Balancing Carbon, Costs, and Communities: A Novel Decision Support Framework for Urban Forest Management

Authors

  • Marco di Cristofaro

    Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest systems, Tuscia University, Viterbo, Italy
    Author
  • Federico V. Moresi

    Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest systems, Tuscia University, Viterbo, Italy
    Author
  • Mauro Maesano

    Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest systems, Tuscia University, Viterbo, Italy
    Author
  • Bruno Lasserre

    Dipartimento di Bioscienze e Territorio, Università degli Studi del Molise, Pesche (IS), Italy
    Author
  • Giuseppe Scarascia-Mugnozza

    Biocities Facility, European Forest Institute (EFI), Rome, Italy
    Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46991/JISEES.2025.SI1.087

Keywords:

Sustainable development, Urban forests, Management strategies, Decision Support Tool, Forest model, Life Cycle perspective

Abstract

Urban forests (UF) play a key role in climate change mitigation, social well-being, and sustainable urban development. UF reduces urban heat islands, improves air quality, and enhances biodiversity. Moreover, green spaces improve mental and physical health, fostering community interaction and reducing stress. Integrating urban forests into sustainable urban planning is essential to enhance city resilience through innovative tools and strategies. This study introduces an innovative Decision Support Tool (DST) based on a multi-criteria approach, which integrates ecological (CO2 sequestration), economic (costs and revenues), and social (accessibility and inclusivity) parameters to evaluate six UF management strategies over 27 years. (Business as Usual - BaU, Yielding Scenario - YS, High Management - HM, Forest Development - FD, Social Boost- SB, and Cover Maximizing- CM). Results show that all UF strategies offset CO2 emissions within 6-7 years, with the BaU scenario increasing carbon removal capacity by 13.5%. The FD and SB scenarios achieved the best-balanced outcomes, with environmental indices of +0.45 and +0.59 and social indices of +0.49 and +0.12, respectively. However, both had negative economic indices (-0.26 for FD and -0.32 for SB), reflecting the need for substantial public investment. The CM scenario reached the highest environmental (+1) and social (+1) indices but incurred significant economic costs (economic index of -1). The YS scenario showed a positive economic index (+0.35) but negative environmental (-0.31) and social (-0.35) performances, illustrating trade-offs in passive management. This study emphasises the value of flexible decision-support frameworks to balance ecological, economic, and social goals in UF management. Future enhancements could incorporate advanced analytics and be adapted to diverse urban contexts, expanding the tool’s applicability. Overall, the DST offers actionable insights to inform sustainable urban forest policies aimed at fostering resilient and inclusive cities worldwide.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-21

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

Balancing Carbon, Costs, and Communities: A Novel Decision Support Framework for Urban Forest Management. (2025). Journal of Innovative Solutions for Eco-Environmental Sustainability, 087. https://doi.org/10.46991/JISEES.2025.SI1.087

Most read articles by the same author(s)