USER INVOLVEMENT IN POVERTY POLICY STRUCTURES AS AN APPROACH TO GIVE A VOICE TO PEOPLE LIVING IN POVERTY AND TO STRENGTHEN SOCIAL COEHISION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU.F/2025.16.1.024Keywords:
poverty, politics, economy, social service, Innovative, Projects, Qualitative methods, Quantiative methods, participative methods, User InvovlementAbstract
Solidarity and social inclusion, which are often used as synonyms in professional discourse on social work, are understood to date with too little focus on the structural level in politics, economics and social services.
Furthermore, in the implementation of projects to promote social cohesion, marginalized groups such as people affected by poverty have so far been insufficiently involved in identifying commonalities between groups of people and in joint activities.
Therefore, following the user involvement approach and on a structural level, I argue that political, economic and social conditions as well commitment must be in place. In the case of people affected by poverty, who are a very heterogeneous group, at least in Switzerland, mechanisms are needed to enable these groups to identify and voice their concerns and bring them to the attention of the appropriate political, economic or social decision-makers in a targeted manner.
Using two research-based projects from poverty policy in Switzerland, I follow to answer the research question: How can people affected by poverty be given a voice in the structures and decision-making processes of poverty policy? The theoretical framework is based on the user involvement approach. Using participative, qualitative and quantitative research methods I answer the question with the potential impact, challenges and conditions of an implementable platform and training courses for professionals from politics, economics and social services, as well as for people affected by poverty. This differentiated knowledge of people affected by poverty and the fulfillment of the requirements of all those involved, a structure of exchange supported by social policy and led by external professionals, willingness to learn and work together, clear communication, or reimbursement of travel expenses, are necessary to strive for a truly sustainable and inclusive society, rather than one that merely appears to be so.
However, it should be noted that potential impact has been identified and that further long-term impact and international comparative analyses are necessary to gain comprehensive knowledge.
References
Beresford, P., Branfield, F. (2006). Developing inclusive partnerships: user-defined outcomes, networking and knowledge - a case study. Health & social care in the community, 14(5), pp. 436–444.
Beresford, P., Carr, S. (2016). Social care, service users and user involvement. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 28(2).
Bray, R., De Laat M., Godinot X., Ugarte A., Walker, R. (2019). The Hidden Dimensions of Poverty, Montreuil: Fourth World Publications.
Chiapparini, E. (ed.) (2016). The Service User as a Partner in Social Work Projects and Education. Concepts and Evaluations of Courses with a Gap-Mending Approach in Europe. Opladen, Berlin & Toronto: Budrich. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvbkjvpm
Chiapparini, E., Bitsch, K. (2024). The added value of combining the expertise of people with experience of poverty and professionals in joint project development: contextualisation, implementation and evaluation of the BFH specialist course "Sharing experience and expertise" Bern: Edition Soziothek (in German). https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.21954
Chiapparini, E., Eicher, V. (2019). User Involvement in der Sozialen Arbeit – Anknüpfungspunkte für Praxis-, Forschungs- und Lehrprojekte in der Schweiz. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Soziale Arbeit, 24(18), 117-134. https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.9955.
Chiapparini, E., Guerry, S., Reynaud, C. (2025). How can the expertise of people with experience of poverty inform Swiss poverty policy in the long term and have an impact on it? Foundations and concept for a permanent participation structure, which was developed on the basis of research conducted with people who have experience of poverty. Federal Social Insurance Office. https://doi.org/10.24451/dspace/11266
Chiapparini, E., Schuwey, C., Beyeler, M., Reynaud, C., Guerry, S., Blanchet, N., Lucas, B. (2020). Modelle der Partizipation armutsbetroffener und -gefährdeter Personen in der Armutsbekämpfung und -prävention. Forschungsbericht Nr. 7/20. Bern: Bundesamt für Sozialversicherungen (BSV). https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.11878
Chiapparini, E., Willener, D., Domonell, K., Hegedüs, A. (2023). Digitalisierung: Hürden für vulnerable Gruppen. In Soziale Sicherheit CHSS. Bundesamt für Sozialversicherungen BSV. https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.18933
De Corte, J., Kerstenne, C. (2015). Rapport final. Évaluation de l’apport des experts du vécu en matière de pauvreté au sein des services publics fédéraux. Gent: Universiteit Gent: Liège: Université de Liège.
Beresford, P., Boxall, K. (2012). Service Users, Social Work Education and Knowledge for Social Work Practice. Social Work Education, 31(2), 155–167.
Dierckx, M., Vandenbroeck, M.& Devlieghere, J. (2024). Child and Family Social Work as a Space for Promoting Social Cohesion. Child & Family Social Work, 12(3), pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.13178
Federal Statistical Office (FSO) (2023). Statistics on Income and Living Conditions. https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/en/home/statistics/economic-social-situation-population/economic-and-social-situation-of-the-population/poverty-deprivation/risk-poverty.html
FSO (2024a). Poverty rate 2022. https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/querschnittsthemen/wohlfahrtsmessung/alle-indikatoren/gesellschaft/armutsquote.assetdetail.30526410.html
FSO (2024b). At-risk-of-poverty rate 2022. https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/wirtschaftliche-soziale-situation-bevoelkerung.assetdetail.30865436.html
Güttler, A., Bruse, T. (2022). Beyond agile. A new system of corporate organisation in practice. Berlin: Springer Gabler.
Herriger, N. (2014). Empowerment in der Sozialen Arbeit. Eine Einführung. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer Verlag.
Hill, D, Bell, M., Laredo, E. (2024). Solidarity is not a dirty word: exploring and locating solidarity as a theory and model for a radical community social work practice. Critical and Radical Social Work.12(4). pp. 442-455. https://doi.org/10.1332/20498608Y2024D000000022
Kern, T. (2008). Soziale Bewegungen. Ursachen, Wirkungen, Mechanismen. Wiesbaden: VS. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Kristiansen, A., Heule, C. (2016). Sweden: Power, Experiences and Mutual Development. Using The Concept of Gap-Mending in Social Work Education in The Service User as a Partner in Social Work Projects and Education. Concepts and Evaluations of Courses with a Gap-Mending Approach in Europe (ed. Chiapparini), Opladen, Berlin & Toronto: Budrich. pp. 27-53 https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvbkjvpm
Krumer-Nevo, M. (2016). Poverty-Aware Social Work: A Paradigm for Social Work Practice with People in Poverty. The British Journal of Social Work, 46(6), pp. 1793–1808.
Kuckartz, U., Rädiker, S. (2022). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung. Grundlagentexte Methoden. Weinheim, Basel.
McLaughlin, H. (2009). What's in a Name: 'Client', 'Patient', 'Customer', 'Consumer', 'Expert by Experience', 'Service User'--What's Next? British Journal of Social Work 39 (6), 1101–1117
Müller de Menezes, R., Chiapparini, E. (2021). «Wenn ihr mich fragt…». Das Wissen und die Erfahrung von Betroffenen einbeziehen Grundlagen und Schritte für die Beteiligung von betroffenen Personen in der Armutsprävention und -bekämpfung. Bundesamt für Sozialversicherungen (BSV), Nationale Plattform. https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.15093
Schön, U.-K. (2016). User Involvement in Social Work and Education-A Matter of Participation? Journal of evidence-informed social work 13 (1), pp. 21–33. DOI: 10.1080/15433714.2014.939382
Sen, A. (2000). Ökonomie für den Menschen. Wege zur Gerechtigkeit und Solidarität in der Marktwirtschaft. München, Wien: Carl Hanser Verlag.
Sevinç T. (2022). Three approaches to social unity and solidarity. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 25(4), pp. 459–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2019.1697843
Stern, S., Rüegge, B., Wick, A., Thomas, R. (2024). Evaluation Nationale Plattform gegen Armut (NAPA). Im Auftrag des BSV. Beiträge zur Sozialen Sicherheit. Forschungsbericht Nr. 01/24. 01-24D-eBericht_neu.pdf
Thallmaier, S. R. (2014). Customer Co-Design. A Study in the Mass Customization Industry. 1. Aufl. s.l.: Springer.
Zask, J. (2011). Participer. Essai sur les formes démocratiques de la participation (Les voies du politique). Lormont: Le Bord de l'eau.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Emanuela Chiapparini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
