The Online and Offline Communication Preferences of Armenian Social Network Users

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU:F/2023.14.2.066

Keywords:

virtual communication, online and offline space, social networks, Armenian users

Abstract

Online is one of the main types of communication and relationship building. Social networking site users are increasing day by day, not only in Armenia but worldwide. Currently, debates are actively underway about the impact of online communication on offline communication. Are online and offline communications two complementary means, or does one completely replace the other? "If people stay at home and do their daily activities without engaging with others, they will not put in the effort to establish social connections beyond the online world, as it would seem futile." The article explores the prevalence of social networks among Armenian users, their variations, online and/or offline communication preferences of Armenian users in various spheres of life, connected with age, gender, and depending on the subject of communication. As a result of a survey conducted using questionnaires, a range of preferences were identified, based on which users construct online communications. The main differences were observed among different age groups, rather than gender.

Author Biographies

Anrieta Karapetyan, Yerevan State University

Assistant Professor of the Department of Applied Sociology,

Faculty of Sociology, Yerevan State University, Yerevan, Armenia

Sean Gardner, International expert of social media

International expert of social media, Washington, D.C., USA

References

Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Wainapel, G., Fox, S․ (2002). “On the Internet No One Knows I’m an Introvert”: Extroversion, Neuroticism, and Internet Interaction. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5 (2), pp. 125–128.

Atanasova, A. (2016). Gender-Specific Behaviors on Social Media and What They Mean for Online Communications. Retrieved July 21, 2023 from: https://www.socialmediatoday.com/social-networks/gender-specific-behaviors-social-media-and-what-they-mean-online-communications#:~:text=Social%20media%20data%20also%20shows,warmer%27%20and%20more%20positive%20words.

Atanesyan, A.V. (2019). The Impact of Social Networks on Protest Activities (The Case of Armenia). Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 3, pp. 73-84. DOI:10.31857/S013216250004280-1.

Caughlin, J. P., Sharabi, L. L. (2013) A Communicative Interdependence Perspective of Close Relationships: The Connections between Mediated and Unmediated Interactions Matter, Journal of Communication, vol 63, 2013, pp. 873 - 893

Chaffey, D. (2013). Global social media statistics research summary. Retrieved June 14, 2023 from: https://www.smartinsights.com/social-media-marketing/social-media-strategy/new-global-social-media-research/#:~:text=A%20summary%20of%20global%20social,the%20rest%20of%20the%20year.

Cheryl, H․, Beverley, F․ (2012). A prototype analysis of relational boredom December 4, pp. 630-638

Daniel C․, Technological or Media Determinism, 2013. Retrieved June 5, 2023 from: https://www.wolearn.org/pluginfile.php/45/mod_page/content/33/chandler2002_PDF_full.pdf

Erin, V., Jason, P. R. (2014). Lindsay R., Social comparison, social media, and self-esteem, American Psychological Association, Psychology of Popular Media Culture, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 206–222

Hakobyan, A. (2019). Fake news and its Spread on Social Media, Journal of Sociology Bulletin of Yerevan University, Vol. 10 No. 3 (30)

Jochen, P., Valkenburg, P. M. (2016). Adolescents’ Exposure to Sexually Explicit Material on the Internet, University of Amsterdam, Communication Research Vol. 33

Julie, C․, Edwin, J. C. (2015). Conformity: Definitions, Types, and Evolutionary Grounding

Karapetyan, A. (2020). Mass Communications: From Classics to the Virtual Models, Journal of Sociology Bulletin of YSU, VOL. 11 NO. 2 (32) DOI 10.46991/BYSU:F/2020.11.2.059

Kazakulova, Y․, Kuhn, E․ (2012). Communication Strategies via Social Media, Jönköping International business school, pp. 30-36

Kemp, S․ (2023). Digital 2023: Armenia. Retrieved August 23, 2023 from: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2023-armenia#:~:text=Facebook%20users%20in%20Armenia%20in,in%20Armenia%20in%20early%202023.

König, R., Seifert, Al. (2020). University of Zurich Alexander University of Applied Sciences and Arts North, From Online to Offline and Vice Versa: Change in Internet Use in Later Life Across Europe, Frontiers in Sociology. Retrieved July 3, 2023 from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339334351_From_Online_to_Offline_and_Vice_Versa_Change_in_Internet_Use_in_Later_Life_Across_Europe

Laeder, J․ (2018). Social Media and Consumer Culture: Addicted to the Idealized Consumer, Santa Clara University, pp. 2-9. Retrieved October 10, 2023 from: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/215443111.pdf

Lieberman, A., Schroeder, J. (2020). Two social lives: How differences between online and offline interaction influence social outcomes, Current Opinion in Psychology, 2020, pp. 16-21. Retrieved May 4, 2023 from: https://escholarship.org/content/qt94n9w8b9/qt94n9w8b9_noSplash_293949a5e051fffc8e1fdcc9ffc168c4.pdf?t=qdtezb

Martirosyan, S. (2022). Social networks in Armenia, where, how many people are there. Retrieved April 9, 2023 from: https://media.am/hy/critique/2022/12/20/34858/

Matook, S., Butler, B. (2014). Social media and Relationships, The International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and Society, Wiley - Blackwell, pp. 7- 9

McLuhan, M., Fiore, Q., Quentin, F. (1967). The Medium is the Message, Random House, NY, 1st Edition

Melkumyan, Y. (2020). Visualization of Social Strata in Media, Journal of Sociology Bulletin of YSU, Vol. 11 No. 2 (32) DOI 10.46991/BYSU:F/2020.11.2

Most popular global mobile messenger apps as of October 2020, based on number of monthly active users

Nicholas, C․ (2011). The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains, by W. W. Norton Company,

Nina, V. A․ (2015). "The Transformation of Online Friendships into a Real-Life Context in Individuals with Social Anxiety-Development and Application of the Need to Transfer Scale" Wien / Vienna, pp. 9-15

Pallant, J., Whiteside, N., Aleti, T., Zeleznikow, J. (2018). Helpful or harmful? Exploring the impact of social media usage on intimate relationships, Australasian Journal of Information Systems,

Prahastiwi, U․ (2018). The Impact of Digital Technology to Change People’s Behavior in Using the Media, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Proceeding of The American Studies International Conference (ASIC)

Rosander, M., Eriksson, O․ (2021). Conformity on the Internet – The role of task difficulty and gender differences. Computers in Human Behavior, 28 (5)

Syed, H. A. (2015). Impact of Internet Usage Comfort and Internet Technical Comfort on Online Shopping and Online Banking, Journal of International Consumer Marketing 27(3), pp. 207-219

Terry, T. K. (2010). Online Education and Adult Learning: New Frontiers for Teaching Practices, Texas A&M University, USA, pp. 200-210

Thayers, S. E․, Ray, S. (2006). Online Communication Preferences across Age, Gender, and Duration of Internet Use, CyberPsychology & Behavior, Vol. 9, pp. 432–440

Downloads

Published

2023-12-25

How to Cite

Karapetyan, A., & Gardner, S. (2023). The Online and Offline Communication Preferences of Armenian Social Network Users. Journal of Sociology: Bulletin of Yerevan University, 14(2 (38), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU:F/2023.14.2.066

Issue

Section

Sociology of Communications