CONFLICT-DRIVEN MOBILIZATION IN PROTRACTED CONFLICT: A MULTI-LEVEL CONCEPTUAL SYNTHESIS FROM THE KARABAKH CASE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU.F/2025.16.1.099

Keywords:

sociology of conflict, theoretical synthesis, intractable conflict, conflict-driven mobilization, collective action, Nagorno-Karabakh

Abstract

This synthesis article examines conflict-driven mobilization in the protracted Nagorno-Karabakh conflict by integrating findings from five distinct papers. Framed by a multi-level analytical perspective, the paper investigates how micro-level emotional and moral motivations, meso-level group identity and collective dynamics, and macro-level structural inequalities and historical legacies converge to drive conflict-driven mobilization. Drawing upon a qualitative research design that combines document analysis, process tracing, semi-structured interviews, and participatory methodologies, the synthesis addresses the central question: How do interdependent emotional, collective, and structural factors fuel mobilization in protracted conflicts? Looking into evidence from the historical evolution of civic movements to their transformation into armed struggles, the paper reveals that mobilization is not solely a rational, calculated act but is deeply rooted in personal and collective grievances. Furthermore, the integration of participatory approaches underscores the value of context-sensitive research in capturing the lived experiences of conflict-affected communities. Ultimately, the proposed multi-level theory advances existing conceptual frameworks in the sociology of conflict mobilization and offers a heuristic tool for understanding similar dynamics in other protracted conflict zones.

Author Biography

  • Smbatyan, Hayk, Yerevan State University

    Ph.D. candidate, Chair of Theory and History of Sociology, Faculty of Sociology, Yerevan State University, Armenia, Master of Social Sciences, “Peace and Conflict Studies” program, Uppsala University, Sweden

References

Abrahamian, L. H. (1990). K’aosy yev kosmosy zhoghovrdakan yeluyt’neri karruts’vatsk’um: Gharabaghyan sharzhumy azgagrageti hayats’k’ov. (in Armenian). Mshakuyt’, 2(3), 14-21. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3LE4VBK

Abrahamian, L. H. (1993). The anthropologist as shaman: interpreting recent political events in Armenia. In 100-116, Beyond Boundaries (1st ed., p. Gísli Pálsson). Oxford/Providence: Berg. doi:10.4324/9781003135159

Arutyunyan, L. (2006). "Obshchestvo ni voyny ni mira" i perspektivy mirnogo razresheniya karabakhskogo konflikta. (in Russian). KAVKAZ. Yezhegodnik KISMI, 104-110. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3osfIa8

Atanesyan, A. (2024). Traumatic Past and the Politics of Memory: What Should be and Should not be the Armenian Approach? Journal of Sociology: Bulletin of Yerevan University, 15(2), 15-26. doi:10.46991/BYSU.F/2024.15.2.15

Bieber, F. (2006). Post-War Bosnia: Ethnic Structure, Inequality and Governance of the Public Sector. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Cederman, L.-E., Gleditsch, K. S., & Buhaug, H. (2013). Inequality, Grievances and Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139084161

Constantin, S., & Carlà, A. (2024). The Vicious Circle of Securitization Processes in the Former Indian State of Jammu and Kashmir. Journal of Global Security Studies, 10(1). doi:10.1093/jogss/ogae034

Cornell, S. E. (1999). The Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict. Department of East European Studies, Uppsala University.

De Waal, T. (2013). Black Garden: Armenia and Azerbaijan Through Peace and War. New York: New York University Press.

Duschinski, H. (2009). Destiny Effects: Militarization, State Power, and Punitive Containment in Kashmir Valley. Anthropological Quarterly, 83(3), 691-717. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20638657

Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Glenny, M. (2000). The Balkans : nationalism, war, and the Great Powers, 1804-1999. New York: Viking.

Gurr, T. R. (1970). Why Men Rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Horowitz, D. L. (1991). A Democratic South Africa?: Constitutional Engineering in a Divided Society. Berkeley: University of California Press. Retrieved from http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft0f59n6zd/

Kalyvas, S. N. (2006). The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Malešević, S. (2010). Sociological Theory and Warfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McAdam, D. (1985). Political process and the development of Black insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Oberschall, A. (1973). Social Conflict and Social Movements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

Poghosyan, G. (2022). The Geopoliticization of the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict in the Shadow of the Madrid Principles: A Look at the Past. Journal of Political Science: Bulletin of Yerevan University, 30-39. doi:10.46991/JOPS/2022.1.1.030

Saghatelyan, S. (2012). On the Question of Conflict Analysis in Modern Western Sociology. Journal of Sociology: Bulletin of Yerevan University, 3(1), 36-44. doi:10.46991/BYSU:F/2012.3.1.036

Saghatelyan, S. (2015). Frame Тheory as a Language of Conflict Description. Journal of Sociology: Bulletin of Yerevan University, 6(3), 45-50. doi:10.46991/BYSU:F/2015.6.3.045

Schön, D. (1995). Knowing-in-action: The new scholarship requires a new epistemology. Change, 27-34.

Sewell, W. H. (1992). A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1-29. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2781191

Smbatyan, H. (2018). Arts’akhyan kamavorakan sharzhman sots’iologiakan imastavorumy K’arrorya paterazmi hamatek’stum. (in Armenian). Collection of Scientific Articles of YSU SSS, 262-270. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2Yc02wl

Smbatyan, H. (2020). Challenging the Reality-Conception Split in Conflict Studies: Participatory Methodologies Under Focus. Journal of Global Development and Security Studies, 127-155. Retrieved from https://shorturl.at/WztEc

Smbatyan, H. (2021). Civilian Participation in Interstate War: Unfolding Voluntary Collective Action in Nagorno-Karabakh War. Pax et Bellum Journal, 4(1), 57-69. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3uyuf4V

Smbatyan, H. (2022). Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict Through the Prism of Horizontal Inequalities: Theoretical Overview. Journal of Sociology: Bulletin of Yerevan University, 13(1), 5-23. doi:10.46991/BYSU:F/2022.13.1.005

Smbatyan, H. (2025). From civic mobilization to armed struggle: Tracing the roots of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics, 10(3), 154–178. doi:10.17356/ieejsp.v10i3.1121

Snow, D. A., Soule, S. A., & Kriesi, H. (2004). The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Blackwell Publishing.

Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics (2nd ed. ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tilly, C. (1978). From Mobilization to Revolution. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Tilly, C. (2004). Social Movements, 1768-2004 (1st ed. ed.). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315632063

Uzer, U. (2012). Nagorno-Karabakh in Regional and World Politics: A Case Study for Nationalism, Realism and Ethnic Conflict. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 32(2), 245–252. doi:10.1080/13602004.2012.694668

Vartikyan, A. (2017). Anomie, Social Alienation and Security in Armenian Society. Journal of Sociology: Bulletin of Yerevan University, 8(2), 11-18. doi:10.46991/BYSU:F/2017.8.2.011

Weber, M. (1978 ). The Nature of Social Action, Runciman. In G. W. Runciman, Max Weber: Selections in Translation (pp. 7-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wood, E. J. (2003). Insurgent Collective Action and Civil War in El Salvador. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-16

Issue

Section

Applied Sociological Studies

How to Cite

Smbatyan, H. (2025). CONFLICT-DRIVEN MOBILIZATION IN PROTRACTED CONFLICT: A MULTI-LEVEL CONCEPTUAL SYNTHESIS FROM THE KARABAKH CASE. Journal of Sociology: Bulletin of Yerevan University, 16(1(41), 99-112. https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU.F/2025.16.1.099

Similar Articles

1-10 of 77

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.