An Alternative to the Dissident Paradigm and Intersecting Civil Protests in Soviet Armenia: Equal but Different?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46991/JOPS/2022.1.3.073Keywords:
dissident paradigm, totalitarian ideology, Soviet Armenia, Soviet power, socialism, intelligentsia, anti-Soviet organizations, Armenian diasporaAbstract
The article analyzes alternative dimensions of dissidence and civil protests in Soviet Armenia, which covers the period from the mid-1960s to the mid-1980s, from the Khrushchev Thaw to Gorbachev’s Perestroika. Comparative study of the dissident paradigm has political and civilizational significance. The dissident paradigm is precisely associated with the entire human rights movement, and human rights activists were those who were called dissidents. Thanks to them, ideas of an alternative development of Soviet society and public authorities emerged.
At the present stage, the democratic rights of citizens, for which the intelligentsia and human rights activists fought in the 1960s-1980s, are proclaimed and enshrined in the Constitution of the Republic of Armenia. But this does not mean that the issue of human rights has been resolved in reality, since in reality human rights are often violated, first of all, by the public authorities themselves. The experience of the first generation of human rights defenders continues to be of interest to numerous committees and commissions advocating respect for the constitutional and legal rights of citizens.
The relevance of the research topic is due to the fact that the processes of formation of a democratic society and the rule of law in modern Armenia put forward the task of effectively protecting human rights and freedoms. Given the fact that the recognition of human rights as a basic value was the result of a long evolution of society, it is important to see that their prerequisite was the struggle of the most socially active people for the possibility of civilizational development.
References
Aleksanyan, Ashot. 2016. “The impact of the Armenian genocide on the formation of national statehood and political identity.” Journal of Armenian Studies 2 (8): 22-43.
Alexeyeva, Ludmilla, and Paul Goldberg. 1990. The Thaw Generation: Coming of Age in the Post-Stalin Era. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Alexeyeva, Ludmilla. 1985. Soviet Dissent: Contemporary Movements for National, Religious and Human Rights. Middletown, Connecticut: Wesleyan University Press.
Amalrik, Andrei. 1971. Will the Soviet Union Survive until 1984? London: Allen Lane, The Penguin Press. [Амальрик, Андрей. 1970. Просуществует ли Советский Союз до 1984 года? Амстердам: Фонд имени Герцена].
Amalrik, Andrei. 1978. The USSR and the West in one boat. London: Overseas Publicutions Interchange Ltd. [Амальрик, Андрей. 1978. СССР и Запад в одной лодке. Лондон: Overseas Publicutions Interchange Ltd].
Bacon, Edwin. 1992. “Glasnost’ and the Gulag: New Information on Soviet Forced Labour around World War II.” Soviet Studies 44 (6): 1069-1086. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09668139208412066
Bergman, Jay. 1992. “Soviet Dissidents on the Russian Intelligentsia, 1956-1985: The Search for a Usable Past.” The Russian Review 51 (1): 16-35. https://doi.org/10.2307/131244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/131244
Bergman, Jay. 1998. “Was the Soviet Union Totalitarian? The View of Soviet Dissidents and the Reformers of the Gorbachev Era.” Studies in East European Thought 50 (4): 247-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008690818176
Boffa, Giuseppe. 1996. From the USSR to Russia. History of the unfinished crisis. 1964-1994. Moscow: International relationships. [Боффа, Джузеппе. 1996. От СССР к России. История неоконченного кризиса. 1964-1994. Москва: Международные отношения].
Caute, David. 2010. Politics and the Novel During the Cold War. Routledge.
Chatterjee, Choi. 2017. “Imperial Subjects in the Soviet Union: M.N. Roy, Rabindranath Tagore, and Re-Thinking Freedom and Authoritarianism.” Journal of Contemporary History 52 (4): 913-934. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022009417716754
Edelman, Marc. 2001. “Social Movements: Changing Paradigms and Forms of Politics.” Annual Review of Anthropology 30: 285-317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.285
Ellman, Michael. 2002. “Soviet Repression Statistics: Some Comments.” Europe-Asia Studies 54 (7): 1151-1172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0966813022000017177
Fairbanks Jr., Charles H. 1989. “Soviet Bureaucratic Politics: The Role of Leaders and of Lower Officials.” In: Politics and the Soviet System, edited by Thomas F. Remington, 83-118. Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09820-0_5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09820-0_5
Fireside, Harvey. 1989. “Dissident Visions of the USSR: Medvedev, Sakharov & Solzhenitsyn.” Polity 22 (2): 213-229. https://doi.org/10.2307/3234832. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3234832
Ginzburg, Aleksandr. 1967. Belaia kniga po delu Siniavskogo-Daniėlia [White Book on the Siniavskii-Daniėl’ case]. Frankfurt am Main: Possev-Verlag.
Harutyunyan, Avag. 2015. The 50th Anniversary of the Armenian Genocide and the Second Republic. Yerevan: “Noravank” Scientific and Educational Foundation [Հարությունյան, Ավագ. 2015. Հայոց ցեղասպանության 50-րդ տարելիցը և Երկրորդ Հանրապետությունը: Երևան։ «Նորավանք» գիտակրթական հիմնադրամ].
Ilic, Melanie, and Jeremy Smith, eds. 2009. Soviet State and Society under Nikita Khrushchev. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203878330
Jhabvala, Farrokh. 1985. “The Soviet-Bloc’s View of the Implementation of Human Rights Accords.” Human Rights Quarterly 7 (4): 461-491. https://doi.org/10.2307/762150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/762150
Johnston, Gordon. 2004. “What Is the History of Samizdat?” Social History 24 (2): 115-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03071029908568058
Kneen, Peter. 1998. “Reconceptualizing the Soviet system: Pluralism, totalitarianism and science.” The Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 14 (4): 28-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523279808415389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13523279808415389
Komaromi, Ann. 2004. “The Material Existence of Soviet Samizdat.” Slavic Review 63 (3): 597-618. https://doi.org/10.2307/1520346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1520346
Komaromi, Ann. 2012. “Samizdat and Soviet Dissident Publics.” Slavic Review 71 (1): 70-90. https://doi.org/10.5612/slavicreview.71.1.0070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5612/slavicreview.71.1.0070
Kukulin, l’ia. 2011. “Alternative Social Blueprinting in Soviet Society of the 1960s and the 1970s, or Why Left-Wing Political Practices Have Not Caught on in Contemporary Russia.” Russian Studies in History 49 (4): 51-92. https://doi.org/10.2753/RSH1061-1983490403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/RSH1061-1983490403
Laycock, Jo. 2016. “Survivor or Soviet Stories? Repatriate Narratives in Armenian Histories, Memories and Identities.” History and Memory 28 (2): 123-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/histmemo.28.2.0123
Litvinov, Pavel. 1969. The Demonstration in Pushkin Square. London: Harvill Press.
Martin, Barbara. 2019. “Roy Medvedev’s Political Diary: An Experiment in Free Socialist Press.” Jahrbücher Für Geschichte Osteuropas 67 (4): 601-626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25162/jgo-2019-0019
Medvedev, Roy, eds. 1972b. Political diary 1964-1970 and 1965-1970. Amsterdam: Herzen Foundation. [Медведев, Рой (ред.). 1972b. Политический дневник 1964-1970 и 1965-1970. Амстердам: Фонд имени Герцена].
Medvedev, Roy. 1972a. A book about socialist democracy. Amsterdam/Paris: Alexander Herzen Foundation: Editions Grasset & Fasquelle. [Медведев, Рой. 1972a. Книга о социалистической демократии. Амстердам-Париж: Фонд имени Герцена; Издательство Грассе&Фаскель].
Monshipouri, Mahmood, eds. 2016. “Part II - Digital dissidence and grassroots politics.” In: Information Politics, Protests, and Human Rights in the Digital Age, 99-174. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316493120
Nathans, Benjamin. 2015. “Talking Fish: On Soviet Dissident Memoirs.” The Journal of Modern History 87 (3): 579-614. https://doi.org/10.1086/682413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/682413
Pieralli, Claudia. 2021. “White Book on the Siniavskii-Daniėl’ case (A. Ginzburg).” In: Voci libere in URSS. Letteratura, pensiero, arti indipendenti in Unione Sovietica e gli echi in Occidente (1953-1991), edited by Claudia Pieralli, and Marco Sabbatini. Florence: Firenze University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-463-2
Remington, Thomas F. 1985. “Politics and Professionalism in Soviet Journalism.” Slavic Review 44 (3): 489-503. https://doi:10.2307/2498016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2498016
Remington, Thomas F. 1989. “Gorbachev and the Strategy of Glasnost.” In: Politics and the Soviet System, edited by Thomas F. Remington, 56-82. Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09820-0_4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09820-0_4
Rhéaume, Charles. 2008. “Western Scientists’ Reactions to Andrei Sakharov’s Human Rights Struggle in the Soviet Union, 1968-1989.” Human Rights Quarterly 30 (1): 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2008.0004
Sakharov, Andrei. 1990. Peace, Progress, Human Rights: Articles and Speeches. Leningrad: Soviet writer. [Сахаров, Андрей. 1990. Мир, прогресс, права человека: Статьи и выступления. Ленинград: Советский писатель].
Sharlet, Robert. 1977. “Dissent and Repression in the Soviet Union.” Current History 73 (430): 112-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.1977.73.430.112
Sharlet, Robert. 1978. “Dissent and Repression in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe: Changing Patterns since Khrushchev.” International Journal 33 (4): 763-795. https://doi.org/10.2307/40201689. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002070207803300406
Shtromas, Alexander Y. 1979. “Dissent and Political Change in the Soviet Union.” Studies in Comparative Communism 12 (2/3): 212-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-3592(79)90010-3
Simmons, Ernest J. 1966. “The Trial Begins for Soviet Literature.” The Massachusetts Review 7 (4): 714-724.
Skilling, H. Gordon. 1989. Samizdat and an Independent Society in Central and Eastern Europe. St Antony’s Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09284-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09284-0
Talvoja, Kädi. 2018. “The official art of the Khrushchev Thaw: The Severe Style as an ambassador of the Estonian national school at Baltic art exhibitions in Moscow.” Journal of Baltic Studies 49 (3): 333-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/01629778.2018.1459756. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01629778.2018.1459756
Virabyan, Amatuni. 2001. Armenia from Stalin to Khrushchev. Yerevan: “Gitutyun” Publishing House of NAS RA [Վիրաբյան, Ամատունի. 2001. Հայաստանը Ստալինից մինչև Խրուշչով: Երևան։ ՀՀ ԳԱԱ «Գիտություն» հրատ.].
Warth, Robert D. 1960. “Stalin’s Ghost and the Khrushchev Thaw: Soviet Historians in the Crucible.” The Antioch Review 20 (4): 417-425. https://doi.org/10.2307/4610281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4610281
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Armenak Manukyan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
