The Prerequisites for Establishing the Republic of Armenia State Policy in the Field of Biosecurity

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU.D/2024.15.3.061

Keywords:

national security , biological security, biological terrorism, centralized management system , dangerous biological factor, biological weapon

Abstract

In the modern era, the biological factor has assumed a crucial role in almost all spheres of activity of the individual, society, state and nation. The 21st century is unique in its scientific and technical progress and virtualization processes, which were initially notable for their negative aspects. One of the most serious threats is the growth of biological terrorism and biological disasters, which pose a serious threat to the stable functioning and normal development of states, societies and individuals. New directions have been added to the military-political and economic spheres of state competition, defining the place and role of the biosecurity system in the context of the country's national security. The main objective of the article is to study the priorities, priority areas and problems of the state policy of the Republic of Armenia in the field of biosafety, as well as control and prevention of biological threats and challenges, which are significantly increasing as a result of scientific and technological progress. To achieve the set goals, it is necessary to present the essence of biosafety and define the concept, to study international experience in ensuring biosafety, investigating the feasibility of their application in the process of ensuring biosafety in the Republic of Armenia, and also to consider issues of biosafety development in the Republic of Armenia. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), every year two billion people worldwide become ill with infectious diseases, of which 17 million die. Half of the world's population lives in areas endemic for infectious diseases or within natural foci. The growth of tourism, labor migration, trade turnover, as well as the evergrowing refugee problem contribute to the spread of infectious diseases and the emergence of epidemics, especially in countries where the level of health infrastructure is low.

Author Biography

  • Bagrat Vardanyan, Yerevan State University

    Leading specialist of the internal audit department of the staff of the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia, YSU, Faculty of International Relations, Applicant

References

ՀՀ կառավարության 2017 թվականի հունվարի 12-ի N 122-Ն որոշում, // https://www.e-draft.am/en/projects/763/about

ՀՀ վարչապետի 2018 թվականի հոկտեմերի 8-ի N 1320-Ա որոշում, http://www.irtek.am/views/act.aspx?aid=96756&fbclid=IwAR1KSPPprCyCQ5VtrXqrJcneflOQBnSsXX4O9tGYt5x1npnq342fAOfLUis

ՀՀ բնակչության սանիտարահամաճարակային անվտանգության ապահովման մասին օրենք // https://www.arlis.am/documentview.aspx?docID=29774

ՀՀ ազգային անվտանգության ռազմավարություն // https://www.primeminister.am/u_files/file/Different/AA-Razmavarutyun-Final.pdf

Указ Президента РФ от 11 марта 2019 г. № 97 "Об Основах государственной политики Российской Федерации в области обеспечения химической и биологической безопасности на период до 2025 года и дальнейшую перспективу” // https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/72092478/

National Biodefense Strategy of US, White House, 2018 // https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/National-Biodefense-Strategy.pdf

UK Biological Security Strategy, The Home Office, London, July 2018 // https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/730213/2018_UK_Biological_Security_Strategy.pdf

The Canadian Biosafety Guideline, Government of Canada, September 2020 // https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/canadian-biosafety-standards-guidelines.html

National Biosecurity Strategy of Australia, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Canberra, August 2022 // https://www.biosecurity.gov.au/sites/default/files/2022-08/National%20Biosecurity%20Strategy%28final%29.pdf

Broussard L.A. biological agents: weapons of warfare and bioterrorism // Molecular Diagnosis and Therapy. 2001. 6. № 4. С. 324-333.

Жемчугов В. Биобезопасность - важное направление работы // Гражданская защита. 2008. № 10. С. 34-35

Фуко М. Рождение биополитики // курс лекций, прочитанных в Коллеж де Франс в 1978-1979 учебном году. Санкт-Петербург, 2010.

Burduniuc O.S., Hamza H.A. biological risks and laboratory - acquired infections // Научные горизонты. 2020. № 10 (38). С. 117-139.

Доброхотский О.Н. оценка и управление биологическими рисками при работе с патогенными биологическими агентами// Биозащита и биобезопасность. 2010. Т. 2. № 3. С. 18-22.

Кивачук А.А. Биополитика и власть современных биотехнологий// Вестник Приднестровского университета. Серия: Гуманитарные науки. 2019. № 1-1 (61). С. 172-177.

Hall C.M. Biosecurity, tourism and mobility: institutional arrangements for managing tourism-related biological invasions // Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events. 2011. 3. № 3: 256-280.

Вюрмелинг Г.Б. Основы европейской биополитики // В сборнике: Демократия в России и Европе: философское измерение. Материалы Международной конференции «Философские проблемы демократического общества». Под ред. В.Н. Брюшинкина. 2003. С. 177-192.

Downloads

Published

29.11.2024

Issue

Section

Political science

How to Cite

Vardanyan, Bagrat. 2024. “The Prerequisites for Establishing the Republic of Armenia State Policy in the Field of Biosecurity”. YSU Journal of International Affairs 15 (3 (45): 61-71. https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU.D/2024.15.3.061.