Vol. 11 No. 2 (32) (2020)

Articles

  • Articles

    Visualization of Social Strata in Media

    Yuliana Melkumyan
    View PDF
    Abstract

    Visualization of social strata in the media space. - Visual communication is gaining in importance today. The perception of the world around us is mediated by visual images. The visual image cannot be fully expressed by verbal means; it is perceived as a whole, not sequentially. To depict social strata, their detailed definition is necessary, which would make it possible, through indices, icons and symbols, to express culturally specific codes that will create specific cognitive images for the participants in communication. Due to their ideological function, visual images justify unequal power relations in society. It turns out that visualization is an integral part of the endless semiosis of stratification processes and the formation of class identity. However, any visual image is a construct and can be deconstructed. Therefore, through visualization, it is possible to deconstruct or reconstruct the system of social stratification.

    References

    Hoopes, J. (1991) Peirce on Signs: Writings on Semiotic by Charles Sanders Peirce, University of North Carolina Press

    Mead, G.H. (1934) Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist, (C. W. Morris, Ed.), Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press (4) Symbolic Interactionism

    Hall, S. (2001) Introduction in Rose G. Visual Methodologies, Sage Publications, p. 6

    Marvasti, A. (2004) Qualitative Research in Sociology, Sage Publications, p. 67 Doi: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209700

    Rose, G. (2001) Visual Methodologies, Sage Publications, p. 70

    Hodge, R. & Kress, G. (1988) Social Semiotics. Cambridge: Polity Press

    Fyfe, G. & Law J. (1988) Picturing Power: Visual Depiction and Social Relations, London: Routledge, pp. 1-14

    Rose, G. (2001) Visual Methodologies, Sage Publications, p. 11

    Melkumyan, Yu. (2012) The Problem of Middle Class Construction in the Modern Armenian Society, Banber Yerevani Hamalsarani: Social Sciences, Economics, YSU publishing, Yerevan, p. 8

    Berger, J. (1972) Ways of Seeing, British Broadcasting Corporation, p. 10

    Hilgartner, S. (2007) Rost i upadok social'nyh problem: kontseptsiya publichnyh aren, Hilgartner, S, Bosk, Ch.L.Sotsial'nye problemy: konstruktsionistskoe prochtenie: hrestomatiya, Kazan, Kazan', pp. 145–184.

    Sorokon, P. (1992) Chelovek. Tsivilizatsiya. Obshestvo, Moscow, Izdatel'stvo politiocheskoi literatury

    Rose, G. (2001) Visual Methodologies, Sage Publications, p. 20

    Schwartzman, S. (2002) The statistical measurement of poverty, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Expert Group of Poverty Statistics

    Sindzingre, A. (1999) Values, norms and poverty: a consultation on WDR 2000/2001 poverty and development. Washington, DC: World Bank Group

    Mckay, A & Lawson, D. (2003) Assessing the extent and nature of chronic poverty in low income countries: issues and evidence, World Development Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00221-8

    Belova, L.I. (2015) Konstruirovanie obraza bednosti sovremennimi SMI (sotsiologicheskii aspekt), Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, No 5, (360). Filologiya. Iskusstvovedenie, 92, pp. 58–64

    Melkumyan, Y. (2017) Armenia’s ‘Middle Class’: Stability Characteristics and the Challenge of Erosion, Caucasus Analytical Digest, Middle Classes, N 95, 30, retrieved from: http://www.laender-analysen.de/cad/pdf/CaucasusAnalyticalDigest95.pdf

    Berger, J. (1972) Ways of Seeing, British Broadcasting Corporation, p. 11

  • Articles

    Sociology of Medicine: Gender Problems of the Competitiveness of Women Dentists

    Edita Margaryan
    View PDF
    Abstract

    Modern medicine is developing in a society in which special attention is paid to the quality of services provided, including dental services. At the same time, there are gender stereotypes that impede the full realization of the possibilities of women dentists as professionals, which directly affects the state of this field of medicine as a whole. The study of gender imbalance and the development of measures to improve the competitiveness of female dentists in the modern labor market are relevant at all stages of the organization and provision of dental services. The article reveals gender problems and stereotypes in the dental services market through a sociological survey of practicing doctors.

    References

    Levina, V.N. (2016) lichnostnye kachestva vracha v sotrudnichestve s pacientom: uchebnoe posobie, Ijevsk, p. 60

    Batyshev, A.S. (2011) Vrach plyus Pacient: filosofiya uspeha, Batyshev A.s., Batysheva T.T., Moskow, VK, p. 521

    Kurbatov, A.V., Amlaev, K.R. & Murav'ev, K.A. (2011) Sovremennoe sostoyanie problemy neravenstva v zdarov'e: ekologicheskie, gendernye, ekonomicheskie aspekty (obzor), Nauka. Innovacii. Technologii, No 74 pp. 24-30

    Sud'in, S.A. (2012) Gendernyi aspekt sociologii meditsiny i zdorov'ya, Wenshina v rossiiskom obshestve, No 4 pp. 24-31

    Kovaleva, M.D., Vargina, S.A. & Djereshtieva, M.R. (2009) Gendernye osobennosti razvitiya sovremennoi stomatologii, Sociologiya meditsiny Социология медицины, No 1, pp. 60-62;

    Narchaev, M.A., Medjidov, M.N. (2016) Optimizatsiya lechebnoi raboty vracha-stomatologa-terapevta na poliklinicheskom prieme, Vestnik Dagestanskoj meditsinskoi akademii No 1(18), pp. 71-74.

    Kovaleva, M.D. & Barkovskaya, A.Yu. (2012) Gendernaya problematika v sotsiologii meditsiny, No 2, pp. 17-18

    Makeeva, I.M., Svistunova, E.G., Margaryan E.G. & Porotsenko, A.S. (2017) Osobennosti trudovoi deyatel'nosti i vozmojnosti professional'nogo rosta vrachei-stomatologov s uchetom ih gendernyh razlichii, Stomatologiya, No 3, p 49 Doi։ https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat201796349-51

  • Articles

    The Eco-System, Barriers and Factors of Sustainable Growth Social Economy in Armenia

    Anna Malkhasyan
    View PDF
    Abstract

    Thanks to the international donor community, in recent years, the concept of social entrepreneurship has become a factor in the regulation of socio-economic and local problems in Armenia. The article examines the main trends in the development of the social economy. In particular, the author analyzes the institutional aspects and factors of the development of social entrepreneurship. On the basis of expert assessments, recommendations have been developed for a more effective development of the ecosystem of social entrepreneurship.

    References

    UN, SDG implementation voluntary national review, 2018, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/19586Armenia_VNR_2018.pdf

    Caucasus Barometer, The annual household survey about social economic issues and political attitudes (Georgia and Armenia), 2018, https://caucasusbarometer.org/en/cb2017/factsheet/.

    Save the Children, Youth-focused and gender-sensitive labor market research in Ar-menia, 2018, https://armenia.savethechildren.net/sites/armenia.savethechildren.net/files/library/ LMR%20Report_Eng.pdf

    World Bank, Work for a better future in Armenia: an analysis of jobs dynamics, 2019, http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/387401564380250230/pdf/Work-for-a-better-future-in-Armenia-An-analysis-of-jobs-dynamics.pdf

    Civil Society Organization Sustainability Index, For Central and Eastern Europe and Eurasia, 2019, https://www.fhi360.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/resource-csosi-2018-report-europe-eurasia.pdf

    The analysis presented in the article is based on market assessment results, conducted in April-May, 2020, in the framework of EU funded “Social entrepreneurship in Georgia and Armenia project”, implemented by Mercy Corps jointly with regional partners – the Association of Business Consulting Organisations of Georgia and Development Principles, Armenian NGO. In the article, only the desk review and qualitative survey results are presented. For more details see: http://www.developmentprinciples.org/news/17?fbclid=IwAR2-bFxO50QUyhV0gtTzm 7XtptfJOpou5VYquKZLvC11ZnRolhqIHIXsJ04

    European Commission, A map of social enterprises and their ecosystems in Europe, 2014, http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp

    https://www.e-draft.am/projects/1180/about

    https://www.arlis.am/DocumentView.aspx?docID=110802

    Youth entrepreneurship in eastern partnership countries: the way forward, 2018, http://eap-csf.eu/wp-content/uploads/YOUTH_ENTREPRENEURSHIP_IN_EAP_THE_WAY_FORWARD.pdf

    https://www.facebook.com/Schoolofsocialentrepreneurs/

  • Articles

    Military Sociology in Armenia: Contemporary Development and Prospects

    Armen Khachikyan
    View PDF
    Abstract

    The purpose of the article is to acquaint with the history of military sociology and the peculiarities of its development in Armenia. Military sociology, which developed in connection with the need for theoretical and applied knowledge in the military field, occupies an important place among the sociological disciplines of the middle level. It develops theoretical and methodological concepts and approaches and expands the possibilities of their use. For a better understanding of the theoretical foundations of military sociology, the scope of research and its practical significance, it is necessary to comprehensively consider the scientific environment, prerequisites and reasons for the emergence, as well as the stages of development of military sociology in the country.

    References

    Khachikyan, A. (2019). Banaky vorpes socialakan institut: ZU-i ev zintsarayuyan nkatmamb verabermunqi ev dranc heghinakutyan apahovman problemner. HH PN "Haykakan banak" razmagitakan handes, 76-89

    Atanesyan, A.V., Mkrtichyan, A.E., Avetisyan, A.R., Sahakyan, A.R., Margaryan, V.H. & Makhalkina, M,A, (2013). Banak ev hasarakutyun. Usumnakan dzernark buheri ev razmakan hastatutyunneri hamar. Yerevan, "Asoghik, 21:

    Frolov, S.S. (1994). Sociologiya. Uchebnik. Dlya vysshikh uchebnikh zavedenii. Moscow, nauka, 256

    Naumova, N.F., Sycheva, V.S. (1993). Obshestvennoe mnenie o social'nykh problemakh armii Rosii. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, No 12, 81

    Harutyunyan, L. (Ed.). (2005).Razmakan Sociologia: Usumnakan nyuteri zhoghovatsu, Yerevan, 6

    Comte, Օ. (1967). Understood as “history without the names of individuals and even without those of peoples”, 123.

    Caforio, G. & Nuciari, M. (2018). Handbook of the Sociology of the Military-Springer International Publishing, p. 5. Doi։ https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71602-2

    Qotanjyan, S. (2010). Hakamartutyan etnoqaxaqagitutyun. Hayastani razmakan qaxaqakanutyan ev azgayin anvtangutyan himunqner. HH PN D. Kanayani anv. azgayin razmavarakan hetazotutyunneri institut, Yerevan

    Moreno, J. L. (1951). Sociometry, Experimental Method and the Science of Society: An Approach to a New Political Orientation. Beacon House

    Albright, D. E. (1980). Comparative Conceptualization of Civil-Military Relations. World Politics, Vol. 32, No. 4, 553-576. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2010057

    Sarkesian, S. C. (1981). Military Professionalism and Civil-Military Relations in the West. International Political Science Review. Revue internationale de science politique, Vol.2, No. 3, Civil-Military Relations, 283-297. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/019251218100200304

    Obraztsov, I.V. (2003). Sovetskaya voennaya sociologiya: process institucionalizacii otechestvennoi voennoi sociologii. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya No 12, 66

    Margaryan, V. & Atanesyan, A. (2015). Razmavarakan pashtpanakan-anvtangayin krtutyan azgayin instituty vorpes HH PN pashtpanakan azgayin hetazotakan hamalsarani gitakrtakan baghadrich, HH PN PAHH "Haykakan banak" razmagitakan handesi havelvats, 3(35), 40-52

    Atanesyan, A. (2016). Hayastanum banaki ev zintsarayoghneri heghinakutyan apahovman himnakhndirnery "azg-banak" hayecakargayin modeli mshakman hamateqstum, HH PN PAHH "Haykakan banak" razmagitakan handes, 4(90), 121

    Gasparyan, Kh. & Khachikyan, A. (2019). HH PN N zoramasi social- hogebanakan khndirneri usumnasirutyun, Yerevan

    Caforio G. & Nuciari M. (2018). Handbook of the Sociology of the Military-Springer International Publishing, 5. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71602-2

  • Articles

    Women in the Military Sphere: Some Issues of Social Adaptationilitary Sphere

    Mariam Gevorgyan
    View PDF
    Abstract

    Since the 1970s, feminist movements and the recognition of gender equality as one of the basic human rights, as well as a number of other legal, socio-political changes in the armed forces have recorded significant structural changes that have provided the “weaker sex” with wider access to this area. The article deals with issues related to the dynamic processes of social integration of women in the army environment. Based on the analysis of a number of models of their involvement in the armed forces, the main factors influencing the stage-by-stage processes of such involvement in this specific area are presented.

    References

    Barb'eri, E. (1993). Rol' jenshchiny v obshchestve budushchego. Kur'er YUNESKO

    Grady, C. (2018). The waves of feminism, and why people keep fighting over them, explained. Retrieved from https://www.vox.com/2018/3/20/16955588/feminism-waves-explained-first-second-third-fourth

    Avetisyan, A.R. & Atanesyan, A.V. (2016). Kiny ev banaky: himnakhndirner, martahraverner ev hnaravorutyunner. Yerevan, 13-14

    Verveer, M. (1979). Women and Gender Perspectives in the Military: An International Comparison. Edited by Egnell Robert and Alam Mayesha. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1-3

    Duncanson, C. & Woodward, R.(2015). Regendering the military: Theorizing women's military participation. Security Dialogue, 4. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010615614137

    Winslow, D. (2010). Gender and Military Sociology, Swedish National Defence College, Department of Leadership and Management, 8. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8e46/220715509f02bab3e93207473d5e653ed74b.pdf

    Zeigler, S. L. & Gunderson, G. G. (2005). Women and the U.S. Military. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 6

    Goldring K., Should women serve in the combat unites, Retrieved from https://www.theper-spective.com/debates/living/women-serve-combat-units/

    Segal, M. W. (1995). Women’s Military Roles Cross-Nationality: Past, Present and Future. Gender and Society, 9 no. 6, 757–775. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/089124395009006008

    Iskra, D.M., Trainor, S.C., Leithauser, M., & Segal, M.W. (2002). Women's Participation in Armed Forces Cross-Nationally: Expanding Segal's Model. Current Sociology, 50, 771 - 797. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392102050005009

    Zavyalova, E.K. (2001). Psikhologicheskie mekhanizmy social'noi adaptacii. Vestnik Baltiiskoi pedagogicheskoi akademii. 40, St. Peterburg

    Hollingshead, A. B. (1946). Adjustment to Military Life, American Journal of Sociology. Human Behavior in Military Society. Vol. 51, No. 5, 439-447. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/219855

    Atanesyan, A.V (2012). Razmasociologiakan usumnasirutyunneri motecumnern u metodabanutyuny, Zinvorakan arajnordutyun, Yerevan, 24-31

    Neronova, O.E. (2014). Specifika adaptacii voennoslujashchikh k slujbe v armii, Vestnik Voronejskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta T 10 No3-2, 58-59

    Atanesyan A. (2014). Women in Armenian Armed Forces: self-perception and opportunities for the better recruitment and adaptation policies, Center for Gender and Leadership studies, 4-5. Retrieved from http://www.ysu.am/files/Arthur%20Atanesyan.pdf

  • Articles

    Contemporary Approaches to Sociological Reinterpretation of the Functions of Armed Forces

    Arevik Hambardzumyan
    View PDF
    Abstract

    While relatively stable, the functions of the armed forces and the ways of their implementation still undergo certain changes from time to time. This creates difficulties for their theoretical and methodological interpretation, as well as the need to rethink the concepts of the army in military sociology. The late 20th and early 21st centuries are considered by military sociologists to be a key period in terms of changing social roles, mission, functions and structure of the armed forces. The article pays special attention to theoretical approaches to their rethinking in the modern army.

    References

    Edmunds, T. (2006). What are armed forces for? The changing nature of military roles in Europe. International Affairs, 82(6), 1059․ Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2006.00588.x

    Huntington, S. (1957). The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil–Military Relations, Harvard University Press Massachusetts, Cambridge

    Janowitz, M. (1960). The professional soldier. A Social and Political Portrait, Free Press, Glencoe. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1891771

    Moskos, Ch., Williams, J. & Segal D. (2000). The Postmodern Military: Armed Forces after the Cold War, 1st Edition, Oxford University press, Oxford

    Shaw, M. (2000). The Development of “Common –Risk” Society: A theoretical Overview”, Military and Society in Twenty First Century Europe, A comparative Analysis, Transaction Publishers, 13-26. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315124490-3

    Shaw, M. (1991). Post Military Society: Militarism, Demilitarization, and War at the end of Twentieth Century, Temple University Press

    Beck, U. (1986). “Risk Society Towards a New Modernity”. SAGE publications, US, CA

    Berdal, M. (1992). Book Review: Martin Shaw, Post-Military Society: Militarism, Demilitarization and War at the End of the Twentieth Century,Cambridge: Polity Press, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 21(3), 544–546. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298920210030417

    Burk, J. (1994). The Military in New Times: Adapting Armed Forces to a Turbulent World, Westview Press, London and New York, 3-6

    Aglyan, V. (2015). Mijazgayin hierarkhik haraberutyunneri martahravernery, Noravanq, 21-rd dar, 5(63), Yerevan, 26

    Callaghan, J. & Kernic F. (2003). New missions and tasks for the Post-Modern Military. Armed Forces and International Security: Global Trends and Issues, Lit Verlag Munster, 41

    Burk, J. (1994). The Military in New Times Adapting Armed Forces to a Turbulent World, Westview Press, London and New York, 7-8

    Levy, Y. (2010). The essence of the “Market Army”, Public Administration review, 70(3), 378-389. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02152.x

    Edmunds, T. (2010). The defence dilemma in Britain, International Affairs, 86(2), 377–394. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2010.00887.x

    Gadjiev, K. (2003). Geopolitika Kavkaza. Moscow, 8

    Fjader, Ch. (2014). The nation-state, national security and resilience in the age of globalization, National Emergency Supply Agency (NESA), Helsinki, Finland, Vol. 2, No. 2, 114–129. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2014.914771

    DiIorio, J. (1992). Feminism and war: Theoretical issues and debates. Reference Services Review, 20(2), 1992, 51–68. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb049153

    Jaquette, J. (2003). Feminism and the Challenges of the “Post-Cold War” World. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 5(3), 331–354. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461674032000122704

    Nye, J. (2017). Soft power: the origins and political progress of a concept. Palgrave Communications, 2. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.8

  • Articles

    Mass Communications: From Classics to the Virtual Models

    Anrieta Karaperyan
    View PDF
    Abstract

    The article is devoted to the widespread use of mass communications and their virtual models, features and limitations, as well as the comparison of virtual and classical models. To study virtual communications, it is not enough to describe the corresponding processes within the framework of classical models, as well as the communication elements included in them. In order to fully describe modern communication processes, it is proposed to supplement the classical models with such elements as feedback, perception and self-presentation of the user, as well as the virtual communication space.

    References

    Nastasia, D. & Rakow, L. (2005). What is communication? Unsettling a priori and a posteriori approach, The International Communication Association, Philosophy of Communication Division, 4-10

    Santandreu, R. J., Shurden, S. & Shurden, M. (2011). The complexity of communication, Journal of Case Studies in Education, Lander University, 2. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ EJ1057194.pdf, p. 5-8.

    Atanesyan, A.V. (2008). Aktual'nye problemy sovremennykh politicheskikh i konfliktnykh kommunikacii. Yerevan. Izd.-vo EGU, 9-15

    Relvin, R. (2012). Cognition: Theory and Practice, Hardcover – International Edition, 20-30

    Broadbent, D. E. (2011). Perception and communication, Applied Psychology, Unit of the Medical Research Council, Cambridge, National Federation of the Blind (NFB), 10-11

    Amodu, L. O. (2006). Perception: A Determinant for Effective Communication, An African Journal of Philosophy, 9 (1), 148-153. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4314/sophia.v9i1.38774

    Pochepcov, G.G. (2001). Teoriya kommunikacii. Moscow, Refl-buk, 40-48

    Kulczycki, E. (2014). Communication History and Its Research Subject, Adam Mickiewicz University, 133

    Adhikary, N․ M․ (2008). The Sadharanikaran Model, and Aristotle's Model of Communication: A Comparative Study, Vol. 2, No. 1, Serial No. 2, 75. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3126/bodhi.v2i1.2877

    Lasswel, H. (1948). Structure and Function of Communication in Society, (ed. by J. Bryson. The Communication of Ideas), N.Y. 30-35

    Fedaghi, S. A. (2012). A Conceptual Foundation for the Shannon-Weaver Model of Communication, computer Engineering Department Kuwait University, International Journal of Soft Computing, 18-25

    Schramm, W․ (1963). The Science of Human Communication, Basic Books, Inc., New York, 40-45

    Kent, G. (1967). Graphic conceptual models and communication theory, Boston University, 18-30

    Lacy, S. (1989). The Westley-MacLean Model Revised: An Extension of a Conceptual Model for Communication Research, School of Journalism, Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan, 20-24

    Lakkaraju, K., Sukthankar, G. & Wigand R. T. (2018). Social Interactions in Virtual Worlds: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Cambridge University Press, 13-18. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316422823

    Sparso, J. (2004). On Synchronous and Asynchronous Communication Paradigms, Technical University of Denmark, 30-40

    Kumar, K. A., Natarajan, S. & Acharaya, B. (2017). Computer-mediated communication: A path-way to analyze social media communication trajectories, serials publications, 197-199

    Innis, R. E.(2011). Signs of feeling: Susanne Langer's aesthetic model of minding, University of Massachusetts Lowel, PA 29, 50-52

    Brindha, K. & Hanyu Yan, K. (2017). Virtual Reality as a Communication Process: User Perceptions and Experiences, Sweden, Linnaeus university, 60-65

    Lacy, S. (1989). The Westley-MacLean Model Revised: An Extension of a Conceptual Model for Communication Research, School of Journalism, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, 20-24

    Reicher, S. D., Spears, R.& Postmes, T. (1995). A Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Phenomena, University of Amsterdam, European Review of Social Psychology, 162-168. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779443000049

    Walther, J.B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyper-sonal interaction, University of California, Santa Barbara, 28-35

    Spitzberg, B.H. (2000). A Model of Intercultural Communication Competence, WR Cupach SAGE Publications, Incorporated, 375-387

    Spitzberg, B.H. (2006). Preliminary development of a model and measure of computer-mediated communication (CMC) competence, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11 (2), 629-666. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00030.x

    Marchand, P. (1998). Marshall McLuhan: The Medium and the Messenger, The MIT Press, 111-121

    Bubas, G. (2006). Competence in Computer-Mediated Communication: An Evaluation and Potential Uses of a Self-Assessment Measure, International Communication Association Conference, Dresden, Germany, 5-15

  • Articles

    Social Problems in Post-Divorced Single-Parent Families

    Galina Kantemirova
    View PDF
    Abstract

    The article examines the influence of divorce on various factors in the life of family members. The works of foreign researchers devoted to environmental factors that affect the likelihood of divorce are analyzed. An assessment of the differences between children from complete and incomplete families is given.

    References

    Phillips, R. (1988). Putting asunder: A history of divorce in Western society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Amato, P. R. & Irving S. (2006). Historical trends in divorce in the United States (M. A. Fine, J. H. Harvey (Eds.), Handbook of divorce and relationship dissolution. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 41–57.

    Bramlett, M. D. (2002). Mosher, W. D., Cohabitation, marriage, divorce, and remarriage in the United States. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/e305022003-001

    Kreider, R. M. et al. (2002). Number, Timing, and Duration of Marriages and Divorces. US. Census Bureau

    Peterson, R.A. (1996). Re-evaluation of the economic consequences of divorce. American Sociological Review, N.61, 528–536. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2096363

    Christakis, N.A. & Fowler, J.H. (2013). Social Contagion Theory: Examining Dynamic Social Networks and Human Behavior. Stat. Med, N. 32(4), 556–577. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.5408

    Ackerman, C. (1963). Affiliations: Structural Determinants of Differential Divorce Rates, American Journal of Sociology, N. 69, 13–20. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/223506

    Treas, J. & Giesen, D. (2000). Sexual Infidelity among Married and Cohabiting Americans, Journal of Marriage and the Family, N.62, 48–60. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00048.x

    Booth, A & Edwards, J (1991). Johnson D., Social Integration and Divorce, Social Forces, N. 70, 207–224. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2580069

    Waite, L. & Lillard L. (1991). Children and Marital Disruption, American Journal of Sociology, N.96 (4), 930–953. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/229613

    Heaton, T. (1990). Marital stability throughout the child rearing years, Demography, N.27, 55. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2061552

    Feng, D. et al (1999). Intergenerational Transmission of Marital Quality and Marital Instability, Journal of Marriage and the Family, N.61, 451–463. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/353761

    Bumpass, L., Martin R. & Sweet J. (1991). The impact of family background and early marital factors on marital disruption, Journal of Family Issues, N.12, 22–42. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/019251391012001003

    Thornton, A. (1991). Influence of the marital history of parents on the marital and cohabitation experiences of children, American Journal of Sociology, N. 96, 868 - 894. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/229611

    Goldscheider, E. & Waite, L. (1991). New families, no families: the transformation of the American home, Berkeley, University of California Press

    Keith, V. & Finlay, B. (1988). The impact of parental divorce on children's educational attainment, marital timing, and likelihood of divorce, Journal of Marriage and the Family, N.50, 707–809. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/352648

    Teachman, J. (2002). Stability Across Cohorts in Divorce Risk Factors, Demography, N.39, 331–351. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2002.0019

    Lehrer, E. (1993). Chiswick, C., Religion as a Determinant of Marital Stability, Demography, N.30, 385–404. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2061647

    McDermott, R. et al (2013). Breaking Up is Hard to Do Unless Everyone Else is Doing It Too: Social Network Effects on Divorce in a Longitudinal Sample, Soc. Forces, N. 92(2), 491-519. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sot096

    Pryor, J. & Rogers, B. (2001). Children in changing families: Life after parental separation, Boston: Blackwell

    Amato, P.R. (1999). Children of divorced parents as young adults. (Hetherington E.M., ed.), Coping with divorce single parenting and remarriage: A risk and resiliency perspective, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1999, 147–163

    Fine, M.A. & Harvey, J.H., (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of divorce and relationship dissolution, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

    Schleider, J.L. & Weisz, J.R. (2013). Relation Between Parent Psychiatric Symptoms and Youth Problems: Moderation through Family Structure and Youth Gender, Child. Psychol, N. 42, 195-204. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-013-9780-6

    Scarr, S. & McCartney, K. (1983). How people make their own environments: A theory of genotype environment effects, Child Development, N.54, 424-435. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1983.tb03884.x

    D’Onofrio, B.M. et al. (2005). A genetically informed study of marital instability and its association with offspring psychopathology, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, N.114, 570–586. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.114.4.570

    Gottesman, I.I. & Gould, T.D. (2003). The endo phenotype concept in psychiatry: Etymology and strategic intentions, American Journal of Psychiatry, N.160, 636–645. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.160.4.636

    Karney, B.R. & Bradbury, T.N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research, Psychological Bulletin, N.118, 3–34. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3

    Emery, R.E. (1999). Marriage, Divorce, and children’s adjustment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

    Rhee, S.H. & Waldman, I.D. (2002). Genetic and environmental influences on antisocial behavior: A metaanalysis of twin and adoption studies. Psychological Bulletin, N.128, 490–529. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.3.490

    Jockin, V., McGue, M. & Lykken, D.T. (1996). Personality and divorce: A genetic analysis, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, N. 71, 288–299. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.288

    Rutter M., et al. (2001). Testing hypotheses on specific environmental causal effects on behavior, Psychological Bulletin, N 127, 291–324. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.291

    Booth, A., Carver, K. (2000). Granger, D.A., Biosocial perspectives on the family, Journal of Marriage and the Family, N 62, 1018–1034. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01018.x

    Collins, W.A. et al.(2000). Contemporary research on parenting: The case for nature and nurture, American Psychologist, N.55, 218–232. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.2.218

    Rodgers, J., Cleveland, H., Van Den Oord, E. & Rowe, D. (2000). Resolving the debate over birth order, family size, and intelligence, American Psychologist, N.55, 599–612. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.6.599

    Teachman, J. (2003). Premarital sex, premarital cohabitation, and the risk of subsequent marital dissolution among women, Journal of Marriage and Family, V. 65, 444–455. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00444.x

    Sweeney, M. M. & Phillips, J. A. (2004). Understanding racial differences in marital disruption: Recent trends and explanations, Journal of Marriage and Family, V. 66, 639–650. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00043.x

    Bramlett, M. D. & Mosher, W. D. (2002). Cohabitation, marriage, divorce, and remarriage in the United States. Vital and Health Statistics, Series 23. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/e305022003-001

    Bratter, J. & King, R. B. (2008). But will it last. Marital instability among interracial and same race couples, Family Relations, V. 57, 160–171. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2008.00491.x

    Amato, P. R. & DeBoer, D. (2001). The intergenerational transmission of marital instability across generations: Relationship skills of commitment to marriage? Journal of Marriage and Family, V. 63, 1038–1051. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.01038.x

    Brown, S. L. (2004). Moving from cohabitation to marriage: Effects on relationship quality, Social Science Research, V. 33, 1–19. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0049-089X(03)00036-X

    Tach, L. & Halpern Meekin, S. (2009). How does premarital cohabitation affect trajectories of marital quality? Journal of Marriage and Family, V. 71, 298–317. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00600.x

    Stanley, S. M., Rhoades, G. K. & Markman H. J. (2006). Sliding versus deciding: Inertia and the premarital cohabitation effect, Family Relations, V. 55, 499–510. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00418.x

    Frisco, M. L. & Williams, K. (2003). Perceived housework equity, marital happiness, and divorce in dual earner households, Journal of Family Issues, V. 24, 51–73. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X02238520

    Amato, P. R., Booth, A., Johnson, D. R. & Rogers, S. J. (2007). Alone together: How marriage in America is changing, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674020184

    Schoen, R., Astone, N. M., Rothert, K., Standish, N. J. & Kim, Y. J. (2002). Women's employment, marital happiness, and divorce, Social Forces, 81, 643–662. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2003.0019

    Lawrence, E. & Bradbury, T. N. (2001). Physical aggression and marital dysfunction: A longitudinal analysis, Journal of Family Psychology, V. 15, 135–154. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.15.1.135

    DeMaris, A. (2000). Till discord do us part: The role of physical and verbal conflict in union disruption, Journal of Marriage and the Family, V. 62, 683–692. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00683.x

    Previti, D. & Amato, P. R. (2004). Is infidelity a cause or a consequence of poor marital quality? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, V. 21, 217–230. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407504041384

    Hall, J. H. & Fincham, F.D. (2006). Relationship dissolution after infidelity, M. Fine, J. Harvey (Eds.), Handbook of divorce and relationship dissolution, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 153–168

    Clements, M. L., Stanley, S. M. & Markman, H. J. (2004). Before they said, “I do”: Discriminating among marital outcomes over 13 years, Journal of Marriage and Family, V. 66, 613–626. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00041.x

    Gottman, J. M. & Levenson, R. W. (2000). The timing of divorce: Predicting when a couple will divorce over a 14 year period, Journal of Marriage and the Family, V. 62, 737–745. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00737.x

    Bradbury, T.N., Karney, B. R. (2004). Understanding and altering the longitudinal course of the marriage, Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 862–879. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00059.x

    Fincham, F. D., Stanley, S. M. & Beach, S. R. (2007). Transformative processes in marriage: An analysis of emerging trends. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 275–293. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00362.x

    Amato, P. R. & Hohmann Marriott, B. (2007). A comparison of high and low distress marriages that end in divorce, Journal of Marriage and Family, V. 69, 621–638. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00396.x