Some Issues of Identifying and Ensuring the "Best Interest of the Child" in RA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU:C/2023.14.2.142Keywords:
best interests of the child, legally protected interest, subjective right, guardianship and guardianship authority, the child's right to express an opinion, child's right to be heard, protection of rightsAbstract
The principle of ensuring the protection of the best interests of the child, embedded in international and domestic legal documents, underlies the legal system for child protection. It runs like a red thread in all legal acts regulating relations with the participation of a child; it also guides the competent authorities in almost all actions involving the child and, in the documents, drawn up as a result. The European Court of Human Rights, at the same time regarding the “best interests of the child” both as a substantive right, and as a principle, and as a norm of judicial procedure, thereby shows the comprehensive and fundamental significance of the latter. Therefore, in terms of identifying and reinforcing the evaluative concept of “the best interests of the child,” it is important to develop effective training in which the “best interests of the child” will be considered as the fundamental criterion in all matters affecting the child. As a result, in the event of competition between the interests of the child and the rights of others, in all cases, the supremacy of the interests of the child will be affirmed, and even an action determined by a judicial act cannot be carried out in a way that violates the best interests of the child.
References
Малеина Н. М. ''Защита личных неимущественных прав советских граждан'', М., 1991, Знание, p. 9-10.
Теория государства и права, /Под ред. Н. И. Матузова, А. В. Малько/ - 2. изд., перераб. и доп. - М. : Юристъ, 2004, p. 209-211.
Алексеев С. С. ''Общая теория права'', М.: Проспект, 2009, p. 305.
Нечаева Л. М. ''Семейно-правовой статус несовершеннолетнпх'', //Проблемы реализации правовых норм впериод проведения судебно-правовой реформы, Тюмень, 1994, p. 140.
Ильина О. Ю. ''Проблемы интереса в семейном праве Российской Федерации'', М, Городец, 2007 p. 78.
Антокольская М. В. 'Семейное право'', Учебник, Изд. 2-е, перераб. и доп., Ibid, p. 228.
European Court of Human Rights, Case of Olsson v. Sweden (No. 2), 27.11.1992, app No (s). 13441/87. European Court of Human Rights, Case of P., C. and S. v. The United Kingdom, 16/07/2002, App. No(s). 56547/00. European Court of Human Rights, Case of W. v. The United Kingdom, 08/07/1987, Application No. 9749/82.
The UN Committee on the Rights of the Child supervises the implementation by the member states of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, ratified by RA in 1993, and of the two protocols attached to the Convention.
Otto Luchterhandt, Nora Sargsyan "Regulation of children's rights according to RA 2015 under the editorship of the Constitution", "Articles of Yerevan University. Jurisprudence", Yerevan, 2019 N 2 (29), page 31.
Katherine Hunt Federle & Danielle Gadomski ''THE CURIOUS CASE OF THE GUARDIAN AD LI¬TEM'', available at https://udayton.edu/law/_resources/documents/law_review/curious_case_of_the_guardian.pdf as of 25.04.2023.
Katherine Hunt Federle ''Children’s Rights and the Need for Protection'', Family Law, Quarterly 34(3), 2000, p. 426-427.
Katherine Hunt Federle & Danielle Gadomski ''THE CURIOUS CASE OF THE GUARDIAN AD LITEM'', Ibid.
The decision of the RA Court of Cassation dated December 02, 2016 in civil case No. SD3/0139/02/15.
The decision of the RA Court of Cassation of March 23, 2012 in civil case No. YAKD/0474/02/11.
UN Committee on the Rights of the Children, General Comment № 14 (2013).
The decision of the RA Court of Cassation of December 27, 2011 in civil case No. ARAD/0264/02/11.
Алексеев С. С. ''Общая теория права'', М., Ibid., p. 358.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Bulletin of Yerevan University
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.