INTERNATIONAL ATTITUDE TO CULTURAL GENOCIDE PREVENTION IN NAGORNO-KARABAKH: A LINGUISTIC PERSPECTIVE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46991/AFA/2025.SI-1.145Keywords:
Ethnic cleansing, cultural genocide, Nagorno-Karabakh (Artsakh), Armenia, Azerbaijan, prosodic analysisAbstract
The present study is an attempt to examine the tragic consequences of genocides in general, with a particular focus on cultural genocides. Cultural genocide, though not explicitly identified in international law, represents a profound and insidious form of destruction aimed at eradicating the cultural, religious, and social foundations of a group. The cultural genocide in Nagorno-Karabakh (Artsakh), the destruction of its cultural legacy, continues to demand urgent attention. Hence, we aim to highlight the true picture of cultural genocide through a prosodic and linguistic analysis of speeches – both written and spoken – by prominent American and European politicians. The purpose is to underscore the critical importance of preserving cultural identities and to advocate for the formal recognition of cultural genocide in international law. Acknowledging both physical and cultural genocides allows for a more comprehensive strategy for preventing and responding to the destruction of communities and their unique legacies. Combining historical research with prosodic analysis of political speeches delivered between 2020 and 2023, this article explores how vocal elements such as intonation, stress, and rhythm reflect global attitudes toward the cultural erasure of Nagorno-Karabakh. The findings reveal that these speech patterns often mirror geopolitical positions – some conveying urgency, others indifference – shaping public awareness and political engagement. The study calls for the equal recognition of physical and cultural genocides to ensure the full protection of vulnerable groups and stronger mechanisms for international accountability.
Downloads
References
Avedian, L. (2021, March 31). Cultural cleansing in occupied Artsakh. The Armenian Weekly.
Balayan, V. (2002). Artsakhi patmut'yun: Hnadaric minch& mer o'rery' [History of Artsakh: From antiquity to the present day]. Amaras. (in Armenian)
Conversi, D. (2006). Genocide, ethnic cleansing and nationalism. The Sage Handbook of Nations and Nationalism, 320-333.
Hakobyan, H., Minasyan, T., & Torosyan, V. (2022). Manuscript heritage of Artsakh and Utik. Yerevan: Matenadaran Publications.
HART. (Humanitarian Aid Relief Trust). (2023). A joint report on the analysis of the risk factors associated with the crime of genocide in the Republic of Artsakh. Retrieved October 20, 2024.
Harvard Law School Advocates for Human Rights. (2020, November 10). On the International Recognition of Artsakh and Ending Civilian Suffering: A Conversation with Permanent Representative Robert Avetisyan. Retrieved October 20, 2024.
Hasan-Jalalyan, S. (2023). Genesis of Azerbaijan-Artsakh Conflict. Scientific Artsakh 4 (19), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.52063/25792652-2023.4.19-29.
Klonowiecka-Milart A., Paylan Sh. (06.11.2023). Forced Displacement of Armenians from Nagorno-Karabakh: A Response. https://opiniojuris.org/2023/11/06/forced-displacement-of-armenians-from-nagorno-karabakh-a-response/ Retrieved October 10, 2024.
Lemkin, R.(1945). Genocide – A Modern Crime. Free World (Vol. 4), 39‒43.
Lemkin, R. (1946). Genocide. American Scholar (Vol. 15), 227‒230.
Lemkin, R. (1947). Genocide as a Crime under International Law. American Journal of International Law, 41 (1), 145-151.
Luck, E. C. (2018). Cultural Genocide and the protection of cultural heritage, Los Angeles: J. Paul Getty Trust.
Menendez, B. (2023). Chairman Menendez delivers floor speech. Foreign Relations Committee. Retrieved October 20, 2024.
Ocampo, L. M. (2023, August 7). Expert opinion: Genocide against Armenians in 2023. Retrieved October 20, 2024.
Petrosyan, H., & Muradyan, H. (2022) The Cultural heritage of Artsakh/Karabakh at the Cross-hairs of attacks, Yerevan: Ministry of Education, Science, Culture and Sports of the Republic of Artsakh Publ.
Rep. Schiff. leads letter urging U.S. to protect Armenian cultural heritage in Artsakh. (2024, June 26). Armenian National Committee of America. Retrieved October 20, 2024.
Risk factors and indicators of the crime of Genocide in the Republic of Artsakh: Applying the UN framework of analysis for atrocity crimes to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict report. (2023, September 5). Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention. Retrieved October 25, 2024.
Safeguarding Armenian cultural and eligious Heritage in Artsakh. (2023, January 22). Armenian Bar Association. Retrieved November 12, 2024.
Sewell, A. (2023, August 9). Armenians face genocide in Azerbaijan, former international criminal court prosecutor warns. AP. Retrieved November 14, 2024.
Shahnazaryan, A. (2014). Azerbaijani attempts to falsify the ethnic belonging of Artsakh princley houses. The Problems of the History of Armenia, 15, 73-88.
Stepanyan, G. (2024, August 15). Artsakh Ombudsman. Azerbaijan continues cultural genocide in Artsakh amid international silence. Horizon Weekly. Retrieved November 14, 2024.
Tatikyan, S. (2024). Legal and political aspects of the de-Armenization of Nagorno-Karabakh: Ethnic cleansing, genocide, forced displacement or voluntary exodus? International Journal of Armenian Genocide Studies. 9 (1), 62-95 https://doi.org/10.51442/ijags.0051. /10.51442/ijags.0051.
Tatoyan, A. (2022, September 12). The distortion of historical facts at the basis of Azerbaijan’s anti-Armenian policy. Center for Truth and Justice. Retrieved November 10, 2024.
Zovighian, L. (2022, November 10). Artsakh can’t afford to wait for the international community to sound the alarm of Genocide. Newsweek. Retrieved November 10, 2024.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.












