Rethinking Ukraine's Geopolitics: The Failure of Intermediation and the Origins of War

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46991/jia.2026.2.1.048

Keywords:

Russia-Ukraine War, Ukraine, geopolitics, post-Soviet transition, buffer state, bridge state

Abstract

The Russia–Ukraine war stands as one of the most consequential geopolitical conflicts of the 21st century, raising fundamental questions about the relationship between geography, power, and conflict in the post–Cold War international order. Tensions between Russia and Western powers have intensified during the conflict, and more than three years after the outbreak of the war, its outcome remains uncertain. The paper analyzes Ukraine’s geopolitical position as a key factor shaping the origins and dynamics of the ongoing war. Particular attention is given to Ukraine’s evolving relations with Russia and with Western actors, primarily the United States and the European Union. Ukraine has long occupied a central place not only in Russia’s geopolitical and geostrategic designs, but also in Russian history and identity. Yet after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Ukraine began to develop closer political and economic ties with Western institutions, following a trajectory similar to that of several former Eastern Bloc states. This article argues that Ukraine’s geopolitical position is best understood not as a buffer, but as a failed intermediary space, in which competing integration projects (Euro-Atlantic and Russian) have eroded the conditions necessary for neutrality, transforming structural in-betweenness into a catalyst for war.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Gréta Hőhn

    PhD student of Ludovika University of Public Service, Budapest, Hungary

References

Biscop, Sven. “From Buffer to Frontier: Ukraine and the EU.” Egmont Policy Brief 298 (February 2023): 1–2. https://www.egmontinstitute.be/app/uploads/2023/02/Sven-Biscop_Policy_Brief_298.pdf.

Blaj, Laura. “Ukraine’s Independence and Its Geostrategic Impact in Eastern Europe.” Debatte: Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe 21, no. 2–3 (2013): 165–81.

Brzezinski, Zbigniew. “Russia Needs to Be Offered a ‘Finland Option’ for Ukraine.” Financial Times, February 23, 2014. https://www.ft.com/content/e855408c-9bf6-11e3-afe3-00144feab7de.

Brzezinski, Zbigniew. The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives. New York: Basic Books, 1997.

Ciaramella, Eric, and Eric Green. “Ukraine, NATO, and War Termination.” Council on Foreign Relations, 2025. https://www.cfr.org/report/ukraine-nato-and-war-termination.

Economist, The. “What Is ‘Finlandisation’?” February 11, 2022. https://www.economist.com/the-economist-explains/2022/02/11/what-is-finlandisation.

EmperorTigerstar. “The History of Ukraine: Every Year.” YouTube video, April 24, 2022. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-b5w5qc_VY.

Fekete, Rita. “What Is the Geopolitical Cause of the Russia–Ukraine War? – Ágnes Bernek.” YouTube video, July 20, 2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3gF66_h7y4. In Hungarian: [Rita Fekete. “Mi az orosz-ukrán háború geopolitikai oka? - Bernek Ágnes.” YouTube video, July 20, 2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3gF66_h7y4.]

Fiveable. “Satellite States - (Honors World History) - Vocab, Definition, Explanations.” https://library.fiveable.me/key-terms/hs-honors-world-history/satellite-states.

Haushofer, Karl. Geopolitics of the Pan-Ideas. Berlin: Zentral-Verlag, 1931. In German: [Karl Haushofer. Geopolitik der Pan-Ideen. Berlin: Zentral-Verlag, 1931.]

Jójárt, Krisztián. “Russia’s Security Perception of NATO.” In NATO Today, edited by Zoltán Szenes, 78–80. Budapest: Zrínyi, 2021. In Hungarian: [Jójárt Krisztián. „Oroszország biztonsági percepciója a NATO-ról.” In A mai NATO, szerk. Szenes Zoltán, 78–80. Budapest: Zrínyi Kiadó, 2021.]

JPMorganChase Center for Geopolitics. “The Russia–Ukraine Endgame and the Future of Europe.” May 2025. https://www.jpmorganchase.com/content/dam/jpmorganchase/documents/center-for-geopolitics/jpmc-cfg-russia-ukraine.pdf.

Kissinger, Henry A. “How the Ukraine Crisis Ends.” Washington Post, March 5, 2014. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/henry-kissinger-to-settle-the-ukraine-crisis-start-at-the-end/2014/03/05/46dad868-a496-11e3-8466-d34c451760b9_story.html.

Klemensits, Péter. “The Role of Eurasia in Classical Geopolitical Theories.” Eurasia Center, March 4, 2021. https://eurasiacenter.hu/2021/02/17/eurazsia-szerepe-a-klasszikus-geopolitikai-elmeletekben/. In Hungarian: [Péter Klemensits. “Eurázsia szerepe a klasszikus geopolitikai elméletekben.” Eurázsia Központ, March 4, 2021. https://eurasiacenter.hu/2021/02/17/eurazsia-szerepe-a-klasszikus-geopolitikai-elmeletekben/.]

Kutcher. “The Russo-Ukrainian War and Mackinder’s Heartland Thesis.” 2024.

Mackinder, H. J. “The Geographical Pivot of History.” The Geographical Journal 23, no. 4 (1904): 421–37.

Mearsheimer, John J. “Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault: The Liberal Delusions That Provoked Putin.” Foreign Affairs 93, no. 5 (September/October 2014): 77–89.

Plokhy, Serhii. The Gates of Europe: A History of Ukraine. New York: Basic Books, 2015.

Reuters. “Kremlin Says Joining the EU Is Ukraine’s Sovereign Right.” February 18, 2025. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/kremlin-says-joining-eu-is-ukraines-sovereign-right-2025-02-18/.

Rindlisbacher, Stephan. “The Territory of Ukraine and Its History.” In Ukraine’s Many Faces: Land, People, and Culture Revisited, edited by Olena Palko and Manuel Férez Gil, 165–74. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839466643-019.

Rumer, Eugene. “Neutrality: An Alternative to Ukraine’s Membership in NATO.” Council on Foreign Relations, January 7, 2025. https://www.cfr.org/article/neutrality-alternative-ukraines-membership-nato.

Smoly, Valerii. “Specific Features of Historical Evolution.” In Ukraine in Maps, edited by Károly Kocsis, Leonid Rudenko, and Ferenc Schweitzer, 19–24. Budapest: Geographical Institute, 2008. https://hungarian-geography.hu/konyvtar/Ukraine/Ukraine_in_maps_Specific_features_of_historical_evolution.pdf.

Spykman, Nicholas John. The Geography of the Peace. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1944.

Stogiannos, Athanasios. The Genesis of Geopolitics and Friedrich Ratzel: Dismissing the Myth of the Ratzelian Geodeterminism. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2019.

Synhaievska, Daria. “Ukraine’s Political Transformation: A Journey from Independence to the Present Day.” UkraineWorld, 2024. https://ukraineworld.org/en/articles/analysis/ukraines-political-transformation.

Szilágyi, István. “Russian Geopolitical Thinking: An Overview.” Geopolitikai Szemle 1, no. 1 (2019): 9–39. In Hungarian: [István Szilágyi. “Az orosz geopolitikai gondolkodás: Áttekintés.” Geopolitikai Szemle 1, no. 1 (2019): 9–39.]

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World Population Prospects 2024: Summary of Results. New York: United Nations, 2024. https://population.un.org/wpp/assets/Files/WPP2024_Summary-of-Results.pdf.

Varga, Gergely. “The Geopolitics and Tragedy of the War in Ukraine.” Danube Institute, January 2025. https://danubeinstitute.hu/hu/kutatas/the-geopolitics-and-tragedy-of-the-war-in-ukraine.

Vynnyk, Oksana. “Professional Ethics, Medical Experts and the Famine of 1932–1933 in Soviet Ukraine.” Journal of Genocide Research 26, no. 3 (2024): 265.

Washington Post, The. “Here’s What Russia and Ukraine Have Demanded to End the War.” August 24, 2025. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2025/08/19/russia-ukraine-peace-deal-trump-putin-zelensky/.

Downloads

Published

13.07.2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Hőhn, Gréta. 2026. “Rethinking Ukraine’s Geopolitics: The Failure of Intermediation and the Origins of War”. YSU Journal of International Affairs 2 (1): 48-67. https://doi.org/10.46991/jia.2026.2.1.048.