Авторские права на результаты, созданные искусственным интеллектом
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU:C/2023.14.1.077Ключевые слова:
искусственный интеллект, авторское право, автор, творчество, оригинальность, личные неимущественные права, лица, организующие создание произведенияАннотация
В статье рассматривается возможность охраны произведений, созданных искусственным интеллектом, в рамках авторского права с точки зрения самого автора произведения, условия охраны и права, предоставляемые в результате охраны. Сегодня искусственный интеллект создает произведения, которые, в случае их создания людьми, неизбежно считались бы авторскими произведениями и подлежали бы правовой охране. На результаты признанию авторских прав, созданные искусственным интеллектом, пока что нет единого подхода, по крайней мере решение этого вопроса может иметь теоретическое и практическое значение. В ходе исследования использовались общефилософские, традиционно-правовые методы.
Исследование основаны как на правовые источники (Закон об авторском праве и смежных правах, Бернская конвенция, позиции Кассационного суда РА, иностранных судов), так и на научные работы, изданные книги, научные статьи и т.д.
В статье рассматривается вопрос о иных правовых конструкций, в том числе вопрос о лицах, организующих создание произведения, в рамках возможности правовой охраны произведений, созданных искусственным интеллектом.
Библиографические ссылки
Տե՛ս Abbott R. B. (2016) I Think, Therefore I invent: creative computers and the future of patent law. Boston College Law Review, Vol. 57, 1079–1126; Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2727884 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2727884
Birdy, A. (2016). The Evolution of Authorship: Work Made by Code. The Columbia Journal of Law & The Arts, 39(3), 395–401, DOI: https://doi.org/10.7916/jla.v39i3.2078
Bob L. T., Iglesias S. M, Ben-Tal O., Miron M. and Gómez E., 2019, Artificial Intelligence and Music: Open Questions of Copyright Law and Engineering Praxis, Arts 2019, 8(3)
https://doi.org/10.3390/arts8030115
Bringsjord S, Bello P, Ferrucci D, (2011) ‘Creativity, the Turing Test, and the (Better) Lovelace Test’ Minds and Machines 11(1); DOI:10.1023/A:1011206622741
Ciolino DS (1995) Moral Rights and real obligations: a property-law framework for the protection of authors’ moral rights. Tulane L Rev 69:935–995
Davies CR (2011) An evolutionary step in intellectual property rights—artificial intelligence and intellectual property. Computer Law and Security Review, University of Glamorgan 27:601–619
Deltorn, Jean-Marc and Macrez, Franck (2018), Authorship in the Age of Machine learning and Artificial Intelligence. In: Sean M. O'Connor (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Music Law and Policy,Oxford University Press, 2019 (Forthcoming), Centre for International Intellectual Property Studies (CEIPI) Research Paper No. 2018-10, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3261329 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3261329
Fetzer, J.H. (1990). What is Artificial Intelligence?.In: Artificial Intelligence: Its Scope and Limits. Studies in Cognitive Systems, Kluwer Academic Publishers vol 4. Springer, pp 3-4; DoI:. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1900-6_1
Ginsburg, J.C. (2018). People Not Machines: Authorship and What It Means in the Berne Convention. IIC 49, 131–135, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-018-0670-x
House of Commons Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee, Disinformation and ‘fake news’, Eighth Report of Session 2017–19, Published on 18 February 2019 by authority of the House of Commons, available at
Ihalainen, J. (2018). Computer creativity: artificial intelligence and copyright. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice
Lambert P (2017) Computer-generated works and copyright: selfies, traps, robots, AI and machine learning. EIPR 39:12–20; DOI:10.31228/osf.io/np2jd
Lauber-Ronsberg, Hetmark A. and S., 2019. The concept of authorship and inventorship under pressure. Does artificial intelligence shift paradigms? Journal Intellectual Property law and practice 14: 570-79; DOI:10.1093/jiplp/jpz061
Lee JA, Hilty R., and Liu KC, “Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property”, Oxford University Press, United Kingdom, 2021, DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198870944.001.0001
MacCutcheon J (2013) The vanishing author in computer-generated works: a critical analysis of recent Australian case law. Melbourne University law review 36:915–969
Madeleine CB (2018), Artificial intelligence and the creative industry: new challenges for the EU paradigm for art and technology by autonomous creation, in Woodrow BARFIELD and Ugo PAGALLO (eds), Research handbook on the law of artificial intelligence, Northampton, MA : Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 511-535, DOI: 10.4337/9781786439055.00032
McCarthy J. (2007), What is artificial intelligence? Computer Science Department Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/, Revised November 12, 2007
Miernicki M., Irene Ng (Huang Ying), (2021) “Artificial intelligence and moral rights”, AI & Society 36(2), 321; DOI:10.1007/s00146-020-01027-6
Pam Frost Groder, ‘Neural Networks Show New Promise for Machine Vision’ (2006) 8(6) Computing in Science & Engineering
Perry M, Margoni T (2010), Thomas, From Music Tracks to Google Maps: Who Owns Computer Generated Works?. Computer Law and Security Review, Vol. 26, pp. 621-629, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1647584
Rigamonti CP (2006) Deconstructing moral rights. Harvard International Law Journal / Vol. 47:353–
Rushton, M. The Moral Rights of Artists: Droit Moral ou Droit Pécuniaire?. Journal of Cultural Economics 22, 15–32 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007454719802
Schönberger D. (2018), Deep Copyright: Up - And Downstream Questions Related to Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) in Droit d’auteur, 4.0 / Copyright 4.0, DE WERRA Jacques (ed.), Geneva / Zurich (Schulthess Editions Romandes) pp. 145-173., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3098315
Smith B. (1928) “Legal Personality.” The Yale Law Journal, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 283–99. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/789740.
Sundara Rajan M. T., (2019) “Moral rights: the future of copyright law?” Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2019, Vol. 14, No. 4, p. 257-258; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpz008
Surden H., Artificial Intelligence and Law: An Overview, 35 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. (2019). Available at: https://readingroom.law.gsu.edu/gsulr/vol35/iss4/8
Turing A. M., (1950) Computing machinery and intelligence, Mind, Volume LIX, Issue 236, October, pp. 433–460, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.
Yanisky-Ravid S. (2017), Generating Rembrandt: Artificial Intelligence, Copyright, and Accountability in the 3A Era--The Human-like Authors are Already Here- A New Model, Mich. St. L. Rev. 659-726, Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship/956
The RA Law on Copyright and Related Rights, 15․06․2006
Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works amended on September 28, 1979 available at <https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text/283698>
European Court of Justice (2011a) Painer v. Standard Verlags GmbH C-145/10;
European Court of Justice (2012) Football Dataco Ltd v. Yahoo! UK Ltd C-604/10;
European Court of Justice, Infopaq: C-5/08 Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 July 2009
European Court of Justice, BSA: C-393/09, Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 22 December 2010
European Court of Justice, Painer: C-145/10, Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 December 2011
European Court of Justice; Dataco: Case 604/10, Judgment of the Court, (Third Chamber) of 1 March 2012
Acohs Pty Ltd v Ucorp Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 577
Beijing Feilin Law Firm v Beijing Baidu Netcom Science Technology Co., Ltd., No 239 Minchu (Beijing Internet Ct. 2011
Feist Publications, Inc. v Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 US 340 (1991)
Naruto v Slater, case no. 15-cv-04324-WHO (N.D. Calif. 2016)
Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Co. Ltd. v Shanghai Yingxun Technology Co., Ltd., No 14010 Minchu (Shenzhen Nanshan District Ct. 2019)
https://ai.facebook.com/blog/how-facebook-uses-super-efficient-ai-models-to-detect-hate-speech/
https://ai.facebook.com/blog/heres-how-were-using-ai-to-help-detect-misinformation/
https://medium.com/@divya.dixit/the-next-rembrandt-3631f4e04b98
Загрузки
Опубликован
Как цитировать
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2023 Вестник Ереванского Университета
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование») 4.0 Всемирная.
