transformations in legal practice
(Practical Perspective); transformations in teaching law (Educational Perspective) and
transformation in the essence and perception of law itself (Theoretical Perspective).
Based on the research two possible social structures, with economic, political and
legal order, have been proposed: negative and positive.

Author Biography

Taron Simonyan, Yerevan State University

Candidate of Law, Associate Professor at YSU Chair of Theory and History of State and Law

References

One of several changes in size, amount, quality, etc. that happen frequently, especially from one extreme to another. - https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/fluctuation

There are certain locations in parameter space, however, where changes are explosive. The system crosses over an invisible boundary and the landscape of attractors alters dramatically. Such changes are called bifurcations. - Russ Marion, The Edge of Organization, Chaos and Complexity Theories of Formal Social Systems, Sage Publications, 1999, p. 20.

Alvin Toffler, The Third Wave, Bantam Books, 1989.

Klaus Schwab, The Fourth Industrial Revolution, World Economic Forum, Geneva, 2016, https://law.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/3385454/Schwab-The_Fourth_Industrial_Revolution_Klaus_S.pdf

Ibid. p. 9.

Andra Le Roux-Kemp, “The Fourth Industrial Revolution and a New Policy Agenda for Undergraduate Legal Education and Training in England and Wales”, Journal of Law, Technology, and Trust, 2(1). 2021, pp. 1-35, p. 4.

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qt-uncertainty/

Chris Jay Hoofnagle, Simson L. Garfinkel, Law and Policy for Quantum Age, Cambridge University Press, 2022.

Klaus Schwab, ibid, p. 11.

E.P. Hennock, The origins of the welfare state in England and Germany, 1850–1914, Cambridge University Press, 2007, 73–85.

Loi concernant les mines, les minières et les carriers 1810; Décret contenant les dispositions de police relatives à l'exploitation des mines 1813.

Miquel Martin-Casals (ed.), The Development of Liability in relation to Technological Change, Cambridge University Press, 2010.

Sean Bottomley, The British patent system during the industrial revolution, 1700–1852, Cambridge University Press 2014.

Jonatan Bromander, Expropriation i Sverige – en rättshistorisk analys, examensarbete Juridiska institutionen Uppsala 2020.

Marc Steinberg, England’s great transformation: law, labor, and the Industrial Revolution, The University of Chicago Press, 2016.

Bruno Debaenst, “The Digital Revolution from a Legal Historical Perspective”, Law, AI and Digitalization, (ed) Katja de Vries and Mattias Dahlberg, Juridiska Fakulteten, I Uppsala, 2021, pp. 23-36, p. 24.

Klaus Schwab, ibid, p. 11.

Miloš Vec, Recht und Normierung in der Industriellen Revolution. Neue Strukturen der Normsetzung in Völkerrecht, staatlicher Gesetzgebung und gesellschaftlicher Selbstnormierung, Klostermann Vittorio 2006.

Bruno Debaenst, ibid, p. 26.

Bruno Debaenst, ibid, p. 26.

Klaus Schwab, ibid, p. 11.

Michael Haenlein & Andreas Kaplan, ‘A Brief History of Artificial Intelligence: on the Past, Present, and Future of Artificial Intelligence’ [2019] California Management Review 61(4) 5 (6).

Bruno Debaenst, ibid, p. 27.

Engr. A. K. M. Fazlul Hoque, The 4th Industrial Revolution: Impact and Challenges, Conference paper, Conference: National Conference on Electronics and Informatics jointly organized by Bangladesh Electronics Informatics Society and Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission held at Atomic Energy Centre, Dhaka, 4-5 December 2019: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337830441_4th_Industrial_Revolution-_Impact_and_Challenges

On February 23, 2022, the European Commission presented its proposal for a law on corporate sustainability obligations – the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDD). The Bundestag has passed the Act on Corporate Due Diligence Obligations in Supply Chains (July 16, 2021), which can be considered as an implementation of the EU requirements. Meanwhile, Germany has provided more detailed regulations rather than the EU act. The Law enters into force on January 1, 2023.

Francis Fukuyama, The End of History and the Last Man, Free Press, 1992, 2006.

Willem H. Gravett, Is the Dawn of the Robot Lawyer upon Us? The Fourth Indus- trial Revolution and the Future of Lawyers, 2020, 23 Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 1.

Charles Sainctelette, De la responsabilité et de la garantie (accidents de transport et de travail), Bruylant, 1884, 49.

Bruno Debaenst, ibid, p. 29-30.

Klaus Schwab, ibid, p. 12.

Engr. A. K. M. Fazlul Hoque, ibid.

Benjamin Alarie, Anthony Niblett & Albert H Yoon, ‘Law in the future’, 2016, 66 (4), University of Toronto Law 423 (424); Jerry Kaplan, Artificial Intelligence, What Everyone Needs to Know, Oxford University Press 2016.

Klaus Schwab, ibid, p. 12.

Virginia Bacay Watson, The Fourth Industrial Revolution and its Discontents: Governance, Big Tech, and the Digitization of Geopolitics, Hindsight, Insight, Foresight: Thinking about Security in the Indo-Pacific, September, 2020, pp. 37-48, p. 38.

Ravel Law. 2015a. Ravel: Data Driven Research www.ravellaw.com (accessed December 30, 2015).

Surdeanu, Mihai, Nallapati, Ramesh, Gregory, Walker, Joshua, and Manning, Christopher D., Risk analysis for intellectual property litigation, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. New York, NY: ACM, 2011, pages 116-20.

Ross Intelligence. 2015. Ross: Your Brand New Super Intelligent Attorney www.rossintelligence.com/ (accessed December 0, 2015).

Kevin D. Ashley, Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics, New Tools for Law Practice in the Digital Age, Cambridge University Press, 6th printing, 2019, p. 6.

Kevin D. Ashley, ibid, p. 8.

Michiel Fierens, Stephanie Rossello and Ellen Wauters, ‘Setting the Scene: On AI Ethics and Regulation’, in Jan De Bruyne and Cedric Vanleenhove (eds), Artificial Intelligence and the Law (Intersentia 2021), p. 49.

Jan De Bruyne and Cedric Vanleenhove (eds), Artificial Intelligence and the Law, Intersentia, 2021; Woodrow Barfield & Ugo Pagallo (ed.), Research Handbook on the Law of Artificial Intelligence, Edward Elgar Publishing 2018.

Jan De Bruyne, Elias Van Gool and Thomas Gils, ‘Tort Law Damage Caused by AI Systems’, in Jan De Bruyne and Cedric Vanleenhove (eds), Artificial Intelligence and the Law (Intersentia 2021), p. 359.

Klaus Schwab, ibid, p. 8.

Richard Susskind, Tomorrow’s lawyers. An Introduction to Your Future (second edition), Oxford University Press, 2017, p. xvii.

Bruno Debaenst, ibid, p. 32-33.

Ruth L. Okediji, Creative Markets and Copyright in the Fourth Industrial Era: Reconfiguring the Public Benefit for a Digital Trade Economy, International Center for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD), Issue Paper No. 43, 2018․

Andra Le Roux-Kemp, “The Fourth Industrial Revolution and a New Policy Agenda for Undergraduate Legal Education and Training in England and Wales”, Journal of Law, Technology, and Trust, 2(1). 2021, pp. 1-35; Taron Simonyan, “Practical Challenges of a Lawyer in XXI century: Artificial Intelligence”, Articles of the annual conference of the Faculty of Law YSU, 2018, Yerevan, pp. 35-45․

Petre Prisecaru, "Challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution," Knowledge Horizons - Economics 8, no. 1 (2016), pp. 57-62, p. 57.

The Law’s column was added by the Author.

Klaus Schwab, ibid, p. 86.

Klaus Schwab, ibid, p. 92.

Lawrence Solum B., Legal Personhood For Artificial Intelligences, 70 N.C. L. Rev. 1231, 1992, p 1231, https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr/vol70/iss4/4/ , Hatziavramidis K. S., Esq., Artificial Intelligence & The Law: Pros And Cons, 2018, p 383, https://lintar.untar.ac.id/repository/penelitian/buktipenelitian_10288001_3A220716.pdf

Cuthbert O., Saudi Arabia Becomes First Country To Grant Citizenship To A Robot, Arab News, 26 October 2017, https://www.arabnews.com/node/1183166/saudi-arabia

Cuthbertson A., Artificial Intelligence “Boy” Shibuya Mirai Becomes World's First AI Bot To Be Granted Residency, Newsweek, 6 November 2017, https://www.newsweek.com/tokyo-residency-artificial-intelligence-boy-shibuya-mirai-702382

European Parliament, Committee On Legal Affairs. Report With Recommendations To The Commission On Civil Law Rules On Robotics (2015/2103(INL)), pp. 17–18, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0005_EN.html

Gill v. Whitford, US Supreme Court, (138 S. Ct. 1916 (2017)), Rucho v. Common Cause, US Supreme Court, (139 S. Ct. 2484 (2019)), Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, US Supreme Court, (136 S. Ct. 1540 (2016)); Kraus v. Cegavske, No. 82018, 2020 Nev. Unpub. LEXIS 1043 (Nov. 3, 2020); Williams-Sonoma Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. (N.D. Cal. 3:18-cv-07548); Asif Kumandan et al. v. Google LLC (N.D. Cal. 5:19-cv-04286); Vance et al v. Amazon.com, Inc. (W.D. Wa. 2:20-cv-01084); Vance et al v. Facefirst, Inc. (C.D. Cal. 2:20-cv-06244); Vance et al v. Google LLC (N.D. Cal. 5:20-cv-04696); Vance et al v. Microsoft Corporation (W.D. Wa. 2:20-cv-01082); Janecyk v. IBM Corp. (Cook County Cir. Ct. Ill. 2020CH00833); Jordan Stein v. Clarifai, Inc. (Cook County Cir. Ct. Ill. 2020CH01810); K. et al v. Google, LLC (N.D. Cal. 5:20-cv-02257); Williams et al. v. PersonalizationMall.com LLC (N.D. Ill. 1:20-cv-00025).

Chris Jay Hoofnagle, Simson L. Garfinkel, ibid, p. 355.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-14

How to Cite

Simonyan, T. (2023). The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the New Path of Law. Bulletin of Yerevan University C: Jurisprudence, 14(2 (39), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU:C/2023.14.2.021

Issue

Section

THEORY AND HISTORY OF STATE AND LAW