THE IMPACT OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL ADAPTATION AND SOCIAL INTEGRATION OF OLDER ADULTS: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46991/SBMP/2025.8.2.015Keywords:
aging, Digital technologies, Social integration, Cognitive functions, Digital divide, Psychosocial well-being, social adaptationAbstract
In contemporary digital society the psychological well-being and social integration of older adults are increasingly connected to their attitudes toward digital technologies and their skills in using them. This study aims to analyze the psychological impact of digital technologies on individuals aged 65 and above, focusing on psychological adaptation, social health, and cognitive functions.
The study was conducted in 2024-2025, involving 150 participants aged 65-85 years. Results indicate that active use of digital technologies can have both positive and negative psychological consequences, depending on the intensity of use, motivations, and level of social support. Key findings show that moderate use contributes to maintaining cognitive activity and strengthening social connections, while excessive or uncontrolled use can lead to stress, anxiety, and social isolation.
References
1. Chen, L., Zhang, Y., & Wang, M. (2022). Digital isolation among older adults: A systematic review of social media use and mental health outcomes. Journal of Aging and Technology, 15(2), 234-251.
2. Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
3. Mitzner, T. L., Savla, J., Boot, W. R., Sharit, J., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., & Rogers, W. A. (2019). Technology adoption by older adults: Findings from the PRISM trial. The Gerontologist, 59(1), 34-44.
4. Park, D. C., Lodi-Smith, J., Drew, L., Haber, S., Hebrank, A., Bischof, G. N., & Aamodt, W. (2014). The impact of sustained engagement on cognitive function in older adults: The Synapse Project. Psychological Science, 25(1), 103-112.
5. Peek, S. T., Wouters, E. J., van Hoof, J., Luijkx, K. G., Boeije, H. R., & Vrijhoef, H. J. (2014). Factors influencing acceptance and use of technology for aging in place: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 83(4), 235-248.
6. Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008). The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 417-433.
7. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069-1081.
8. Schwartz, E., & Ayalon, L. (2020). Technology adoption by older adults: Differences between younger-old and older-old. Innovation in Aging, 4(3), igaa021.
9. Wang, S., Bolling, K., Mao, W., Reichstadt, J., Jeste, D., Kim, H. C., & Nebeker, C. (2023). Technology to support aging in place: Older adults' perspectives. Healthcare, 7(2), 60.
10. Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30-41.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Anna Nadoyan, Anahit Stepanyan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
