TRAUMATIC PAST AND THE POLITICS OF MEMORY: WHAT SHOULD BE AND SHOULD NOT BE THE ARMENIAN APPROACH?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU.F/2024.15.2.15Keywords:
Culture of memory, models of memory, politics of memory, identity, Genocide prevention, ArmeniaAbstract
Armenia has a history marked by traumatic and harrowing events. In the 20th century, it endured the Armenian Genocide, recognized as the first genocide of such magnitude committed against an ethnic group by a state government with the intention of erasing all existence and memory of it from the land where the Armenian people originated. A nation that has endured genocide must learn lessons to prevent such atrocities from happening again. Failure to draw the right conclusions and implement appropriate policies in a timely manner can result in similar threats reemerging. Every nation must remember its traumatic events in a manner that enables and encourages necessary policies and actions. If similar risks and threats reappear, it may indicate that the nation has either failed to remember its traumatic past in a way that serves it instrumentally and pragmatically or has not remembered it at all. Have Armenians adequately remembered their Genocide? If so, why is there a resurgence of the risk of another genocide affecting the Armenian population, not only in Karabakh but also in Armenia, in modern times? Do Armenians need to reconsider their politics of memory in this context, and if so, are they doing it correctly? This paper critically addresses these questions, accompanied by a brief conceptual exploration and case studies.
References
Assmann, A. (2011) From Collective Violence to the Common Future: Four Models for Dealing with the Traumatic Past. Bulletin of Yerevan State University, Sociology and Economics series, N 134.5, p. 14-22.
Atanesyan A.V., Reynolds B.M., Mkrtichyan A.E. (2023) Balancing between Russia and the West: the hard security choice of Armenia. European Security, DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2023.2258528
Atanesyan A.V., Mkrtichyan A.E. (2023) Russia as an ally: the dynamics of public perceptions in Armenian society before and after the 2020 Karabakh war. Polis. Political Studies. No. 2. P. 9-26. (In Russ.)
Atanesyan A.V. (2016). Culture of Memory and Some Models of Memory About the Armenian Genocide in Contemporary Armenian Society. Historical and social-educational ideas, N. 8(4/1), pp. 46-54. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17748/2075-9908-2016-8-4/1-46-54
Atanesyan A.V. (2018) “Velvet Revolution” in Armenia: Potential, Gains, and Risks of Political Protest Activity. Polis. Political Studies, N. 6, p. 80-98. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2018.06.06
Cornejo, V. (2020) "A Nation That Forgets Its Past Has No Future". The Network, July 17. URL: https://network.crcna.org/topic/justice-inclusion/biblical-justice/nation-forgets-its-past-has-no-future
Dadrian, V․ N. (1995) The History of the Armenian Genocide: Ethnic Conflict from the Balkans to Anatolia to the Caucasus. Providence, R.I., Berghahn.
Guterres, A. (2020) ‘Never Again’ Means Constant Retelling of Holocaust Story, Secretary-General Stresses at Exhibition Opening, Citing Rising Antisemitism, Other Hatreds. UN Press Release, January 21. URL: https://press.un.org/en/2020/sgsm19943.doc.htm
Kaasik-Krogerus, S., Čeginskas, V.L.A., Sääskilahti, N. (2020) Politics of memory and oblivion. An introduction to the special issue, European Politics and Society, N21:3, p. 271-276, DOI: 10.1080/23745118.2019.1645419
Kévorkian, R․ H. (2011) The Armenian Genocide: A Complete History. I.B. Tauris.
Lemkin Institute: Genocide threat has spread to sovereign territory of Armenia. Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention, 07.04.2024, URL: https://www.lemkininstitute.com/single-post/lemkin-institute-genocide-threat-has-spread-to-sovereign-territory-of-armenia (accessed 11.04.2024).
Margalit, A. (2004) The Ethics of Memory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, p. XIII-IX.
Maurantonio, N. (2014) The Politics of Memory. In: The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication (ed. by Kate Kenski and Kathleen Hall Jamieson). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Nascimento Araújo, M.P., and Sepúlveda dos Santos, M. (2009) History, Memory and Forgetting: Political Implications, RCCS Annual Review, N1, p. 77-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/rccsar.157
Ocampo, L.M. (2023) Expert Opinion: Genocide against Armenians in 2023. New York, August 7. URL: https://www.cftjustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Moreno-Ocampo-Expert-Opinion.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3AzzJHsmxnGJ0J5071fmVdzrudwmdnyWPMRKiWWGKdbDvbKvRUL5lKACU
Ranger, J., & Ranger, W. (2023). Towards a resonant theory of memory politics. Memory Studies, N16(2), p.451–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980221101112
Scotini, M., Galasso, E. (2015) Politics of Memory. Documentary and Archive. Berlin, Archive Books.
Verovšek, P.J. (2016) Collective memory, politics, and the influence of the past: the politics of memory as a research paradigm. Politics Groups and Identities, N4 (3), p. 529-543.
Von Joeden Forgey, E. (2023). Why Prevention Fails: Chronicling the Genocide in Artsakh. International Journal of Armenian Genocide Studies, 8(2), 86–107. https://doi.org/10.51442/ijags.0046
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Arthur Atanesyan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
