TRAUMATIC PAST AND THE POLITICS OF MEMORY: WHAT SHOULD BE AND SHOULD NOT BE THE ARMENIAN APPROACH?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU.F/2024.15.2.15

Keywords:

Culture of memory, models of memory, politics of memory, identity, Genocide prevention, Armenia

Abstract

Armenia has a history marked by traumatic and harrowing events. In the 20th century, it endured the Armenian Genocide, recognized as the first genocide of such magnitude committed against an ethnic group by a state government with the intention of erasing all existence and memory of it from the land where the Armenian people originated. A nation that has endured genocide must learn lessons to prevent such atrocities from happening again. Failure to draw the right conclusions and implement appropriate policies in a timely manner can result in similar threats reemerging. Every nation must remember its traumatic events in a manner that enables and encourages necessary policies and actions. If similar risks and threats reappear, it may indicate that the nation has either failed to remember its traumatic past in a way that serves it instrumentally and pragmatically or has not remembered it at all. Have Armenians adequately remembered their Genocide? If so, why is there a resurgence of the risk of another genocide affecting the Armenian population, not only in Karabakh but also in Armenia, in modern times? Do Armenians need to reconsider their politics of memory in this context, and if so, are they doing it correctly? This paper critically addresses these questions, accompanied by a brief conceptual exploration and case studies.

Author Biography

  • Arthur Atanesyan, Yerevan State University

    Dr. Sci. (Pol.), Professor, Head of Applied Sociology Department, Faculty of Sociology, Yerevan State University, Yerevan, Armenia

References

Assmann, A. (2011) From Collective Violence to the Common Future: Four Models for Dealing with the Traumatic Past. Bulletin of Yerevan State University, Sociology and Economics series, N 134.5, p. 14-22.

Atanesyan A.V., Reynolds B.M., Mkrtichyan A.E. (2023) Balancing between Russia and the West: the hard security choice of Armenia. European Security, DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2023.2258528

Atanesyan A.V., Mkrtichyan A.E. (2023) Russia as an ally: the dynamics of public perceptions in Armenian society before and after the 2020 Karabakh war. Polis. Political Studies. No. 2. P. 9-26. (In Russ.)

Atanesyan A.V. (2016). Culture of Memory and Some Models of Memory About the Armenian Genocide in Contemporary Armenian Society. Historical and social-educational ideas, N. 8(4/1), pp. 46-54. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17748/2075-9908-2016-8-4/1-46-54

Atanesyan A.V. (2018) “Velvet Revolution” in Armenia: Potential, Gains, and Risks of Political Protest Activity. Polis. Political Studies, N. 6, p. 80-98. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2018.06.06

Cornejo, V. (2020) "A Nation That Forgets Its Past Has No Future". The Network, July 17. URL: https://network.crcna.org/topic/justice-inclusion/biblical-justice/nation-forgets-its-past-has-no-future

Dadrian, V․ N. (1995) The History of the Armenian Genocide: Ethnic Conflict from the Balkans to Anatolia to the Caucasus. Providence, R.I., Berghahn.

Guterres, A. (2020) ‘Never Again’ Means Constant Retelling of Holocaust Story, Secretary-General Stresses at Exhibition Opening, Citing Rising Antisemitism, Other Hatreds. UN Press Release, January 21. URL: https://press.un.org/en/2020/sgsm19943.doc.htm

Kaasik-Krogerus, S., Čeginskas, V.L.A., Sääskilahti, N. (2020) Politics of memory and oblivion. An introduction to the special issue, European Politics and Society, N21:3, p. 271-276, DOI: 10.1080/23745118.2019.1645419

Kévorkian, R․ H. (2011) The Armenian Genocide: A Complete History. I.B. Tauris.

Lemkin Institute: Genocide threat has spread to sovereign territory of Armenia. Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention, 07.04.2024, URL: https://www.lemkininstitute.com/single-post/lemkin-institute-genocide-threat-has-spread-to-sovereign-territory-of-armenia (accessed 11.04.2024).

Margalit, A. (2004) The Ethics of Memory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, p. XIII-IX.

Maurantonio, N. (2014) The Politics of Memory. In: The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication (ed. by Kate Kenski and Kathleen Hall Jamieson). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.

Nascimento Araújo, M.P., and Sepúlveda dos Santos, M. (2009) History, Memory and Forgetting: Political Implications, RCCS Annual Review, N1, p. 77-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/rccsar.157

Ocampo, L.M. (2023) Expert Opinion: Genocide against Armenians in 2023. New York, August 7. URL: https://www.cftjustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Moreno-Ocampo-Expert-Opinion.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3AzzJHsmxnGJ0J5071fmVdzrudwmdnyWPMRKiWWGKdbDvbKvRUL5lKACU

Ranger, J., & Ranger, W. (2023). Towards a resonant theory of memory politics. Memory Studies, N16(2), p.451–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980221101112

Scotini, M., Galasso, E. (2015) Politics of Memory. Documentary and Archive. Berlin, Archive Books.

Verovšek, P.J. (2016) Collective memory, politics, and the influence of the past: the politics of memory as a research paradigm. Politics Groups and Identities, N4 (3), p. 529-543.

Von Joeden Forgey, E. (2023). Why Prevention Fails: Chronicling the Genocide in Artsakh. International Journal of Armenian Genocide Studies, 8(2), 86–107. https://doi.org/10.51442/ijags.0046

Downloads

Published

2024-12-25

Issue

Section

Political Sociology

How to Cite

Atanesyan, A. (2024). TRAUMATIC PAST AND THE POLITICS OF MEMORY: WHAT SHOULD BE AND SHOULD NOT BE THE ARMENIAN APPROACH?. Journal of Sociology: Bulletin of Yerevan University, 15(2 (40), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU.F/2024.15.2.15

Similar Articles

1-10 of 96

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.