Digital Authoritarianism as a Modern Threat to Democratic Stability: Restriction of Freedom or Network Politicization?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46991/JOPS/2023.2.6.062Keywords:
digital, authoritarianism, dictatorship, power, mass surveillance, regime, facial recognition, control, espionage, cyberattacks, censorshipAbstract
This article is dedicated to the identification of contemporary instances of digital authoritarianism, exploring its definitions, characteristics, methodologies, and the tools employed by authoritarian governments to manipulate the social and political conduct of their citizens and control the flow of information. It aimed to consolidate power, control and manipulate information, and suppress dissent. The article delves into the various interpretations of digital authoritarianism by analyzing its fundamental elements and evident expressions. Through a comprehensive review of scholarly literature, reports, news publications and case studies, the article aims to unravel the dynamic nature of digital authoritarianism, shedding light on how it adjusts to technological progress and confronts conventional notions of liberty within the digital era. Digital authoritarianism materializes through mass surveillance, cyber attacks, information censorship, and the targeted utilization of citizen data. A thorough exploration of digital authoritarianism can empower democratic societies to preclude potential infiltration of such manifestations, uphold democratic principles, and arrange the landscape based on these principles while ensuring unfettered access to information.
References
Albrecht, Bahia, and Naithani, Gaura. 2022.“Digital Authoritarianism: A Global Phenomenon.” Deutsche Welle. March 17, 2022. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://akademie.dw.com/en/digital-authoritarianism-a-global-phenomenon/a-61136660.
Aleksanyan, Ashot, and Arusyak Aleksanyan. 2022. “Rethinking the Non-Resilience of Trade Unions in Armenia: How to Protect Social Rights and Freedoms of Workers?” Journal of Political Science: Bulletin of Yerevan University 1 (1): 78-106. https://doi.org/10.46991/JOPS/2022.1.1.078.
Aleksanyan, Nane. 2022. “Mapping Political Populism in the European Post-Transitional Periphery”. Journal of Political Science: Bulletin of Yerevan University 1 (2): 73-91. https://doi.org/10.46991/JOPS/2022.1.2.073.
Amnesty International. 2023. “Armenia/Azerbaijan: Pegasus Spyware Targeted Armenian Public Figures amid Conflict.” Accessed September 29, 2023. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2023/05/armenia-azerbaijan-pegasus-spyware-targeted-armenian-public-figures-amid-conflict/.
BBC. 2021. “Pegasus: Who Are the Alleged Victims of Spyware Targeting?” July 22, 2021. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-57891506.
Brandt, Jessica, and Torrey Taussig. 2019. “Europe’s Authoritarian Challenge.” The Washington Quarterly 42 (4): 133-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2019.1693099.
Ellis, Joseph M. 2022. “Russian Disinformation: The Forest Brothers, Baltic Resistance, and NATO.” In: Information Wars in the Baltic States: Russia’s Long Shadow, edited by Janis Chakars and Indra Ekmanis, 35-52. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99987-2_3.
Factor TV. 2023. “During the war, they tried to spy on the phone of the MFA spokesperson. Samvel Martirosyan: VIDEO.” May 29, 2023. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://factor.am/651459.html
Feldstein, Steven. 2019. “The Global Expansion of AI Surveillance.” Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://carnegieendowment.org/files/WP-Feldstein-AISurveillance_final1.pdf.
Freedom House. 2019. “Social Media Are a Growing Conduit for Electoral Manipulation and Mass Surveillance.” Accessed September 29, 2023. https://freedomhouse.org/article/social-media-are-growing-conduit-electoral-manipulation-and-mass-surveillance.
Freedom House. 2022. “Freedom on the Net 2022.” Accessed September 29, 2023. https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2022-10/FOTN2022Digital.pdf.
Glazunova, Sofya. 2022. The “Sovereign Internet” and Social Media. In: Digital Activism in Russia: The Communication Tactics of Political Outsiders. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 67-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93503-0_4.
Gosztonyi, Gergely. 2023. The Rise of Digital Authoritarianism Across the Globe. In: Censorship from Plato to Social Media. Law, Governance and Technology Series, vol 61. Springer, Cham, 157-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46529-1_11.
Greitens, Sheena Chestnut, 2020. “Dealing with Demand for China’s Global Surveillance Exports.” The Brookings Institution, April 2020, Accessed September 29, 2023. https://www.brookings.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2020/04/FP_20200428_china_surveillance_greitens_v3.pdf.
Isaacs, Rico. 2022. Non-oligarchic Public Voice in Kazakhstan from Below, 2011-2022. In: Political Opposition in Authoritarianism. The Theories, Concepts and Practices of Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 97-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06536-1_6.
JAM-news. 2021. “Azerbaijan Suspected of Spying on Journalists Using Israeli Pegasus Spyware.” July 19, 2021. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://jam-news.net/azerbaijan-suspected-of-spying-on-journalists-using-israeli-pegasus-spyware/.
Khalil, Lydia. 2020. “Digital Authoritarianism, China and Covid.” Lowy Institute, November 2, 2020. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/digital-authoritarianism-china-covid.
Krapiva, Natalia, and Anastasiya Zhyrmont. 2023. “Digital Dictatorship: Authoritarian Tactics and Resistance in EECA.” Access Now, March 17, 2023. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://www.accessnow.org/digital-dictatorship-and-resistance-in-eastern-europe-and-central-asia/.-.
Kravtsov, Vlad. 2022. Securitizing the Epidemic: Ideological Adaptations and Illiberal Meanings. In: Autocracy and Health Governance in Russia. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 153-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05789-2_5.
Michaelsen, Marcus. 2018. “Transforming Threats to Power: The International Politics of Authoritarian Internet Control in Iran.” International Journal of Communication 12: 3856-3876.
Mirzoyan, Armen. 2021. “Those who have information about Armenia’s foreign policy are targeted by Pegasus.” Hetq.am, November 24, 2021. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://hetq.am/hy/article/138214.
Mölder, Holger. 2019. “The prospects of strategic imagination in explaining international security challenges.” Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology 57: 55-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01386-w.
Mozur, Paul, 2021. “The Great Firewall: China’s model of digital control.” MIGS Montreal, September 26, 2021. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMDYzAsomGA.
Perez, Evan, and Diaz, Daniella. “FBI: DNC Rebuffed Request to Examine Computer Servers.” CNN, January 5, 2017. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://www.cnn.com/2017/01/05/politics/fbi-russia-hacking-dnc-crowdstrike/index.html.
Polyakova, Alina, and Chris Meserole. 2019. “Exporting digital authoritarianism: The Russian and Chinese models.” Brookings Institution Policy Brief. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/FP_20190827_digital_authoritarianism_polyakova_meserole.pdf.
Qiaoan, Runya, and Jessica C. Teets. 2020. “Responsive Authoritarianism in China - a Review of Responsiveness in Xi and Hu Administrations.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 25: 139-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-019-09640-z.
Richey, Mason. 2018. “Contemporary Russian revisionism: understanding the Kremlin’s hybrid warfare and the strategic and tactical deployment of disinformation.” Asia Europe Journal 16: 101-113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-017-0482-5.
Roberts, Huw, Josh Cowls, Jessica Morley, Mariarosaria Taddeo, Vincent Wang, and Luciano Floridi. 2021. “The Chinese approach to artificial intelligence: an analysis of policy, ethics, and regulation.” AI & Society: Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Communication 36: 59-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00992-2.
Rothacher, Albrecht. 2021. Putin’s Autocracy: Siloviki Rule and Their Kleptocracy. In: Putinomics. Springer, Cham, 105-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74077-1_3.
Schatz, Edward. 2023. “Varieties of Authoritarianism in Eurasia.” In: Securitization and Democracy in Eurasia: Transformation and Development in the OSCE Region, edited by Anja Mihr, Paolo Sorbello, and Brigitte Weiffen, 279-290. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16659-4_19.
Schlumberger, Oliver, Mirjam Edel, Ahmed Maati, and Koray Saglam. 2023. “How Authoritarianism Transforms: A Framework for the Study of Digital Dictatorship.” Government and Opposition: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2023.20.
Shahbaz, Adrian. 2018. “The Rise of Digital Authoritarianism: Fake news, data collection, and the challenge to democracy”. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-net/2018/rise-digital-authoritarianism.
Sinkkonen, Sinkkonen, and Jussi Lassila. 2022. “Digital Authoritarianism and Technological Cooperation in Sino-Russian Relations: Common Goals and Diverging Standpoints.” In: Russia-China Relations: Emerging Alliance or Eternal Rivals?, edited by Sarah Kirchberger, Svenja Sinjen, and Nils Wörmer, 165-184. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97012-3_9.
Taylor, Monique. 2022. China’s Digital Authoritarianism Goes Global: A Governance Perspective. In: China’s Digital Authoritarianism. Politics and Development of Contemporary China. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 111-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11252-2_6.
Williams, Martyn. 2010. “North Korea Moves Quietly onto the Internet.” Computerworld, June 10, 2010. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://www.computerworld.com/article/2518914/north-korea-moves-quietly-onto-the-internet.html.
Woodhams, Samuel, 2020. “The Rise of Internet Throttling: A Hidden Threat to Media Development.” Center for International Media Assistance, May 20, 2020. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://www.cima.ned.org/publication/the-rise-of-bandwidththrottling-a-hidden-threat-to-media-development/.
Yang, Yuan, and Madhumita Murgia, 2019. “Data leak reveals China is tracking almost 2.6m people in Xinjiang.” Financial Times, February 16, 2019. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://www.ft.com/content/9ed9362e-31f7-11e9-bb0c-42459962a812.
Yaybokeand, Erol, and Samuel Brannen. 2020. “Promote and Build: A Strategic Approach to Digital Authoritarianism.” Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), October 15, 2020. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://www.csis.org/analysis/promote-and-build-strategic-approach-digital-authoritarianism.
Yilmaz, Ihsan, and Fan Yang. 2023. “Digital Authoritarianism, Religion and Future of Democracy.” In: Digital Authoritarianism and its Religious Legitimization: The Cases of Turkey, Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, and India, edited by Ihsan Yilmaz, 151-166. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3600-7_7.
Yilmaz, Ihsan. 2023. “Digital Authoritarianism and Religion in Democratic Polities of the Global South.” In: Digital Authoritarianism and its Religious Legitimization: The Cases of Turkey, Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, and India, edited by Ihsan Yilmaz, 1-19. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3600-7_1.
Zheng, Wang. 2020. “What Is WeChat and What Can It Do?” CGTN, August 9, 2020. Accessed September 29, 2023. https://newseu.cgtn.com/news/2020-08-09/What-is-WeChat-and-what-can-it-do--SNepY1rgNG/index.html.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Armen Mirzoyan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
