The Essence of the Constitutional Requirement on the Establishment of Taxes, Duties, and other Mandatory Payments in Accordance with the Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU.C/2025.16.1.049Keywords:
Tax obligations; , Taxes; , Duties; , Mandatory payments; , Principle of legality; , Legal certainty; , Right to property;Abstract
This article examines the constitutional and human rights dimensions of tax obligations in the Republic of Armenia, focusing on Article 60(8) of the 2015 Constitution, which integrates the obligation to pay taxes, duties, and other mandatory payments into the provision on the right to property. The analysis reveals a legal transformation: whereas previous constitutions treated taxation as a standalone civic duty, the 2015 Constitution reframes it as a legitimate restriction on property rights.
Through a doctrinal analysis of Constitutional Court jurisprudence—particularly Decisions ՍԴՈ-753 (2008), ՍԴՈ-816 (2009), ՍԴՈ-1142 (2014), and ՍԴՈ-1436 (2018)—the article clarifies the principle of legality as applied to taxation. The Court has consistently ruled that both the types of taxes and their constituent elements (e.g., taxable base, rates, and scope) must be defined exclusively by law, not by sub-legislative acts.
The article further compares Armenian constitutional standards to the European Court of Human Rights’ interpretation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights. It emphasizes that taxation, while an interference with property rights, is permissible when it is lawful, pursues a legitimate public aim, and satisfies the requirement of proportionality.
A practical case study on cadastral valuation illustrates how delegating key components of tax determination (e.g., zoning boundaries) to government decisions violates the principle of legality and may lead to unconstitutional interference with property rights.
Ultimately, the article concludes that to be valid, tax obligations must be clearly and comprehensively grounded in legislation, ensuring legal certainty, predictability, and compliance with constitutional and international human rights standards
References
Հայաստանի Հանրապետության Սահմանադրության մեկնաբանություններ / ընդհանուր խմբագրությամբ՝ Գ. Հարությունյանի, Ա. Վաղարշյանի – Եր.: «Իրավունք», 2010:
Balancing Privacy and the Public Interest: The Application of the “General Measures” Doctrine in L.B. v. Hungary in the Absence of Any Substantive Proportionality Assessment. European Constitutional Law Review, Volume 20, Issue 1, March 2024.
Constitution of the Republic of Armenia (with the amendments of 2015), European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Tax Code of the Republic of Armenia,
Decision No. 1023-N of the Government of the Republic of Armenia dated 4 June 2020, on Defining the Zoning Boundaries, Boundary Coordinates, and Zoning Maps for Location-Based Valuation of Land Plots (Except for Agricultural Land) and Constructions in the Republic of Armenia, on Repealing Government Decisions No. 470-N of 17 April 2003 and No. 462 of 28 September 1994, and on Amending Government Decision No. 1101-N of 25 July 2002,
Decision No. ՍԴՈ-1142 of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Armenia dated 2 April 2014, on the case concerning the application of Members of the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia regarding the constitutionality of Articles 5, 7, 8, 37, 38, 45, 49, and 86 of the Law of the Republic of Armenia “On Funded Pensions.
Decision No. ՍԴՈ-1436 of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Armenia dated 27 November 2018, on the case concerning the application of the Human Rights Defender of the Republic of Armenia regarding the compliance with the Constitution of Clause 11 of Part 4 of Article 109 and Subclauses “a” of Clause 2 of Part 1 of Article 123 of the Tax Code of the Republic of Armenia, as well as Subclauses 2 of Points 3 and 15 of the Procedure established by Annex No. 1 to Government Decree No. 1373-N of 5 October 2017.
Decision No. ՍԴՈ-753 of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Armenia dated 13 May 2008, on the case concerning the application of “Radio Hay” LLC regarding the compliance of Part 3 of Article 53 of the Law of the Republic of Armenia “On Television and Radio” with the Constitution of the Republic of Armenia.
Decision No. ՍԴՈ-816 of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Armenia dated 18 July 2009, on the case concerning the applications of “BJNI Mineral Water Plant” CJSC and “Komunnakhagits” CJSC regarding the compliance of Articles 7 and 19 of the Law of the Republic of Armenia “On Environmental and Nature Use Fees” and Part 2 of Article 22 of the Law of the Republic of Armenia “On Taxes” with the Constitution of the Republic of Armenia.
Guide on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights. Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights, 2020.
Law of the Republic of Armenia “On Defining the Procedure for Cadastral Valuation of Real Estate Approximating Market Value for the Purpose of Property Taxation,
Taxation at the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review, Volume 24 (1):1, 2024
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Саяд Бадалян

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.