The Problem of Using the Results of Operational-Intelligent Activities Carried Out for the Purpose of Detecting Crime in the Criminal Judiciary of the RA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU.C/2026.17.1.082Keywords:
operational search activity, admissibility of evidence, inadmissible evidence, detection of a crimeAbstract
The purpose of the article is to analyze the issue of using the results of operational-investigative activities carried out for the purpose of revealing a crime in the criminal proceedings of the Republic of Armenia. The legal norms are such that often both the investigating authorities and the prosecutor's office, as well as the court interpret them in different ways.
This refers to a certain contradiction between Part 3 of Article 96 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Armenia and Article 4 of the Law “On Operative-Investigative Activities”.
In other words, the article aims to present a problem that has arisen or may arise in legal practice. In this regard, the article is also relevant, since the approaches presented may be of interest to students, lawyers, law enforcement officers, and judges.
Downloads
References
ՀՀ քրեական դատավարության օրենսգիրք՝ ընդունված 2021 թվականի հունիսի 30-ին (HH qreakan datavarutyan orensgirk, yndunvats 2021 tvakan hunsisi 30-in)։
«Նորմատիվ իրավական ակտերի մասին» ՀՀ օրենք՝ ընդունված 2018 թ․ մարտի 21-ին (Normativ-iravakan akteri masin hh orenq yndunvats 2018t. marti 21-in)։
«Օպերատիվ–հետախուզական գործունեության մասին» ՀՀ օրենք՝ ընդունված 2007 թ․ հոկտեմբերի 22-ին («Operativ-hetakhuzakan gortzuneutyan masin» HH orenk yndunvats 2007.t hoktemberi 22-in)։
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Карен Амирян
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
