Decoding Digital Hostility: Non-Verbal Mechanisms of Hate Speech in Electronic Discourse

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU.B/2026.17.1.129

Keywords:

electronic discourse, hate speech, multimodality, emoticons/emojis, affective interaction

Abstract

The study investigates how non-verbal elements such as emojis function as vehicles of hate speech in digital communication. While hate speech has traditionally been defined through verbal or textual aggression, contemporary online environments reveal a broader, multimodal landscape where hostility is often conveyed implicitly through images, icons, and affective cues. Drawing on qualitative multimodal discourse analysis, this research integrates approaches from critical discourse analysis and social semiotics to examine how the mentioned non-verbal sign contributes to the expression and circulation of hate in electronic discourse. Data are drawn from publicly available media posts and analysed for recurring semiotic patterns, cultural symbolism, and the interplay between textual and visual modes. The study explores how users employ non-verbal cues to reinforce stereotypes, exclude social groups, or express aggression. By illuminating the subtle ways hate operates beyond language, this research emphasizes the need to expand definitions of hate speech to encompass multimodal dimensions of online communication. Ultimately, the study contributes to a deeper understanding of how digital symbols shape affective interaction and ideological meaning in contemporary electronic discourse.

Author Biography

  • Anna Karapetyan, Yerevan State University

    Candidate of Philological Sciences, Assistant at the Chair of English Philology, YSU Armenian Language

References

Derks, D., Bos, A. E. R., & von Grumbkow, J. (2007). Emoticons and social interaction on the Internet: The importance of social context. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 842-849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.11.013

Dresner, E., & Herring, S. C. (2010). Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication Theory, 20(3), 249-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01362.x

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.

Herring, S. C., & Dainas, A. (2017). Nice picture comment!: Graphicons in Facebook comment threads. In G. Meikle (Ed.), The Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp. 237-254). Routledge.

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.

Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. Arnold.

Liu, P., Guberman, J., Arbor, A, Culotta, A. (2018). Forcasting the presence and intensity of hostility on Instagram using linguistic and social features. arxiv, 1804.06759(1), 1-10. http://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1804.06759

Lo, S. (2008). The nonverbal communication functions of emoticons in computer-mediated communication. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(5), 595-597. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0132

Luor, T., Wu, L. L., Lu, H. P., & Tao, Y. H. (2010). The effect of emoticons in simplex and complex task-oriented communication: An empirical study of instant messaging. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 889-895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.003

Machin, D. (2013). What is multimodal critical discourse studies and why are people saying such terrible things? Critical Discourse Studies, 10(4), 347-355. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2013.813770

Oxford English Dictionary. (n.d.). Emoji, n. In OED Online. Oxford University Press. https://www.oed.com/

Rivera, K., Cooke, N. J., & Bauhs, J. A. (1996). The effects of emotional icons on remote communication. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 99-100). ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/257089.257139

Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage.

Walther, J. B. & D'Addario, K. P. (2001). The impacts of emoticons on message interpretation in computer-mediated communication. Social Science Computer Review, 19(3), 324-347. https://doi.org/10.1177/089443930101900307

Sources of Data

Beyonce makes grammy history for most wins ever by a female artist. (15 March 2021). Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/p/CMbN6-hIwfm/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

Placeholder. (6 march 2024). Facebook. https://socialmedia.example/post/12345

They were willing to lie to protect other members of the family, but they weren’t willing to tell the truth to protect me and my husband. (8 March 2021). Instagram. https://www.instagram.com/p/CMKYAQbHfqC/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

Downloads

Published

2026-03-13

Issue

Section

Linguistics

How to Cite

Karapetyan, A. (2026). Decoding Digital Hostility: Non-Verbal Mechanisms of Hate Speech in Electronic Discourse. Bulletin of Yerevan University B: Philology, 17(1(49), 129-137. https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU.B/2026.17.1.129