TERRITORIAL MANAGEMENT AS A PRACTICE OF REPRODUCTION OF THE SOCIAL SPACE. TERRITORIAL MANAGEMENT IN THE SPHERE OF SOCIAL-SPATIAL PLANNING, SPATIAL ORGANIZATION AND CONTROL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU:F/2024.15.1.083Keywords:
social space, engagement, socio-spatial planning, spatial organization, spatial control, territorial managementAbstract
Interactions between society and social spaces due to the continuous increase in the complexity of social relations are subjected to permanent reinterpretations. In this context, the previous mechanisms of development and reform of spaces are being replaced by more systematic and multi-vector practices. Currently, socio-spatial planning approaches are considered the most applicable in the context of spatial development and reform, which, based on the representativeness of planning processes and decision-making, offer an effective toolkit for the interaction of society, the expert community and state institutions. At the same time, however, emphasizing the need to ensure the technical standards of spatial reform, strictly professional processes of reform are relatively separated, placing them under the system of spatial organization. The engagement of the professional community, state institutions and society in the process of spatial reforms inevitably leads to the formation of a specific role-status decision-making system, where each subject is endowed with a certain right to make decisions and the power. In this way, the interactions between place leadership and process management emerge, which as a result reproduce the existing system of spatial control. As it becomes clear from the analysis of approaches related to spatial reform, there is a comprehensive system of knowledge on socio-spatial planning, spatial organization and control, but there is a lack of knowledge in the context of highlighting the interrelationships between the above-mentioned concepts, which is also a consequence of not considering the mentioned components in one general conceptual unit. In the framework of this work, an attempt is made to overcome this limitation by offering a new approach to the concept of territorial management (which is already in use) as a practice combining the components of socio-spatial planning, spatial organization and control of spatial reform, within the context of which a new definition of territorial management is also given.
References
Achmani, Y., Vries, W. T. D., Serrano, J., & Bonnefond, M. (2020). Determining Indicators Related to Land Management Interventions to Measure Spatial Inequalities in an Urban (Re)Development Process. Land, 9(11), 448. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9110448
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
Bertaud, A. (2003). Metropolis: A Measure of the Spatial Organization of 7 Large Cities. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238775276_Metropolis_A_Measure_of_the_Spatial_Organization_of_7_Large_Cities
Bosher, L., & Chmutina, K. (2017). Disaster Risk Reduction for the Built Environment (1st ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119233015
CARE International. (2022). Framework of Milestones and Indicators for Community-Based Adaptation (p. 19). CARE Climate Change. https://careclimatechange.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/2022-CARE-Framework-of-Milestones-and-Indicators-for-CBA-Copy.pdf
Colledge, M., Parker, C., Sonderland Saga, R., & Kalendides, A. (2022). Place Leadership in English Local Authorities: A critical success factor for vital and viable high streets (p. 26) [Research Report]. Manchester Metropolitan University, New York University. https://squidex.mkmapps.com/api/assets/ipm/place-leadership-in-english-local-authorities-hstf.pdf
Crespo, J. L., & Cabral, J. (2010). The institutional dimension to urban governance and territorial management in the Lisbon metropolitan area. Análise Social, 45(197), 639–662.
Davern, M., Gunn, L., Whitzman, C., Higgs, C., Giles-Corti, B., Simons, K., Villanueva, K., Mavoa, S., Roberts, R., & Badland, H. (2017). Using spatial measures to test a conceptual model of social infrastructure that supports health and wellbeing. Cities & Health, 1(2), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2018.1443620
Delaney, D. (2009). Territory and Territoriality. In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (pp. 219–231). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10996-5
Edgemon, L., Freeman, C., Burdi, C., Trail, J., Marsh, K., & Pfeiffer, K. (2018). Community Resilience Indicator Analysis: County-Level Analysis of Commonly Used Indicators From Peer-Reviewed Research (p. 39). Argonne National Laboratory. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331232094_Community_Resilience_Indicator_Analysis_County-Level_Analysis_of_Commonly_Used_Indicators_From_Peer-Reviewed_Research
Eraso, J. P. M. (2021). THE INTEGRATED MODEL OF TERRITORIAL MANAGEMENT: A BET FOR PUBLIC MANAGEMENT. Revista Brasileira de Gestao e Desenvolvimento Regional, 17(3), 30–44.
Erdiaw-Kwasie, M. O., & Basson, M. (2017). Reimaging socio-spatial planning: Towards a synthesis between sense of place and social sustainability approaches. Planning Theory, 17(1), 1–19.
Fayol, H. (1954). General and Industrial Management (Translated by Constance Storrs from the French Edition (Dunod) )). Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons, LTD.
Hall, E. T. (1990). The hidden dimension. Anchor Books.
Hewege, C. R. (2012). A Critique of the Mainstream Management Control Theory and the Way Forward. SAGE Open, 2(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244012470114
Hölzel, M., & De Vries, W. T. (2023). Rural Development Policy in Germany Regarding Coworking Spaces and Effects on Vitality and Versatility of Rural Towns. Urban Science, 7(3), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci7030086
Horelli, L. (2002). A Methodology of Participatory Planning. In R. B. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 607–628). J. Wiley & Sons.
Hummon, D. (2012). Community Attachment: Local Sentiment and Sense of Place. In I. Altman & S. Low (Eds.), Place Attachment (Reprint of the original 1 st ed., pp. 253–278). Springer US.
Jakku, E., & Lynam, T. (2010). What is adaptive capacity? (p. 21) [Report for the South East Queensland Climate Adaptation Research Initiative]. CSIRO Climate Adaptation National ResearchFlagship.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259117037_What_ is_adaptive_capacity
Jenson, J. (2010). Defining and Measuring Social Cohesion. e Commonwealth Secretariat.
Jouini, M., Burte, J., Biard, Y., Benaissa, N., Amara, H., & Sinfort, C. (2019). A framework for coupling a participatory approach and life cycle assessment for public decision-making in rural territory management. Science of The Total Environment, 655, 1017–1027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.269
Lekanne Deprez, F., & Tissen, R. (2008). Towards a Spatial Theory of Organizations: Creating New Organizational Forms to Improve Business Performance. SSRN Electronic Journal, 61. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1105664
Lloyd, R., & Aho, W. (2020). The Four Functions of Management—An essential guide to Management Principles. Fort Hays State University. https://doi.org/10.58809/CNFS7851
Manzo, L. C., & Perkins, D. D. (2006). Finding Common Ground: The Importance of Place Attachment to Community Participation and Planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 20(4), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412205286160
Misun, J. (2017). Changing Views on Organizational Control in the Countries of the Eastern Bloc. In Knowledge – Economy – Society. Selected Problems of Dynamically Developing Areasof Economy (pp. 49–63). Foundation of the Cracow University of Economics.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital: Originally published in Journal of Democracy 6 (1), 1995. In L. Crothers & C. Lockhart (Eds.), Culture and Politics (pp. 223–234). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62965-7_12
Rapoport, A. (1994). Spatial organization and the built environment. In T. Ingold (Ed.), Companion encyclopedia of anthropology (pp. 460–502). Routledge.
Shafique, A., Majid, R. A., & Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Malaysia. (2021). Determining Attributes of Spatial Organization in Public Open Space. 43–53. https://doi.org/10.17501/26731029.2020.1204
Sotarauta, M. (2016). Place leadership, governance and power. Administration, 64(3–4), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1515/admin-2016-0024
The Institute of Place Management, (IPM). (2021). 25 ‘Vital and Viable’ Priorities: Place Management. https://squidex.mkmapps.com/api/assets/ipm/place-management-vital-and-viable.pdf
Volpati, V., & Barthelemy, M. (2018). The spatial organization of the population density in cities. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1804.00855
Wafa, A. B. (2024). Territorial Management: A Tool for Local Development. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 32, 80–84. https://doi.org/10.55549/epess.1412822
Wong, S. (2001). Cities, Internal Organization of. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (1 st ed., pp. 1825–1829). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/04396-5
Zhou, L., De Vries, W. T., Panman, A., Gao, F., & Fang, C. (2023). Evaluating Collective Action for Effective Land Policy Reform in Developing Country Contexts: The Construction and Validation of Dimensions and Indicators. Land, 12(7), 1401. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12071401
Վերմիշյան Հ., & Ենգիդունյան Վ. (2023). Երևանի կենտրոնի պատմամշակութային տարածությունների պլանավորման սոցիալ-մշակութային հայեցակետերը. Herald of Social Sciences, 208–219. https://doi.org/10.53548/0320-8117-2022.3-208.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Vahan Yengidunyan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
