Polycrisis and the Transformation of International Order: A Systemic Complexity Framework

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46991/JOPS/2026.5.14.126

Keywords:

polycrisis, international order, systemic complexity, complexity theory, complex adaptive systems, fragmented multipolarity, global governance, strategic competition, interdependence, systemic transformation

Abstract

This article analyzes issues surrounding the polycrisis and the transformation of the international order through the lens of systemic complexity. The growing intertwining of geopolitical rivalry, economic shocks, technological competition, climate change, health crises, and resource security challenges has fundamentally altered the nature of contemporary international politics. These crises do not merely unfold in isolation; they increasingly reinforce one another, generating cascading effects and systemic vulnerabilities that challenge traditional conceptions of the international order. While existing international relations theories offer insight into specific aspects of instability, they often fail to explain the mechanisms of interaction between simultaneous crises and their broader consequences. This article develops a conceptual model based on the principle of systemic complexity to explain how the polycrisis drives the transformation of the international order. Drawing on complexity theory and systems thinking, the authors conceptualize the international order as a complex adaptive system comprising multiple actors operating across closely interconnected domains: security, the economy, technology, the environment, and public health. Through mechanisms of interdependence, spillover effects, feedback loops, and adaptive responses, the polycrisis generates non-linear dynamics that reshape patterns of cooperation, competition, and governance. Based on qualitative conceptual analysis and illustrative examples, the article argues that the polycrisis constitutes a systemic state rather than a mere temporary accumulation of disparate shocks. The proposed approach offers a complexity-theory perspective on contemporary global transformations and provides a foundation for further research into the evolving architecture of the international order.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Mohamed Ibrahim Hassan Farag, Cairo University, Helwan University

    PhD in Political Science of the Faculty of Economics and Political Science at Cairo University and a Doctorate in Business Administration at Helwan University

References

Allison, Graham. 2017. Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides's Trap? Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Baldwin, Richard, and Beatrice Weder di Mauro, eds. 2020. Economics in the Time of COVID-19. London: CEPR Press.

Bibeau, Alexis, Sophie Schriever, Philippe Bourbeau, and Julie Fournier. 2025. “Parties’ Platforms, Migration, and Security: Patterns and Determinants.” Geopolitics 30 (1): 378-404. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2024.2321499.

Cairney, Paul. 2012. "Complexity Theory in Political Science and Public Policy." Political Studies Review 10 (3): 346–358.

Creswell, John W., and J. David Creswell. 2018. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Edmond, Chick, and Mohamed Ibrahim Hassan Farag. 2026. “ The Role of the European Union in Managing African Crises Between Development Aid and Geopolitical Interests.” World Affairs 189: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/waf2.70050.

Edmond, Chick. 2026. “Resource Geopolitics and Domestic Power Bargains: How the 21st-Century Scramble for Africa Reshapes Security and Democratic Space”. International Journal of Politics and Security 8 (1): 26-53. https://doi.org/10.53451/ijps.1891206.

Farag, Mohamed Ibrahim Hassan. 2025. “Middle Powers in a Multipolar World: The Case of Turkey's Foreign Policy Repositioning.” International Journal of Contemporary Security Studies 1 (2): 175-188. https://doi.org/10.18485/fb_ijcss.2025.1.2.13.

Farag, Mohamed Ibrahim Hassan. 2026a. “Addressing Asymmetric Security Threats in the Mediterranean: Facing Reality and Adaptation Strategies.” Scientific Journal of the Faculty of Economic Studies and Political Science 11 (21): 790-857. https://doi.org/10.21608/esalexu.2025.372816.1299.

Farag, Mohamed Ibrahim Hassan. 2026b. “From Primacy to Fragmented Multipolarity: Systemic Change through Power-Conversion Channels.” Political Issues 84: 130-156. https://doi.org/10.58298/842026810.

Farag, Mohamed Ibrahim Hassan. 2026c. “Local Climate Action and Policy Implementation in Egypt and Somalia: A Multilevel Governance Perspective.” Innovation Journal of Social Sciences and Economic Review 8 (1): 92-102. https://doi.org/10.36923/ijsser.v8i2.366.

Farag, Mohamed Ibrahim Hassan. 2026d. “Reshaping the Regional Order in the Middle East under the New Multipolarity: An Analysis in Light of Structural Realism.” Journal of Politics and Economics 30 (29): 296–317. https://doi.org/10.21608/jocu.2026.432610.1487.

Farrell, Henry, and Abraham L. Newman. 2019. “Weaponized Interdependence: How Global Economic Networks Shape State Coercion.” International Security 44 (1): 42-79. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00351.

Farrell, Henry, and Abraham L. Newman. 2023. Underground Empire: How America Weaponized the World Economy. New York: Henry Holt.

George, Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hale, Thomas, David Held, and Kevin Young. 2013. Gridlock: Why Global Cooperation Is Failing When We Need It Most. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Holland, John H. 1992. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Homer-Dixon, Thomas, et al. 2022. "Synchronous Failure: The Emerging Causal Architecture of Global Crisis." Ecology and Society 27 (3): 6.

Ikenberry, G. John. 2018. "The End of Liberal International Order?" International Affairs 94 (1): 7–23.

IPCC. 2023. “Sections.” In: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 35-115. https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647.

Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph S. Nye. 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown.

Laborde, David, Will Martin, and Rob Vos. 2021. "Impacts of COVID-19 on Global Poverty, Food Security, and Diets." IFPRI Discussion Paper.

Lawrence, Michael, Scott Janzwood, and Thomas Homer-Dixon. 2024. "What Is a Polycrisis? And How Is It Different from a Systemic Risk?" Cascade Institute Working Paper.

Miller, John H., and Scott E. Page. 2007. Complex Adaptive Systems: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Morin, Edgar. 2008. On Complexity. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Newman, Mark. 2018. Networks. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tooze, Adam. 2022. "Welcome to the World of the Polycrisis." Financial Times, October 28.

Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Yergin, Daniel. 2020. The New Map: Energy, Climate, and the Clash of Nations. New York: Penguin Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

Issue

Section

Security Policy

How to Cite

Farag, M. I. H. (2026). Polycrisis and the Transformation of International Order: A Systemic Complexity Framework. Journal of Political Science: Bulletin of Yerevan University, 5(2(14), 126-156. https://doi.org/10.46991/JOPS/2026.5.14.126

Similar Articles

91-100 of 132

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.