Resilience of Civiliarchic Democracy in the Face of Challenges and Gaps in European Integration: The Political Dimension of the Index of Civiliarchy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46991/JOPS/2024.3.9.097Keywords:
civiliarchic democracy, civiliarchy, civiliarchic transformations, Eastern Partnership, liberal democracy, consolidation, post-Soviet populismAbstract
The Eastern Partnership (EaP) countries face significant challenges in achieving democratic consolidation amid geopolitical tensions, authoritarian tendencies and regional conflicts. This paper examines the resilience of civiliarchic democracy as a framework to understand and address these challenges. The study employs a mixed methods approach including comparative analysis and the Civiliarchy Index to explore the interplay between European integration, democratic resilience and anti-civiliarchic forces. To identify the main principles of EU foreign policy in the EaP countries and its normative component, a qualitative targeted content analysis of official EU documentation was used. Additionally, the method of discourse analysis was used to consider the narrative regarding the participation and lobbying from the EU and European institutions and values within the EaP countries, as well as prepare for the negotiations with EU and EU member states for the interests of EaP countries. Europeanization and democratization determine both the political and social prospects for sustainable development of the EaP countries, as well as the hybrid challenges of strategic security and the dichotomy of inter-integration conflicts. The paper analyzes the gaps in European political integration in the EaP countries for the period from 2013 to 2023. The authors rely on studies on Europeanization and European political integration in the tradition of neo-institutionalism, as well as on the resilience of the EaP countries. The findings of the paper imply that the civiliarchic democracy the EaP countries face is thwarted by internal instability, external pressures and shortcomings in EU policies. But EU’s strategic and engagement can in some extent tackle authoritarian trends and improve democratic institutions. Theoretical and practical insight into the concept of civiliarchic democracy and its resiliency in light of the democratization literature is the main contribution of the study. Policy and scholarly implications of the findings in support of improving democratic institutions and further inclusive European integration in the EaP region are suggested.
References
Aleksanyan, Arusyak (ed.). 2017. Trends of the Index of Democracy Level in the dimension of human rights and democratization (Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Ukraine and Moldova). Yerevan: YSU press.
Aleksanyan, Arusyak (ed.). 2018b. Political Stability of Newly Independent Countries under Conditions of Modernization (Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Ukraine and Moldova). Yerevan: YSU press.
Aleksanyan, Arusyak (ed.). 2019. Challenges to the Consolidation of Modern Democracy: IDL Comparative Analysis (Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Ukraine and Moldova), Yerevan: YSU press.
Aleksanyan, Arusyak. 2018a. “Regional Perspectives on Democratisation of Eastern Partnership countries.” Global Campus Human Rights Journal 2 (1): 193-208. https://doi.org/20.500.11825/681.
Aleksanyan, Ashot. 1999. “The Era of Civiliarchy.” Bulletin of Yerevan University 2: 2-9.
Aleksanyan, Ashot. 2010a. “Post-Soviet social partnership: the political and civiliarchic dimensions of social responsibility.” Central Asia and the Caucasus: Journal of Social and Political Studies 11 (4): 126-137.
Aleksanyan, Ashot. 2010b. “Social partnership in the system of civiliarchic social responsibility.” Bulletin of Yerevan University: International relations, Political science 132.6: 24-36.
Aleksanyan, Ashot. 2014b. “Civiliarchic representation of women as a phenomenon of social partnership in Armenia.” Bulletin of Yerevan University. International Relations, Political Science 144.6 (3): 36-46.
Alexanian, Ashot. 2011. “The Civiliarchic Foundations of Democratization of Political Regime in Armenia.” Central Asia and the Caucasus. Journal of Social and Political Studies 12 (3): 116-127.Alexanian, Ashot. 2014a. “Current challenges for the integration processes in the Southern Caucasus: European and Eurasian dimensions.” Central Asia and the Caucasus. Journal of Social and Political Studies 15 (3): 28-40.
Alexanyan, Ashot. S. 2005. “The Civiliarchic Transformation of Civil Society in Armenia: Civiliologic Discourse.” In: Black Sea Politics: Political Culture and Civil Society in an Unstable Region, edited by A. Güneş-Ayata, A. Ergun, and I. Çelimli, 130-140. London: I.B. TAURIS. https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755620203.ch-0008.
Baltag, Dorina, and Iulian Romanyshyn. 2024. “Special issue: the European Union and its Eastern Partnership neighbours—a framework to evaluate performance.” International Politics 61: 1059-1077. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-023-00475-3.
Barbieri, Michele, and Nane Aleksanyan. 2024. “Human Security as a Factor of Sustainable Security in Post-War Armenia: Global Responsibility of Small States.” Journal of Political Science: Bulletin of Yerevan University 3 (2(8): 42-64. https://doi.org/10.46991/JOPS/2024.3.8.042.
Boudon, Raymond. 1997. “The Present Relevance of Max Weber’s Wertrationalität (Value Rationality): Conference paper.” In: Methodology of the Social Sciences, Ethics, and Economics in the Newer Historical School: From Max Weber and Rickert to Sombart and Rothacker, edited by Peter Koslowski, 3-31. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59095-5_1.
Boulter, Stephen. 2024. Natural Law Liberalism and Democracy. In: Natural Law Liberalism and the Malaise of Modernity. Palgrave Studies in Ethics and Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp. 75-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59737-4_4.
Cocozza, Antonio. 2023. Formal Rationality and Substantial Rationality from Max Weber to Ralf Dahrendorf. In: The Unexpected in Action: Ethics, Rationality, and Skills. Springer, Cham, pp. 15-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26793-2_2.
Costa, Olivier. 2023. “Conclusion: The European Union Between Resistance, Resilience, and Reinvention.” In: The EU Political System After the 2019 European Elections, edited by Olivier Costa, Steven Van Hecke, 503-515. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12338-2_23.
Council of the EU and the European Council. 2024. “Eastern Partnership.” March 17, 2022. Accessed May 10, 2024. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/eastern-partnership/.
Council of the EU. 2022. “Armenia-Azerbaijan: EU sets up monitoring capacity along the international borders.” Press release, October 17, 2022. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2022/10/17/armenia-azerbaijan-eu-sets-up-monitoring-capacity-along-the-international-borders/.
Crowder, George. 2023. “Populism: A Berlinian Critique.” Society 60: 708-721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-023-00878-1.
Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy. Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dahrendorf, Ralf. 2006. Homo Sociologicus: Ein Versuch zur Geschichte, Bedeutung und Kritik der Kategorie der sozialen Rolle. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90216-6.
Davutoğlu, Ahmet. 2020. “Introduction: Conceptual and Methodological Framework.” In: Systemic Earthquake and the Struggle for World Order: Exclusive Populism versus Inclusive Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108751643.001.
de Ghantuz Cubbe, Giovanni. 2022. “Populisms, Constitutions, Constitutional Courts, and Constitutional Democracy.” In: Populism and Contemporary Democracy in Europe: Old Problems and New Challenges, edited by Josep Maria Castellà Andreu, and Marco Antonio Simonelli, 43-63. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92884-1_3.
Debus, Marc, and David Schweizer. 2024. “The Differentiated Impact of Perceived EU Regional Policy on Citizens’ Positions on European Integration.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-024-00568-5.
Dzebisashvili, Shalva. 2024. “The Dilemma of Good Governance Versus Power Grab in Georgia.” In: Polarization, Shifting Borders and Liquid Governance: Studies on Transformation and Development in the OSCE Region, edited by Anja Mihr, and Chiara Pierobon, 177-193. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44584-2_10.
EEAS. 2022. “Eastern Partnership.” March 17, 2022. Accessed May 10, 2024. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/eastern-partnership_en.
Ehrhart, Hans-Georg. 2024. “Ukrainekrieg ohne Ende? Neun Thesen für ein Kriegsende.” Zeitschrift für Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik 17: 415-435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12399-024-01009-2.
EUR-Lex. 2016. “Shared vision, common action: a stronger Europe - A global strategy for the European Union’s foreign and security policy.” June 28, 2016. Accessed May 10, 2024. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eugs_review_web_0.pdf.
EUR-Lex. 2019. “The European Union’s global strategy - Three years on, looking forward.” June 13, 2019. Accessed May 10, 2024. https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eu_global_strategy_2019.pdf.
European Parliament. 2024a. “Three Eastern Partnership neighbours: Ukraine, Moldova and Belarus.” Accessed May 10, 2024. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/171/three-eastern-partnership-neighbours-ukraine-moldova-and-belarus.
European Parliament. 2024b. “Three Eastern Partnership neighbours in the South Caucasus.” Accessed May 10, 2024. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/172/three-eastern-partnership-neighbours-in-the-south-caucasus.
European Parliament. 2024c. “Resolution of 29 February 2024 on deepening EU integration in view of future enlargement (2023/2114(INI)).” Accessed May 10, 2024. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024-02-29_EN.html#sdocta11.
Freudlsperger, Christian, and Frank Schimmelfennig. 2025. War and Boundary Formation: The Russo-Ukrainian War and European Integration. In: Ukraine’s Thorny Path to the EU: From “Integration without Membership” to “Integration through War”, edited by Maryna Rabinovych, and Anne Pintsch, 19-41. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69154-6_2.
Galtung, Johan. 1996. Peace by Peaceful Means: Peace and Conflict, Development and Civilization. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221631.
Gel’man, Vladimir. 2003. “Post-Soviet Transitions and Democratization: Towards Theory-Building.” Democratization 10 (2): 87-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/714000120.
Gel’man, Vladimir. 2022. “Exogenous Shock and Russian Studies.” Post-Soviet Affairs 39 (1-2): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2022.2148814.
Griffiths, Tom G., and Robert Imre. 2013. Wallerstein’s World-Systems Analysis. In: Mass Education, Global Capital, and the World: The Theoretical Lenses of István Mészáros and Immanuel Wallerstein. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp. 11-39. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137014825_2
Gritschmeier, Raphael. 2021a. Einleitung: Wie wirkt Populismus innerhalb der Demokratie?. In: Populismus – Korrektiv oder Gefahr: Funktionsspektrum und politische Bedeutung in demokratischen Systemen. Springer VS, Wiesbaden, pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-35901-0_1.
Gritschmeier, Raphael. 2021b. Theoretische Grundlagen. In: Populismus - Korrektiv oder Gefahr: Funktionsspektrum und politische Bedeutung in demokratischen Systemen. Springer VS, Wiesbaden, pp. 21-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-35901-0_2.
Gutbrod, Hans, and David Wood. 2023. Commemorating for Peace. In: Ethics of Political Commemoration. Twenty-first Century Perspectives on War, Peace, and Human Conflict. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp. 119-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31594-7_5.
Heinisch, Reinhard, and Annika Werner. 2024. “The strange bedfellows of populism and liberalism: the effect of populist attitudes on the perception of the COVID-19 pandemic and policies to contain it.” Comparative European Politics 22: 433-458. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-023-00367-z.
Heinisch, Reinhard, and Viktoria Jansesberger. 2021. “Does Ethno-Territorial Identity Matter in Populist Party Support? Evidence on the Demand-Side from 19 Populist Radical Right and Populist Radical Left National and Regionalist Parties.” European Politics and Society 24 (2): 213-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2021.1976577.
Heinisch, Reinhard, and Viktoria Jansesberger. 2022. “Lacking Control – Analysing the Demand Side of Populist Party Support.” European Politics and Society 25 (2): 266-285. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2022.2150027.
Heinisch, Reinhard, Duncan McDonnell, and Annika Werner. 2021. “Equivocal Euroscepticism: How populist radical right parties can have their EU cake and eat it.” Journal of Common Market Studies 59 (2): 189-205. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13055.
Heinisch, Reinhard, Steven Saxonberg, Annika Werner, and Fabian Habersack. 2021. “The effect of radical right fringe parties on main parties in Central and Eastern Europe: Empirical evidence from manifesto data.” Party Politics 27 (1): 9-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819863620.
Holden, Patrick 2017. “Neo-liberalism by default? The European Union’s trade and development policy in an era of crisis.” Journal of International Relations and Development 20: 381-407. https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2015.10.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1991a. “Democracy’s Third Wave.” Journal of Democracy 2 (2): 12-34.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1991b. The Third Wave. Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman and London: University of Oklahoma Press.
Jakobs, Philipp. 2022. Max Weber and the Sociology of Organization. In: Max Weber and the sociology of organization: Reflections on a concept of pre-modern organization. Springer, Wiesbaden, pp. 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-40287-7_2.
Jang, Woojeong. 2023. “The Contestation of International Ties and Regime Transitions: Evidence from the Former Soviet Republics.” Democratization 31 (1): 233-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2023.2262939.
Jonasson, Ann-Kristin. 2024. “EU Norm Promotion in a Conflictual World. An Existential Necessity with Obstacles?.” In: The Borders of the European Union in a Conflictual World: Interdisciplinary European Studies, edited by Antonina Bakardjieva Engelbrekt, Per Ekman, Anna Michalski, and Lars Oxelheim, 93-117. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54200-8_5.
Joppke, Christian. 2021. “Populism and the double liberalism: exploring the links.” Theory and Society 50: 769-790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-021-09435-3.
Juška, Žygimantas. 2024. The Soft Power of the European Union in Four Regions. In: Soft Power of the European Union: Mastering the Language of Power Politics. Springer, Cham, pp. 69-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56384-3_4.
Klimovich, Stanislav. 2023. “From failed democratization to the war against Ukraine: what happened to Russian institutions under Putin?.” Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 33: 103-120 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41358-023-00345-7.
Lacher, Hannes, and Dillon Wamsley. 2023. “Democratization, development, and inequality: the limits of redistributive models of democracy.” Theory and Society 52: 1031-1065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-023-09526-3.
Lavrelashvili, Teona, and Steven Van Hecke. 2023. “The End of Enlargement? The EU’s Struggle with the Western Balkans and Eastern Partnership Countries.” In: The EU Political System After the 2019 European Elections. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics, edited by Olivier Costa, and Steven Van Hecke, 433-454. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12338-2_20.
Lijphart, Arend. 1969. “Consociational Democracy.” World Politics 21 (2): 207-225. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009820.
Linz, Juan J., and Alfred Stepan. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
M⊘ller, J⊘rgen. 2008. “A Critical Note on ‘The Rise of Illiberal Democracy.’” Australian Journal of Political Science 43 (3): 555-561. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361140802267316.
Malinova, Olga. 2022. “Legitimizing Putin’s Regime: The Transformations of the Narrative of Russia’s Post-Soviet Transition.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 55 (1): 52-75. https://doi.org/10.1525/j.postcomstud.2022.55.1.52.
Malkopoulou, Anthoula, and Benjamin Moffitt. 2023. “How not to respond to populism.” Comparative European Politics 21: 848-865. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-023-00341-9.
McLarren, Katharina. 2024. “Wars Come and Go, International Society Changes, and Religions Endure: Narratives of Religious Actors on the Ukraine War.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-024-00555-w.
Mearsheimer, John J. 2018. The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities. New Haven: Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300240535.
Minesashvili, Salome. 2022. European Identity and Foreign Policy in Georgia and Ukraine Since 1991. In: European Identities During Wars and Revolutions: Change Under Crises in Georgia and Ukraine. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp. 51-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96717-8_2.
Müller, Patrick, and Peter Slominski. 2024. “Hungary, the EU and Russia’s War Against Ukraine: The Changing Dynamics of EU Foreign Policymaking.” In: The War Against Ukraine and the EU: Facing New Realities, edited by Claudia Wiesner, and Michèle Knodt, 111-131. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35040-5_6.
Paustyan, Ekaterina, and Irina Busygina. 2024. “The Regional Dimension of Russia’s Resilience during Its War against Ukraine: An Introduction.” Post-Soviet Affairs 40 (4): 243-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2024.2350259.
Pintsch, Anne, and Maryna Rabinovych. 2025. “From “Integration without Membership” to “Integration through War”—Or Why Sailing the Thorny Path Will Ultimately Lead to the EU.” In: Ukraine’s Thorny Path to the EU: From “Integration without Membership” to “Integration through War”, edited by Maryna Rabinovych, and Anne Pintsch, 311-323. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69154-6_13.
Platzer, Peter. 2024. “Are the New Enemies of Liberal Democracy in the Sense of Karl Popper Still the Same but Only Free of Ideology.” In: Reconciliation, Conflict Transformation, and Peace Studies, edited by Iyad Muhsen AlDajani, and Martin Leiner, 75-99. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47839-0_5.
Pradhan, Ramakrushna, and Sukanya Kakoty. 2024. Eurasian Regionalism: An Introduction. In: Security Integration in the Post-Soviet Space and Collective Security Treaty Organization: Roadmap for Future Cooperation. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore, pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-6445-7_1.
Rašković, Matevž (Matt), Katalin Takacs Haynes, and Anastas Vangeli. 2024. “The emergence of populism as an institution and its recursive mechanisms: A socio-cognitive theory perspective.” Journal of International Business Policy 7: 19-40. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-023-00164-1.
Rogov, Kirill. 2013. “Forty Years in the Desert: The Political Cycles of Post-Soviet Transition.” In: Russia 2025: Scenarios for the Russian Future, edited by Maria Lipman, and Nikolay Petrov, 18-45. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137336910_2.
Santaniello, Mauro, and Michele Barbieri. 2024. “Monocratic Cybersecurity in the EU Member States: Insights from Italy, France, Germany and Spain.” European Politics and Society: 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2024.2349893.
Saxonberg, Steven, and Reinhard Heinisch. 2022. “Filling the Demand Gap: The Success of Centrist Entrepreneurial Populism in the Czech Republic.” Europe-Asia Studies 76 (3): 363-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2022.2136624.
Schramm, Lucas. 2024a. Crises and European Integration. In: Crises of European Integration. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp. 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54748-5_1.
Schramm, Lucas. 2024b. Outcomes of Crises of European Integration. In: Crises of European Integration. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp. 33-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54748-5_2.
Sharlamanov, Kire. 2022. Populism and Liberal Democracy. In: Populism as Meta Ideology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp. 195-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-03934-8_8.
Suciu, Oana-Valentina. 2018. “Confronting Multiple Pasts in Post-Soviet Armenia.” In: Transitional Justice and the Former Soviet Union: Reviewing the Past, Looking toward the Future, edited by Cynthia M. Horne, and Lavinia Stan, 282-302. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sweetman, Brendan. 2021. Freedom and Disagreement in a Democracy. In: The Crisis of Democratic Pluralism: The Loss of Confidence in Reason and the Clash of Worldviews. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp. 41-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78382-2_2.
Upadhyay, Archana. 2024. “Small States in a Transforming World: The Baltic Response to the War in Ukraine.” In: The Baltics in a Changing Europe, edited by Bhaswati Sarkar, 35-51. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-5890-6_3.
Van der Loo, Guillaume. 2017. “The EU’s Association Agreements and DCFTAs with Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia: A Comparative Study.” CEPS Special Report, 24 June 2017. Archive of European Integration. Accessed June 15, 2024. https://aei.pitt.edu/88152/.
Venizelos, Giorgos. 2024. “(Anti-)Populism and Post-truth.” In: Post-Truth Populism: A New Political Paradigm, edited by Saul Newman, and Maximilian Conrad, 91-118. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64178-7_4.
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1995a. After Liberalism. New York: The New Press.
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1995b. Utopistics, or, Historical choices of the twenty-first century. New York: The New Press.
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 2004. World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Durham and London: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822399018.
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 2006. European Universalism: The Rhetoric of Power. New York: The New Press.
Weiss, Johannes. 1985. “Max Weber’s Distinction Between Means-End Rationality and Value-Rationality — Rationale, Scope, Difficulties.” In: Social Action. Theory and Decision Library, vol. 43. Springer, edited by Gottfried Seebass, Raimo Tuomela, 207-223. Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5263-8_15.
Wilford, Heather P. 2023. “The Varieties of Nationalism and Their Implications for the Liberal World Order.” Society 60: 483-491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-023-00853-w.
Zakaria, Fareed. 1997. “The Rise of Illiberal Democracy.” Foreign Affairs 76 (6): 22-43. https://doi.org/10.2307/20048274.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ashot Aleksanyan, Arusyak Aleksanyan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
