ON CURRENT APPROACHES TO THE CONCEPT OF POLITENESS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46991/FLSP.2021.19.043Keywords:
politeness, Politeness Principle, Cooperative Principle, maxims, postulates, conventionalismAbstract
In recent decades abundant linguistic and interdisciplinary research has
focused on the study of conditions for communicative success and effectiveness.
In the light of these studies the concept of politeness has gained special
importance. It is viewed as a special communicative-pragmatic category
regulating speech behavior This article aims at studying and analysing the current
theories and approaches to the concept of politeness, focusing specifically on the
analysis of politeness principles, maxims and postulates advanced by Grice,
Leech, Goffman, Lakoff, Brown and Levinson.
Downloads
References
Brown P., Levinson S. (1978), Universals in Language Usage: Politeness
Phenomena // Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interactions. Ed.
by Goody E.N., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Brown P., Levinson S. (1987), Politeness: Some Universals in Language
Usage, Cambridge UP, 30-198.
Goffman E. (1967), On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social
interaction. In E. Goffman (Ed.), Interaction Ritual, Garden City, NY, Anchor
Books, p. 5-46.
Goffman E. (1981), Forms of Talk. – Philadelphia, p. 335.
Grice H.P. (1975), Logic and Conversation. – In: “Syntax and Semantics”, v. 3,
ed. by P. Cole and J.L. Morgan, N.Y., Academic Press, p. 45-134.
Lakoff R. (1973), The logic of politeness: or, Minding your p’s and q’s //
Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting: Chicago Linguistic Society. - #9,
Chicago, University of Chicago, p. 292-305.
Leech G.N. (1983), Principles of Pragmatics. London – N.Y., Longman, pp. 3-
Zhang Q. (1998), Fuzziness – vagueness – generality – ambiguity // Journal of
pragmatics, vol. 29, #1, p. 31.
Аллен Дж.Ф., Перро Р. (1986), Выявление коммуникативного намерения,
содержащегося в высказывании. // Новое в зарубежной лингвистике, Вып.
, М., Прогресс, с. 322-363.
Винокур Т.Г. (1993), Говорящий и слушающий. Варианты речевого
поведения. М., Наука, с. 60, 172.
Демьянников В.З. (1982), Конвенции, правила и стратегии общения
(интерпретирующий подход к аргументации). Известия АН СССР, Серия
лит-ры и языка. #4, с. 327-337.
Ермакова О.Н., Земская Е.А. (1993), К построению типологии коммуникативных неудач (на материале естественного русского диалога) // Русский
язык в его функционировании. Коммуникативно - прагматический аспект.
М., с. 20, 65.
Земская Е.А. (1994), Категория вежливости в контексте речевых действий
// Логический анализ языка: Язык речевых действий. М., Наука.
Карасик В.И. (1992), Язык социального статуса. М., Институт языкознания
РАН, Волгогр. гос. пед. институт.
Русский язык в его функционировании: коммуникативно-прагматический
аспект. √ М., 1993, с. 35, 221.
Формановская Н.И. (1982), Употребление русского речевого этикета. М.,
с.4, 201.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Gohar Hovsepyan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC). CC BY-NC allows users to copy and distribute the article, provided this is not done for commercial purposes. The users may adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material giving appropriate credit, providing a link to the license. The full details of the license are available at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
