The problem of artificial intelligence in the context of existential ontology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU.E/2025.16.2.037Keywords:
artificial intelligence, virtual reality, technogenic society, reason, consciousness, digital technologies, biotechnological revolutionAbstract
In today’s virtual and increasingly digitalized world, the questions surrounding the relationship between the development of artificial intelligence and the existential ontology of the human being have acquired new theoretical and practical significance. These issues require focused philosophical and socio-cultural reflection.Taking this reality into account and addressing the challenges facing contemporary society, the article places special emphasis on the fundamental questions concerning the nature, development, and functions of artificial intelligence, as well as the problems and potential risks it poses. Attention is also given to the prospects for effective human–AI interaction and the potential of human–machine systems to contribute to solving real societal issues.The core issue lies in the fact that the increasing penetration of artificial intelligence into nearly all spheres of life—its growing role in the digital economy, business, and other domains—as well as the emergence of virtual reality and the post-human era, demand a rethinking of the place and role of cutting-edge technologies in human life.Furthermore, the interest in artificial intelligence is driven not only by the modern human’s attraction to technological innovations that aim to improve socio-economic life, but also by the fact that AI exhibits playful dimensions and is tied to questions concerning the organization of leisure and entertainment in consumer society.
References
1. Միրզոյան Վ. Ա․, Հանրաբանական դիտարկումներ: Թարգմանությունների ժողովածու, Եր., Մեկնարկ, 2024 թ., 400 էջ:
2. Агамбен Дж. Homo sacer. Суверенная власть и голая жизнь. М., «Европа», 2011, 256 с.
3. Брайдотти Р. Постчеловек. М., Института Гайдара, 2021. 408 с.
4. Ваттимо Дж. Прозрачное общество. М., Логос, 2002, 128 с.
5. Гумбрехт Х. У. Производство присутствия: чего не может передать значение․М․, Новое литературное обозрение, 2006, 184 с.
6. Делѐз Ж. Капитализм и шизофрения․ Екатеринбург, Рипол классик, т.1, 2025, 512 с.
7. Кассирер Э. Избранное. Опыт о человеке․ М., Гардарика, 1998, 794 с.
8. Кутырёв В. А. Естественное и искусственное:борьба миров. Директ-Медиа, М., 2014, 270 с.
9. Мамардашвили М. К. Сознание – это парадоксальность, к которой невозможно привыкнуть: Как я понимаю философию: Москва: Прогресс, 1990. 199 с.
10. Мигуренко Р. А. Человеческие компетенции и искусственный интеллект, Изв․Томского политех․ университета. Экономика: Философия, социология и культурология. 2010. Т. 317. № 6, 85-89 с.
11. Мигуренко Р. А. Постнеклассические стратегии решения проблемы сознания и здравый смысл. Томск․политех․ унив․ Эконом․, Философия, социология и культурология., 2012. № 6, 157-161 с.
12. Сергеев С. Ф. Образование в техногенном мире: гуманизм и трансгуманизм. Школьные технологии. , № 1, 2018. 22-28 с.
13. Стоян А. А. Роль "машин желания" в обществе массового человека. Вестник ЛГУ, № 1, 2018, 56-68 с.
14. Терещенко Н.А. Социальная философия после «смерти социального»: Казань: Казан. ун-т., 2011, 368 с.
15. Энтин М. Л., Энтина Е. Г., Тнэлм Н. И.. В поисках партнерских отношений – XI.Росия и Европейский Союз в 2019-первой половине 2020 года. М., Зебра -Е, 2020, 592 с.
16. Eden A. H., Jams M. H. Singularity Hypotheses: A Scientific and Philosophical Assessment, Springer Heidelberg New York Dordecht London, 2013.1-12
17. Jonas H. Homo pictor and differentia of man. Social Research.Vol. 29., № 2 (S․1962), 201–220p.
18. Leroi-Gourhan, A. Gesture and Speech․ Cambridge, MA: October, 1993, 451 p.
1. Mirzoyan V. A., Republican Reflections: A Collection of Translations, Yerevan, Meknark, 2024, 400 p.
2. Agamben, G. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Moscow, “Evropa”, 2011, 256 p.
3. Braidotti, R. The Posthuman. Moscow, Gaidar Institute, 2021, 408 p․
4. Vattimo, G. The Transparent Society. Moscow, Logos, 2002, 128 p․
5. Gumbrecht, H. U. The Production of Presence: What Meaning Cannot Convey. Moscow, New Literary Observer, 2006, 184 p.
6. Deleuze G. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Yekaterinburg, Ripol Klassik, Vol. 1, 2025,512 p.
7. Cassirer E. Selected Works: An Essay on Man. Moscow, Gardarika, 1998, 794 p.
8. Kutyrev V. A. The Natural and the Artificial: A Struggle of Worlds. Moscow, Direct-Media, 2014, 270 p.
9. Mamardashvili M. K. Consciousness Is a Paradox One Cannot Get Used To: How I Understand Philosophy. Moscow: Progress, 1990, 199 p.
10. Migurenko R. A. Human Competencies and Artificial Intelligence, Proceedings of Tomsk Polytechnic University. Economics: Philosophy, Sociology, and Cultural Studies. 2010, Vol. 317, No. 6, pp. 85–89.
11. Migurenko R. A. Post-Nonclassical Strategies for Solving the Problem of Consciousness and Common Sense. Tomsk Polytechnic University. Economics, Philosophy, Sociology, and Cultural Studies, 2012, No. 6, pp. 157–161.
12. Sergeev, S. F. Education in a Technogenic World: Humanism and Transhumanism. School Technologies, No. 1, 2018, pp. 22–28.
13. Stoyan A. A. The Role of "Machines of Desire" in the Society of the Mass Man. Vestnik LGU, No. 1, 2018, pp. 56–68.
14. Tereshchenko N. A. Social Philosophy after the "Death of the Social". Kazan: Kazan University, 2011, 368 p.
15. Entin M. L., Entina E. G., Tnelm N. I. In Search of Partnership Relations – XI. Russia and the European Union in 2019–First Half of 2020. Moscow, Zebra-E, 2020, 592 p.
16. Eden A. H., Jams M. H. Singularity Hypotheses: A Scientific and Philosophical Assessment, Springer Heidelberg New York Dordecht London, 2013.1-12p.
17. Jonas H. Homo pictor and differentia of man. Social Research.Vol. 29., № 2 (S․1962), 201–220p.
18. Leroi-Gourhan A. Gesture and Speech․ Cambridge, MA: October, 1993, 451 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nelli Alaverdyan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
