DYNAMICS OF LEGITIMIZED AGGRESSION AND VALUE ORIENTATIONS IN YOUNG PEOPLE
Keywords:
legitimized aggression, youth, values, aggressiveness, young people, value orientationsAbstract
The article presents the results of an analysis of the dynamics of legitimized aggression expressions and value orientations in young people. Materials and methods: 255 people participated in the study (143 people in 2006 and 112 people in 2024). Legitimized Aggression Questionnaire; Schwartz Portrait Value Questionnaire (PVQ-RR), and Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ) were used. In the 2024 sample SCL-909R and the Constructive Thinking Inventory CTI were additionally administered. Results: the aggression and hostility scores according to the Buss-Perry questionnaire did not change statistically. Legitimized aggression generally shows a decreasing trend (both the total score and the subscale scores) (with the exception of "legitimized aggression in the media," which increased, and the "legitimized aggression in sports" subscale, which remained unchanged). Young people demonstrate a decrease in the value of «conformity», but an increase in the general scales (and subscales) for the values of «openness to change», «Self-Enhancement», and «Self-Transcendence». Correlations were demonstrated between the overall level of legitimized aggression and levels of «esoteric» and «categorical thinking», as well as a connection between all subscales of legitimized aggression and levels of hostility, anger, and physical aggression (Bass-Perry). Legitimized aggression was also shown to be associated with the presence of symptoms such as hostility, paranoia, and psychoticism (SCL-90R), as well as with the value of adherence to traditions. Conclusions: the changing value profile and level of legitimization of various forms of aggression among young people is linked to the influence of a more general factor, determined by changing social attitudes. One way to manifest aggression within the legitimate sphere may be through the value of "tradition," as well as categorical thinking and belief in esoteric theories.
Downloads
References
1. Epstein S. CTI: Constructive Thinking Inventory: professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2001. vii, 59 p.
2. Lebedeva N. Tsennostno-motivatsionnaya struktura lichnosti v russkoy kul'ture. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal. 2001;22(3):26-36. (In Russian)
3. Magun V., Rudnev M. Zhiznennyye tsennosti rossiyskogo naseleniya: skhodstva i otlichiya v sravnenii s drugimi yevropeyskimi stranami. Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneniya Dannyye Analiz Diskussii. 2008;(1):33-58. (In Russian)
4. Magun V.S. The evolution of basic human values of the Russians, 2006–2021. Sociological studies. 2024;12:44-58. doi:10.31857/S013216250029336-2 (In Russian)
5. Pankratova A. Izmeneniye tsennostey detey i vzroslykh v sovremennoy Rossii (1992–2009). Psikhologicheskiye issledovaniya. 2011;4(15). doi:https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v4i15.875 (In Russian)
6. Schwartz S.H., Lehmann A., Roccas S. Multimethod probes of basic human values. Social psychology and cultural context. SAGE Publications, Inc.; 1999:107-124.
7. Schwartz S.H. Kul'turnyye tsennostnyye oriyentatsii: priroda i sledstviya natsional'nykh razlichiy. Psikhologiya Zhurnal vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. 2008;5(2):37-67. (In Russian)
8. Yenikolopov S.N., Tsibul'skiy N.P. Izucheniye vzaimosvyazi legitimizatsii nasiliya i sklonnosti k agressivnym formam povedeniya. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovaniye. 2008;13(1):90-98. (In Russian)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sergey Enikolopov, Tatiana Medvedeva, Svetlana Kuznetsova , Oksana Vorontsova, Olga Boyko

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

