| P - ISSN | : | 2738-294X |
| E - ISSN | : |
Vol. 2 No. 3(6) (2023)
Full Issue
In this Issue
-
In this Issue
In this Issue
AbstractThe paradoxical factors of war and peace are transforming the models of democratization of the modern world, irreversibly changing the hierarchy of the main actors in international, regional and national security. The democratization of the external environment, although proceeding inconsistently and contradictorily, does not give anyone the opportunity to trample on civiliarchic norms and procedures or ignore human interests and rights with impunity.
Economization, steadily leading to the formation of a single world economic space, makes national security models based on isolationism unviable, and integration into this emerging space is the only possible way to effectively protect national interests. To refuse integration means to abandon sustainable development, since such development is a key prerequisite for ensuring the resilience of national security. No society can be competitive without becoming part of the global economic space. This factor, among other things, determines the priority of geo-economic mechanisms for ensuring national security compared to geopolitical and geostrategic ones, since it is geo-economics that becomes a priority for global development.
Digitalization, which forms a single world information and communication space, creating a global network society, gives citizens of the countries covered by it access to all material and spiritual benefits, multiplies the intellectual resource, and therefore all other resources, promoting sustainable development, achieving well-being and security of the individual and society. On the other hand, information technologies are not an absolute blessing: they create new opportunities for control and manipulation of mass consciousness in domestic politics and new effective means of interstate confrontation, and, consequently, new threats to national security.
References
Regional Policy
-
Regional Policy
Comparative Analysis of National Security Strategies of Armenia in the Context of Political Realism, Liberalism, and Marxism
AbstractThe article examines the characteristic features of Armenian national security strategies, actively conducting research of an interdisciplinary nature with extensive use of systems analysis. Issues of stability of the political system of Armenia in the interests of national security are considered not only from the point of view of the general theory of systems, but also using the methodological principles of synergetics. An independent section of research was the study of regional conflicts in the post-Soviet space and their impact on the state of national security of Armenia. In this context, traditional international relations theory offers tools for analyzing the previous actions of states within a broader framework and deciding on further actions.
The present article seeks to provide simple textual comparisons and analyses of the Republic of Armenia’s National Security Strategies of 2007 and 2020. Those elements within the Strategies which have remained, changed, or been added will then be made the subject of contextual analyses with the theoretical traditions of liberalism, realism, and Marxism to draw out the Republic of Armenia’s major priorities and assess the capability of its approaches to meeting the foreign policy problems that exist. Each theory of international relations will emphasize those positions in the National Security Strategies that most accurately reflect Armenia’s past and current positions, and evaluate them in accordance with global and regional standards.
ReferencesAkhvlediani, Tinatin. 2022. “Geopolitical and Security Concerns of the EU’s Enlargement to the East: The Case of Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia.” Intereconomics 57: 225-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-022-1067-0.
Akiner, Shirin, and Catherine Barnes. 2001 “The Tajik Civil War: Causes and Dynamics.” In: Accord: Politics of Compromise: The Tajikistan Peace Process, edited by Kammolludin Abdullaev and Catherine Barnes, 16-22. London: Conciliation Resources.
Aleksanyan, Ashot. 2020. “Civil Society as a Phenomenon of Post-Soviet Political Life: A Threat or a Guarantor of National Security.” In: Transformation and Development: Studies in the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) Member States, edited by Anja Mihr, 29-49. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42775-7_3.
Aleksanyan, Ashot. 2021. “On the Issue of Three-Dimensional Political Security of the Political Systems of Post-Soviet Societies”. Bulletin of Yerevan University D: International Relations and Political Sciences 12 (2 (35): 45-57. https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU:D/2021.12.2.045.
Auch, Eva-Maria. 2005. “The Abkhazia Conflict in Historical Perspective.” In: IFSH, OSCE Yearbook 2004, 221-235. Baden-Baden.
Baltag, Dorina, and Giselle Bosse. 2016. “The EU’s Eastern Partnership with Moldova: A ‘Best-Case’ Scenario for EU Security Community-Building?.” In: External Governance as Security Community Building: The Limits and Potential of the European Neighbourhood Policy, edited by Pernille Rieker, 49-77. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56169-5_3.
Basu, Rumki (ed.). 2012. International Politics: Concepts, Theories and Issues. New Delhi: SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9788132113997.
Brenner, Robert. 2006. “What Is, and What Is Not, Imperialism?” Historical Materialism 14 (4): 79-105. https://doi.org/10.1163/156920606778982464.
Breuer, Christian. 2022. “The New Cold War and the Return of History.” Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy 57 (4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-022-1056-3.
Burchill, Scott. 2020. Critical Thinking: Part One—The Limits of the Expressible. In: Misunderstanding International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore, 5-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1936-9_2.
Callinicos, Alex. 2007. “Does Capitalism Need the State System?” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 20 (4): 533-549. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570701680464.
Castellin, Luca G. 2021. “The Art of Living Together: The Relationship Between Individual and Society in Reinhold Niebuhr’s Political Thought.” In: Religion and the Liberal State in Niebuhr's Christian Realism, edited by Christoph Rohde, 35-56. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-34464-1_2.
Colburn, Forrest D. 2021. Seeking a New Compass. In: Colonialism, Independence, and the Construction of Nation-States. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54716-5_9.
Cooke, Samantha. 2022. “Introduction: Refocusing International Relations.” In: Non-Western Global Theories of International Relations. Palgrave Studies in International Relations, edited by Samantha Cooke, 1-15. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84938-2_1.
Cordesman, Anthony H. 2020. The Greater Middle East: From the ‘Arab Spring’ to the ‘Axis of Failed States. Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Cordesman, Anthony H. 2021. “Israel and the Palestinians: From the Two-State Solution to Five Failed.” Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Cox, Robert W. 1983. “Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method.” Millennium 12 (2): 162-175. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298830120020701.
Cox, Robert W. 1993. “Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method.” In: Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations: Cambridge Studies in International Relations, edited by Stephen Gill, 49-66. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511558993.003.
Cox, Robert W., and Timothy J. Sinclair. 1996. “On thinking about future world order (1976).” In: Approaches to World Order. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge University Press, 60-84. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607905.006.
Cox, Robert, and Timothy J. Sinclair. 1996. Approaches to World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davidson, Neil. 2016. Nation-states: Consciousness and Competition. Chicago, Illinois: Haymarket Books.
Davidson, Neil. 2018. “The Frontiers of Uneven and Combined Development.” Historical Materialism 26 (3): 52-78. https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206X-00001656.
Di Maio, Micah, and Jessica Abenstein. 2011. “Policy Analysis: Tajikistan’s Peacebuilding Efforts through Promotion of Hanafi Islam.” Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 6(1): 75-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/15423166.2011.950863228443.
Fahmy, Dalia, and Eid Mohamed. 2020. “Arab Spring: Modernity, Identity, and Change.” In: Arab Spring. Critical Political Theory and Radical Practice, edited by Eid Mohamed and Dalia Fahmy, 1-12. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24758-4_1.
Ferguson, Thomas. 1995. Golden Rule: The Investment Theory of Party Competition and the Logic of Money-Driven Political Systems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fukuyama, Francis. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.
Gilens, Martin. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton, N.J: New York: Princeton University Press; Russell Sage Foundation.
Gindin, Sam, and Leo Panitch. 2012. The Making of Global Capitalism: The Political Economy of American Empire. London: Verso.
Giragosian, Richard. 2020. “Armenia’s Transition: The Challenges of Geography, Geopolitics and Multipolarity.” In: Armenia’s Velvet Revolution: The Decline and Defeat of Authoritarianism, edited by Anna Ohanyan and Laurence Broers, 141-159. London: I.B. Tauris.
Halliday, Fred. 2002. “The Pertinence of Imperialism.” In: Historical Materialism and Globalisation: Essays on Continuity and Change, edited by Mark Rupert and Hazel Smith, 75-89. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315541402.
Harvey, David. 2003. The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Holovko-Havrysheva, Oksana. 2021. “Adjusting National Consumer Protection Legislation in Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine to EU Standards: Practices, Experience and Challenges.” In: Extraterritoriality of EU Economic Law. European Union and its Neighbours in a Globalized World, vol. 4, edited by Nuno Cunha Rodrigues, 289-316. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82291-0_14.
Jordaan, Eduard. 2003. “The Concept of a Middle Power in International Relations: Distinguishing between Emerging and Traditional Middle Powers.” Politikon: South African Journal of Political Studies 30 (1): 165-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/0258934032000147282.
King, Charles. 2008. The Ghost of Freedom: A History of the Caucasus Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195177756.001.0001.
Kremlin.ru. 2022. “Address by the President of the Russian Federation.” February 24, 2022. Accessed September 20, 2023. http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/67843.
Kumar H.M., Sanjeev. 2023. Subaltern Realism and Historical Sociology: Transcending Chronofetishism and Tempocentrism. In: Decolonizing Grand Theories. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore, 113-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4841-3_4.
Kunz, Barbara. 2022. “Europe in the U.S.-Russian Security Dilemma: Is There a Way Out?.” In: Polarity in International Relations. Governance, Security and Development, edited by Nina Græger, Bertel Heurlin, Ole Wæver, and Anders Wivel, 333-349. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05505-8_17.
Lane, David. 2013. The Capitalist Transformation of State Socialism: The Making and Breaking of State Socialist Society, and What Followed. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203739853.
Lehti, Marko, and Henna-Riikka Pennanen. 2020. “Beyond Liberal Empire and Peace: Declining Hegemony of the West?.” In: Contestations of Liberal Order, edited by Marko Lehti, Henna-Riikka Pennanen, and Jukka Jouhki, 17-59. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22059-4_2.
Lenin, Vladimir I. 1974. Imperialism, The Highest Stage of Capitalism. Vol. 22. 45 Vols. Collected Works. Moscow: Progress Publisher.
Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan A. Way. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lieber, Robert J. 2022. “Polarity, Non-polarity, and the Risks of A-Polarity.” In: Polarity in International Relations. Governance, Security and Development, edited by Nina Græger, Bertel Heurlin, Ole Wæver, and Anders Wivel, 171-189. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05505-8_9.
Magdoff, Harry. 2003. Imperialism without Colonies. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Mihályi, Peter, and Iván Szelényi. 2019. Varieties of Postcommunist Capitalism: A Comparative Analysis of Russia, Eastern Europe and China. Chicago: Brill.
Miliband, Ralph. 1969. The State in Capitalist Society. New York: Basic Books.
Minasyan, Sergey. 2012. “Multivectorism in the Foreign Policy of Post-Soviet Eurasian States.” PONARS Eurasia (July): 268-273.
Mirzoyan, Alla. 2010. Armenia, the Regional Powers, and the West: Between History and Geopolitics. 1st ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mladenov, Nicolai S. 2021. The Rise of China. In: China’s Rise to Power in the Global Order. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 97-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66452-7_3.
Neufeld, Mark A. 1995. International Relations theory and social criticism. In: The Restructuring of International Relations Theory. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge University Press, 95-121. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598722.006.
Ohanyan, Anna. 2020. “Velvet is not a colour: Armenia’s democratic transition in a Armenia’s Democratic Transition in a Global Context.” In: Armenia’s Velvet Revolution: The Decline and Defeat of Authoritarianism, edited by Anna Ohanyan and Laurence Broers, 25-49. London: I.B. Tauris.
Özlü, Hüsnü. 2022. “The Foundation and Development of Turkey’s Defense Industry in the Context of National Security Strategy”. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs 26 (2) (January): 216-240.
Pashakhanlou, Arash Heydarian. 2017. Realism and Fear in International Relations. In: Realism and Fear in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41012-8_1.
Pedi, Revecca, and Anders Wivel. 2022. “What Future for Small States After Unipolarity? Strategic Opportunities and Challenges in the Post-American World Order.” In: Polarity in International Relations. Governance, Security and Development, edited by Nina Græger, Bertel Heurlin, Ole Wæver, and Anders Wivel, 127-147. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05505-8_7.
Pee, Robert. 2015. Democracy Promotion, National Security and Strategy: Foreign Policy Under the Reagan Administration. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315738079.
Pogosyan, Tevan. 2011. “Armenia’s Foreign and Security Policy: Is Complementarity Possible?” In: Reassessing Security in the South Caucasus Regional Conflicts and Transformation, edited by Annie Jafalian, 195-207. London: Ashgate.
Pratt, Cranford (ed.). 1990. Middle Power Internationalism: The North-South Dimension. McGill-Queen’s University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt130hb83.
Rogers, James. 2021. “Small States, Great Powers, and Armed Drones.” In: Small States and the New Security Environment. The World of Small States, vol. 7, edited by Anne-Marie Brady and Baldur Thorhallsson, 59-71. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51529-4_5.
Rosenberg, Justin. 1994. The Empire of Civil Society: A Critique of the Realist Theory of International Relations. London: Verso.
Rosenberg, Justin. 1996. “Isaac Deutscher and the Lost History of International Relations.” New Left Review 215: 3-15.
Rosenberg, Justin. 2005. “Globalization Theory: A Post Mortem.” International Politics 42: 2-74. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800098.
Shoup, Laurence H. 2021. “The Council on Foreign Relations, the Biden Team, and Key Policy Outcomes: Climate and China.” The Monthly Review 73 (1). Accessed April 20, 2023. https://monthlyreview.org/2021/05/01/the-council-on-foreign-relations-the-biden-team-and-key-policy-outcomes/.
Sinkkonen, Ville, and Henri Vogt. 2020. “The West: Divided in Freedom and Fear?.” In: Contestations of Liberal Order, edited by Marko Lehti, Henna-Riikka Pennanen, and Jukka Jouhki, 123-150. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22059-4_5.
Solnick, Steven Lee. 1998. Stealing the State: Control and Collapse in Soviet Institutions. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Song, Wei. 2023. The Significance and Research Path of Foreign Policy Theory. In: Positional Realism. Contributions to International Relations. Springer, Singapore, 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6829-7_1.
Vacaru, Cristina. 2006. “Resolution Mechanisms of the Transnistrian Conflict.” Studia Politica: Romanian Political Science Review 6 (4): 905-921.
Way, Lucan. 2008. “The Real Causes of the Color Revolution.” Journal of Democracy 19 (3): 55-69. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.0.0017.
Williams, Alex. 2020. Complexity & Political Dynamics. In: Political Hegemony and Social Complexity. International Political Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 53-67. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19795-7_4.
Yue, Jianyong. 2018. USA, Global Capitalism and “Drawing China Out”. In: China’s Rise in the Age of Globalization. Palgrave Studies in Economic History. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 235-269 . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63997-0_6.
Security Policy
-
Security Policy
South Caucasus in the Phase of Russian-Ukrainian War: New Security Challenges and Possible Scenarios for Development
AbstractThe paper mainly examines the economic, political and military situation in the South Caucasus after the start of Russian-Ukrainian war. In the paper we are focused on the question of what kind of consequences does the Russian-Ukrainian war has on the countries of the South Caucasus. Relying on the analytical-forecasting approach, we also are trying to forecast what developments can be expected in this region. On this regard we especially look onto the facts from Armenia’s perspective. Of course, the discussion of the situation in Georgia and Azerbaijan was also under our great attention, because we also had set a task to compare the processes that took place in the three countries of the region.
The modernity of the topic can be measured, first of all, by its global political significance: Russian-Ukrainian conflict continues to be on the top of world political processes. On the other hand, it is actual when studying political and economic processes in the post-Soviet territory. By and large, as a result, the South Caucasus is a part of the European and Middle Eastern security sphere, or at least has an important role in them. Therefore, the ongoing developments in this region are not local and may also affect the European, Middle Eastern and the processes also in other regions.
Russian-Ukrainian conflict has affected on foreign policy behavior of the Southern Caucasus countries. The region is now under the turbulence zone, so we are not aware from being faced by new challenges and security issues. Since we have highly evaluated the impact of the conflict on the countries of the region, we have also tried to make certain predictions regarding possible future development scenarios, which could be as recommendations for foreign policy decision making structures of Armenia.
ReferencesAli, Toghruli 2023. “Elevating Azerbaijan-Ukraine Strategic Partnership: Mine Clearing Unveils New Dimensions.” Washington DC: Caspian Policy Center.
Avdaliani, Emil. 2022a. Turkey’s Evolving Approach to the Black Sea and the South Caucasus Region. In: New World Order and Small Regions. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore, 87-127. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4037-8_4.
Avdaliani, Emil. 2022b. “Russia’s “Return” to the South Caucasus. In: New World Order and Small Regions. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore, 191-224. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4037-8_7.
Avdaliani, Emil. 2023a. “Carnegie EIP. Playing With Fire: Georgia’s Cautious Rapprochement with Russia.” Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Avdaliani, Emil. 2023b. “Playing With Fire: Georgia’s Cautious Rapprochement with Russia. Carnegie EIP.” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, July 21, 2023. Accessed 20 September 2023. https://carnegieendowment.org/politika/90246.
Baev, Pavel K. 2023. The next surge of conflict in the South Caucasus is still preventable. L’Ifri Report, October 2023. Accessed 20 November 2023. https://www.ifri.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/baev_conflict_south_caucasus_2023.pdf.
Charap, Samuel, and Miranda Priebe. 2023. “Avoiding a Long War: U.S. Policy and the Trajectory of the Russia-Ukraine Conflict.” Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Accessed 20 September 2023. https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA2510-1.html.
Deen, Bob, Wouter Zweers, and Camille Linder. 2023. “The EU in the South Caucasus: Navigating a geopolitical labyrinth in turmoil.” Clingendael Report (March). Accessed 20 September 2023. https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/2023-03/the-eu-in-the-south-caucasus.pdf.
Galitsky, Alex. 2022. “Foreign Policy. Azerbaijan’s Aggression Has Forced Armenia into Russia’s Arms.” October 24, 2022. Accessed 20 September 2023. https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/10/04/azerbaijan-aggression-armenia-russia-nagorno-karabakh/.
Isayev, Heydar, and Joshua Kucera. 2022. “Ahead of Ukraine invasion, Azerbaijan and Russia cement “alliance”.” Eurasianet, February 24, 2022. Accessed 20 September 2023. https://eurasianet.org/ahead-of-ukraine-invasion-azerbaijan-and-russia-cement-alliance
Kibak, Quil, Ryan Kirkpatrick, William O’Neil, and Daniel O’Neill. 2023. “Russian Malign Influence in Eastern Europe and the South Caucasus: Recommendations for U.S. Government Strategy in the Post-Ukraine Invasion Context. University of Maine.” Accessed 20 September 2023. https://spia.umaine.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/39/2023/05/SPI-578-Final-Report-2.pdf.
Krawatzek, Félix, Isabelle DeSisto, and George Soroka. 2023. “Russians in the South Caucasus: Political Attitudes and the war in Ukraine.” ZOIS Report 2, May 3, 2023. Accessed 20 September 2023. https://www.zois-berlin.de/en/publications/zois-report/russians-in-the-south-caucasus-political-attitudes-and-the-war-in-ukraine.
Krivosheev, Kirill. 2023. “Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Could the New EU Mission Sideline Russia in Armenia-Azerbaijan Settlement?” February 16, 2023. Accessed 25 May 2023. https://carnegieendowment.org/politika/89060.
Lebow, Richard Ned. 2022. “International Relations Theory and the Ukrainian War.” Analyse & Kritik 44 (1): 111-135.
Meister, Stefan. 2023a. “Introduction by Special Editor: Russia’s War against Ukraine: Connectivity and Disruption in the South Caucasus.” Caucasus Analytical Digest 132 (March).
Meister, Stefan. 2023b. “Geopolitics of Infrastructure and Connectivity in the South Caucasus: The Case of Armenia and Azerbaijan.” Caucasus Analytical Digest 132 (March): 21-25. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000613995.
Mghdesyan, Arshaluis. 2023. “Russia’s powerful economic levers over Armenia.” Eurasianet, November 1, 2023. Accessed 20 November 2023. https://eurasianet.org/russias-powerful-economic-levers-over-armenia
Minassian, Gaidz. 2022. “How the War in Ukraine Intersects With the South Caucasus, Part I: The Stakes of a New Bipolarity.” EVN Report. December 12, 2022. Accessed 20 September 2023. https://evnreport.com/opinion/how-the-war-in-ukraine-intersects-with-the-south-caucasus-part-i/.
Neset, Siri et al. 2023. “Changing Geopolitics of the South Caucasus after the Second Karabakh War: Prospect for Regional Cooperation and/or Rivalry.” CMI Report 4 (September). Bergen, Norway: Chr. Michelsen Institute.
O’Byrne, David. 2022. “Eurasianet. Azerbaijan’s Russian gas deal raises uncomfortable questions for Europe.” November 22, 2022. Accessed 10 June 2023. https://eurasianet.org/azerbaijans-russian-gas-deal-raises-uncomfortable-questions-for-europe.
Souleimanov, Emil, and Yury Fedorov. 2023. “The War in Ukraine: Risks and Opportunities For the ‘Post-Soviet South’.” Middle East Policy, August 21, 2023. Accessed September 20, 2023. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/mepo.12709.
Toroyan, Hayk. 2023. “Circumventing Russia: Can the South Caucasus connect the West to the East?” Friedrich Naumann Faundation, March 21, 2023. Accessed September 20, 2023. https://www.freiheit.org/germany/circumventing-russia-can-south-caucasus-connect-west-east.
Walker, Nigel. 2023. “Conflict in Ukraine: A timeline (2014 - eve of 2022 invasion).” House of Common library: Research Briefing, August 22, 2023. Accessed September 20, 2023. https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-9476/CBP-9476.pdf.
European Integration
-
European Integration
Euronews as a Tool for the Formation of Europe’s Image
AbstractThe ongoing political and economic transformations affect the image of Europe: the economic crisis, Brexit, the migration crisis, the Russian-Ukrainian war and other events are a challenge to the image of Europe. Euronews, being Europe’s leading TV channel, is used as a tool to shape Europe’s image by demonstrating European democracy, unity, identity and values.
This article presents interpretations of the term ‘regional image’, analyzes the regional image of Europe, the role of the media and, in particular, of Euronews in shaping the regional image, and also presents the results of a content analysis of the channel’s live broadcasts and publications of the official Euronews website. The study clearly demonstrates how Euronews uses the techniques of repetition, exclusion, framing, agenda setting, and the context of the Russian-Ukrainian war to shape the image of Europe in line with the main goals of the EU.
This article proposes the features of creating content for the regional image of Europe for the news television broadcast Euronews, scientifically argued from the perspective of communication theory, and examines the features of preparing journalistic material for broadcast.
ReferencesBartnicki, Adam R., Elżbieta Kużelewska, and Michał Ożóg. 2023. “Information and Information Technologies in the 2022 Russian-Ukrainian War.” In: War in Ukraine. Media and Emotions, edited by Agnieszka Turska-Kawa, Agnieszka Kasińska-Metryka, and Karolina Pałka-Suchojad, 21-41. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37608-5_3.
Bateson, Gregory. 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Behr, Timo and Juha Jokela. 2011. “Regionalism & Global Governance: The Emerging Agenda, Notre Europe.” Notre Europe (July). https://institutdelors.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/regionalism_globalgovernance_t.behr-j.jokela_ne_july2011_01.pdf.
Boyd-Barrett, Oliver. 2017. “Ukraine, Mainstream Media and Conflict Propaganda.” Journalism Studies 18 (8): 1016-1034. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2015.1099461.
Brighi, Elisabetta, and Serena Giusti. 2023. “Italian diplomacy and the Ukrainian crisis: the challenges (and cost) of continuity.” Contemporary Italian Politics 15 (2): 190-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/23248823.2023.2195776.
Council of Europe. 2016. ”Regional and local broadcasting in Europe.“ European Audiovisual Observatory, Strasbourg.
Dubova, Yulia. 2016. “Institutional Approach to Territory Marketing.” In: Business Challenges in the Changing Economic Landscape - Vol. 2. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 2/2, edited by Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin, Hakan Danis, Ender Demir, and Ugur Can, 331-339. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22593-7_24.
Entman, Robert M. 1991. “Framing U.S. Coverage of International News: Contrasts in Narratives of the KAL and Iran Air Incidents.” Journal of Communication 41 (4): 6-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1991.tb02328.x.
Ergunova, Olga T. 2017. Territory marketing: Training manual. Ekaterinburg: Ural Federal University Publishing House [Ергунова, Ольга Т. 2017. Маркетинг территории: Учебное пособие. Екатеринбург: Изд-во Уральский федеральный университет].
Erni, John Nguyet, and Nick Yin Zhang. 2020. “Ethnic Minority Youth as Digital Cultural Participants: Toward a Critical Indicator Study.” In: New Media Spectacles and Multimodal Creativity in a Globalised Asia. Digital Culture and Humanities, vol 3., edited by Sunny Sui-kwong Lam, 3-24. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7341-5_1.
ESPON/EU. 2012. “Territorial Impact of Globalization for Europe and its Regions (TIGER).” Applied Research 2013/1/1. Final Report, June 29, 2012. ESPON & Université Libre de Bruxelles, 2012 https://www.espon.eu/sites/default/files/attachments/TIGER_Final_Report.pdf.
European Commission. 2022a. “REPowerEU: Joint European action for more affordable, secure and sustainable energy.” March 8, 2022. Accessed April 20, 2023. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_22_1511.
European Commission. 2022b. “Press Statement of President Charles Michel of the European Council and President Ursula von der Leyen of the European Commission on Russia’s unprecedented and unprovoked military aggression of Ukraine.” February 24, 2022. Accessed April 20, 2023. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/statement_22_1321.
European Commission. 2023. “Speech by President von der Leyen at the European Parliament Plenary on one year of Russia's invasion and war of aggression against Ukraine.” February 15, 2023. Accessed April 20, 2023. https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/news/speech-president-von-der-leyen-european-parliament-plenary-one-year-russias-invasion-and-war-2023-02-15_en.
Farzindar, Atefeh, and Diana Inkpen. 2018a. Linguistic Pre-processing of Social Media Texts. In: Natural Language Processing for Social Media. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies. Springer, Cham, 15-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02167-1_2.
Farzindar, Atefeh, and Diana Inkpen. 2018b. Semantic Analysis of Social Media Texts. In: Natural Language Processing for Social Media. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies. Springer, Cham, 41-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02167-1_3.
Gromyko, Alexey. 2022. “European Culture: Centripetal and Centrifugal Forces.” Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences 92 (Suppl. 4): 277-284. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331622100082.
Herzog, Christian, and Alise Scerbinina. 2021 ““Self-centered, self-promoting, and self-legitimizing”: CNN’s portrayal of media ownership concentration in the US.” Atlantic Journal of Communication 29 (5): 328-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2020.1779725.
Kaye, Barbara K., and Thomas J. Johnson. 2021. ““Newstrusting” or “newsbusting?” heuristic and systematic information processing and trust in media.” Atlantic Journal of Communication 29 (5): 312-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2021.1869004.
Kotler, Philip, and John A. Caslione. 2009. Chaotics: The Business of Managing and Marketing in the Age of Turbulence. New York: AMACOM.
Kotler, Philip. 2014. Kotler on Marketing: How to Create, Win, and Dominate Markets. Free Press.
Löffelholz, Martin, Liane Rothenberger, and David H. Weaver. 2023. Cross-Border Journalism Research and Practice: An Introduction. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Cross-Border Journalism, edited by Liane Rothenberger, Martin Löffelholz, and David H. Weaver, 1-15. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23023-3_1.
Machill, Marcel. 1998. “Euronews: the first European news channel as a case study for media industry development in Europe and for spectra of transnational journalism research.” Media, Culture & Society 20 (3): 427-450. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344398020003005.
Mader, Matthias, and Harald Schoen. 2023. “No Zeitenwende (yet): Early Assessment of German Public Opinion Toward Foreign and Defense Policy After Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 64: 525-547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-023-00463-5.
McCombs, Maxwell E., and Donald L. Shaw. 1993. “The Evolution of Agenda-Setting Research: Twenty-Five Years in the Marketplace of Ideas.” Journal of Communication 43 (2): 58-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01262.x.
Minesashvili, Salome. 2022. European Identity and Foreign Policy in Georgia and Ukraine Since 1991. In: European Identities During Wars and Revolutions. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 51-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96717-8_2.
Nye, Joseph S. 1968. International Regionalism; Readings. Harvard University. Center for International Affairs. Boston: Little, Brown.
Oleinik, Anton. 2023. “War propaganda effectiveness: a comparative content-analysis of media coverage of the two first months of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.” Atlantic Journal of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2023.2187801.
Peiren, Shao. 2023. Scope and Significance of Geography of Media. In: New Perspectives on Geography of Media. Qizhen Humanities and Social Sciences Library. Springer, Singapore, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2111-9_1.
Radulović, Dejan, Renata Pindžo, Sofija Radulović, and Darko B. Vuković. 2015. “Region as a Basic Territorial Unit of Regional Development (Concepts and Types).” Economic Analysis 48: 69-80.
Rahaman, Valiur. 2021. “The Concept of Cognitive Social Media and Cognitive Literary Studies.” In: Big Data Analytics in Cognitive Social Media and Literary Texts, edited by Sanjiv Sharma, Valiur Rahaman, and G. R. Sinha, 1-21. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4729-1_1.
Robinson, Piers. 1999. “The CNN effect: can the news media drive foreign policy?” Review of International Studies 25 (2): 301-309. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210599003010.
Sandhu, Nymphea Saraf, and Sanjiv Sharma. 2021. “Cognitive Transformation Through Social Media.” In: Big Data Analytics in Cognitive Social Media and Literary Texts, edited by Sanjiv Sharma, Valiur Rahaman, and G. R. Sinha, 219-236. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4729-1_12.
Starke, Christopher. 2021a. The Concept of European Identity. In: European Solidarity Under Scrutiny. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 73-113. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67179-2_4.
Starke, Christopher. 2021b. Framing European Identity. In: European Solidarity Under Scrutiny. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 115-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67179-2_5.
Stroev, Evgeniy N., Liubov V. Plakhova, Elena A. Sotnikova, Olga A. Lebedeva, and Nataliya A. Skvortsova. 2020. “Influence of Marketing of Territories on Increase of Investment Activity.” In: Growth Poles of the Global Economy: Emergence, Changes and Future Perspectives, vol. 73, edited by Elena G. Popkova, 131-141. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15160-7_12.
Theiler, Tobias. 2003. “Societal security and social psychology.” Review of International Studies 29: 249-268. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210503002493.
Theiler, Tobias. 2004. “The origins of Euroscepticism in German-speaking Switzerland.” European Journal of Political Research 43: 635-656. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00168.x.
Theiler, Tobias. 2005. Political Symbolism and European Integration. (Europe in Change). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Timmermans, Frans. 2023. “The Only Way to End the War.” Project Syndicate, February 22, 2023. Accessed April 20, 2023. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/russia-war-eu-must-arm-ukraine-and-plan-for-accession-process-by-frans-timmermans-2023-02?barrier=accesspaylog.
UNSPECIFIED. 1988. Towards a large European audio-visual market. European File 4/88, February 1988. [EU Commission - Brochure]. Accessed February 10, 2023. https://aei.pitt.edu/14724/.
Van Langenhove, Luk. 2013. “What is a region? Towards a statehood theory of regions.” Contemporary Politics 19 (4): 474-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2013.853392.
Vazhenina, Irina S. 2006. “Image and reputation of the territory as the basis for promotion in a competitive environment.” Marketing in Russia and abroad 6: 82-98 [Важенина, Ирина С. 2006. “Имидж и репутация территории как основа продвижения в конкурентной среде.” Маркетинг в России и за рубежом 6: 82-98].
Zimmerbauer, Kaj. 2011. “From Image to Identity: Building Regions by Place Promotion.” European Planning Studies 19 (2): 243-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.532667.
Political Journalism
-
Political Journalism
Digital Authoritarianism as a Modern Threat to Democratic Stability: Restriction of Freedom or Network Politicization?
AbstractThis article is dedicated to the identification of contemporary instances of digital authoritarianism, exploring its definitions, characteristics, methodologies, and the tools employed by authoritarian governments to manipulate the social and political conduct of their citizens and control the flow of information. It aimed to consolidate power, control and manipulate information, and suppress dissent. The article delves into the various interpretations of digital authoritarianism by analyzing its fundamental elements and evident expressions. Through a comprehensive review of scholarly literature, reports, news publications and case studies, the article aims to unravel the dynamic nature of digital authoritarianism, shedding light on how it adjusts to technological progress and confronts conventional notions of liberty within the digital era. Digital authoritarianism materializes through mass surveillance, cyber attacks, information censorship, and the targeted utilization of citizen data. A thorough exploration of digital authoritarianism can empower democratic societies to preclude potential infiltration of such manifestations, uphold democratic principles, and arrange the landscape based on these principles while ensuring unfettered access to information.
ReferencesAlbrecht, Bahia, and Naithani, Gaura. 2022.“Digital Authoritarianism: A Global Phenomenon.” Deutsche Welle. March 17, 2022. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://akademie.dw.com/en/digital-authoritarianism-a-global-phenomenon/a-61136660.
Aleksanyan, Ashot, and Arusyak Aleksanyan. 2022. “Rethinking the Non-Resilience of Trade Unions in Armenia: How to Protect Social Rights and Freedoms of Workers?” Journal of Political Science: Bulletin of Yerevan University 1 (1): 78-106. https://doi.org/10.46991/JOPS/2022.1.1.078.
Aleksanyan, Nane. 2022. “Mapping Political Populism in the European Post-Transitional Periphery”. Journal of Political Science: Bulletin of Yerevan University 1 (2): 73-91. https://doi.org/10.46991/JOPS/2022.1.2.073.
Amnesty International. 2023. “Armenia/Azerbaijan: Pegasus Spyware Targeted Armenian Public Figures amid Conflict.” Accessed September 29, 2023. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2023/05/armenia-azerbaijan-pegasus-spyware-targeted-armenian-public-figures-amid-conflict/.
BBC. 2021. “Pegasus: Who Are the Alleged Victims of Spyware Targeting?” July 22, 2021. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-57891506.
Brandt, Jessica, and Torrey Taussig. 2019. “Europe’s Authoritarian Challenge.” The Washington Quarterly 42 (4): 133-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2019.1693099.
Ellis, Joseph M. 2022. “Russian Disinformation: The Forest Brothers, Baltic Resistance, and NATO.” In: Information Wars in the Baltic States: Russia’s Long Shadow, edited by Janis Chakars and Indra Ekmanis, 35-52. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99987-2_3.
Factor TV. 2023. “During the war, they tried to spy on the phone of the MFA spokesperson. Samvel Martirosyan: VIDEO.” May 29, 2023. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://factor.am/651459.html
Feldstein, Steven. 2019. “The Global Expansion of AI Surveillance.” Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://carnegieendowment.org/files/WP-Feldstein-AISurveillance_final1.pdf.
Freedom House. 2019. “Social Media Are a Growing Conduit for Electoral Manipulation and Mass Surveillance.” Accessed September 29, 2023. https://freedomhouse.org/article/social-media-are-growing-conduit-electoral-manipulation-and-mass-surveillance.
Freedom House. 2022. “Freedom on the Net 2022.” Accessed September 29, 2023. https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2022-10/FOTN2022Digital.pdf.
Glazunova, Sofya. 2022. The “Sovereign Internet” and Social Media. In: Digital Activism in Russia: The Communication Tactics of Political Outsiders. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 67-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93503-0_4.
Gosztonyi, Gergely. 2023. The Rise of Digital Authoritarianism Across the Globe. In: Censorship from Plato to Social Media. Law, Governance and Technology Series, vol 61. Springer, Cham, 157-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46529-1_11.
Greitens, Sheena Chestnut, 2020. “Dealing with Demand for China’s Global Surveillance Exports.” The Brookings Institution, April 2020, Accessed September 29, 2023. https://www.brookings.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2020/04/FP_20200428_china_surveillance_greitens_v3.pdf.
Isaacs, Rico. 2022. Non-oligarchic Public Voice in Kazakhstan from Below, 2011-2022. In: Political Opposition in Authoritarianism. The Theories, Concepts and Practices of Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 97-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06536-1_6.
JAM-news. 2021. “Azerbaijan Suspected of Spying on Journalists Using Israeli Pegasus Spyware.” July 19, 2021. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://jam-news.net/azerbaijan-suspected-of-spying-on-journalists-using-israeli-pegasus-spyware/.
Khalil, Lydia. 2020. “Digital Authoritarianism, China and Covid.” Lowy Institute, November 2, 2020. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/digital-authoritarianism-china-covid.
Krapiva, Natalia, and Anastasiya Zhyrmont. 2023. “Digital Dictatorship: Authoritarian Tactics and Resistance in EECA.” Access Now, March 17, 2023. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://www.accessnow.org/digital-dictatorship-and-resistance-in-eastern-europe-and-central-asia/.-.
Kravtsov, Vlad. 2022. Securitizing the Epidemic: Ideological Adaptations and Illiberal Meanings. In: Autocracy and Health Governance in Russia. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 153-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05789-2_5.
Michaelsen, Marcus. 2018. “Transforming Threats to Power: The International Politics of Authoritarian Internet Control in Iran.” International Journal of Communication 12: 3856-3876.
Mirzoyan, Armen. 2021. “Those who have information about Armenia’s foreign policy are targeted by Pegasus.” Hetq.am, November 24, 2021. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://hetq.am/hy/article/138214.
Mölder, Holger. 2019. “The prospects of strategic imagination in explaining international security challenges.” Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology 57: 55-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01386-w.
Mozur, Paul, 2021. “The Great Firewall: China’s model of digital control.” MIGS Montreal, September 26, 2021. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMDYzAsomGA.
Perez, Evan, and Diaz, Daniella. “FBI: DNC Rebuffed Request to Examine Computer Servers.” CNN, January 5, 2017. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://www.cnn.com/2017/01/05/politics/fbi-russia-hacking-dnc-crowdstrike/index.html.
Polyakova, Alina, and Chris Meserole. 2019. “Exporting digital authoritarianism: The Russian and Chinese models.” Brookings Institution Policy Brief. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/FP_20190827_digital_authoritarianism_polyakova_meserole.pdf.
Qiaoan, Runya, and Jessica C. Teets. 2020. “Responsive Authoritarianism in China - a Review of Responsiveness in Xi and Hu Administrations.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 25: 139-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-019-09640-z.
Richey, Mason. 2018. “Contemporary Russian revisionism: understanding the Kremlin’s hybrid warfare and the strategic and tactical deployment of disinformation.” Asia Europe Journal 16: 101-113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-017-0482-5.
Roberts, Huw, Josh Cowls, Jessica Morley, Mariarosaria Taddeo, Vincent Wang, and Luciano Floridi. 2021. “The Chinese approach to artificial intelligence: an analysis of policy, ethics, and regulation.” AI & Society: Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Communication 36: 59-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00992-2.
Rothacher, Albrecht. 2021. Putin’s Autocracy: Siloviki Rule and Their Kleptocracy. In: Putinomics. Springer, Cham, 105-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74077-1_3.
Schatz, Edward. 2023. “Varieties of Authoritarianism in Eurasia.” In: Securitization and Democracy in Eurasia: Transformation and Development in the OSCE Region, edited by Anja Mihr, Paolo Sorbello, and Brigitte Weiffen, 279-290. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16659-4_19.
Schlumberger, Oliver, Mirjam Edel, Ahmed Maati, and Koray Saglam. 2023. “How Authoritarianism Transforms: A Framework for the Study of Digital Dictatorship.” Government and Opposition: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2023.20.
Shahbaz, Adrian. 2018. “The Rise of Digital Authoritarianism: Fake news, data collection, and the challenge to democracy”. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-net/2018/rise-digital-authoritarianism.
Sinkkonen, Sinkkonen, and Jussi Lassila. 2022. “Digital Authoritarianism and Technological Cooperation in Sino-Russian Relations: Common Goals and Diverging Standpoints.” In: Russia-China Relations: Emerging Alliance or Eternal Rivals?, edited by Sarah Kirchberger, Svenja Sinjen, and Nils Wörmer, 165-184. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97012-3_9.
Taylor, Monique. 2022. China’s Digital Authoritarianism Goes Global: A Governance Perspective. In: China’s Digital Authoritarianism. Politics and Development of Contemporary China. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 111-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11252-2_6.
Williams, Martyn. 2010. “North Korea Moves Quietly onto the Internet.” Computerworld, June 10, 2010. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://www.computerworld.com/article/2518914/north-korea-moves-quietly-onto-the-internet.html.
Woodhams, Samuel, 2020. “The Rise of Internet Throttling: A Hidden Threat to Media Development.” Center for International Media Assistance, May 20, 2020. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://www.cima.ned.org/publication/the-rise-of-bandwidththrottling-a-hidden-threat-to-media-development/.
Yang, Yuan, and Madhumita Murgia, 2019. “Data leak reveals China is tracking almost 2.6m people in Xinjiang.” Financial Times, February 16, 2019. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://www.ft.com/content/9ed9362e-31f7-11e9-bb0c-42459962a812.
Yaybokeand, Erol, and Samuel Brannen. 2020. “Promote and Build: A Strategic Approach to Digital Authoritarianism.” Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), October 15, 2020. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://www.csis.org/analysis/promote-and-build-strategic-approach-digital-authoritarianism.
Yilmaz, Ihsan, and Fan Yang. 2023. “Digital Authoritarianism, Religion and Future of Democracy.” In: Digital Authoritarianism and its Religious Legitimization: The Cases of Turkey, Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, and India, edited by Ihsan Yilmaz, 151-166. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3600-7_7.
Yilmaz, Ihsan. 2023. “Digital Authoritarianism and Religion in Democratic Polities of the Global South.” In: Digital Authoritarianism and its Religious Legitimization: The Cases of Turkey, Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, and India, edited by Ihsan Yilmaz, 1-19. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3600-7_1.
Zheng, Wang. 2020. “What Is WeChat and What Can It Do?” CGTN, August 9, 2020. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://newseu.cgtn.com/news/2020-08-09/What-is-WeChat-and-what-can-it-do--SNepY1rgNG/index.html.
Public Policy
-
Public Policy
Decision-making: The Process Contributing to Professional Public Administration
AbstractThis article analysis one of the main issues of public administration theory and practice, which is helpful in government functioning and policy-making. Research study includes the discourse on how to plan and make decisions on behalf of democratic attitude. Public administration is utmost outcome, and the success or failure of the government depends on it. Theoretical debate on decision-making process, accordingly, surveys the fundamental perception on rational and incremental decision-making processes. It refers basically to the administrative institutions. Decision making is important for organizational effectiveness because of its central role in the overall process of directing and controlling. Decisions do not automatically guarantee all programmed outcomes, but denoting actions with professionalism and public support. As a valuable process it is likely to be a central element of management and leadership. Comparative study of examples of developed democratic systems shows the high responsibility of public institutes and government as key actors. Particular attention is paid there to the professionalism of government, which is a vital characteristic of any democratic public administration and virtually a policy quality. Findings of current research shows that decisions are not based solely on laws and regulations. Moreover, as the study shows, many other appropriate skills of decision-makers are important that will be seen with the close linkages with strategic governance.
ReferencesAlthans, Birgit. 2005. “Jane Addams’ and Mary Parker Follett’s Applied Pragmatism: Social Management and Pedagogy.” In: Pragmatism and Education, edited by Daniel Tröhler and Jürgen Oelkers, 95-115. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087903558_008.
Altunyan, Katerina, and Edgar Kalantaryan. 2019. “Public Management Reforms in The Republic of Armenia.” SOTIS-social technologies, research [SOTIS-sotsial'nyye tekhnologii, issledovaniya] 6 (100): 17-26.
Altunyan, Katerina. 2021. “Public Administration in the Republic of Armenia: Reassessment After Thirty Years.” Scientific Artsakh 4 (11): 125-136. https://doi.org/10.52063/25792652-2021.4-125.
Campitelli, Guillermo, and Fernand Gobet. 2010. “Herbert Simon’s Decision-Making Approach: Investigation of Cognitive Processes in Experts.” Review of General Psychology 14 (4): 354-364. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021256.
Cloarec, Nicole. 2018. “Recasting the Iron Lady into flesh and blood: gender performance and politics in three Thatcher biopics.” Biography 41 (3): 630-653.
Daft, Richard L. 2019. Organization Theory and Design. CENGAGE Learning Custom Publishing, Mason, OH.
Drucker, Peter. 2007a. Management Challenges for the 21st Century. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080942384.
Drucker, Peter. 2007b. The Effective Executive. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080549354.
Follett, Mary P. 1998. The New State: Group Organization the Solution of Popular Government. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Gow, James I. 2003. “Decision man: Herbert Simon in search of rationality.” Canadian Public Administration 46 (1): 120-126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2003.tb01583.x.
Héon, François, Sébastien Damart, and Lisa A. T. Nelson. 2021. “Follett, Mary Parker: Change in the Paradigm of Integration.” In: The Palgrave Handbook of Organizational Change Thinkers, edited by David B. Szabla, 595-615. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38324-4_10.
Kalani, Ebrahim, and Ehsan Kamrani. 2017. “Study on the Effects of Work Teams on Human Resources Excellence.” Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies 5: 12-20. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhrss.2017.51002.
Kariel, Henry S. 1955. “The New Order of Mary Parker Follett.” The Western Political Quarterly 8 (3): 425-440. https://doi.org/10.2307/442898.
Khan, Haroon A. 2018. Governance, Public Administration, and the Challenges of Globalization. In: Globalization and the Challenges of Public Administration. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 5-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69587-7_2.
Khudaverdyan, Armen. 2008. Public sector management reforms in the Republic of Armenia. Organizational structures of management, civil service. Yerevan: Sarvard [Khudaverdyan, Armen. 2008. Hanrayin volorti karravarman barep’vokhumnery Hayastani Hanrapetut’yunum: Karravarman kazmakerpakan karruts’vatsk’ner, k’aghak’ats’iakan tsarrayut’yun: Yerevan: Sarvard].
Lindblom, Charles E. 1959. “The Science of ‘Muddling Through.’” Public Administration Review 19 (2): 79-88. https://doi.org/10.2307/973677.
Lindblom, Charles E., and Edward J. Woodhouse. 1993. The Policy-Making Process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
Martin, Thomas N. 2016. Smart Decisions: The Art of Strategic Thinking for the Decision-Making Process. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Naarttijärvi, Markus. 2023. “Situating the Rule of Law in the Context of Automated Decision-Making.” In: The Rule of Law and Automated Decision-Making: Exploring Fundamentals of Algorithmic Governance, edited by Markku Suksi, 15-31. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30142-1_2.
Osborne, David, and Ted Gaebler. 1992. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading Mass: Addison-Wesley Pub.
Simon, Herbert A. 1960. The New Science of Management Decision. New York: Harper.
Spencer, Leland G., and Timothy S. Forest. 2023. “Mediating Maggie: Margaret Thatcher, leadership, and gender in The Iron Lady and The Crown.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 40 (2-3): 108-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2023.2229898.
Stein, Guido. 2010. Managing People and Organizations : Peter Drucker's Legacy. Bingley UK: Emerald.
Stewart, Ruth, Laurenz Langer, and Yvonne Erasmus. 2019. “An integrated model for increasing the use of evidence by decision-makers for improved development.” Development Southern Africa 36 (5): 616-631, https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2018.1543579.
Zekos, Georgios I. 2022. Cyberspace Governance and Politics. In: Political, Economic and Legal Effects of Artificial Intelligence. Contributions to Political Science. Springer, Cham, 337-382. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94736-1_8.
Book Review
-
Book Review
Politics Between Nations. Contributions to International Relations, edited by Adebowale Akande. Springer, Cham. 2023. XXVII, 645 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24896-2.
AbstractThis book comparatively analyzes global conflicts and diplomatic relations between international players, as well as the mechanisms of public diplomacy, the difficulties of peace diplomacy and hard power war. In the book, the authors pay special attention to the issues of the modern world order, relations between various geopolitical, regional and national actors in an environment of increasingly complex international relations, emerging challenges and threats. The authors pay special attention to the efforts of intergovernmental organizations, the problem of terrorism, including international terrorism, and the violation of global stability, which still remain serious challenges and threats that national states, as well as international institutions, are called upon to solve. The authors analyze various dimensions of the intensification of terrorism, military conflicts and threats to national states emanating from military blocs, and update the issues of terrorist danger and international instability. They note that this state of affairs in the world system puts on the political agenda the importance of enhanced interaction between national states with international weight, resources and capabilities. In this regard, constructive and civilized interaction of all countries in the international arena to counter terrorism and strengthen international stability is of particular relevance.
ReferencesAfolabi, Taiwo. 2023. “Bringing Law as Interpretation (Through Performance Art) to the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement: A Conceptual Framework for Borderlands.” In: Politics Between Nations. Contributions to International Relations, edited by Adebowale Akande, 397-421. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24896-2_20.
Akande, Adebowale, and Mark Goodman. 2023. “Introduction: Who Rules the World? After War Ends, Who Wins the Peace?” In: Politics Between Nations. Contributions to International Relations, edited by Adebowale Akande, 3-25. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24896-2_1.
Akande, Adebowale, Titilola Akande, Jibola Adetoun, and Modupe Adewuyi. 2023. “Children in Times of War and World Disorder in the Twenty-First Century: The International Law and Children’s Human Rights.” In: Politics Between Nations. Contributions to International Relations, edited by Adebowale Akande, 305-335. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24896-2_16.
Anderson, Richard D. 2023a. “The Fix: Why We Can’t Solve the World’s Problems.” In: Politics Between Nations. Contributions to International Relations, edited by Adebowale Akande, 29-50. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24896-2_2.
Anderson, Richard D. 2023b. “Failed Assault on Ukraine: Russian Corruption and the Politics of Military Incompetence.” In: Politics Between Nations. Contributions to International Relations, edited by Adebowale Akande, 151-169. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24896-2_8.
Anderson, Richard D. 2023c. “Why Foreign Policies Fail, and Why Political Scientists Misunderstand Policy Failure.” In: Politics Between Nations. Contributions to International Relations, edited by Adebowale Akande, 621-645. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24896-2_30.
Brueller, Nir N., David R. King, and Rojan Robotham. 2023. “A Spin of the Wheel: Co-operation or Competition—Defense Procurement and Defense Industries in International Relations.” In: Politics Between Nations. Contributions to International Relations, edited by Adebowale Akande, 475-496. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24896-2_23.
Chaney, Cassandra D., Natasha M. Lee-Johnson, Chelsey C. Wooten, DeShara C. Doub, and Emily C. George Tilley. 2023. ““The Hidden Figure of a Global Crime”: From Human Trafficking to Human Rights: Complexities and Pitfalls.” In: Politics Between Nations. Contributions to International Relations, edited by Adebowale Akande, 423-447. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24896-2_21.
Cimbala, Stephen J. 2023. “Modernizing the U.S. Strategic Land-Based Missile Force: Prudent Necessity or Deterrence Distraction?” In: Politics Between Nations. Contributions to International Relations, edited by Adebowale Akande, 519-535. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24896-2_25.
Cimbala, Stephen J., and Adam B. Lowther. 2023. “Nuclear Danger in Asia: Arms Races or Stability?” In: Politics Between Nations. Contributions to International Relations, edited by Adebowale Akande, 263-280. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24896-2_14.
Goodman, Mark. 2023a. “The Questions of War: Taiwan and Ukraine.” In: Politics Between Nations. Contributions to International Relations, edited by Adebowale Akande, 171-191. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24896-2_9.
Goodman, Mark. 2023b. “The End of “The Endless War”: Biden’s Botched Afghanistan Exit and the Myth of American Decline.” In: Politics Between Nations. Contributions to International Relations, edited by Adebowale Akande, 249-261. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24896-2_13.
Goodman, Mark. 2023c. “Putin’s Russia and the Nuclear War Threat to the West: Everyone Loses, One Step Forward, Two Steps Back.” In: Politics Between Nations. Contributions to International Relations, edited by Adebowale Akande, 337-351. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24896-2_17.
Gray, Gabrielle, and Richard Seltzer. 2023. “Public Perception of Race Relations During the Obama Era.” In: Politics Between Nations. Contributions to International Relations, edited by Adebowale Akande, 233-246. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24896-2_12.
Jones, David A. 2023. “Trojan Horses or Still Out in the Cold? United States Foreign Relations with Poland: Road Ahead in the Wake of Russian Rockets Landing in NATO State Poland.” In: Politics Between Nations. Contributions to International Relations, edited by Adebowale Akande, 605-620. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24896-2_29.
Lulat, Y. G. -M. 2023. “Britain’s Economic Relations with Africa in a Post-Brexit Future.” In: Politics Between Nations. Contributions to International Relations, edited by Adebowale Akande, 561-587. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24896-2_27.
Mișcoiu, Sergiu, and Dan Petrica. 2023. “The New EU-Africa Relations’ Strategy: Soft Power or Neoliberalist Power?” In: Politics Between Nations. Contributions to International Relations, edited by Adebowale Akande, 539-560. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24896-2_26.
Mișcoiu, Sergiu. 2023. “Romania: Between Europeanisation and De-Europeanisation.” In: Politics Between Nations. Contributions to International Relations, edited by Adebowale Akande, 589-603. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24896-2_28.
Pinto, José Filipe, and Sérgio Vieira da Silva. 2023. “The Battle Against Global Terrorism: The Role of Private Security in the USA and in the EU.” In: Politics Between Nations. Contributions to International Relations, edited by Adebowale Akande, 371-395. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24896-2_19.
Pinto, José Filipe. 2023a. “European Union: Politics and Policies.” In: Politics Between Nations. Contributions to International Relations, edited by Adebowale Akande, 111-129. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24896-2_6.
Pinto, José Filipe. 2023b. “Populist Sharp Power: How the World Entered in a New Cold War.” In: Politics Between Nations. Contributions to International Relations, edited by Adebowale Akande, 193-210. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24896-2_10.
Rendtorff, Jacob Dahl. 2023a. “Cosmopolitan Peacekeeping Through International Humanitarian Order in the Frame of Sustainability and the Global Economy.” In: Politics Between Nations. Contributions to International Relations, edited by Adebowale Akande, 73-95. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24896-2_4.
Rendtorff, Jacob Dahl. 2023b. “Human Rights in the World Community: Issues, Challenges, and Action Proposed.” In: Politics Between Nations. Contributions to International Relations, edited by Adebowale Akande, 211-231. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24896-2_11.
Salavrakos, Ioannis-Dionysios, Allison Palmadessa, and Ernestas Radvila. 2023. “A Global Animal Farm: Situating International Instability.” In: Politics Between Nations. Contributions to International Relations, edited by Adebowale Akande, 449-474. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24896-2_22.
Sheikh, Naveed S. 2023. “Islam v. Islamic State: Charges, Arguments, and Evidence in the Islamic Case Against ISIS.” In: Politics Between Nations. Contributions to International Relations, edited by Adebowale Akande, 497-517. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24896-2_24.
Stivachtis, Yannis A. 2023a. “The American Supremacy and Leadership Preeminence in NATO: A Test of the Transatlantic Alliance.” In: Politics Between Nations. Contributions to International Relations, edited by Adebowale Akande, 51-71. Springer, Cham.. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24896-2_3.
Stivachtis, Yannis A. 2023b. “Making War and Building Peace: What Future for the United Nations and Regional Peace Operations.” In: Politics Between Nations. Contributions to International Relations, edited by Adebowale Akande, 131-147. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24896-2_7.
Stivachtis, Yannis A. 2023c. “Addressing Disinformation and Misplaced Criticism: The Need for a More Effective EU Public Diplomacy.” In: Politics Between Nations. Contributions to International Relations, edited by Adebowale Akande, 281-303. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24896-2_15.
Stivachtis, Yannis A. 2023d. “Human Security and Human Rights: Connecting the Global and the Local.” In: Politics Between Nations. Contributions to International Relations, edited by Adebowale Akande, 353-368. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24896-2_18.
Tonon, Graciela H. 2023. “Making Waves: Accessing a Model of Sustainable Peace and Cooperation Through Qualitative Methodologies.” In: Politics Between Nations. Contributions to International Relations, edited by Adebowale Akande, 97-109. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24896-2_5.
-
Book Review
Peace Pedagogies in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Theory and Practice in Formal Education, edited by Larisa Kasumagić-Kafedžić, and Sara Clarke-Habibi. Springer, Cham. 2023. XVIII, 343 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26246-3.
AbstractThis book is dedicated to the problem of peace pedagogy in Bosnia and Herzegovina, which is becoming increasingly important throughout the world, taking into account the level of hostility, xenophobia and hate speech, as well as other potential threats and risks to humanity. The book analyzes the international development of peace pedagogies and the mechanism for their implementation in Bosnia and Herzegovina, identifying key words and formulating key questions. In this context, current issues and problems in the education system and political context of Bosnia and Herzegovina are analyzed. With the assistance of international organizations and Western countries, the educational system of Bosnia and Herzegovina advocates a more active and systematic strengthening of peace pedagogy in order to more effectively harness the potential of education as a means of reconciliation. The book examines the wide range of international and local initiatives that arose in post-war Bosnia and Herzegovina with the aim of integrating the values of peace and peace education into the education system in Bosnia and Herzegovina, through formal and informal European educational mechanisms.
ReferencesCerić, Haris, Amel Alić, and Sedin Habibović. 2023. “Evaluating Intercultural Sensitivity among High School and University Students.” In: Peace Pedagogies in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Theory and Practice in Formal Education, edited by Larisa Kasumagić-Kafedžić, and Sara Clarke-Habibi, 267-287. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26246-3_13.
Clarke-Habibi, Sara. 2023. “Teacher Identity as a Barrier and Bridge to Peace Pedagogies.” In: Peace Pedagogies in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Theory and Practice in Formal Education, edited by Larisa Kasumagić-Kafedžić, and Sara Clarke-Habibi, 137-160. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26246-3_7.
Dujković-Blagojević, Bojana. 2023. “Preparing Future Teachers to Educate for Democracy and Human Rights: The Western Balkans Approach.” In: Peace Pedagogies in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Theory and Practice in Formal Education, edited by Larisa Kasumagić-Kafedžić, and Sara Clarke-Habibi, 81-98. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26246-3_4.
Emkić, Eleonora. 2023. “Approaches to Peace Education and Institutionalization of Peace Values in Formal Education in Bosnia and Herzegovina.” In: Peace Pedagogies in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Theory and Practice in Formal Education, edited by Larisa Kasumagić-Kafedžić, and Sara Clarke-Habibi, 65-77. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26246-3_3.
Karahasanović-Avdibegović, Ida. 2023. “Drama-Based Pedagogy: Theatre for Social Change in Classroom.” In: Peace Pedagogies in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Theory and Practice in Formal Education, edited by Larisa Kasumagić-Kafedžić, and Sara Clarke-Habibi, 207-226. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26246-3_10.
Kasumagić-Kafedžić, Larisa, and Sara Clarke-Habibi. 2023. “Peace Pedagogies: A Review of Key Theories and Approaches.” In: Peace Pedagogies in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Theory and Practice in Formal Education, edited by Larisa Kasumagić-Kafedžić, and Sara Clarke-Habibi, 3-42. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26246-3_1.
Kasumagić-Kafedžić, Larisa, Paula M. Pickering, and Ethan Brown. 2023. “Promoting Peace and Intercultural Understanding Through Sustained Partnership: The American-Bosnian Collaboration Project.” In: Peace Pedagogies in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Theory and Practice in Formal Education, edited by Larisa Kasumagić-Kafedžić, and Sara Clarke-Habibi, 315-332. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26246-3_15.
Kasumagić-Kafedžić, Larisa. 2023. “Integrating Critical and Intercultural Pedagogies in Teacher Education and Language Didactics.” In: Peace Pedagogies in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Theory and Practice in Formal Education, edited by Larisa Kasumagić-Kafedžić, and Sara Clarke-Habibi, 99-114. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26246-3_5.
Ljubojević, Branka. 2023. “Teacher Reflections on Peacebuilding Through Mother Tongue Language and Literature Education.” In: Peace Pedagogies in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Theory and Practice in Formal Education, edited by Larisa Kasumagić-Kafedžić, and Sara Clarke-Habibi, 187-205. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26246-3_9.
Mavrak, Mirjana. 2023. “Fostering Inner, Interpersonal and Intergroup Peace Through a Gestalt Psychology Approach in Adult Education.” In: Peace Pedagogies in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Theory and Practice in Formal Education, edited by Larisa Kasumagić-Kafedžić, and Sara Clarke-Habibi, 115-136. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26246-3_6.
Millican,Juliet, and Larisa Kasumagić-Kafedžić. 2023. “Applied Learning for Peace: Experiential Pedagogies, Teacher Practice and Engagement in Higher Education.” In: Peace Pedagogies in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Theory and Practice in Formal Education, edited by Larisa Kasumagić-Kafedžić, and Sara Clarke-Habibi, 291-314. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26246-3_14.
Pašalić-Kreso, Adila. 2023. “Education as a Victim and Accomplice of Conflict: Historical Perspectives and Possible Ways of Strengthening Peace Pedagogy in Bosnia and Herzegovina.” In: Peace Pedagogies in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Theory and Practice in Formal Education, edited by Larisa Kasumagić-Kafedžić, and Sara Clarke-Habibi, 43-63. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26246-3_2.
Plasto, Melisa Forić, and Bojana Dujković Blagojević. 2023. “Peace in History Education of Bosnia and Herzegovina.” In: Peace Pedagogies in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Theory and Practice in Formal Education, edited by Larisa Kasumagić-Kafedžić, and Sara Clarke-Habibi, 163-185. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26246-3_8.
Šiljak, Zilka Spahić, and Melika Šahinović. 2023. “Peace Pedagogy in Intercultural and Interreligious Learning: Insights from the ETOS Initiative and SAPERE BiH Program (2014-2020).” In: Peace Pedagogies in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Theory and Practice in Formal Education, edited by Larisa Kasumagić-Kafedžić, and Sara Clarke-Habibi, 247-265. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26246-3_12.
Sobhani, Naghmeh. 2023. “Peace-Based Education in Early Post-War Bosnia and Herzegovina: Insights from the Education for Peace Program (2000-2013).” In: Peace Pedagogies in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Theory and Practice in Formal Education, edited by Larisa Kasumagić-Kafedžić, and Sara Clarke-Habibi, 227-245. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26246-3_11.
-
Book Review
Karsgaard, Carrie. 2023. Instagram as Public Pedagogy: Online Activism and the Trans Mountain Pipeline. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. XVII, 277 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26182-4
AbstractThis book provides a comparative analysis of the public pedagogy of Instagram in the social networking system, which today is not only one of the leading channels whose content is actively consumed by young people, but also a platform where content from various information and communication environments is posted and distributed. In this context, modern research into Instagram public pedagogy is aimed primarily at studying the phenomena of civic and social activity, communication barriers and ways to overcome them. The book provides examples of various social and humanities studies that occupy the study of public pedagogy, as well as the influence of social networks and virtual reality on behavior and perception of various events. In this book, the political science research problem lies in the formation of digital political pedagogy and the pedagogical contradiction of applying traditional theoretical approaches to the formation of public attitudes in the new environment of virtual social networks. Knowledge of the peculiarities of the formation of civil and political attitudes on Instagram and other social networks will allow us to develop effective methods for diagnosing and leveling the influence of social networks.
ReferencesKarsgaard, Carrie. 2023. Introduction. In: Instagram as Public Pedagogy. Palgrave Studies in Education and the Environment. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26182-4_1.
Karsgaard, Carrie. 2023. Resistance to the Trans Mountain Expansion in a Settler Colonial Context. In: Instagram as Public Pedagogy. Palgrave Studies in Education and the Environment. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 21-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26182-4_2.
Karsgaard, Carrie. 2023. Social Media Learning: Public Pedagogy, Power, and Agency. In: Instagram as Public Pedagogy. Palgrave Studies in Education and the Environment. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 75-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26182-4_3.
Karsgaard, Carrie. 2023. #stoptmx: Hashtagged Issue Public Pedagogy. In: Instagram as Public Pedagogy. Palgrave Studies in Education and the Environment. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 131-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26182-4_4.
Karsgaard, Carrie. 2023. From Blueberry Harvesting Grounds to Urban Ports: Public Pedagogy and Place. In: Instagram as Public Pedagogy. Palgrave Studies in Education and the Environment. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 183-229. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26182-4_5.
Karsgaard, Carrie. 2023. New Visions for Anti-colonial Digital Methods. In: Instagram as Public Pedagogy. Palgrave Studies in Education and the Environment. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 231-254 . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26182-4_6.
Karsgaard, Carrie. 2023. Conclusion: Public Pedagogy, Formal Education, and Anti-colonial Justice. In: Instagram as Public Pedagogy. Palgrave Studies in Education and the Environment. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 255-271. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26182-4_7.
