The US, Strategic Environment in the South Caucasus and Armenia: A Sight on the Future
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46991/JOPS/2022.1.3.025Keywords:
United States, South Caucasus, Armenia, foreign policy, cooperation, future, scenarioAbstract
The political, economic and geopolitical presence of the United States in the South Caucasus dates back at least a century, when, after the First World War, they emerged as a global political, economic and geopolitical actor. Cooperation has increased dramatically since 1991, when the three countries gained independence after the collapse of the Soviet Union. From this perspective, the article focuses on identifying core US interests in Eurasia and attempting to define US strategic interests and priorities with respect to the region. In this sense, the main research question is how the US relations with the South Caucasus and in particular with Armenia will look like in the future, especially within the current stage of the Ukrainian conflict that began after February 2022.
The article simulates and tests four scenarios for future US engagement with the South Caucasus. Based on these scenarios, it is argued that, despite the lack of strategic interests in the region, the Ukrainian conflict prompted the US to increase its presence in the South Caucasus. This study is based on strategic documents, including the US National Security Strategy (2017), the Interim National Security Strategic Guidance of 2021, other white papers, reports, and studies of US foreign policy priorities.
References
Asatryan, Garnik S. 2002. “Armenia and Security Issues in the South Caucasus.” Connections 1 (3): 21-30.
Baban, Inessa, and Zaur Shiriyev. 2010. “The U.S. South Caucasus Strategy and Azerbaijan.” Turkish Policy Quarterly 9 (2): 93-103.
Beitelman, David A. 2012. “America’s Pacific Pivot.” International Journal 67 (4): 1073-1094.
Biden, Jr., Joseph R. 2020. “Why America Must Lead Again: Rescuing U.S. Foreign Policy After Trump.” Foreign Affairs (March/April). Accessed June 1, 2022. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2020-01-23/why-america-must-lead-again.
Blank, Stephen. 2012. “Russia’s Caucasus Wars: The Wrecks of Empire and the Wars of Decolonization.” American Foreign Policy Interests 34 (4): 182-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803920.2012.706520.
Blank, Stephen. 2021. “What the Biden Administration Can and Should do in the South Caucasus.” CACI Analyst. Accessed June 1, 2022. https://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/analytical-articles/item/13661-what-the-biden-administration-can-and-should-do-in-the-south-caucasus.html.
Börzel, Tanja A., Pamuk, Yasemin, and Andreas Stahn. 2009. “Democracy or Stability? EU and US Engagement in the Southern Caucasus.” In: Promoting Democracy and the Rule of Law. Governance and Limited Statehood Series, edited by Amichai Magen, Thomas Risse, and Michael A. McFaul, 150-184. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244528_6.
Boute, Anatole. 2022. “Shaping the Eurasian Gas Market: The Geopolitics of Energy Market Regulation.” Geopolitics. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2022.2094778.
Clinton, Hillary. 2011. “America’s Pacific Century.” Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2011/10/11/americas-pacific-century/.
DeYoung, Karen. 2021. “U.S. begins indirect talks with Iran Tuesday on reentering nuclear deal.” The Washington Post, April 5, 2021. Accessed June 1, 2022. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/us-iran-talks-nuclear-deal/2021/04/05/8fc279dc-962e-11eb-b28d-bfa7bb5cb2a5_story.html.
Elamiryan, Ruben. 2017. “Eastern Partnership Countries on the Crossroads of the Eurasian Integration Processes.” Accessed June 1, 2022. https://think.visegradfund.org/wp-content/uploads/think_visegrad_analysis_ruben_elamiryan_ifat_2017.pdf.
Ellyatt, Holly. 2019. “Europe is fast-becoming a natural gas battleground for Russia and the US.” CNBC, January 8, 2019. Accessed June 1, 2022. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/08/russia-and-the-us-battling-over-europes-gas-market.html.
Episkopos, Mark. 2021. “Joe Biden’s Pick of Victoria Nuland Means Relations with Russia Could Get Worse.” The National Interest, January 15, 2021. Accessed June 1, 2022. https://nationalinterest.org/feature/joe-biden’s-pick-victoria-nuland-means-relations-russia-could-get-worse-176516.
Figueroa, William. 2022. “China and Iran Since the 25-Year Agreement: The Limits of Cooperation.” Accessed June 1, 2022. https://thediplomat.com/2022/01/china-and-iran-since-the-25-year-agreement-the-limits-of-cooperation/.
Glaser (Kukartseva), Marina, and Pierre-Emmanuel Thomann. 2022. “The concept of “Greater Eurasia”: The Russian “turn to the East” and its consequences for the European Union from the geopolitical angle of analysis.” Journal of Eurasian Studies 13 (1): 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/18793665211034183.
Gowen, Annie, and Amy B. Wang. 2022. “Pelosi, in Armenia, condemns Azerbaijan’s ‘illegal’ attacks as cease-fire holds.” The Washington Post, September 18, 2022. Accessed November 1, 2022. https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2022/09/18/nancy-pelosi-armenia-visit/.
Harold, Scott, and Alireza Nader. 2012. “China and Iran: Economic, Political and Military Relations.” RAND Corporation. Accessed June 1, 2022. https://www.rand.org/pubs/occasional_papers/OP351.html.
Hillary, Clinton. 2011. “America’s Pacific Century.” Foreign Policy, October 11, 2011. Accessed June 1, 2022. https://foreignpolicy.com/2011/10/11/americas-pacific-century/.
Holmes, Oliver. 2022. “About 100 troops killed in clashes between Armenia and Azerbaijan.” The Guardian, September 13, 2022. Accessed June 1, 2022. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/sep/13/deadly-clashes-erupt-in-disputed-territory-between-azerbaijan-and-armenia.
Khelashvili, George, and S. Neil Macfarlane. 2010. “The Evolution of US Policy towards the Southern Caucasus”. Uluslararası İlişkiler 7 (26): 105-124.
Kondratov, Eugene, and Elisabeth Johansson-Nogués. 2022. “Russia’s Hybrid Interference Campaigns in France, Germany and the UK: A Challenge against Trust in Liberal Democracies?” Geopolitics. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2022.2129012.
Kuzio, Taras. 2022. “The world has changed. Time for the US to take note of the strategic importance of the South Caucasus.” Accessed June 1, 2022. https://neweasterneurope.eu/2022/07/13/the-world-has-changed-time-for-the-us-to-take-note-of-the-strategic-importance-of-the-south-caucasus/.
Markedonov, Sergey. 2021. “Foreign Policy Priorities of the United States in the South Caucasus for the Joseph Biden Administration.” Eurasia. Expert 1: 54-61. Accessed June 1, 2022. https://journal.eurasia.expert/S271332140014453-5-1. https://doi.org/10.18254/S271332140014453-5.
Nixey, James. 2010. “The South Caucasus: Drama on Three Stages.” In: America and a Changed World: A Question of Leadership, edited by Robin Niblett, 125-144. London: Wiley-Blackwell, The Royal Institute of International Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444391565.ch7.
Novikova, Gayane. 2014. “The Models of Sovereignty in the South.” Connections 13 (2) (Spring): 93-104.
Olcott, Martha Brill. 2002. “U.S. Policy in the South Caucasus.” Connections 1 (3): 59-66.
Persbo, Andreas. 2021. “Armenia as a bellwether for the South Caucasus.” Accessed June 1, 2022. https://www.europeanleadershipnetwork.org/commentary/armenia-as-a-bellwether-for-the-south-caucasus/.
Poghosyan, Beniamin. 2022. “Thirty Years of Interaction: US policy in the South Caucasus after the end of the Cold War.” USA & Canada: Economics, Politics, Culture 1: 67-87. https://doi.org/10.31857/S2686673022010059 [Погосян, Бениамин. 2022. Тридцать лет взаимодействия: политика США на Южном Кавказе после окончания холодной войны.” США & КАНАДА: Экономика, Политика, Культура 1: 67-87].
Pu, Xiaoyu. 2022. “The Status Dilemma in World Politics: An Anatomy of the China-India Asymmetrical Rivalry.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 15 (3): 227-245. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poac015.
Ramachandran, Sudha. 2022. “India and China Face off Again, This Time at Tawang.” Accessed June 1, 2022. https://thediplomat.com/2022/12/india-and-china-face-off-again-this-time-at-tawang/.
Razom. 2016. “U.S. Policy on Ukraine: Challenges and Opportunities.” Accessed June 1, 2022. https://static.razomforukraine.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/US-Policy-on-Ukraine_Challenges-and-Opportunities.pdf.
Rowden, Rick. 2020. “India’s Strategic Interests in Central Asia and Afghanistan Go Through Iran.” Newlines Institute, December 18, 2020. Accessed June 1, 2022. https://newlinesinstitute.org/iran/indias-strategic-interests-in-central-asia-and-afghanistan-go-through-iran/.
Rumer, Eugene, Sokolsky, Richard, and Paul Stronski. 2017. “U.S. Policy Toward the South Caucasus: Take Three.” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, May 31, 2017. Accessed June 1, 2022. https://carnegieendowment.org/2017/05/31/u.s.-policy-toward-south-caucasus-take-three-pub-70122.
Russell, Greg. 2006. “Alfred Thayer Mahan and American Geopolitics: The Conservatism and Realism of an Imperialist.” Geopolitics 11 (1): 119-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040500524137.
Shraibman, Artyom. 2019. “Official Visit Symbolizes New U.S. Attitude to Belarus”. Accessed June 1, 2022. https://carnegiemoscow.org/commentary/79765.
Stanzel, Angela, 2022. “China’s path to geopolitics: Case study on China’s Iran policy at the intersection of regional interests and global power rivalry.” SWP Research Papers 5. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), German Institute for International and Security Affairs.
Strategic Studies Institute. 2020. “The strategic environment.” Key Strategic Issues List (KSIL): Academic Years 2021-2022. US Army War College: 6-20. Accessed June 1, 2022. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep25428.7.
Stronski. Paul. 2020. “What Will the Next U.S. Administration Mean for the Caucasus and Central Asia?” Accessed June 1, 2022. https://carnegiemoscow.org/commentary/83091.
The White House. 2017. The National Security Strategy of the United States of America. Washington, DC. Accessed June 1, 2022. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf.
The White House. 2021. Interim National Security Strategic Guidance: Renewing America’s Advantages. Washington, DC. Accessed June 1, 2022. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/NSC-1v2.pdf.
U.S. Embassy in Armenia. 2022. “Speaker Pelosi Remarks at Address on U.S. Commitment to Armenia’s Security and Democracy.” September 18, 2022. Accessed November 1, 2022. https://am.usembassy.gov/speaker-pelosi-cafesjian/.
U.S. Embassy Yerevan. 2018. “John Bolton Interview with Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL).” Accessed June 1, 2022. https://am.usembassy.gov/bolton-rferl-interview/.
US Department of State. 2022. “Integrated Country Strategy: Armenia.” ICS, May 4, 2022. Accessed June 1, 2022. https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/ICS_EUR_Armenia_Public.pdf.
Valiyev, Anar. 2018. “US Disengagement from the South Caucasus: The Throne is Never Vacant.” PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo 545. Accessed June 1, 2022. https://www.ponarseurasia.org/u-s-disengagement-from-the-south-caucasus-the-throne-is-never-vacant/.
Youngs, Richard. 2017. Europe’s Eastern Crisis: The Geopolitics of Asymmetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316344033.011.
Zhang, Ketian. 2022. “Explaining Chinese Military Coercion in Sino-Indian Border Disputes.” Journal of Contemporary China: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2022.2090081.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Ruben Elamiryan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
