Perception and transformation of the concept of good governance in the post-Soviet space

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU:D/2023.14.1.088

Keywords:

good governance, government effectiveness indicators, post-Soviet area, developing and transitional state, government effectiveness, transparency, reform, development

Abstract

The discussion of the main provisions of the concept of good governance became relevant, especially since the end of the XX century that in world practice coincided with the collapse of the USSR and the formation of new independent states. In the created conditions the newly independent countries were forced to reform their management systems and follow the path of development in accordance with the standards set by the developed countries, which was quite problematic and difficult to implement in this period.

This article analyzes the structural and substantive aspects of the concept of good governance, the features of understanding and transformation of the considered concept in the post-Soviet space. In particular, it is discussed what are the motives and consequences of the transformation of the traditional perception of the components of the concept of effective management in the post-Soviet space, as well as the role of international organizations (UN, World Bank, etc.) in these trends. The main question is whether to borrow the western standards of good governance or to develop and implement our own concept taking into account the features of the historical and cultural heritage and social development. The article also gives forecasts about what basic elements should be added to the concept of good governance and what are the promising opportunities for their implementation in the post-Soviet space.

Author Biography

Narine Asryan, Yerevan State University

Lecturer at YSU Chair of Public Administration 

References

Andrews M., Good Governance Scripts: Will Compliance Improve Form or Functionality? in Jomo Kwame Sundaram and Anis Chowdhury, eds., Is Good Governance Good for Development? United Nations Series on Development (London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2012).

Annan, K., United Nations Annual Report of the Secretary-General on the Work of the Organization, 27 August, 1998, http://www.un.org/Docs/SG/Report98/ch2.htm

European Commission, Development and Cooperation – EuropeAid (n.d.) ‘Human Rights and Democracy’. http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/what/humanrights/index_en.htm

Good Governance and the World Bank, Based on research by Elizabeth Drake, Ambreen Malik, Ying Xu, Ioanna Kotsioni, Rasha El-Habashy, and Vivek Misra, LSE Masters students 2001-2 Edited by Vivien Collingwood, Nuffield College, University of Oxford, https://www.ucl.ac.uk/dpu-projects/drivers_urb_change/urb_economy/pdf_glob_SAP/BWP_Governance_World%20Bank.pdf, p.4

Grindle M. S., Good Governance: The Inflation of an Idea, Center for International Development Working Paper No. 202 (Harvard University, October 2010); Levy B., Working with the Grain: Integrating Governance and Growth in Development Strategies, Oxford University Press, 2014, pp.3-5.

Grindle, M. S., Good Enough Governance: Poverty Reduction and Reform in Developing Countries, Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 17 (4), 2004, pp. 525– 528.

Grindle, M. S., Good governance, R.I.P.: A critique and an alternative. Governance 30(1), 2017, pp. 17–22.

Haggard S., Kaufmann R. R., The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995, pp. 53–55

Kitschelt H., Post-Communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and Inter-Party Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999

Levy B., The Case for Principled Agnosticism, Journal of Democracy 21, no. 4 (October 2010).

Levy, B. Governance reform: Getting the fit right. Public Administration and Development 35(4), PAD-15-0064.R1, 2015, pp.238–249.

Matthews, R.C.O., The Economics of Institutions and the Sources of Growth, Economic Journal 96 (384), 1986, pp. 903-918.

McFaul M., Transitions from Postcommunism, Journal of Democracy, 16 (July 2005), pp. 5–19

Petrova B., Redistribution and the Quality of Government: Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe. British Journal of Political Science, 2020, pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123419000085

Simonis, U. E., Defining good governance - the conceptual competition is on. (Discussion Papers / Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, 2004-005). Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung gGmbH. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-110379, 2004, pp. 5-7.

Toye, J., Dilemmas of Development: Reflections on the Counter-Revolution in Development Theory and Policy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987.

United Nations Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (n.d.). ‘What is Good Governance?’ http://www.unescap.org/pdd/prs/projectactivities/ongoing/gg/governance.asp

ՄԱԿ-ի հազարամյակի հռչակագիր, Երևան, ՄԱԿ-ի հայաստանյան գրասենյակ, 2000թ., էջ 11-14, https://unic.un.org/aroundworld/unics/common/documents/publications/milleniumdeclaration/armenia_millenium_declaration_armenian.pdf

Published

2023-05-19

How to Cite

Asryan, Narine. 2023. “Perception and Transformation of the Concept of Good Governance in the Post-Soviet Space”. Bulletin of Yerevan University D: International Relations and Political Sciences 14 (1 (40):88-101. https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU:D/2023.14.1.088.

Issue

Section

Public Administration