Comparative analysis of positive and negative consequences of the dissemination of conspiracy theories.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU:E/2024.15.1.044Keywords:
Conspiracy Theories, Conspiracy Thinking, Cognitive Biases, Comparative Analysis, Political Narratives, Populism, Political AlienationAbstract
The article is dedicated to a comparative analysis of the assessment of socio-psychological, socio-political, and epistemological consequences stemming from the propagation of conspiracy theories. Particularly, the article demonstrates that, despite the prevalent negative reputation attached to the dissemination of conspiracy theories within academic circles of the humanities and social sciences, their ramifications cannot be unequivocally categorized as negative phenomena. The article draws upon interdisciplinary empirical and theoretical research findings concerning the issue, encompassing socio-psychological, socio-political, and epistemological consequences of conspiracy theory dissemination. Negative consequences outlined include deepening public distrust in political institutions, threats to democracy, rejection of scientific knowledge, and manifestations of socio-psychological vulnerability. Conversely, positive consequences are identified as heightened political transparency and accountability, the revelation of actual conspiracies and cognitive adaptation within the individual’s worldview. The comparative analysis concludes that initially, the negative consequences of conspiracy theory dissemination outweigh the positive ones; however, the positive consequences exhibit short-term effects while the negative consequences have long-term implications. The findings of the article hold relevance for humanitarian and social researches, in shaping state and public policy development.
References
Բաբաջանյան Լ․, Դավադրապաշտական տեսությունների տարածման սոցիալ-քաղաքական սպառնալիքները, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xVDeUlmsJo&ab_channel=%3A%D4%B2%D5%B8%D6%82%D5%B6TV, :Բուն TV, հղումը հասանելի է 17․02․2024։
Բաբաջանյան Լ․, Պոպուլիզմի և դավադրապաշտական տեսության գաղափարական բաղադրիչները, Բանբեր Երևանի համալսարանի․ Փիլիսոփայություն, Հոգեբանություն, 2021, № 2, էջ 31-43։
Բաբաջանյան Լ․, Պոպուլիստական դավադրապաշտական տեսությունների տարածման քաղաքական սպառնալիքները, Բանբեր Երևանի համալսարանի․ Միջազգային հարաբերություններ, Քաղաքագիտություն, 2022, № 1, էջ 61-73։
Բաբաջանյան Լ․, Why are Spreading Deceptive Political Conspiracy Theories Ethically Wrong?, «Բանբեր Երևանի համալսարանի․ Փիլիսոփայություն, Հոգեբանություն», Երևան, 2023, No 2., էջ 31-32։
Apophenia, Carroll R.T., The Skeptic’s Dictionary, https://skepdic.com/apophenia.html, հղումը հասանելի է 17․02․2024։
Bale, J. M., Political Paranoia v. Political Realism: On Distinguishing Between Bogus Conspiracy Theories and Genuine Conspiratorial Politics, Patterns of Prejudice, 2007, 41(1), էջ 45–60։
Bergmann E., Butter M., Conspiracy Theory and Populism, Consequences of Conspiracy Theories, «Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories» (խմբ․ Butter M. and Knight P.), Routledge, 2020, էջ 334-337։
Butler, L.D., Koopman, C. and Zimbardo, P.G., The psychological impact of viewing the film “JFK”: emotions, beliefs, and political behavioral intentions, Political Psychology, 1995, 16 (2), էջ 237-257։
Cassam Q., Vice Epistemology, The Monist, 2016, 99,
Coady D., Are Conspiracy Theorists Irrational? Episteme, Volume 4, Issue 02, 2007,
Coady D., Conspiracy Theory as Heresy, Educational Philosophy and Theory, Routledge, 2021, էջ 756-759:
Coady D., Cass Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule on Conspiracy Theories, Argumenta 3․2, 2018,
Grimes, D.R., On the viability of conspiratorial beliefs, PloS One, 11(1), 2016: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0151003 - հղումը հասանելի է 17․02․2023
Imhoff R․, Lamberty P․, Too special to be duped: need for uniqueness motivates conspiracy beliefs, European Journal of Social Psychology, 2017, էջ 724–734։
Jolley D., Mari S., Douglas K. M., Consequences of Conspiracy Theories, «Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories» գրքում (խմբ․՝ Butter M., Knight P.), Routledge, 2020, էջ 231-242։
Jolley, D., Meleady R., Douglas, K.M., Exposure to intergroup conspiracy theories promotes prejudice which spreads across groups’, British Journal of Psychology, 2019, էջ 17-35։
Jolley D., Douglas K.M., The social consequences of conspiracism: exposure to conspiracy theories decrease intentions to engage in politics and to reduce one’s carbon footprint, BJP, 105 (1), 2014, էջ 35-36:
Krekó, P., Countering Conspiracy Theories and Misinformation, խմբ․ Butter, M., Knight, P., «Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories» գրքում, London: Routledge, 2020, էջ 242-256։
Raikka J., Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories: An Introduction, Argumenta 3․2, 2018, էջ 5-6։
Van Prooijen J․-W․, Douglas K․M․, Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations, Memory Studies, 2017, Vol. 10 (3), էջ 323–333։
Van Prooijen J.-W., Psychological benefits of believing conspiracy theories, Current Opinion in Psychology, Elsevier, 2022, 47:101352:
Uscinski J.E., Parent J.M., American Conspiracy Theories, Oxford University Press, New York, 2014, էջ 32։
Uscinski, J. E., Parent, J., Torres, B., Conspiracy theories are for losers, APSA 2011 Annual Meeting Paper, 2011 https://ssrn.com/abstract=1901755 , հղումը հասանելի է 17․02․2024։
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Bulletin of Yerevan University
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.