Historical Rethinking of Relations with the First Republic of Armenia and the United States of America: The Dilemma of Orientation and Expectations

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46991/JOPS/2023.2.5.076

Keywords:

First Republic of Armenia, United States of America, revolution, Armenian National Central Council, Ottoman Empire, Ottoman Turkey, Armenian-Turkish Peace Pact

Abstract

This article examines the features of relations with the First Republic of Armenia and the United States of America in the context of the dilemma of orientation and expectations of the Armenian political elite and society. The purpose of this study is to determine the characteristics of the influence of interethnic conflicts on the Armenian population and political elite after the February Revolution of 1917 on the territory of the Russian Empire. The main attention is paid to identifying general and specific elements in the process of restoring independent Armenian statehood at the end of May 1918.

The scientific novelty lies in the study of transformative processes and the long break of independent Armenian statehood, the people’s and liberation struggle, as well as the geopolitical developments in the region in the context of the clash of both diplomatic and military, political and economic interests. As a result, after lengthy negotiations, on February 25, 1919, the assembly was presented with a single demand of the Armenians for recognition of the Armenian state.

The characteristic features of such decisions are highlighted and described, on the basis of which it was proposed to transfer Armenia under the guardianship of the Entente and transfer its mandate to one of the countries for at least twenty years. It is emphasized that the Armenian delegations expressed their desire to transfer the patronage (mandate) of a united, independent and free Armenia to the United States of America or the newly formed League of Nations.

Author Biography

Gegham Petrosyan, Yerevan State University

Professor, Doctor of Sciences (History) of the Chair of International Relations and Diplomacy of the Faculty of International Relations at Yerevan State University

References

Aleksanyan, Ashot. 2016. “The impact of the Armenian genocide on the formation of national statehood and political identity.” Journal of Armenian Studies 2 (8): 22-43.

Ashkhatavor. 1920. “Ashkhatavor” (Worker) Newspaper (January 17). Tiflis.

Boryan, Bagrat A. 1929. Armenia: International Diplomacy and the USSR. Part 2. Moscow-Leningrad: State Publishing House (in Russian) [Борьян, Баграт А. 1929. Армения: Международная дипломатия и СССР. Част 2. Москва-Ленинград: Государственное издательство].

Churchill, Winston S. 2015. The World Crisis: The Complete Set. Bloomsbury Revelations.

Denikin, Anton I. 1925. Armed forces of the South of Russia. Volume 4. In the book: Essays on Russian Troubles: [In 5 volumes]. Berlin: Word (in Russian) [Деникин, Антон И. 1925. Вооруженные силы Юга России. Том 4. В книге: Очерки русской смуты: [В 5-ти томах]. Берлин: Слово].

Droshak. 1928. Journal “Droshak” 5 (May). Boston.

Ghambaryan, Armenuhi. 2021. “The activities of the civil mission of the First Republic of Armenia to the USA (end of 1919 - beginning of 1920).” Historical-Philological Journal 3: 134-149 (in Armenian) [Ghambaryan, Armenuhi. 2021. “Hayastani Arrajin Hanrapetut’yan k’aghak’ats’iakan arrak’elut’yan gortsuneut’yunn AMN (1919t’. verj - 1920t’. skizb).” Patmabanasirakan handes 3: 134-149].

Hairenik. 1924. “Hairenik” monthly (June). Boston.

Hairenik. 1926. “Hairenik” monthly (October). Boston.

Haratch. 1919. Haratch (Forward) Newspaper (October 23). Yerevan.

Haratch. 1920. Haratch (Forward) Newspaper (February 3). Yerevan.

Hovannisian, Richard G. 1971. The Republic of Armenia: The First Year, 1918-1919. Vol. 1. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Hovhannisyan, Lilit. 2002. The Armenian Question and the Great Powers 1914-1917. Yerevan: Zangak-97 publishing house.

Katchaznouni, Hovhannes. 1923. The Armenian Revolutionary Federation (Dashnagtzoutiun) Has Nothing To Do Any More. Vienna: Mechitarist Press.

Khatisyan, Alexander. 1930. The origin and development of the Republic of Armenia. Athens (in Armenian) [Khatisyan, Alek’sandr. 1930. Hayastani hanrapetut’ean tsagumn u zargats’umy: At’enk’].

Libaridian, Gerard J. 2022. “The History of Imperial Politics and the Politics of Imperial History.” Journal of Political Science: Bulletin of Yerevan University 1 (3): 10-24. https://doi.org/10.46991/JOPS/2022.1.3.010.

Lloyd, George D. 1938. The truth about the peace treaties. London: Victor Gollancz.

Nor Ashkhatavor. 1919a. “Nor Ashkhatavor” (New worker) Newspaper (August 21). Tiflis.

Nor Ashkhatavor. 1919b. “Nor Ashkhatavor” (New worker) Newspaper (August 27). Tiflis.

Nor Ashkhatavor. 1919c. “Nor Ashkhatavor” (New worker) Newspaper (September 7). Tiflis.

Petrosyan, Gegham. 2019. Transcaucasia in diplomatic vicissitudes: the formation of Armenian independent statehood (February 1917 - June 1918). Yerevan: Yerevan State University Publishing House (in Russian) [Петросян, Гегам. 2019. Закавказье в дипломатических перипетиях: становления Армянской независимой государственности (февраль 1917 - июнь 1918 гг.). Ереван: Изд-во ЕГУ].

Petrosyan, Gegham. 2022. “Armenian Statehood in Foreign Policy Realities: The First Steps of the First Republic”. Journal of Political Science: Bulletin of Yerevan University 1 (2): 12-48. https://doi.org/10.46991/JOPS/2022.1.2.012.

Petrosyan, Gegham. 2023. The international situation and foreign policy of the Republic of Armenia 1918-1920, Book One. Yerevan: YSU publishing house (in Armenian) [Petrosyan, Gegham. 2023. Hayastani Hanrapetut’yan mijazgayin drut’yuny yev artak’in k’aghak’akanut’yuny 1918-1920 t’t’., girk’ Arrajin: Yerevan: YePH hratarakch’ut’yun].

Ruben [Der Minasian, Ruben]. 1982. Hai Heghapokhankani Me Hishataknere [Memoirs of an Armenian revolutionary], Vol. E. Tehran (in Armenian).

Stein, Boris E. 1949. “The Russian Question” at the Paris Peace Conference (1919-1920). Moscow: Gospolitizdat (in Russian) [Штейн, Борис Е. 1949. «Русский вопрос» на Парижской мирной конференции (1919-1920 гг.). Москва: Госполитиздат].

The beginning of the civil war, Compiled by S. A. Alekseev; Edited and with a foreword by N. L. Meshcheryakov. Moscow; Leningrad: State Publishing House, 1926 (Revolution and civil war in descriptions of the White Guards; vol. 3) (Memoirs: Denikin, Krasnov, Lukomsky, Drozdovsky, Sakharov, Pokrovsky, Budberg, Gins and others) (in Russian) [Начало гражданской войны, Составил С. А. Алексеев; Под редакцией и с предисловием Н. Л. Мещерякова. Москва; Ленинград: Государственное издательство, 1926 (Революция и гражданская война в описаниях белогвардейцев; т. 3) (Мемуары: Деникин, Краснов, Лукомский, Дроздовский, Сахаров, Покровский, Будберг, Гинс и другие)].

Vratsyan, Simon. 1966. Through the Ways of Life, Cases, Faces, Lives. Volume E. Beirut (in Armenian) [Vrats’yan, Simon.1966. Kyank’i ughinerov depk’er, demk’er, aprumner: Ye hator: Beyrut’].

Vratsyan, Simon.1928. Republic of Armenia. Paris.

Worker of Armenia. 1919. Newspaper (August 9). Yerevan, Armenia.

Yengoyan, Ashot. 2023. “Transformations of the Ideology of Nation-Building and State-Building in Armenia: Phenomenon of Integrity of Nation and State.” Journal of Political Science: Bulletin of Yerevan University 2 (1(4): 70-101. https://doi.org/10.46991/JOPS/2023.2.4.070.

Zang. 1918. Newspaper (June 11). Yerevan, Armenia.

Zang. 1919. Newspaper (February 26). Yerevan, Armenia.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-29

How to Cite

Petrosyan, G. (2023). Historical Rethinking of Relations with the First Republic of Armenia and the United States of America: The Dilemma of Orientation and Expectations. Journal of Political Science: Bulletin of Yerevan University, 2(2(5), 76–99. https://doi.org/10.46991/JOPS/2023.2.5.076

Issue

Section

American Politics