The lexical dominant in poetic text

Authors

  • Levon Hakobyan Yerevan State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU:H/2022.8.2.003

Keywords:

Russian formalism, dominant, levels of text organization, poetic image, distant repetition

Abstract

The article is an attempt of further development of the concept of "dominant" - one of the most important concepts of Russian formalism. A study of the formalists’ works devoted to the dominant shows that they are focused on the study of general theoretical problems of literature from the point of view of the new concept, so they were not interested in studying the dominant in a particular poem. The purpose of this article is to identify the main problems of the dominant in a poetic text and to consider the features of the lexical dominant.

The proposed concept is based on the following provisions.

The dominant is a poetic image that prevails over other images of the text.

Only the accented component of the text can act as a dominant. The main indicator of accentuation is the intensive repetition of some element in a poetic text, so only a repeating component can be a dominant.

It is known that a poetic image can be created at any level of text organization, consequently, the dominant in a poem also can be realized at all text levels.

From the perspective of the traditional division of repetition into contact and distant ones, we can assert that the repetitions at the levels lower than the lexical one can actually function only in contact realization, whereas the repetitions at the levels higher than the lexical one can function only in distant reproduction.

The lexical repetition which can be both contact and distant is between these two extreme levels. The contact repetition performs mainly an expressive function, so its role in the formation of the dominant is insignificant.

More important is the distant and especially the throughout repetition, which implies the presence of a separating space between the repeating text components and their implementation in different micro-contexts.

The distant repetition as a dominant has a number of features that distinguish it from other repetitions: a) the dominant is a developing image, the initial and the final states of which are not equal to each other; b) the dominant is a generative image which creates a number of accompanying images that contribute to the promotion of the dominant and the expansion of its presence in the text.

Author Biography

Levon Hakobyan, Yerevan State University

Levon Hakobyan – PhD, Associate Professor, Head of the Chair of Russian Literature, YSU

References

ИСТОЧНИКИ

Блок, А.А., 1965. Записные книжки. 1901-1920. Москва: Художественная литература.

Заболоцкий Н.А., 1983-1984. Собрание сочинений. В трех томах. Москва: Художественная литература.

Поэтика: словарь актуальных терминов и понятий, 2008. Н.Д. Тамарченко, ред., Москва: Изд. Кулагиной; Intrada.

СПИСОК ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ

Арнольд, И.В., 2010. Стилистика. Современный английский язык. Москва: Флинта.

Виноградов, В.В., 1976. О поэзии Анны Ахматовой. В кн.: Виноградов В.В. Поэтика русской литературы. Избранные труды. Москва: Наука, сс.367-459.

Жирмунский, В.М., 1977a. Валерий Брюсов и наследие Пушкина. Опыт сравнительно-стилистического исследования. В кн.: Жирмунский В.М. Теория литературы. Поэтика. Стилистика. Ленинград: Наука, сс. 142-204.

Жирмунский, В.М., 1977b. Поэтика Александра Блока. В кн.: Жирмунский В.М. Теория литературы. Поэтика. Стилистика. Ленинград: Наука, сс. 205-237.

Жолковский, A.К. и Щеглов, Ю.К., 1975. К понятиям «тема» и «поэтический мир». В кн.: Труды по знаковым системам, VII. Тарту: Изд-во Тартуского ун-та, сс. 143-167.

Зарев, П., 1979-1981. Теория на литературата в два тома. София: Наука и изкуство.

Лотман, Ю.М., 1972. Анализ поэтического текста. Структура стиха. Ленинград: Просвещение.

Ляшевская, О. Н. и Шаров, С. А. Частотный словарь современного русского языка (на материалах Национального корпуса русского языка) – http://dict.ruslang.ru/freq.php?

Томашевский, Б.В., 1999. Теория литературы. Поэтика. Москва: Аспект Пресс.

Тынянов, Ю.Н., 1977a. О литературной эволюции. В кн.: Тынянов Ю.Н. Поэтика. История литературы. Кино. Москва: Наука, сс.270-281.

Тынянов, Ю.Н., 1977b. Тютчев и Гейне. В кн.: Тынянов, Ю.Н. Поэтика. История литературы. Кино. Москва: Наука, сс.350-395.

Ханзен-Лёве, O.Α., 2001. Русский формализм: Методологическая реконструкция развития на основе принципа остранения. Перевод с немецкого С.А. Ромашко. Москва: Языки русской культуры.

Христиансен, Б., 1911.Философия искусства. Перевод с немецкого Г.П. Федорова. Санкт-Петербург: Шиповник.

Хэллидей, М.А.К., 1980. Лингвистическая функция и литературный стиль. Пер. с англ. Н.А. Левковской. В кн.: Новое в зарубежной лингвистике. Вып. IX. Лингвостилистика. Москва: Прогресс, сс.116-147.

Эйхенбаум, Б.М., 1969a. Анна Ахматова (Опыт анализа). В кн.: Эйхенбаум Б.М. О поэзии. Ленинград: Советский писатель, сс. 75-147.

Эйхенбаум, Б.М., 1969b. Мелодика русского лирического стиха. В кн.: Эйхенбаум Б.М. О поэзии. Ленинград: Советский писатель, сс.327-511.

Эйхенбаум, Б.М., 1925. Теория «формального метода» – URL: http://www.opojaz.ru/method/method06.html [дата обращения:14.11.2022].

Эрлих, В., 1996. Русский формализм: история и теория. Перевод с английского А.В. Глебовской. Санкт-Петербург: Академический проект.

Якобсон, P., 1923. О чешском стихе, в сопоставлении преимущественно с русским. Берлин – Москва: 1923.

Якобсон, Р., 1987. Заметки о прозе поэта Пастернака. В кн.: Якобсон Р. Работы по поэтике. Москва: Прогресс, сс. 324-338.

Якобсон, Р.О., 2011. Формальная школа и современное русское литературоведение. Перевод с чешского Е. Бобраковой-Тимошкиной. Москва: Языки славянских культур.

Ярхо, Б.И., 2006. Методология точного литературоведения. В кн.: Ярхо Б.И. Методология точного литературоведения. Избранные труды по теории литературы. Москва: Языки славянских культур, сс.3-400.

REFERENCES

Arnol'd, I.V., 2010. Stilistika. Sovremennyy angliyskiy yazyk [Stylistics. Modern English]. Moscow: Flinta Publ. (In Russian).

Vinogradov, V.V., 1976. O poezii Anny Akhmatovoy [On the Poetry of Anna Akhmatova]. In: Vinogradov V.V. Poetika russkoy literatury. Izbrannye Trudy [Poetics of Russian Literature. Selected Works]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., pp.367-459. (In Russian).

Zhirmunskiy, V.M., 1977a. Valeriy Bryusov i nasledie Pushkina. Opyt sravnitel'no-stilisticheskogo issledovaniya [Valery Bryusov and the Heritage of Pushkin. An Experiment in Comparative Stylistic Analysis]. In: Zhirmunskiy V.M. Teoriya literatury. Poetika. Stilistika. [Theory of Literature. Poetics. Stylistics]. Leningrad: Nauka Publ., pp. 142-204. (In Russian).

Zhirmunskiy, V.M., 1977b. Poetika Aleksandra Bloka [The Poetics of Alexander Blok]. In: Zhirmunskiy V.M. Teoriya literatury. Poetika. Stilistika [Theory of Literature. Poetics. Stylistics]. Leningrad: Nauka Publ., pp. 205-237. (In Russian).

Zholkovskiy, A.K. and Shcheglov, Yu.K., 1975. K ponyatiyam «tema» i «poeticheskiy mir» [To the Concepts of "Theme" and "Poetic World"]. In: Trudy po znakovym sistemam, VII [Proceedings on Sign Systems, 7]. Tartu: Tartu State Univ. Publ., pp. 143-167. (In Russian).

Zarev, P., 1979-1981. Teoriya na literaturata v dva toma [Theory of Literature in Two Volumes]. Sofiya: Nauka i izkustvo Publ. (in Bulgarian).

Lotman, Yu.M., 1972. Analiz poeticheskogo teksta. Struktura stikha [Analysis of the Poetic text. The Structure of Verse]. Leningrad: Prosveshchenie Publ. (In Russian).

Lyashevskaya, O. N. and Sharov, S. A. Chastotnyy slovar' sovremennogo russkogo yazyka (na materialakh Natsional'nogo korpusa russkogo yazyka) [Frequency Dictionary of the Modern Russian Language (based on the materials of the National Corpus of the Russian Language)] – http://dict.ruslang.ru/freq.php? (In Russian).

Tomashevskiy, B.V., 1999. Teoriya literatury. Poetika. [Theory of Literature. Poetics]. Moscow: Aspekt Press Publ. (In Russian).

Tynyanov, Yu.N., 1977a. O literaturnoy evolyutsii. [On Literary Evolution]. In: Tynyanov Yu.N. Poetika. Istoriya literatury. Kino. [Poetics. History of Literature. Cinema]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., pp.270-281. (In Russian).

Tynyanov, Yu.N., 1977b. Tyutchev i Geyne. [Tyutchev and Heine]. In: Tynyanov Yu.N. Poetika. Istoriya literatury. Kino. [Poetics. History of literature. Cinema]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., pp.350-395. (In Russian).

Hansen-Löve, A.A., 2001. Russkiy formalizm: Metodologicheskaya rekonstruktsiya razvitiya na osnove printsipa ostraneniya. [Russian Formalism: Methodological Reconstruction of Development Based on the Principle of Elimination]. Moscow: Yazyki russkoy kul'tury Publ. (In Russian).

Christiansen, B., 1911. Filosofiya iskusstva. [Philosophy of art]. St. Petersburg: Shipovnik Publ. (In Russian).

Halliday, M.A.K., 1980. Lingvisticheskaya funktsiya i literaturnyy stil'. [Linguistic Function and Literary Style]. In: Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike. Vyp. IX. Lingvostilistika. [New in Foreign Linguistics. Vol. 9. Linguistic Stylistics]. Moscow: Progress Publ., pp.116-147. (In Russian).

Eikhenbaum, B.M., 1969a. Anna Akhmatova (Opyt analiza). [Anna Akhmatova (Analysis Experience)]. In: Eikhenbaum B.M. O poezii [About Poetry] Leningrad: Sovetskiy pisatel' Publ., pp. 75-147. (In Russian).

Eikhenbaum, B.M., 1969b. Melodika russkogo liricheskogo stikha. [Melody of Russian Lyrical Verse]. In: Eikhenbaum B.M. O poezii [About Poetry]. Leningrad: Sovetskiy pisatel' Publ., pp.327-511. (In Russian).

Eikhenbaum, B.M., 1925. Teoriya «formal'nogo metoda» [Theory of the "Formal Method"]. URL: http://www.opojaz.ru/method/method06.html [Accessed 14 November 2022]. (In Russian).

Erlich, V., 1996. Russkiy formalizm: istoriya i teoriya. [Russian Formalism: History and Theory]. St. Petersburg: Akademicheskiy proekt Publ. (In Russian).

Jacobson, P., 1923. O cheshskom stikhe, v sopostavlenii preimushchestvenno s russkim. [About Czech Verse, in Comparison Mainly with Russian]. Berlin – Moscow. (In Russian).

Jacobson, R., 1987. Zametki o proze poeta Pasternaka [Notes on the Prose of the Poet Pasternak]. In: Jacobson R. Raboty po poetike [Works on Poetics]. Moscow: Progress Publ., pp. 324-338. (In Russian).

Jakobson, R. O., 2011 Formal'naya shkola i sovremennoe russkoe literaturovedenie. [Formal School and Modern Russian Literary Studies]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul'tur Publ. (In Russian).

Yarkho, B.I., 2006. Metodologiya tochnogo literaturovedeniya. [Methodology of Exact Literary Criticism]. In: Yarkho B.I. Metodologiya tochnogo literaturovedeniya. Izbrannye trudy po teorii literatury. [Methodology of Exact Literary Criticism. Selected Writings on Literary Theory]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul'tur Publ., pp.3-400. (In Russian).

Published

2023-05-15

How to Cite

Hakobyan, L. (2023). The lexical dominant in poetic text. Bulletin of Yerevan University H: Russian Philology, 8(2 (21), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU:H/2022.8.2.003

Issue

Section

Literary criticism