ABOUT SOME ISSUES OF THE ACTIVITY OF THE EAEU COURT: A COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46991/SL/2024.98.146

Keywords:

Eurasian Economic Union law, jurisdiction of EAEU, International court, Court of the European Union, provision of advisory opinion by the Court, international judicial practice

Abstract

 

Since the establishment of the Eurasian Economic Union, questions related to the activity of the court of this Union have gained great importance and there has been a need to research them, even though there are very few scientific works related to this international court in our domestic legal literature.

This article talks about the judicial activity of the Court of the EAEU and the decisions made by it, which are not the source of the Union law, comparing them with the functions of the Court of the European Union. With the help of the method of comparative legal analysis, in this article, a discussion was made about some issues of the provision of advisory opinions by the EAEU Court and the EU Court, the European Court of Human Rights, and the International Court of Justice.

In this context, a comparative legal analysis of EAEU and EU courts, including other international courts, will allow to identification of legal issues related to the status and activity of the EAEU court and offer possible options for their solutions. Moreover, such an analysis can be a guide for the contracting parties when discussing the issue of the legal status of the Court of the Union.

Author Biography

Armen Meghryan, Yerevan State University

Lecturer at the YSU chair of European and international law

 

Published

2024-05-10

Issue

Section

INTERNATIONAL LAW