Mapping Political Populism in the European Post-Transitional Periphery

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46991/JOPS/2022.1.2.073

Keywords:

European periphery, illiberal democracy, Eastern Partnership, Russian hegemony, European integration, Euro-Atlantic integration

Abstract

This article comparatively analyzes the manifestations and various factors of political populism in the European post-transitional periphery. The main difficulty in mapping political populism in the European post-transitional periphery and defining populist parties most accurately is that, unlike most political forces in developed democracies, such parties do not belong to traditional parties. Moreover, their ideology combines the positions of both right and left parties, which makes it extremely difficult to place them on the classical right-left scale of the party spectrum.

The political agenda of the populist parties of the European post-transition peripheral countries has a different content, but it usually comes down to updating issues that are hushed up by the political establishment: protecting national and cultural identity, taking tough measures aimed at combating corruption and crime, protecting traditional family values, and even harsh criticism of the Council of Europe, the OSCE and the EU and their institutions. A distinctive feature of the populist forces was also that in their majority they called for the protection of the rights and interests of ordinary people and the wider use of the instruments of direct democracy, and thus directly opposed one of the fundamental principles of liberal democracy, taking into account the opinion of the minority.

The article analyzes the emergence of a populist environment, where the responsibility, trust and dignity of politicians are distorted, which in turn leads to a crisis of understanding and civiliarchic culture. The influence of populist parties has grown and most European post-transitional peripheral countries have at least one successful populist party, and populists are among the most influential parties. It is noteworthy that civil society organizations have identified the activities of populist leaders and their parties as the main threat facing the Eastern Partnership countries. Using populist technologies, mainly in the context of an election campaign, leaders and their political groups seek to manipulate public opinion and change the alignment of political parties in the European post-transitional periphery.

Author Biography

Nane Aleksanyan, Paris Lodron Universität Salzburg

Erasmus + mobility MA student in the Department of Political Science at Paris Lodron Universität Salzburg, Austria

MA student of Public Administration at Yerevan State University, Armenia

References

Albertazzi, Daniele, Bonansinga, Donatella, and Davide Vampa. 2021. “Introduction.” In: Populism and new patterns of political competition in Western Europe, edited by Daniele Albertazzi and Davide Vampa, 1-18. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge.

Arato, Andrew, and Jean L. Cohen. 2021. Populism and Civil Society: The Challenge to Constitutional Democracy. Oxford University Press.

Arditi, Benjamin. 2005. “Populism as an Internal Periphery of Democratic Politics.” In: Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, edited by Francisco Panizza, 72-98. New York, London: Verso.

Berend, Ivan T. 2020. The Economics and Politics of European Integration: Populism, Nationalism and the History of the EU. London and New York: Routledge.

Breyfogle, Nicholas B., Schrader, Abby, and Willard Sunderland. 2007. “Russian colonizations: an introduction.” In: Peopling the Russian periphery: borderland colonization in Eurasian history, edited by Nicholas B. Breyfogle, Abby Schrader and Willard Sunderland, 1-18. London and New York: Routledge.

Carrion, Julio F. 2022. A Dynamic Theory of Populism in Power: The Andes in Comparative Perspective. Oxford University Press.

Csehi, Robert. 2021. Routledge Studies in Anti-Politics and Democratic Crisis. London and New York: Routledge.

de la Torre, Carlos. 2021. “What do we mean by populism?” In: The Routledge Companion to Media Disinformation and Populism, edited by Howard Tumber and Silvio Waisbord, 29-37. London and New York: Routledge.

Di Nucci, Ezio. 2021. The Control Paradox: From AI to Populism. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.

Diesen, Glenn. 2022. Russophobia: Propaganda in International Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1468-3_10.

Fieschi, Catherine. 2019. Populocracy. The Tyranny of Authenticity and the Rise of Populism. Agenda Publishing.

Gabrisch, Hubert, Lucjan T. Orlowski, and Toralf Pusch. 2012. “Sovereign default Risk in the Euro-Periphery and the Euro-Candidate Countries.” MPRA Paper 41265. Accessed August 8, 2022. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/41265/.

Gamkrelidze, Tamar. 2019. “The project of Europe: a robust attempt to redefine Georgian identity.” East European Politics 35 (3): 351-371. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2019.1613645.

Gamkrelidze, Tamar. 2022. “Georgia’s external frontier on Russia sedimented and unmalleable: engagement politics and the impact of the three-tier warfare.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies: 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2021.2023485.

Ghaplanyan, Irina. 2018. Post-Soviet Armenia. The New National Elite and the New National Narrative. London and New York: Routledge.

Glenn, John G. 2019. Foucault and Post-Financial Crises: Governmentality, Discipline and Resistance. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan: 153-191. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77188-5_6.

Gräbner, Claudius, and Jakob Hafele. 2020. “The emergence of coreperiphery structures in the European Union: A complexity perspective.” ZOE Discussion Papers 6. ZOE: Institut für zukunftsfähige Ökonomien, Bonn. Accessed August 8, 2022. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/224134/1/172895116X.pdf.

Graney, Katherine. 2019. Russia, the Former Soviet Republics, and Europe Since 1989: Transformation and Tragedy. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190055080.001.0001.

Gregor, A. James. 2021. “Populism of the Russian Federation.” In: Political Populism In The Twenty-First Century: We The People, edited by Maria Hsia Chang, and A. James Gregor, 21-39. Cambridge Scholars Publishing,.

Heinisch, Reinhard, and Oscar Mazzoleni. 2016. “Introduction.” In: Understanding Populist Party Organisation: The Radical Right in Western Europe, edited by Reinhard Heinisch, and Oscar Mazzoleni, 1-18. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58197-6_1.

Heinisch, Reinhard, Massetti, Emanuele, and Oscar Mazzoleni. 2020. “Populism and ethno-territorial politics - conclusions: bridging legacies in understanding party mobilization.” In: The people and the nation: populism and ethno-territorial politics in Europe, edited by Reinhard Heinisch, Emanuele Massetti, and Oscar Mazzoleni, 280-290. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge.

Huber, Robert A., and Christian H. Schimpf. 2017. “Populism and democracy - theoretical and empirical considerations.” In: Political Populism: A Handbook, ed. by Reinhard C. Heinisch, Christina Holtz-Bacha, and Oscar Mazzoleni, 329-344. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.

HURI. 2021. “Contextualizing Putin’s “On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians.” Ukrainian Research Institute at Harvard University. Accessed August 8, 2022. https://huri.harvard.edu/news/putin-historical-unity.

Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira, and Lisa Zanotti. 2021. “Populism and the welfare state.” In: Handbook on Austerity, Populism and the Welfare State, edited by Bent Greve, 41-53. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Kim, Seongcheol. 2021. Discourse, Hegemony, and Populism in the Visegrád Four. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge.

Kinsella, Stephen. 2012. “Conventions and the European Periphery.” Accessed August 8, 2022. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2155577.

Klobucka, Anna. 1997. “Theorizing The European Periphery.” Symplokē 5 (1/2): 119-35.

Krekó, Péter. 2021. “Populism in Power: The Tribal Challenge.” In: The Psychology of Populism: The Tribal Challenge to Liberal Democracy, edited by Joseph P. Forgas, William D. Crano, and Klaus Fiedler, 240-257. London and New York: Routledge.

Lane, Philip R. 2012. “The European Sovereign Debt Crisis.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 26 (3): 49-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.26.3.49.

Lieven, Anatol. 2000. “Against Russophobia.” World Policy Journal 17 (4): 25-32.

Luostarinen, Heikki. 1989. “Finnish Russophobia: The Story of an Enemy Image.” Journal of Peace Research 26 (2): 123–37.

Manucci, Luca. 2022. “Populism and Collective Memory.” In: The Palgrave Handbook of Populism, edited by Michael Oswald, 451-468. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80803-7_28.

Payaslian, Simon. 2011. The political economy of human rights in Armenia: Authoritarianism and Democracy in a Former Soviet Republic. London, New York: I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd.

Pejović, Astrea, and Dimitar Nikolovski. 2022. “Introduction: Memory politics and populism in Southeastern Europe - toward an ethnographic understanding of enmity.” In: Memory politics and populism in Southeastern Europe, edited by Jody Jensen. 1-11. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge.

Schwörer, Jacob. 2021. The Growth of Populism in the Political Mainstream: The Contagion Effect of Populist Messages on Mainstream Parties’ Communication. Cham, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72449-8.

Stengel, Frank A., MacDonald, David B., and Dirk Nabers. 2019. “Conclusion: Populism, Foreign Policy, and World Politics.” In: Populism and World Politics: Exploring Inter- and Transnational Dimensions, edited by Frank A. Stengel, David B. MacDonald, and Dirk Nabers, 365-372. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04621-7_14.

Van Herpen, Marcel H. 2021. The end of populism: Twenty proposals to defend liberal democracy. Manchester University Press.

Vorländer, Hans. 2019. “Populism and Modern Democracy - An Outline.” In: The Comeback of Populism: Transatlantic Perspectives, edited by Jurgen Gebhardt, Heike Paul, and Ursula Prutsch, 13-27. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter GmbH.

Wilson, Carter A. 2021. Trumpism: Race, Class, Populism, and Public Policy. Lanham: Lexington Books.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-30

How to Cite

Aleksanyan, N. (2022). Mapping Political Populism in the European Post-Transitional Periphery. Journal of Political Science: Bulletin of Yerevan University, 1(2), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.46991/JOPS/2022.1.2.073

Issue

Section

Comparative politics