Assessment of the shadow economy and tax evasion in RA

Authors

  • Ani Khalatyan Yerevan State University
  • Grigor Hakobyan Department of revenue assessment and analysis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU:G/2024.15.1.069

Keywords:

shadow economy , tax evasion , currency demand approach , distributed autogression model , long-term effects

Abstract

This article aimed to assess the shadow economy and tax evasion in Armenia based on the indirect method of Currency Demand Approach (CDA). As the macroeconomic indicators in our analysis are not stationary at the same degree, we have used the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) models and the results of the co-integration test showed that there is a co-integration between the model variables, therefore it is possible to use the CDA.

In the model have been used monthly data during the 2013-2023 period. We can conclude that the CDA method can be considered to be an appropriate method for measuring the shadow economy and tax evasion in the RA’s economy. The results of the research show that during the observed years the level of the shadow economy and tax evasion are decreasing, which means that government is increasingly recognizes the importance to constrain the shadow economy given its connection to issues such as loss of tax revenues.

Author Biographies

Ani Khalatyan, Yerevan State University

PhD, Lecturer, Department of Mathematical Modeling in Economics, YSU

Grigor Hakobyan, Department of revenue assessment and analysis

Chief tax adviser, Department of revenue assessment and analysis

References

Amoh J., Babonyire A., (2019), “An estimation of the underground economy and tax evasion Empirical analysis from an emerging economy.”, Journal of Money Laundering Control Vol.22, No.4, pp. 626-645.

Cagan, P. (1958), “The demand for currency relative to the total money supply.”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol.66, No.4, pp.302-328.

Eilat Y., Zinnes C., (2000), “The Evolution of the Shadow Economy in Transition Countries: Consequences for Economic Growth and Donor Assistance.”, CAER II Discussion Paper No. 83, 70p.

Eilat Y., Zinnes C., (2002), “The Shadow Economy in Transition Countries: Friend or Foe? A Policy Perspective, World Development, 30 (7), pp. 1233-1254.

Frey B., Weck-Hanneman H., (1983), “Estimating the Shadow Economy: A ‘Naive’ Approach.”, Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 35, pp. 23-44.

Frey B., Weck-Hanneman H., (1984), “The hidden economy as an “unobserved” variable.”, European Economic Review, 26/1, pp.33-53.

“LUYS” foundation., (2020), “Estimating the size of the shadow economy of the RA from the perspective of the tax system.”, 50 p.

Medina L, Schneider F., (2021), “The Evolution of Shadow Economies through the 21st Century.”, IMF library pp 11-70.

Nkoro E., Aham U., (2016), “Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) cointegration technique: application and interpretation”, Journal of Statistical and Econometric Methods, Vol.5, No.4, pp 63-91.

Schneider F., Buebn A., & Montenegro C., (2010), “Shadow Economies All over the World New Estimates for 162 Countries from 1999 to 2007”., Policy Research Working Paper 5356., The World Bank Development Research Group Poverty and Inequality Team & Europe and Central Asia Region Human Development Economics Unit.,52p.

Tanzi V., (1980), “The underground economy in the United States: estimates and implications.”, Banca National eel Lavor Quarterly Review, Vol.135, pp.427-453.

Tanzi V., (1979), “Underground Economy, Income Tax Evasion, and the Demand for Cur-rency in the United States, 1929–76.”, unpublished, International Monetary Fund, pp 283-305.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-01

How to Cite

Khalatyan, A., & Hakobyan, G. (2024). Assessment of the shadow economy and tax evasion in RA. Bulletin of Yerevan University G: Economics, 15(1 (43), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU:G/2024.15.1.069

Issue

Section

Economic and mathematical modeling