In this Issue

Authors

Keywords:

the South Caucasus region, Second Karabakh War , security strategy , stabilitocracy, securitization, soft power , hybrid war , international political orientation , foreign investment , bureaucratic management, totalitarian leadership , Russian war, War in Ukraine

Abstract

In the global conditions of growing challenges of integration processes and world order, there was a sharp decline in the level of Russian governance and manageability of international relations. The previous mechanisms of international security turned out to be ineffective, regional and partly global, so regional instability increased sharply. This, in particular, led to the fact that national security turned out to be closely linked with international security. The international dimension of national security, which was never disputed by anyone before, has increased many times. From now on, any state can feel relatively safe only in the conditions of strengthening international law and world order that meets the interests of all countries of the world community. The consequences of European integration of post-Soviet countries for ensuring national security have encountered new risks and have turned out to be very contradictory. They create both new, previously unseen opportunities for the development and prosperity of various countries, and new, extremely dangerous challenges and threats. For Armenia, Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia, which for objective reasons maintain the continuity of not only their regional, but also European interests, all these aspects are especially important and relevant. European integration and democratization of the modern world irreversibly changes the hierarchy of the main actors of national security. Democratization of the political systems of the Eastern Partnership countries and their external environment, albeit inconsistently and contradictorily, does not allow anyone to trample democratic norms with impunity, ignore human interests and rights. The greatest attention is drawn to the search of Armenia, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine for their national identity, definition of a national development strategy, as well as attitudes towards the very contradictory processes of globalization taking place in the world.

Author Biography

Ashot Aleksanyan, Yerevan State University

Doctor of Sciences (Political Sciences), Professor
Head of the Chair of Political Science of the Faculty of International Relations, Yerevan State University
Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Political Science: Bulletin of Yerevan University
Visiting Professor at the Institute of Political Science, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany

Downloads

Published

2024-09-09

How to Cite

Aleksanyan, A. (2024). In this Issue. Journal of Political Science: Bulletin of Yerevan University, 3(1(7), 6–9. Retrieved from https://journals.ysu.am/index.php/j-pol-sci/article/view/12372

Issue

Section

In this Issue