Intergenerational Justice: Challenges and Perspectives in the Republic of Armenia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU.G/2025.16.1.035Keywords:
intergenerational justice, social justice, social justice index, ecological footprint, pension policy, family policy, environment, public debtAbstract
As part of the research presented in this article:
- the ideological and theoretical-methodological foundations of ensuring intergenerational justice as an economic issue were examined, along with its role, significance, and possible approaches to addressing the problem in the context of the theory of justice;
- the intergenerational justice component within the structure of the Social Justice Index and the methodology for its assessment were studied;
- based on the methodology of the Social Justice Index, the current state of intergenerational justice in Armenia was assessed through the analysis of the most comparable data and indicators, as well as their dynamics, and the main challenges arising from the issue were identified.
The research applied methods of economic and statistical analysis, chronological series, scientific deduction, and abstract methods.
The study revealed that all key indicators of intergenerational justice exhibit concerning trends. Data on pension and family benefit policies point to a likely deepening of income inequality in the future, along with a continued decline in opportunities for vulnerable population groups. Should the dynamics of environmental indicators continue, the next generation is sure to inherit an ecological environment with significant negative consequences for the quality of life. Trends in R&D investment and public debt indicators warn of the prospects of reduced competitive opportunities for the economy in the future and a significant increase in the tax burden.
Timely acceptance of the challenges arising from intergenerational justice, as well as the assessment and refinement of the resulting factor priorities in public policy, will not only allow inheriting better living conditions for the next generation, but also lay a solid foundation for long-term sustainable economic development.
References
References
Gyozalyan, Vardush (2022): Economics and Social Justice, Yerevan. Edit Print, pp. 215-237.
Höffe, Otfried (2006): Gerechtigkeit, Eine philosophische Einführung, Verlag C.H. Beck, München (Russian edition. Justice. Philosophical Introduction, trans. from German, M, Praxis, 2007, p. 194)
Merkel, Wolfgang and Giebler, Heiko (2009): Measuring Social Justice and Sustainable Governance in the OECD. In Sustainable Governance Indicators 2009: Policy Performance and Executive Capacity in the OECD, edited by the Bertelsmann Stiftung, 187–215. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.
Rawls John (1971) A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, 561 p.
Sen, Amartya (2009): The Idea of Justice, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts pp. 248-249.
Social Justice in the EU and OECD, Index Report 2019, 94 p.
Solow, Robert (1992): An Almost Practical Step toward Sustainability. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp. 162-172.
Statistical Yearbook of Armenia 2024.
Stiglitz, Joseph (2019): People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent, pp. 191-193.
Wiedmann et all, The Material Footprint of nations, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, September 2013.
World Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Vardush Gyozalyan, Suren Avetisyan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.