More than Words: Robert Burns in Armenian Translation through Russian
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46991/TSTP/2026.SI.3.199Keywords:
Robert Burns, literary translation, indirect translation, cultural transfer, Samuil Marshak, Vahagn Davtyan, comparative translation studiesAbstract
This article examines the Russian and Armenian translations of selected poems by Robert Burns, focusing on the versions produced by Samuil Marshak and Vahagn Davtyan. Rather than evaluating the translations in terms of fidelity to the source text, the study approaches them as instances of cultural reinterpretation shaped by distinct literary traditions, historical circumstances and aesthetic values. Particular attention is paid to the role of indirect translation, as Davtyan’s Armenian versions were produced not from the Scottish originals but through Marshak’s Russian translations. Drawing on a comparative analysis of several well-known poems, including Comin thro’ the Rye, Wha is that at my Bower-door?, Song — (O Whistle, and I'll Come to Ye, My Lad), The Joyful Widower, For a' That and a' That and John Barleycorn, the article demonstrates how poetic meaning is transformed as texts move across linguistic and cultural boundaries. The analysis reveals that Burns’s poems acquire different tonal, ethical and symbolic dimensions in Russian and Armenian. Marshak’s translations tend to foreground musicality, emotional immediacy and the conventions of Russian lyric poetry, while Davtyan’s versions reinterpret Burns through Armenian cultural perceptions of memory, fate, endurance and collective experience. The study argues that translation should be understood not merely as the transfer of meaning between languages but as a process of cultural mediation and poetic recreation. In this context, the Russian and Armenian translations of Burns do not represent different degrees of accuracy but different ways of reading and reimagining the poet. The article concludes that the enduring vitality of Burns’s poetry lies in its ability to sustain multiple cultural lives while remaining recognisably its own. Translation, therefore, emerges not as a distortion of the original but as a mode of literary continuity through which poems acquire new voices, new meanings and new cultural homes.
Downloads
References
Baer, Brian James, ed. 2011. Contexts, Subtexts and Pretexts: Literary translation in Eastern Europe and Russia. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Davtyan, Vahagn, trans. 1977. Im sirte lernerum e [My Heart is in the Highlands]. Yerevan. “Sovetakan grogh” Publishing House.
Friedberg, Maurice. 1997. Literary Translation in Russia. A Cultural History. University Park, Penn.: The Pennsylvania State UP
Kaloh Vid, Natalia. 2011. Ideological Translations of Robert Burns's Poetry in Russia and in the Soviet Union. Maribor: Filozofska fakulteta, Mednarodna založba Oddelka za slovanske jezike in književnosti.
______, Natalia. 2018. “Translations of Robert Burns in the Russian Book Market: The Old and the New.” Studies in Scottish Literature 44(1): 13–20.
Kamovnikova, Natalia. 2017. “The Consciousness of Necessity: Translation of National Literatures in the Soviet Union.” Acta Slavica Estonica: Translation Strategies and State Control. IX: 52-67. Tartu.
Lefevere, André. 2017. Translation, Rewriting, and the Manipulation of Literary Fame. London & New York: Routledge
Loseff, Lev. 1984. On the Beneficence of Censorship: Aesopian Language in Modern Russian Literature. Translated by Jane Bobko. Munich: Verlag Otto Sagner.
Manukyan, Armen. 2024. “Vahagn Davtyani targmanchakan arvesti vorosh hartser [Some Questions of Vahagn Davtyan’s Translation Art].” Grakanagitakan Handes [Literary Journal] 28(1): 185–99.
Mata Buil, Ana. 2016. “Poet-Translators as Double Link in the Global Literary System.” Translation and Interpreting Studies 11(3): 398–415. https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.11.3.05mat
McCue, Kirsteen. 2012. “‘O My Luve’s Like a Red, Red Rose’: Does Burns’s Melody Really Matter?” Studies in Scottish Literature 37(1): 68–82.
Pym, Anthony. 2011. “Translation Research Terms: A Tentative Glossary for Moments of Perplexity and Dispute.” In Translation Research Projects 3, edited by Anthony Pym, 75–110. Tarragona: Intercultural Studies Group.
Burns, Robert. 1982. Stikhotvoreniya [Poems]. Compiled by I. M. Levidova. In English and Russian. Moscow: Raduga Publishers. Accessed January 20, 2026. https://imwerden.de/pdf/burns_stikhotvoreniya_poems_1982_text.pdf
Sherry, Samantha. 2015. Discourses of Regulation and Resistance: Censoring Translation in the Stalin and Khrushchev Era Soviet Union. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Smith, Jeremy J. 2007. “Copia Verborum: The Linguistic Choices of Robert Burns.” The Review of English Studies 58(233): 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/res/hgm002
Witt, Susanna. 2013. “The Shorthand of Empire: Podstrochnik Practices and the Making of Soviet Literature.” Ab Imperio 2013(3): 155–90. https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2013.0080
______. 2017. “Institutionalized Intermediates: Conceptualizing Soviet Practices of Indirect Literary Translation.” Translation Studies 10(2): 166–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781700.2017.1281157
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kristine Dadyan, Anush Sedrakyan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.









