Socio-Pragmatic Markers of Politeness Strategies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU.B/2025.16.1.073

Keywords:

pragmatics, Politeness Theory, politeness strategies, face, direct and indirect speech acts

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate the socio-pragmatic factors influencing the use of politeness strategies in Oprah Winfrey's interviews and to elucidate their role in creating effective communication and rapport-building in the realm of media discourse. Politeness is interpreted in terms of the verbal decisions made by the speakers, the linguistic phrases that create respectful verbal behaviour and convey friendliness to the communicative situation. The data analysis which is conducted on the material of Oprah Winfrey's interviews with Michelle Obama, Lady Gaga, and The Rock, unveil the sociocultural intricacies that mold her conversational demeanor. It is concluded that Oprah Winfrey's adept utilization of direct and indirect interrogative speech acts in the process of inquiry serves as a cornerstone for fostering authentic communication and building rapport within the setting of the talk show. By strategically incorporating direct questions alongside indirect ones, she creates an inclusive atmosphere that encourages the interviewees to share their personal experiences comfortably.

Author Biographies

  • Shushanik Paronyan, Yerevan State University

    Sc. D. in Philology, Professor, Head of YSU Chair of English for Cross-Cultural Communication

  • Mane Vardanyan, American University of Armenia

    American University of Armenia CSE Operations and Communications Coordinator

References

Levinson S. C. Pragmatics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1983.

Verschueren J. Understanding Pragmatics. London, New York et. al. Arnold, 1999.

Mey J. L. Pragmatics: An Introduction, 2nd ed. Oxford, Blackwell.

Griffiths P. An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics, Edinburgh UniversityPress, 2006.

Holtgraves T., Kashima Y. Language, Meaning, and Social Cognition // Personality and Social Psychology Review. SAGE Publications.2008,12(1), pp. 73-94.

Grice H. P. Logic and Conversation//Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3. Eds. P. Cole, J. Morgan. New York, Academic Press, 1975, pp. 41-58.

Leech G. N. Principles of Pragmatics. London, Longman, 1983.

Brown P., Levinson S. C. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.

Watts R. J., Ide S., Ehlich K. Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1992.

Goffman E. Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior. New Brunswick, New Jersey. Transaction Publishers, 2005.

Huang Y. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook for Pragmatics, Oxford University Press, 2017.

2007.

Paronyan Sh. Pragmatics. YSU Press, 2012.

Yule G. Pragmatics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

Redmond M. V. Face and Politeness Theories. Iowa State University Digital Repository, 2015, pp. 26-29.

Watts R. J. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Paronyan Sh, Barseghyan G. Euphemistic Replacement as Communicative Strategy in the News Media// Armenian Folia Anglistika. Vol. 19, Issue 2 (28), 2023, pp. 31-44 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46991/AFA/2023.19.2.031

Hei K. Ch. Strategies of Politeness Used by Grandparents in Intergenerational Talks. Serdang: Penerbit University of Malaya, 2008.

Kovtunenko I., Bylkova S., Borisenko V. Minakova N., Rogacheva, V. Interview as a Genre of New Media Communication: Rhetorical Relations and Pragmatic Effects// XLinguae 11(2). People’s Friendship University of Russia, 2018, pp. 95-105

Huwel H. Media Stylistics: Linguistic Representation, Realization, and Perception//Uruk for Humanities, 14(4). University of Thi-Qar, 2022, pp. 3056-3064.

McLean S. The Basics of Interpersonal Communication. Pearson,Boston, MA, 2005.

Fetzer A. Minister, We Will See How the Public Judges You: Media References in Political Interviews// Journal of Pragmatics. Vol. 38, Issue 2, 2006, p. 180-195.

McCracken G. The Long Interview. Qualitative Research Methods Vol. 13, Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, 1988.

Munson W. All Talk: The Talk Show in Media Culture. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1993.

Mittel J. Audiences Talking Genre: Television Talk Shows And Cultural Hierarchies// Journal of Popular Film and Television, 2003, pp. 36-45.

Ilie C. Semi-Institutional Discourse: The Case of Talk Shows// Journal of Pragmatics. 2001, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp. 209-254.

Priest P. J. Public Intimacies: Talk Show Participants and Tell-All TV. Cresskill, NJ, Hampton Press, 1995.

Heritage J. The Limits of Questioning: Negative Interrogatives and Hostile Question Content// Journal of Pragmatics, 2002. Volume 34, Issues 10–11, pp. 1427-1446.

Becker A. Are You Saying…? A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Interviewing Practices in TV Election Night Coverages Amsterdam, NLD: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2007.

Lauerbach G. Argumentation in Dialogic Media Genres - Talk Shows and Interviews// Journal of Pragmatics, 2007, 39(8), pp. 1333-1341.

Paronyan Sh., Rostomyan A. On the Interrelation between Cognitive and Emotional Minds in Speech// Armenian Folia Anglistika. 1(8)/, Yerevan, 2011, pp. 26-34

Downloads

Published

2025-03-07 — Updated on 2025-05-14

Versions

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 1 (46) (2025)

Section

Linguistics

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Bulletin of Yerevan University

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Paronyan, S., & Vardanyan, M. (2025). Socio-Pragmatic Markers of Politeness Strategies. Bulletin of Yerevan University B: Philology, 16(1 (46), 73-87. https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU.B/2025.16.1.073 (Original work published 2025)