The Image of the US Army in American movies: The Soft Power of American Cinema
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46991/JOPS/2024.3.7.056Keywords:
US Army, image of the army, attributes of the US Army, values, film industry, characters, mise en scène, montage techniques, enemyAbstract
The formation of the army's image has acquired newfound significance in our time. Paradoxically, alongside the spread of humanist ideology, the number of violent conflicts worldwide is increasing. These stimulates the need for propaganda aimed at shaping the image of the army and enhancing the attractiveness of service. As one of the world's largest military forces, the US army has engaged in a diverse array of conflicts with over 750 military bases in approximately 80 countries (Kohli 2020). A diverse range of tools is employed to shape the image of the US army, including media, recruitment campaigns, social media, public events, etc. Among these tools, movies have their specific role. While traditionally intended for entertainment, movies have been used for over a century as a means to shape public opinion. This article delves into the main attributes of the US Army as a social institution, analyzing its four fundamental characteristics: the Militia Tradition, Mobilization Miracles, Man-Mindedness, Maritime Influence, the weapon and the enemy as distinctive attributes. Additionally, it features the seven core values of the US Army: Loyalty, Duty, Respect, Selfless Service, Honor, Integrity, and Personal Courage. The article provides a detailed analysis of how various components of movie production tools communicate the attributes and core values of the US Army and contribute to shaping its image, examining a high-viewership movie “Interceptor” (2022). The goal of the study was to find out the image of the US Army that “Interceptor” projects and to identify the verbal and visual communicative means it uses for this purpose. The content analysis made it possible to distinguish verbal and visual elements of the movie, encompassing human voice, mise-en-scène, as well as film editing techniques, to identify and highlight the messages and ideas conveyed about the attributes of the US Army.
References
Atanesyan, Arthur V. 2022. “Women in the Armed Forces and Conflicts:The U.S. Policies and Experience.” USA & Canada: economics, politics, culture 12: 19-37 (In Russian).
Bordwell, David, and Kristin Thompson. 2008. Film art: An introduction. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Brown, Blain. 2022. Cinematography: Theory and Practice: Image Making for Cinematographers, Directors, and Videographers. Routledge.
Burch, Noel. 2014. Theory of Film Practice. Princeton University Press.
Chande, Neha. 2022. “‘Interceptor’ Maintains #1 Globally on Netflix Despite Poor Reviews, Crossing 35 Million Watch-Hours.” Netflix Junkie, September 9, 2022. Accessed April 10, 2024. https://www.netflixjunkie.com/netflix-news-interceptor-maintains-1-what-to-watch-interceptor-maintains-1-globally-on-netflix-despite-poor-reviews-crossing-35-million-watch-hours-chris-hemsworth-on-netflix-despite-poor-reviews-cros/.
Dahl, Gordon B., and Enrico Moretti. 2008. “The Demand for Sons.” The Review of Economic Studies 75 (4): 1085-1120, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2008.00514.x.
Davis, Lynn E., and Jeremy Shapiro. 2003. The US Army and the New National Security Strategy. Santa Monica, California: Rand.
Edmunds, Timothy. 2006. “What are armed forces for? The changing nature of military roles in Europe.” International Affairs 82 (6): 1059-1075, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2006.00588.x.
Fishburne, Rhondaya, and Bennett Rine. 2021. “Sit Back, Relax and Enjoy the Show: Hollywood’s 21st Century Cold War.” Glimpse from the Globe, February 23, 2021. Accessed April 10, 2024. https://www.glimpsefromtheglobe.com/topics/economics/sit-back-relax-and-enjoy-the-show-hollywoods-21st-century-cold-war/.
Gilchrist, Todd. 2020. “The Crafts on Putting Together Rod Lurie’s ‘The Outpost’.” Variety, July 3, 2020. Accessed April 10, 2024. https://variety.com/2020/artisans/news/rod-lurie-the-outpost-military-advisor-1234697571/.
Hambardzumyan, Arevik. 2020. “Contemporary Approaches to Sociological Reinterpretation of the Functions of Armed Forces”. Journal of Sociology: Bulletin of Yerevan University 11 (2 (32): 49-58. https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU:F/2020.11.2.049.
Hassall, Greg. 2021. “Author Matthew Reilly goes from books to big screen in Interceptor directing debut.” ABC NEWS, 10 October. 2021. Accessed April 10, 2024. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-10-11/matthew-reillys-directing-dream-come-true-interceptor/100513242.
Hillsdale College. 2019. South Carolina, 1942: Churchill’s View of American Troops. The Churchill project, February 5, 2019. Accessed April 10, 2024. https://winstonchurchill.hillsdale.edu/churchills-view-us-troops/.
Hosek, James R. 2003. “The soldier of the 21st century.” In: New Challenges, New Tools for Defense Decisionmaking, edeted by Stuart Johnson, Martin C. Libicki, and Gregory F. Treverton, 181-210. Santa Monica, California: Rand.
Interceptor. 2022. Directed by Metthew Reilly. Australia, US: Ambience Entertainment and Foryor Entertainment. Accessed April 10, 2024. https://www.netflix.com/am/title/81388316.
Kernic, Franz. 2023. Social Sciences and the Military: Preliminary Remarks. In: War, Peace and the Military. Militär und Sozialwissenschaften/The Military and Social Research, vol 56. Springer VS, Wiesbaden, pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-40521-2_1.
Kohli, Atul. 2020. 'Introduction', Imperialism and the Developing World: How Britain and the United States Shaped the Global Periphery. New York, Oxford Academic, pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190069629.003.0001.
Kubrak, Tina. 2020. Impact of Films: Changes in Young People’s Attitudes after Watching a Movie. Behav Sci (Basel). 2020 May 2; 10 (5): 86. PMID: 32370280; PMCID: PMC7288198. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs10050086.
Lee, Benjamin. 2022. “Interceptor review – absurd yet entertaining Netflix action thriller.” The Guardian, June 3, 2022. Accessed April 10, 2024. https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jun/03/interceptor-review-netflix-action-thriller.
Levy, Yagil. 2010. The Essence of the ‘Market Army’. Public Administration Review 70 (3): 378-389. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02152.x.
Löfflmann, Georg. 2013. “Hollywood, the Pentagon, and the Cinematic Production of National Security.” Critical Studies on Security 1 (3): 280-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2013.820015.
Mantovani, Mauro, and Ralf Müllhaupt. 2021. “Analysing Armed Forces Transformation: Methodology and Visualisation.” Defense & Security Analysis 37 (3): 364–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2021.1959731.
Martin, Rebecca. 2023. “Aiming to be the Top Gun: Military Recruitment, Propaganda, and Shaping the Image of War Through Popular Media.” Intersect: Intersect: The Stanford Journal of Science, Technology, and Society 16 (2): 1-8.
Melkonyan, Nvard. 2004. “Mass media as a core means for actualization of the political image.” 21st Century 4 (6): 95-110 (in Russian).
Melkonyan, Nvard. 2015. “Manipulation technics in Armenian mass media and mechanisms of psychosocial influence.” 21st Century 5 (63): 53-74 (in Armenian).
Nafisah, Nia. 2010. “Film Studies: An Introduction.” Accessed April 10, 2024. http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/FPBS/JUR._PEND._BAHASA_INGGRIS/197104242006042-NIA_NAFISAH/Makalah_dll/Film_Studies.pdf.
Nickerson, Charlotte. 2024. Social Institutions in Sociology: Definition & Examples. Accessed April 10, 2024. https://www.simplypsychology.org/social-institution.html.
Padilla, Peter A., and Mary Riege Laner. 2001. “Trends in military influences on army recruitment: 1915-1953.” Sociological Inquiry 71 (2001): 421-436.
Peters, Jan Marie Lambert. 1961. Teaching about the film. MC.60/IV.23/A, UNESCO. Accessed April 10, 2024. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000043350.
Reagan National Defense Survey. 2023. Accessed April 10, 2024. https://www.reaganfoundation.org/reagan-institute/centers/peace-through-strength/reagan-national-defense-survey/.
Robb, David L. 2004. Operation Hollywood: How the Pentagon Shapes and Censors the Movies. Amherst, N.Y. : Prometheus Books.
Schiff, Rebecca L. 2008. The Military and Domestic Politics: A Concordance Theory of Civil-Military Relations (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203892305.
Șerban, Mioara. 2024. “The role of military morale as an essential dimension of combat power.” Security and Defence Quarterly 47 (3): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.35467/sdq/174832.
Siebold, Guy L. 2001. “Core issues and theory in military sociology.” Journal of Political & Military Sociology 29 (1): 140-159.
Sikov, Ed. 2010. Film Studies: An Introduction. Columbia University Press.
Stentiford, Barry M. 2002. The American home guard: the state militia in the twentieth century. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
Tal, Diana, and Avishag Gordon. 2016. “Jacques Ellul Revisited: 55 Years of Propaganda Study.” Society 53: 182-187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-016-9994-7.
Turner, Graeme. 2000. Film as Social Practice (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203461952.
U.S. Army. 2022. “Army of 2030.” October 5, 2022. Accessed April 10, 2024. https://www.army.mil/article/260799/army_of_2030.
U.S. Army. 2024. “The Army Values.” Accessed April 10, 2024. https://www.army.mil/values/index.html.
U.S. Department Of Defense. 2020. U.S. Army Ranger Handbook Revised and Updated. Skyhorse Publishing.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Yuliana Melkumyan, Nvard Melkonyan, Sofi Javadyan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.