Hedging as a Linguopragmatic and Communicative Strategy: Theoretical Foundations and Discursive Manifestations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU.B/2026.17.3.070Keywords:
hedging, uncertainty, politeness, pragmatics, cognitive linguisticsAbstract
Hedges constitute an indispensable part of interpersonal communication as they enable speakers to show caution, form statements with purposive uncertainty, and reduce the degree of commitment. The article provides classical and modern theoretical perspectives that underline communicative roles of hedging. Meanwhile, it analyzes the influence of cognitive and socio-psychological factors on the choice and use of hedges. The research aims to give a comprehensive explanation of what hedges are and how they are used in communication, not only in the context of the linguistic framework, but also of speech culture and social interaction. The paper also addresses the impact of hedges on the semantic strength of an utterance, the impression of its truth value, and the proportion of interpersonal relations. A discourse-based analysis of Donna Tartt’s “The Goldfinch” focuses on the use of hedges in the speech of different characters, their pragmatic functions, and their contribution to the development of communicative strategies. The findings indicate that the use of hedges varies across different contexts and that they play a crucial role in ensuring communicative effectiveness.
Downloads
References
Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E. (1984). Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSRP). Applied Linguistics, 5(3), 196-213. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/5.3.196
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Clemen, G. (1997). The concept of hedging: Origins, approaches and definitions. In R. Markkanen & H. Schröder (Eds.), Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts (pp. 235-248). Walter de Gruyter.
Tartt, D. (2013). The Goldfinch. Little, Brown and Company.
Fraser, B. (1975). Hedged performatives. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 187-210). Academic Press.
Fraser, B. (1980). Conversational mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics, 4(4), 341-350.
Hinkel, E. (2008). Hedging, inflating, and persuading in L2 academic writing. Applied Language Learning, 18(2), 1-24.
Homles, J. (1984). Hedging your bets and sitting on the fence: Some evidence for hedges as support structures. Te Reo, 27, 47-62.
House, J., & Kasper, G. (1981). Politeness markers in English and German. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Conversational routine (pp. 157-185). Mouton.
Hübler, A. (1983). Understatements and hedges in English. John Benjamins.
Hyland, K. (1996). Talking to the academy: Forms of hedging in science research articles. Written Communication, 13(2), 251-281.
Lakoff, G. (1972). Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Chicago Linguistic Society Papers, 8, 183-228.
Markkanen, R., & Schröder, H. (1989). Hedging and discourse: Approaches to the analysis of a pragmatic phenomenon in academic texts. Walter de Gruyter.
Markkanen, R., & Schröder, H. (1992). Hedging in academic discourse. In R. Markkanen & H. Schröder (Eds.), Hedging and discourse (pp. 3-18). Walter de Gruyter.
Prince, E. F., Frader, J., & Bosk, C. (1982). On hedging in physician-physician discourse. In R. J. Di Pietro (Ed.). Linguistics and the professions (pp. 83-97). Ablex.
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 192-233.
Skelton, J. (1988). The care and maintenance of hedges. ELT Journal, 42(1), 37-43.
Tsuk, J. (1986). Hedging in news discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 10(3), 345-358.
Weinreich, U. (1966). Explorations in semantic theory. In T. Sebeok (Ed.), Current trends in linguistics (Vol. 3, pp. 395-477). Mouton.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338-353.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nona Harutyunyan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




