Frick՚s Legal and Political Views
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU.C/2024.15.2.094Keywords:
Frick, medieval poet, verse, complaint, exhortation, falak (fate), church, sin, righteous judge, christianAbstract
Frick (1230-1310) is one of the talented and original representatives of medieval Armenian secular poetry. He remained in history as a poet, but it is worth noting that in his few works that have come down to us, he turned to multifaceted legal, political, and religious issues. He was a consistent successor and developer of the medieval literary secular-democratic trend. Not being free from medieval religious ideology, he introduced criticism and analysis into the idealistic worldview.
One of the themes of his secular poems is the historical fate of the Armenian people, the political, economic and legal status of the impoverished population of Armenia in the 13th century during the reign of the Mongol-Tatar yoke. He expressed his protest against the reigning lawlessness, inequality and injustice. He expressed confidence that there would be political changes and the end of the Tatar kingdom. He believed that in the Christian world there will be freedom, peace and equality, which is possible only with the transformation of political power. Among Christians, he was looking for a king who would come to the aid of Christians who were being tortured and killed by the lawless.
Along with national-political problems, Frick also touched upon socio-economic, class, and universal problems. He very early noticed the existing injustices and inequalities in society, the social stratification of society into two opposite classes: the rich and the poor, which he explained not by divine providence, but by social relations. He expressed the ideas of class equality and free expression of the will of people.
Frick in his poems and instructions condemned the public and private bad manners of that time and established, in the form of prohibitions and instructions, the norms of behavior and lifestyle for all sections of the Armenian society.
References
Frick, (Republican), On the Twentieth Anniversary of the October Revolution, Yer. In 1937 113-114
Ashot Hovhannisyan, Frick under the historiographical light, Yerevan 1955, Page 61.
Frick, Tagher, Yer. 1982, page 16
Frick, Collected on the twentieth anniversary of the October Revolution, Yer, 1937 Page 67
"Minor Chronicles", Vol. 1
Frick, Tagher, Yerevan, 1982.Ashot Hovhannisyan, Episodes of the History of Armenian Liberation Thought, Book 1, Yer. 1957, page 256.
Divan, Frick, Z 9, p. 274
Divan, Frick, Z, 29-30, Page 276
Divan, Frick, Z, 75-76, p. 279.
Manuk Abeghyan, History of Ancient Armenian Literature, book two, Yerevan, 1946, p. 256.
Frick, Tagher, Yerevan, 1982, pp. 102, 104, 105.
Frick (Zhogoyatsu), On the Twentieth Anniversary of the October Revolution, Yerevan 1937, p. 128.
Ancient Armenian Literary History, Manuk Abeghyan, Book 2, Yerevan, 1946. page 249.
Frick, Tagher, Yerevan, 1982.
Frick, Tagher, Yerevan, 1982, p. 48.
Divan, Frick, 272-273, page 320.
G. S. Ghazinyan, A. C. Vagharshyan, Issues in the History of Armenian Law, Yer. 2014: Page 72A.T. Tovmasyan, Ancient and Medieval Armenian Criminal Law, Yer. 1962, p. 228
Frick, Divan, New York, 1952, ID, 8-9, p.362.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Bulletin of Yerevan University

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.