FORMALIZED HANDWRITING ANALYSIS AS A COMPLEMENTARY TOOL IN FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46991/SBMP/2025.8.2.067Keywords:
forensic, handwriting analysis, formalization, case-study, projective techniques, artificial intelligenceAbstract
Forensic psychological assessment demands a comprehensive, scientifically grounded approach capable of capturing both explicit behavior and implicit psychological dynamics. This article explores the role of formalized handwriting analysis as a structured projective method that complements traditional tools within a multimodal forensic framework. The approach relies on standardized definitions, measurable handwriting parameters, and statistical modeling to translate observable motor patterns into psychologically meaningful indicators.
By focusing on measurable or at least quantitatively assessed handwriting features, such as spatial layout, pressure, speed, form, rhythm, and variability, the method provides access to implicit emotional and cognitive dynamics that are often inaccessible through self-report or structured testing. Its unobtrusive and natural character makes it particularly effective in forensic contexts, where examinees may consciously attempt to regulate or distort self-presentation.
Although empirical validation remains an ongoing process, each application contributes to the refinement and confirmation of model reliability. Case-based analyses demonstrate that handwriting indicators can align meaningfully with expert psychological judgments and behavioral observations, while occasional discrepancies help refine interpretation and promote diagnostic caution. Through methodological triangulation, this approach supports the integration of implicit and explicit data, enhancing both the depth and the objectivity of forensic conclusions.
Formalized handwriting analysis, when applied within a multimethod design, supported by AI-methods and interpreted by qualified professionals, offers an additional layer of insight into personality structure and behavioral regulation. Its systematic and transparent use reinforces the scientific validity and legal defensibility of expert psychological evaluations, contributing to more comprehensive and credible forensic assessments.
References
1. Howitt, D. (2018). Introduction to Forensic and Criminal Psychology (6th ed.). Harlow: Pearson.
2. Aghuzumtsyan, R.V., Shahverdyan, G.D., Mamyan, T.S., Hambardzumyan M.V., & Gabrielyan, A.K. (2023). Systemic Features of Forensic and Legal Psychological Expertise. In Handwriting Research: Forensics & Legal. Chernov, Y., Nauer, MA (eds.) (pp. 109–130). Zurich: IHS Books. https://doi.org/10.61246/ihs2/ra105126
3. Aghuzumtsyan, R., & Shahverdyan, G. (2021). Specifics of Forensic Psychology Analysis of Psychological Abuse. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics, 24(2), 77-91. https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.2.2021.05
4. Aghuzumtsyan R. V. (2023, April 13-14). Ways to improve the effectiveness of forensic-psychological expertise. Materials of the 5th International Scientific and Practical Conference dedicated to the 100th anniversary of Professor G.L. Granovsky, Russian State University of Justice, Moscow.
5. Flick, U. (1992). Triangulation revisited: Strategy of validation or alternative? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 22(2), 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1992.tb00215.x.
6. Frank, L. K. (1939). Projective Methods for the Study of Personality, The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 8, 2, 389-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1939.9917671
7. Chernov, Y. G. (2021). Komp'yuternyye metody analiza pocherka. Tsyurikh: IHS Books(In Russian)
8. Chernov, Y. (2023). Psychometric Modeling of Handwriting as a Nonverbal Assessment Instrument and Its Properties. In Quantitative Psychology. IMPS 2022. Wiberg, M., Molenaar, D., González, J., Kim, JS., Hwang, H. (eds) (Vol. 422, pp. 347–355). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27781-8_30.
9. Chernov, Y. (2018). Formal Validation of Handwriting Analysis. In Handwriting Research. Validation & Quality. Chernov, Y., Nauer, MA (eds.) (pp. 37–68). Zurich: IHS Books.
10. Gagiu, D., & Sendrescu, D. (2025). Detection of Personality Traits Using Handwriting and Deep Learning, Appl. Sci., 15, 2154. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15042154.
11. Gavrilescu, M., & Vizireanu, N. (2018). Predicting the Big Five personality traits from handwriting, J Image Video Proc., 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13640-018-0297-3
12. Chernov, Y., Aghuzumtsyan, R., & Hambardzumyan, M. (2025). Integrated expertise in legal psychology with the use of handwritten document analysis. Nowa Kodyfikacja Prawa Karnego (New Criminal Law Codification), 74. https://doi.org/67–90. 10.19195/2084-5065.74.6.
13. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (junior and adult). London: Hodder and Stoughton.
14. Buss, A. H., & Perry M. P. (1992). The Aggression Questionnaire, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 452-459. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.63.3.452.
15. Schmieshek, H., (1970). Fragebogen zur Ermittlung akzentuierter Persönlichkeiten. Psychiatrie, Neurologie und medizinische Psychologie, 22, 10, 378–381.
16. Chernov, Y., & Caspers, C. (2020). Formalized Computer-Aided Handwriting Psychology: Validation and Integration into Psychological Assessment. MDPI. Behavioral Sciences, 10(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs10010027.
17. Costa, P.T., & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
18. Cattell, R. B., Cattell, A. K., & Cattell, H. E. P. (1993). 16PF Fifth Edition Questionnaire. Champaign, IL, IPAT.
19. Schwartz, S. H., & Cieciuch, J. (2022). Measuring the refined theory of individual values in 49 cultural groups: Psychometrics of the revised Portrait Value Questionnaire. Assessment, 29(5), 1005–1019 https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191121998760
20. Bar-On, R. (2004). The Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i): rationale, description, and summary of psychometric properties. In G. Geher (Ed.), Measuring Emotional Intelligence: Common Ground and Controversy (pp. 111-142). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
21. Chernov, Y. (2023). Handwriting Markers for the Onset of Alzheimer’s Disease. Current Alzheimer Research, 20(11), 791–801. https://doi.org/10.2174/0115672050299338240222051023.
22. Chernov Y.G., Zholdasova Zh.A. Markers of Alzheimer’s disease in handwriting. Russian neurological journal. 2021;26(6):16-28. (In Russ.)https://doi.org/10.30629/2658-7947-2021-26-6-16-28.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yury Chernov, Ruben Aghuzumtsyan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
