RE-CONCEPTUALISING YOUTH CIVIC EDUCATION IN POST-WAR ARMENIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46991/educ-21st-century.v7.i2.300Keywords:
youth, participation, Armenian youth, civic education, digital participation, post-war societyAbstract
The purpose of the research is to examine the directions for improving civic education programs in Armenia. The postwar and post-pandemic context in Armenia has created new challenges and opportunities for rethinking education, and civic education as well. This article is an attempt to contribute to the scientific understanding of the directions for improving civic education of young people in Armenia, taking into account the main features of the post-war society. The re-conceptualising of civic education in Armenia is conditioned by the war and the pandemic, a combination of social transformations. This study shows that civic education should go beyond the scope of only transferring knowledge and become a platform for formation of identity, meaning, values and democratic engagement.
The results of the research indicate that the patterns of participation remain uneven. Urban girls are more active, both before the war and in the post-war period. This clarifies the necessary strategy for the differentiated development of inclusion for rural youth. Interactive and problem-based learning forms are the most effective methodologically. Teachers act as exemplary performers, therefore their choice and methodological structure should have. Civic education should maintain the connections of young people, promoting cooperation with local structures and ensuring the continuity of programs. At the same time, there are challenges.
The latest technologies have become the core of modern citizenship, affecting awareness, political participation and social relations. Therefore, the purposefulness and methodological right of civic education should become a combination of civic education and a critical understanding of technologies.
This study contributes to the growing body of research on civic education in transitional societies, offering evidence-based recommendations for rethinking civic education in Armenia. It calls for inclusive, community-driven, and digitally integrated approaches that empower youth and reinforce democratic values in a postwar context.
References
1. Sargsyan H.L., Harutyunyan M.L., Hasarakagitutyun ararkayi dery Hayastani Hanrapetutyunum qaghaqatsiakan hasarakutyan zargacman hamateqstum. Of Russian-Armenian University (Series: Humanities and Social Sciences), 2022, S. 200․ (in Armenian)
2. Alscher P., Ludewig U., McElvany N., Civic education, teaching quality and students’ willingness to participate in political and civic life: Political interest and knowledge as mediators. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, Т. 51, №. 10, 2022, С. 1886-1900.
3. Altaany H.M., Civic education and its role in social stabilization: A comprehensive review. Available at SSRN 5002738, 2024.
4. Claassen R.L., & Monson J.Q., Does Civic Education Matter? The Power of Long-Term Observation and the Experimental Method. Journal of Political Science Education, 11(4), 2015.
5. Crittenden J., Levine P., Civic education, 2007.
6. Finkel E., Neundorf S., Rascón Ramírez A., Can online civic education induce democratic citizenship? Experimental evidence from a new democracy. American Journal of Political Science, Т. 68, №. 2, 2024, С. 613-630.
7. Gordon E., Mihailidis P. (ed.), Civic media: Technology, design, practice. MIT Press, 2022.
8. Krutka D.G., Heath M.K., Smits R.M., Toward a civics of technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, Т. 30, №. 2, 2022, С. 229-237.
9. Morrow R.A., Habermas and civic education. Handbook of Civic Engagement and Education. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022, С. 28-41.
10. Reuter A., Scharf T., Digital civic engagement in later life. Civic Engagement in Later Life, 2025, С. 122.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Marina Galstyan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.